reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Drysfal Nagenhove presents his case as a last-chance appeal, claiming that the Brussels regime is trying to destroy him and his movement. He identifies as a nationalist and conservative activist, noting actions against mass migration, woke degeneracy, and victories against Antifa. He describes Brussels-based headquarters as a hub where activists from across Europe cooperate, housing a recording studio and a boxing club to “strengthen the European youth,” and says it recently hosted the first remigration summit. He asserts the movement became the biggest in the country, surpassing political parties on social media, and that he was elected as an independent identitarian member of parliament. He alleges retaliation from the Brussels regime, including hiring a journalist to hack the account of a minor involved in the movement. Although the journalist found nothing illegal, the footage of supposed racist memes aired on national television was used to escalate attacks. He claims 20 members had their houses raided; some were expelled from banks and universities, others lost jobs, and he claims he himself was placed on a no-fly list. He states the police leaked his private information—years of private messages and pictures—to hostile media, which has used it against the movement. Nagenhove says that when he spoke out on social media about the regime’s terror, the situation worsened: the judge ordered another house raid on his family, and armed police dragged him from bed and jailed him. He alleges the judge blackmailed him with two conditions for release: first, signing a gag order prohibiting discussion of the attacks, and second, visiting the Holocaust Museum as a humiliation ritual. He claims the Brussels justice system is corrupt and infested with judges who hate freedom of speech, citing a judge who allegedly called him a “disgusting fascist” on her own social media. After a show trial, he says the judge ruled that memes shared in a private group chat constituted hate speech, sentencing him to one year in jail and banning him from politics for ten years. He claims fines, coupled with legal costs, amount to over €300,000, describing this as a “death sentence” for the movement because headquarters may have to be sold without support. He portrays his situation as a living nightmare for his family but vows to continue fighting, saying they want to destroy him and the movement, and that with support they will destroy them. His fate is scheduled for this Friday, May 16, at the court of appeals. He states willingness to fight from prison and even at the European Court of Human Rights, asserting that they will win and restore freedom of speech in Europe. He ends by asking for support through sharing his story and donating to his legal fund at gifts and go slash trees.

The speaker accuses a certain community of destroying schools, hospitals, and the army. They claim that the police have been infiltrated by this community. The speaker warns against blaming their own community and states that they have not made any reproaches. The transcript is in French.

Je demande aux Français de soutenir l'expulsion des étrangers qui collaborent avec des idéologies dangereuses. Les lois existantes seront appliquées sans faiblesse pour protéger la France. Les mosquées radicales seront fermées, les prêcheurs de haine expulsés, et les droits des femmes seront protégés. La sécurité ne compromettra pas la liberté des citoyens honnêtes.

Ousmane, quel est ton nom de famille et d'où viens-tu ? Tu n'as pas la nationalité française. Sais-tu pourquoi tu as été arrêté ? C'est à cause de la fille. Quel âge a-t-elle ? Raconte ce que tu as fait avec elle. Plus fort. J'ai violé une petite fille de douze ans, Sophie. Pourquoi n'es-tu pas en prison ? J'étais en garde à vue, mais ils m'ont relâché. Qui t'a relâché ? Les policiers. Vous avez entendu ça ? Les policiers l'ont relâché, il faut le punir. --- Ousmane, what is your last name and where are you from? You don’t have French nationality. Do you know why you were arrested? It’s because of the girl. How old is she? Tell me what you did with her. Louder. I raped a twelve-year-old girl named Sophie. Why aren’t you in prison? I was in police custody, but they released me. Who released you? The police. Did you hear that? The police released him; he must be punished.

He criticizes Brexit, social media freedom, and Trump, but not COVID-19. His criticism of Trump shows his political bias, which worries other lawyers in the convoy cases.

It's unbelievable! Macron hired a US crisis PR firm with TikTok connections. Suddenly, my "Becoming Brigitte" clips got strikes, and my account's at risk. I dare him to bring his court case public because I spoke the truth. Instead, he's trying to ban content creators on TikTok for speaking freely. This is about free speech. If we can't discuss corruption in our governments, we're in trouble. These people who want to shut down free speech are a threat to our freedoms because they think we should only trust the experts, but what happens when the experts are corrupt? Power at the top is going after journalists. We can't allow that to happen. What Macron is doing is psychopathic. I'm ready to do a second series on him because I won't tolerate this.

