reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Carson Carpenter described Charlie Kirk’s campus events and the aftermath: “travesty, honestly.” He recalled, “It was my friend… texted me” and, “I thought it was president Trump who got assassinated at first, but then I found out it was Charlie Kirk…,” calling it “truly heartbreaking.” He questioned security: “security was almost nonexistent” with “close to two to 4,000 people there” and a perimeter “impossible to extend out to the 200 yards of where the shooter was on the building.” He suggested the university, and possibly the Turning Point chapter, knew the space: “the university… had the most knowledge” and “the turning point chapter at that university might have known where the event space was going to be.” He notes “outside… metal detector system” would be impossible, and points to “the guy in the black shirt is always with Charlie” while a white-shirted person made signals that “looks like an indicator for the shooter to, go ahead and take the kill shot.”

Speaker highlights clips with a red circle, saying, "holy shit, that is the bullet. It matches the exit wound, it also matches the shirt puffing up and the angle of the entry and exit." He adds, "in that video you can see the same what appears to be the bullet coming down and it does line up with the actual gunshot itself," and, "you can see something go down into the back right hand side of, of Charlie." Using Google Earth, he states, "his tent being set up in the middle of that triangle area would appear that the shooter was up here somewhere. That's the angle that the bullet was coming down from." "It all makes sense to me, pretty crazy." He argues location: "rooftop access there but there's also a staircase down in the little alley there in that little nook so it's to me, it's pretty obvious that the shooter was was most likely, here somewhere." "Somewhere on those stairs would be my tip, and if the FBI aren't looking there, I don't know why."

The bullet struck Kirk in the neck, causing him to collapse on the stage. The shooter chose an elevated concealed position to avoid close detection and maximize the chances of escape. As soon as the shot was fired, the gunman likely retreated to an entrance on the top of the building. Despite security efforts, the shooter disappeared without a trace, climbing down from the building and blending into nearby campus structures or escape routes surrounding the Losey Center. Witnesses reported that panic broke out immediately after the shot. The audience scattered, seeking shelter as shouts of Get down! And Run! Echoed across the courtyard. Campus police and Kirk's personal security team moved swiftly to secure the area and evacuate Kirk. Charlie Kirk began the event, with more than 3,000 people gathered to attend.

"how did this guy know to move to that exact location?" "There was also a man that was arrested in a parking lot with an airsoft rifle." "that crazy guy screaming that he was basically a distraction?" "the best way to tell a difference between people is to look at their ear." "the ear does not is a bit different to the one we've seen of of photos of Tyler, old photos Tyler." "it's not obvious, but we don't have any positive proof here that there is a rifle in this video at all." "how did he get a rifle up on the roof?" "it's not a takedown model." "the bulge in his pocket" "12:23:34" "potato cam footage" "I didn't shoot him, I didn't do anything, I swear guys." "rifle was pre positioned at some period in time, and that he then was able to pick it off the property, and because he knew he couldn't walk all the way across, and then stash it like that as he was moving into position finally." "there's so many different people that are talking about this and it hasn't died yet." "a Twitter post the day before and ended up sharing it, the same day within hours of when Charlie Kirk got shot, that said he was attending school there, he said something very big was gonna happen the next day"

The video analyzes an alleged assassination attempt on Charlie Kirk, focusing on a "cell phone pistol" that can transform into a "three eighty ACP two shot Derringer pistol" with a hammerless firing system. The host questions whether Kirk wore a bulletproof vest, the shooter’s location, and whether a second weapon was used, citing a security professional with a campus of 5,700 students and about 300 cameras, with a VMS/NVR capable of storing 76 terabytes daily, debunking claims of only 1,500 cameras. The handgun is described as roughly the size of an iPhone 7, 5.5 inches long, 3 inches wide, 18.4 ounces, with a 3-inch barrel and two-shot capacity. The shooter’s proximity (about three yards) and a potential vest ricochet theory are discussed, along with CCTV footage calls and requests for viewers to film the campus and DM videos, asserting nothing is proven and asking to release footage to settle theories.

"all these Internet experts are sure that it was a professional hit against Charlie Kirk." "Firstly, professionals are trained to aim for the center of scene mass." "Neither the center of scene mass or the head was hit." "The round landed here from what I saw." "The shooter got lucky." "Secondly, 200 yards is not that big a distance to make." "and there was even an exfil roof." "If you really wanna analyze these sorts of situations, team, stop looking at the shot." "Check out the planning, check out the prep, and even the exfil route." "Time will tell, I guess."

