TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker admits to using babies of imprisoned mothers and individuals under colonial rule to study experimental vaccines, including in the Belgian Congo with almost a million people. Another speaker raises concerns about the safety of genetically modified organisms used in medicines and the practice of injecting them into children's arms. Safety testing and potential side effects are mentioned.

Speaker 0 describes a unit in Saima that went into African countries; "And how was that done exactly?" "Through inoculation. Through vaccines. Vaccines." "Pretending to inoculate people and that type of thing. The idea being to kill black people? Yeah. To eradicate black people." "There you must understand the concept was that AIDS was a killer. It was incurable at that point in time, so it was led to believe that if infected people, it was the quick non militaristic approach to eliminate black people." "And that is something you know for a fact that AIDS was actively being Yes. Spread to Yes. Other countries? Yes. To African countries."

Speaker 0 describes a historical sequence involving SV40, a cancer-promoting virus, claiming it was taken from the polio vaccine because humanity was being injected with it along with other substances. He says researchers irradiated the virus in a gain-of-function experiment to make it more carcinogenic, then put it in animals, processed the tumors in a blender, and irradiated the material with a linear particle accelerator to make it more aggressive, repeating the cycle until achieving the maximum killing capacity. He asserts this gain-of-function work occurred in the 1960s under the guise of killing Fidel Castro, but the effort was never used for that purpose; it was turned over to MD Anderson, and the technology supposedly disappeared. He then contends that SV40 ended up in plasmids in vaccines in February 2021 (02/21/21), implying a continued or resurfaced presence of SV40 in vaccines. He asserts that this gain-of-function activity has been ongoing for a long time and that the only survivor who can tell the story is Judith Barry Baker; he claims she was there and that nearly everyone involved was killed within a year, except for the person at the head of the operation. He mentions he will discuss this at CHD that weekend. The speaker emphasizes that gain-of-function activity is not new, suggesting that if authorities admitted they took a carcinogenic virus from the animal kingdom and made it more aggressive and mass-distributed it into humanity, and then conducted gain-of-function experiments afterward, one would see rising cancer rates following the mass vaccination programs of the 1950s and 1960s. He notes that everybody knew someone who got cancer within about twenty years of the mass vaccination program of the 1950s and 1960s.

COVID, Ebola, and AIDS have all been blamed on lab experiments involving Anthony Fauci. The speaker questions the origins of these viruses and highlights the role of a particular author in proving their natural origins. They discuss the controversial history of HIV and AIDS, including the use of chimpanzees and the development of vaccines. The speaker raises concerns about the manipulation of data and the potential cover-up of information. They call for transparency, research, and open discussion to uncover the truth.

Robert Charles Gallo, a biomedical researcher, is known for his role in discovering HIV and developing the HIV blood test. However, secret government documents revealed that Gallo had a connection to the creation of HIV. The HIV virus was created at the Litton BioNetics facility under the National Cancer Institute, with financial investors including Roy Asch, Henry Kissinger, and Vice President Nelson Rockefeller. The virus was distributed by the Merck Pharmaceutical Company, and mentally handicapped children were used in contaminated vaccination trials. The virus was later introduced to the American public through a hepatitis B vaccination trial in 1978. The spread of HIV in Africa was also linked to a smallpox vaccine eradication program by the World Health Organization. The creation of HIV was part of a larger biowarfare program funded by the US military.

Scientists are increasingly skeptical about the feasibility and safety of developing an AIDS vaccine. The concern lies in the lengthy testing process required to ensure its effectiveness and potential risks. Initially, a small group of individuals would be administered the vaccine, and if no adverse effects are observed after a year, it would be expanded to 500 people. After another year without complications, the vaccine would be given to thousands. However, the worry is that it could take up to 12 years for any serious issues to arise. This uncertainty raises doubts about the viability of creating an AIDS vaccine.