The video investigates whether Charlie Kirk was assassinated at close range with a 'cell phone pistol' that can transform into a 'three eighty ACP two shot Derringer pistol.' It notes the gun's size—'5.5 inches, 3 inches in width, weight 18.4 ounces'—small enough to conceal in the palm. The discussion covers whether Kirk wore a bulletproof vest, the shooter's location, and if a second weapon was used. A viewer claims CCTV footage on campus exists but is not released, urging release of footage showing the shooter on the roof and leaving the perimeter. A security professional estimates on a campus of about 5,700 students, with '300 cameras' and storage of '76 terabytes of data per day.' The speaker questions vest trajectory, mentions a white vest theory, a 'blue shirt' suspect, crowd reactions, and requests viewers to film the spot and DM videos. They call to release CCTV footage to settle theories.

Speaker 0 says 'The FBI continues to destroy its reputation as a trustworthy investigative agency' and questions Charlie Kirk's death: 'Was it a 30 odd six round that killed Charlie Kirk or a different kind of bullet? Was it a Mauser rifle that was used?' They ask why the Utah Valley campus crime scene is not secure and link it to the pattern after the Butler rally. Zeb Boykin, a former marine sniper, claims 'I do believe I know where the bullet ended up' after analyzing footage. He notes a ricochet off water bottles or a table, two frames showing 'the bullet on exit,' and that it 'would hit the building.' He cites rapid cleanup, 'a 20 foot ladder on the window,' window repairs, and a tampering video with a man in black directing people as attention shifts upward. ER nurses identify an exit wound; 'the ballistics don't lie.'

Charlie Kirk was at Utah Valley University. Charlie was shot at that event. He was transported to a local hospital where he later passed. These individuals were not suspects. They were people of interest. We are not going to release that at this time. We have good video footage of this individual. Following yesterday's tragic shooting of Charlie Kirk, FBI agents have been working around the clock in coordination with our law enforcement partners. We have recovered what we believe is the weapon to be that was used in yesterday's shooting. It's a high powered, bolt action rifle. The rifle was recovered in a wooded area where the shooter had fled. As of this morning, we received more than a 130 tips. The FBI's mission is to protect the American people. Any attack on the First Amendment is an attack on the very foundation of our democracy.

“professional hit against Charlie Kirk.” Yet: “professionals are trained to aim for the center of scene mass.” Neither the center of scene mass nor the head was hit; “The round landed here from what I saw.” The shooter got lucky; “That's not that professional.” At 200 yards, “not that big a distance to make,” and a civilian hunter with a decent rifle and scope will “bring down deer at 200 yards daily easily.” The crucial part is the prep: “serious planning and recce work” to get a long rifle into a rooftop with a perfect line of sight, plus an “exfil roof.” The shooter could move from rooftop to rooftop and exfil away from the scene, showing a level of professionalism and capability beyond what “fixated persons” usually have. Therefore: focus on planning, prep, and exfil route, not the shot. Time will tell, I guess.

An investigator says they compiled a timeline from every media outlet, tracing events from 08:23 when a gray Dodge Challenger was seen near campus to the arrest. The timeline suggests Robinson arrived on campus, performed reconnaissance, changed outfits, and moved through the Luce Center before ambushing Charlie Kirk at 12:33 from the rooftop. He allegedly retrieved a Maser Model 98, 30-06 bolt-action rifle from a drop point, engraved bullet casings with memes, and changed into dark clothing on the roof. After the shooting, he fled the campus, discarded the rifle and casings, and escaped toward Washington County, aided by a disguise using a limp. A large manhunt followed; FBI and US Marshals detained him later. The narrator questions CCTV coverage, possible scene tampering by Turning Point staff, and Discord chatter in the investigation.

This video queries whether Charlie Kirk was assassinated at close range with a a 'cell phone pistol,' a smartphone-like device that can 'transform into a three eighty ACP two shot Derringer pistol' with a 'hammerless firing system.' It covers whether Kirk wore a bulletproof vest and the shooter’s location, suggesting an elevated shooter on a roof and calling for CCTV footage to settle questions. The pistol is described as 'the exact length and width [the] exact same size as the iPhone seven,' with '5.5 inches' length, '3 inches' width, '18.4 ounces,' a 'three inch' barrel, and capacity for two shots. Trajectory debate includes a vest hit and ricochet possibilities; mention of a 'white vest' theory by Kyle Sarifan. A security professional subscriber notes '300 cameras' and '76 terabytes of data per day' in campus surveillance. The video calls for 'release the CCTV footage' and discusses crowd reactions and a second weapon.