Speaker 0: Have you used orphans to study an experimental vaccine? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Have you ever used mentally handicapped to study an experimental vaccine? Speaker 1: What I'm saying is I don't recall specifically having done that, but that in the 1960s it was not unusual to do that and I wouldn't deny that I may have done so. Speaker 0: There's an article entitled Attenuation RA273 Rubella Virus in WY38 Human Dimplex Cells. You familiar with that article? Yes. In that article is one of the things that says, 13 surrogative mentally retarded children were given RA273 vaccine. Okay. Well, that that's in that case, that's what Speaker 1: I did. Speaker 0: Have you ever used babies of mothers in prison to study an experimental vaccine? Yes. Have you ever used individuals under colonial rule to study an experimental vaccine? Yes. Did you do so in the Belgian Congo? Speaker 1: Yes. Did that experiment involve almost a million people? Well, Speaker 1: alright. Yes. Okay.

The speaker filed a freedom of information request for the CDC to disclose a pivotal number that could prove their knowledge about pandemics is wrong. They discuss an experimental hepatitis vaccine trial on gay men in the 1970s, where chimpanzee blood was used. The trial resulted in a surge of HIV infections, and the speaker wants the CDC to release the full placebo rate to settle the matter. They believe that the CDC and WHO may have been involved in racial purging using vaccines. The speaker also shares their personal experience with vaccine injuries and calls for whistleblowers to expose the truth.

The speaker discusses the development of vaccines and raises concerns about a specific type of research called gain-of-function. They suggest that this research involves making viruses more dangerous and could potentially be used to create bio weapons. They mention that Anthony Fauci, a prominent figure in the field, received a raise for his involvement in this research. In 2014, three dangerous viruses escaped from labs in the US, leading 300 scientists to urge President Obama to shut down Fauci's gain-of-function research. Although a moratorium was issued, the research was moved offshore, including to a Chinese lab in Wuhan.

They initially considered using cancer cells to produce vaccines but switched to animal cells due to safety concerns. However, they later discovered hidden viruses in the vaccines, including retroviruses with reverse transcriptase activity. The presence of these retroviruses in MMR vaccines has been acknowledged since 1994, raising concerns about potential long-term health effects. Despite efforts to suppress the data, researchers refused to retract their findings and were subsequently fired. To learn more about vaccines, sign up for "The Truth About Vaccines" event on April 12th for free.

Scientists are increasingly skeptical about the feasibility and safety of developing an AIDS vaccine. The concern lies in the lengthy testing process required to ensure its effectiveness and safety. Initially, a small group of individuals would receive the vaccine, and if no adverse effects are observed after a year, it would be administered to 500 people. If another year passes without any issues, the vaccine would be given to thousands. However, the worry is that it could take up to 12 years for serious problems to arise. This uncertainty raises questions about the viability of creating an AIDS vaccine.

The speaker discusses the CDC report on Merck's Heptavax vaccine and its alleged contamination with HIV in the 1980s. They highlight the CDC's data, which shows a significant increase in HIV infection rates among trial participants. The speaker also mentions the controversial methods used to produce the vaccine, including the use of infected feces and chimpanzee blood. They suggest that the HIV contamination was not properly disclosed to the public and that the vaccine was sold in poor countries while safe versions were introduced in wealthier markets. The speaker proposes the establishment of a neutral foundation to investigate the issue further and requests support for this initiative.

The speaker discusses the CDC report on Merck's Heptavax vaccine and its alleged contamination with HIV in the 1980s. They highlight the CDC's data, which shows that 42% of trial participants were infected with HIV by the end of the trial. The speaker also mentions the use of chimpanzee blood in the vaccine's production and the subsequent spread of HIV through contaminated blood-based injectables. They propose setting up a nonprofit foundation in Switzerland to investigate the facts surrounding this issue. The speaker asks for support and donations to fund the foundation's research.