The speaker references a person who was removing memory cards from cameras about four minutes after what is described as the Charlie Kirk assassination, noting that something about the situation didn’t sit right. They mention Candace released a video showing how this person reacted, and that diligent investigation followed, including a campus visit to UVU to examine the events with a play-by-play analysis. The speaker says they will leave a link to that video but first shows a clip. In the clip, Speaker 1 describes the sequence: “He doesn't try to grab Charlie. He doesn't duck. His first reaction standing right here is to turn this way and start booking.” The person “starts booking back here,” and Speaker 1 notes that he sees the shot and that Charlie hasn’t even hit the ground yet. Charlie is described as being in a position where “Charlie’s like this,” and the person pivots to lean back. Security personnel respond by coming over, grabbing him, and pulling him to the ground. Meanwhile, Terrell Farnsworth “has already turned and begun running back here to climb up on that wall.” The speaker asks the audience to imagine there had just been a shooting, with chaos and people running. Charlie Kirk “was just shot,” and the wall is described as “almost as tall as I am.” The speaker asks the audience if they can see, confirming visibility. The analysis then focuses on the person’s actions: measuring “how much of a pain in the ass he climbed up right here and then threw that loose rock and just so he could get to his vantage point.” The speaker calls it out as an attempt to explain the sequence from the vantage point up the wall. The clip continues with the person producing a selfie video: “Oh, they shot Charlie. They just shot Charlie. They just shot Charlie.” They refer to him as “Agent” and note his statements like “They shot Charlie. God help him.” The speaker says this behavior is a major red flag and cites it as the most troubling aspect. The running scene is described further: as the person runs out, he looks to his left and, in the footage, is seen climbing up, then reacting to the news that Charlie was shot. The voiceover emphasizes the emotional state (or lack thereof) as the footage shows the stampede of people and chaos. The speaker underscores that, to them, the absence of emotion on the person’s face during these events is “the biggest red flag of all.”

they have a rifle, cartridges collected from the woods near the attack location, and footprints compared to the suspect’s shoes. the video was going to be the catalyst, and photographs or images from someone who knew him could reach out to law enforcement or, per the president, push him to turn himself in. multiple sources confirm a person of interest is in custody. a press conference has been slid back as authorities prepare to release information. the community has known that someone had viciously killed Charlie Kirk. police were confident there was no ongoing threat to the public, but there were many unknowns. they’re hopeful this will conclude the case; a name is confirmed by sources as the person in custody, but not released until officially. my sources are breathing a sigh of relief that this case has taken a dramatic turn for the better if this pans out.

"This morning, I can tell you that we have recovered what we believe is the weapon to be that was used in yesterday's shooting." "It is a high powered bolt action rifle." "That rifle was recovered in a wooded area where the shooter had fled." "So the FBI laboratory will be analyzing this weapon." "Investigators have also collected footwear impression, a palm print, and forearm imprints for analysis." "Now, I understand there are a lot of questions about motive." "I assure you that all leads, tips, and tips are being fully investigated." "As of this morning, we have received more than a 130 We thank the community for that."

An individual sent pictures of a suspicious device on a bike. A sniper inside a building took the pictures and saw the person walking away from the bike. The sniper called it out and sent the pictures. Someone is detained who may be the owner of the bike. Gas is off to the building. Authorities were notified. Individuals were filming them, a person on the roof, and then them again. When shots were fired, they tried to run away. There is one shooter deceased and three victims in the crowd. Two helicopters have taken off.

Speaker 0 says they downloaded nearly original footage from the incident and note that reuploads compress the file, referencing “the national file,” and aim to “disprove this or not.” Speaker 1 points to Charlie Kirk: “how many You see him right there? That’s him debating with somebody here right before he gets shot.” “He got shot from his right hand side on that side coming out here.” They discuss a rooftop shooter theory, noting walls, bleachers, and that “you got shot from rooftop.” They show a rooftop trajectory diagram: “count with me… flat surface one, flat surface two, and then flat surface three… almost up on four,” arguing the shooter would have a straight shot at Charlie. They claim “this is 100% the shot” and say “the mic… was the first entry wound” is incorrect; “there is no entry wound on the left side of his neck. He got hit on the right side.” They demand CCTV footage release from Turning Point, noting cameras and a cameraman, and urge campus footage to verify angles, mentioning trees “above the rooftop” and needing to see if the edge of the roof is visible. They conclude the shooter was on the highest point and that multiple cameras likely captured it.