Speaker 0 contends that the top organization that managed Operation Warp Speed and the pandemic was not a public health agency but the NSA, a spy agency, with the Pentagon as the second agency. He asserts that vaccines were developed not by Moderna and Pfizer, but by NIH, whose patents are owned 50% by NIH, and that vaccines were manufactured not by Pfizer or Moderna but by military contractors. He claims Pfizer and Moderna were paid to put their stamps on those vaccines as if they came from the pharmaceutical industry. Speaker 1 responds by stating it’s not warp speed, but has been happening since 06/10/1980 when entering a Fort Detrick military installation, where the sign was turned around with then-president Richard Nixon. He says, “Oh, we’re just gonna cure cancer,” but asserts they turned the sign around on the bioweapons lab, making it a historic landmark at Fort Detrick where they had the gas chamber for the end and a plaque was placed when a new lab was built. He characterizes it as all part of a “plague of corruption” and claims that those involved are protecting themselves because the government, and they played the game. Speaker 1 further alleges that it does not matter whether it is Deborah Birx or Robert Redfield, because they injected the military with HIV in the nineties, and that they know it. He references “HIV p n l four three” and claims to know the plasmid and the exact one, asserting that he knows the people who were injected and that this data exists in his freezer.

AIDS is believed by some to have been created in a lab as a bioweapon. In the 1950s, around 100 million people were infected with the simian virus through contaminated vaccines. The first case of HIV in humans was discovered four years later. During Bill Clinton's time as governor of Arkansas, a company called Health Management Associates (HMA) earned millions of dollars by selling blood to international pharmaceutical companies. The blood was obtained from prisoners, many of whom were infected with hepatitis and AIDS. Products made from the HMA blood caused people to contract AIDS, leading to lawsuits and a temporary shutdown by the FDA. However, Clinton revived the company in 1984 and it continued until he became president.

The speaker states that vaccines contained 40 different viruses that were being inactivated. The yellow fever vaccine contained leukemia virus due to the crude science of the time. The speaker says they were not reporting AIDS virus at the time, but they had a disease virus. The speaker says it was good science at the time because they didn't worry about these viruses.

Speaker 0 argues that the AIDS virus, like COVID and monkeypox, was manufactured for a specific reason, and claims that all of these were produced by the United States government. They state that AZT, “the total numbers of [people] … killed by taking a drug that was known at the time that was going to actually have that kind of an effect,” contributed to mass deaths, and that buyers clubs emerged as a form of a black market to obtain treatments. They compare this to the situation with COVID, noting that obtaining ivermectin felt like buying on the black market, despite ivermectin having won a health Nobel prize years ago, and they describe the ongoing insanity of government actors who have not yet been held accountable. They reference history involving Ted Kennedy and his uncle, suggesting a broader pattern of government activity linked to disease manufacturing and drug development that purportedly does not help, paralleling the vaccines “that we have now learned.” The speaker shares a personal update about a friend who recently underwent surgery and is now facing extubation after three bypasses, describing him as a healthy man who should not be having these problems, and likening his situation to other cases they know of. The speaker claims to know “about six” people who were fully vaccinated due to job or other requirements and who have since died, using these experiences to illustrate perceived consequences of vaccination programs. They pivot to Anthony Fauci, asserting that Fauci’s involvement in government actions spans “twenty five, thirty five years,” and claims Fauci has been involved in nefarious acts that have resulted in the deaths of many people. They reference Bobby Kennedy describing the creation of a drug that allegedly caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of men through AIDS. The speaker concludes with a pointed remark about AIDS and gay people, insisting that “nobody deserves that kind of a fate,” emphasizing that the tragedies described apply to all affected groups, and reiterating the belief that the government and officials have engaged in harmful, deadly activities related to disease and treatment.

No one responded when I asked for proof. Everything was rushed in the case of AIDS, with no proper research or debate among scientists. The announcement was made without solid evidence, and a veil of secrecy was placed over an approximate truth. This is not how science works. Normally, you conduct experiments, analyze the results, and verify them before making a scientific announcement. But in this case, they held a press conference and declared that HIV is the cause of AIDS. They didn't explain why or provide any scientific references. There is no scientific reference, just a collection of arguments and indirect evidence.

There are allegations that AIDS was intentionally spread in African countries through vaccines. Research facilities were set up to inject people with a solution to prevent AIDS, but instead, they were injecting people with AIDS. These facilities were financed by foreign governments. Additionally, there have been cases where HIV vaccines actually increased the likelihood of infection, showing that a vaccine that seemed safe initially could have negative effects.

Dr. Strecker discusses the origins and transmission of the AIDS epidemic. He challenges the belief that the disease came from African monkeys and suggests it actually started in the 1970s in Africa during a smallpox vaccination program by the World Health Organization. He also questions the idea that AIDS is solely a venereal disease, as it can potentially be transmitted by carriers like mosquitoes. Dr. Strecker highlights that the virus can survive outside the body, contradicting previous assumptions. The government's involvement and the labeling of AIDS as a homosexual disease are also questioned, as the outbreak coincided with a hepatitis B vaccine program. The assumption that homosexuals were responsible for the disease lacks logical validity.

The speaker discusses a document they found that challenges the narrative surrounding vaccines, AIDS, and the origins of the disease. They question the connection between vaccines made from chimpanzee blood and the spread of AIDS in Africa and China. They suggest that the vaccine trials conducted by Merck may have introduced the virus to these regions. The speaker calls for the release of trial data to determine the truth. They also express concerns about the WHO pandemic treaty and the potential loss of individual freedoms. They offer a monetary reward to anyone who can provide evidence supporting their claims.

The US government funded experiments with the AIDS virus at Fort Detrick. The World Health Organization's vaccination campaign in Africa and Brazil led to the spread of AIDS. The virus was crafted from animal viruses, causing many deaths. The speaker warns black people in the US not to trust the government or the Democrat Party.

The speaker questions if the virus could be one of those predicted in the late seventies that escaped from a laboratory and infected certain populations. They find it strange that AIDS initially affected specific groups, such as black Africans and middle-aged sexually active men, but not others. The speaker traces the origins of AIDS in America to government experiments conducted on gay men in cities like New York, San Francisco, and Los Angeles in 1978. They believe that AIDS in America does not come from Africa, although they acknowledge the existence of African AIDS.

The Marburg virus, known as the mother of Ebola, broke out in three vaccine production facilities in 1967, causing deaths and injuries. The monkey supplier, Litton BioNetics, was also a biological weapons contractor for the military and the CIA. Dr. Maurice Hilleman, a vaccine expert, discovered that imported monkeys were carrying viruses, including the AIDS virus. The polio vaccine, derived from monkey organs, was contaminated with the SV40 virus. Independent journalist Tom Curtis published an article suggesting that the polio vaccine could have led to the spread of AIDS. However, the theory was challenged and the scientific community dismissed it. The true origins of AIDS remain uncertain.

Doctors at the Federal Communicable Disease Center acknowledge that the flu vaccine and its recommended dosage are ineffective; in a larger dose, it can be harmful. Nevertheless, the flu vaccine is still recommended for older people and the chronically ill. A senate subcommittee headed by Abraham Rebikoff charged that the federal government wasn’t doing a good enough job of informing the public about ineffective vaccines. Scientists at the Division of Biologic Standards test vaccines for potency and safety before licensing them for public use. However, the division does not determine the effectiveness of the vaccine. That is left to the manufacturers. A case in point is the influenza vaccine. Four scientists in charge of work on the flu vaccine during the 1960s found it to be ineffective, and they refused to give it to their own families. Two were transferred to other work, a third left the division, and over the entire ten-year period, not one word of their unfavorable findings was allowed to be published. But a more serious case involving the relationship between the leaders of the division and their scientists involves the adenovirus vaccine, a vaccine given to thousands of American soldiers to prevent certain cold-like symptoms. When it was shown that the vaccine contained a contaminant which caused cancer in laboratory animals, it was taken off the market. But that was three years after the division’s own scientists had pointed out the danger. Doctor Murray justifies the use of the vaccine by saying it took three years to examine the evidence against it. "It is more important to use the vaccines than to take them off the market and remove the agent." "It is more important to use the vaccines" "than to take them off the market" "and to remove the agent." Thus, for three years, American troops were injected with a cold-preventing vaccine, which was causing cancer in laboratory animals. And some of the division’s scientists who charged they were prevented from publishing results of experiments which show some of the vaccines to be ineffective. "It's the control officer in 1960 who has grave doubts about the potency of influenza vaccine. These doubts were made known to the director of the division and through the proper channels."