Speaker 0 argues the Charlie Kirk story keeps getting weirder. They claim a random trans shooter was on the roof, took this shot, runs across into the rooftop, jumps down, somehow undetected because the FBI releases a video footage. Was this when he was walking into the building, then he must have already had planted the gun on the roof prior, and he somehow managed to walk back in the second time without the weapon. If he left with a weapon and hid it in the woods, why didn't he have it on him when he was leaving? They say he runs roughly one mile with a long arm rifle in broad daylight to stash it in the woods. If you were running, you wouldn't carry the rifle with you. He wore an American flag shirt. The FBI with all their resources, that's the best photo? Didn’t we watch Criminal Minds? They claim BAU would rerender that image and get it pixel perfect. Face recognition software could redigitalize that kid's face with AI to pixel perfect; this is weird.

From the outset, one of the speakers says there was a sense that the official narrative about the day didn’t add up, expressing that many Americans feel they were being lied to. The major problem they identify with the assassination narrative includes inconsistencies and unanswered questions rather than acceptance of the official story. Speaker 1 recalls being told Charlie Kirk was shot and initially in critical condition, but notes that the video shows an exit wound and movement of Kirk’s shirt that suggests an impact nearby. With extensive experience around gunshot wounds, they say what they saw didn’t make sense. They reference the FBI’s announcement of a shooter and describe a separate incident involving a person on the roof who allegedly disassembled and reassembled a firearm, aligned a scope, fired a cold bore shot, moved to the roof, and then wrapped the rifle up. They mention texts from the shooter that didn’t sound like a typical 22-year-old and state that these observations raise questions. They say asking questions leads to being torn down or accused of holding conspiracy views, and they specify they aren’t claiming “Israel did it,” but insisting the questions about the event “don’t look good.” They raise specific questions: did the security team remove Charlie Kirk’s lapel mic after the incident and give it to someone else; what happened to the SIM card; did someone take the camera behind him; why was the crime scene contaminated and rebuilt. They admit they don’t know what is true but insist the questions deserve answers. They note that once they question, they’re labeled antisemitic, and they say they didn’t even bring up Israel. They emphasize the personal and national significance of the incident. Speaker 0 mentions a claim that Charlie Kirk was portrayed as Superman, with his body supposedly stopping the 30-odd-six bullet, and asks what would have happened if a 30-06 round hit him. Speaker 1 says it would likely blow his head off and leave remnants of the bullet, arguing that they don’t think such remnants have been found yet. They question why the chair and desk were moved and contend that a forensic expert could determine the shot’s origin, insisting they are simply asking questions. If those questions can be refuted, they would stop asking; but they claim they’re not getting any answers beyond “this is what happened” and being told to “shut up.” Speaker 0 adds that telling someone to be quiet amounts to labeling them antisemitic, and that when the trial comes, they will look like a fool. Speaker 1 says that’s a tactic of the left—when you call them out, they label you a name—and that the right is now doing the same to them.

Discussion centers on claims about the Charlie Kirk assassination, including a side shot. The presenter says "there's now a shooter on the roof" and an eyewitness states the shooter was "wearing tactical gear" and described "the exact type of weapon... a two two three round." A bystander video shows "somebody on the roof" and the eyewitness asserts the shooter was "highly trained, like a highly trained assassin" and that the footage's metadata "begins at 12:22 and goes into 12/23, the very minute that Charlie gets shot." The speaker adds the shooter "looked like a foreign agent" and "not jeans." Another claim: "the FBI's official story is false" with video of an "entry and exit wound," though another participant says "it's not blood splatter. That's literally his necklace getting snapped off and flying over the back of his neck." The discussion concludes with "Cash should resign."

The bullet struck Kirk in the neck, causing him to collapse on the stage. The shooter chose an elevated concealed position to avoid close detection and maximize the chances of escape. Witnesses reported that panic broke out immediately after the shot. The audience scattered, seeking shelter as shouts of Get down! And Run! Echoed across the courtyard. Campus police and Kirk's personal security team moved swiftly to secure the area and evacuate Kirk. Here is the detailed timeline of how it happened: 12:00PM, 09/10/2025. Event begins. Charlie Kirk began the event, with more than 3,000 people gathered to attend. The security detail consisted of six officers, along with Kirk's personal security team.

We were able to track the movements of the shooter. Starting at 11:52AM, the subject arrived on campus shortly away from campus. We have tracked his movements onto the campus, through the stairwells, up to the roof, across the roof to a shooting location. After the shooting, we were able to track his movements as he moved to the other side of the building, jumped off of the building, and fled, off of the campus and into a neighborhood. We do have good video footage of this individual. We are not going release that at this time. If we are unsuccessful, we will reach out to you as the media, and we will push that publicly to help us identify them. We are exhausting every lead. We have every officer invested in this, every investigator, every local agency.