Je suis un expert balistique de l'OTAN au Donbass. J'ai révélé une attaque chimique française contre Donetsk. J'ai été arrêté en France pour avoir divulgué des preuves. Je continue mon combat pour la vérité et aide les enfants blessés. Les images montrent des attaques récentes et des preuves d'obus de l'OTAN. Je travaille volontairement, soutenu par des dons russes. Mon objectif est de montrer la vérité et d'aider les victimes. Translation: I am a NATO ballistic expert in Donbass. I exposed a French chemical attack on Donetsk. I was arrested in France for revealing evidence. I continue my fight for truth and help injured children. The images show recent attacks and evidence of NATO shells. I work voluntarily, supported by Russian donations. My goal is to show the truth and help the victims.

J'ai été victime d'identité erronée sur les réseaux sociaux. Au début, ça m'a blessé, mais j'ai pris du recul et j'ai entendu parler de cela.

Tom states he feels good despite being incarcerated since October in a country that doesn't believe in free speech, which he considers an occupational hazard for a citizen journalist. He claims that since he started speaking out against Islamic rape gangs 16 years ago, he has faced relentless attacks from the British state, which uses lawfare to silence him. He asserts that he has never been convicted by a jury and that every one of his convictions have been...

He recounts a sequence in which five children testified about an incident involving Jamal. He references Judge Nicklin, who he says stated that “the five kids just made up that they were attacked by Jamal.” He emphasizes that these five children had previously spoken about the matter before his involvement. He explains that, as a journalist, he interviewed them and “repeated it,” and then asserts that the group used bankruptcy through the legal system to try to intimidate him. When bankruptcy leverage did not achieve the desired effect, he says they targeted his family’s home. He describes the home being boxed in, live streamed, and people sent to the residence, with threats to kill his kids. He notes that the fallout over those years left him bitter about what happened and that he remained “all in anyway,” framing this as something he did in response to the situation. He says he carried that weapon, calling it a weapon, while he sat there for three years thinking he had a film that “absolutely annihilates them.” He claims the film reached 53,000,000 views, arguing that the public had an interest in knowing the truth about the story. He asserts that the courts did not allow him to fight public interest through legal channels. He states that he has been through the court system and claims to have been imprisoned unjustly, unlawfully, and that he watched people celebrate it. He acknowledges personal flaws by saying, “And I’m not perfect,” and notes that if one follows his life, he has been in some bad places over those three years.

A journalist ("iTV") confronts another journalist about an upcoming court case. The journalist ("iTV") is being taken to court for allegedly harassing a couple of Germans after they endangered his family by photographing them. He questions why the reporter hasn't watched his documentary, which had 67 million views and details his seven months in solitary confinement. He accuses the reporter of being a "propaganda machine" who will publish a pre-written, biased article implying he caused fear of violence. He asks if he should be allowed to contact journalists and ask them questions on camera, and criticizes the Daily Mail for endangering his family. He believes he is facing ten years in jail for wanting to ask a question on camera. He claims he is being targeted with "lawfare" because he is an "uncontrollable journalist" who is ahead of the population on important issues.

Le locuteur appelle à la sagesse des Français, affirmant qu'il n'y a aucune raison de garder sur le territoire des étrangers qui collaborent avec une idéologie totalitaire qui veut la mort des Français. Il propose que les étrangers liés à l'idéologie islamiste soient déchus de leur nationalité et expulsés, et que les Français adoptant cette idéologie soient punis devant les tribunaux. Il promet que, s'il est élu Président, ces lois seront appliquées, que la France prendra les dispositions nécessaires pour se mettre à l'abri des fichiers S, que les mosquées radicales seront fermées, les prêcheurs de haine expulsés, et les associations liées au salafisme et aux frères musulmans dissoutes. Il assure que les droits des femmes seront garantis et que la sécurité ne nuira pas à la liberté des honnêtes gens. **English Translation:** The speaker appeals to the wisdom of the French people, stating that there is no reason to keep foreigners who collaborate with a totalitarian ideology that wants the death of the French on French soil. He proposes that foreigners linked to Islamist ideology should be stripped of their nationality and expelled, and that French people adopting this ideology should be punished in court. He promises that, if elected President, these laws will be applied, that France will take the necessary measures to protect itself from individuals flagged as security risks ("fichiers S"), that radical mosques will be closed, hate preachers expelled, and associations linked to Salafism and the Muslim Brotherhood dissolved. He assures that women's rights will be guaranteed and that security will not harm the freedom of honest people.

The CIA developed plans to kidnap and assassinate me inside the Ecuadorian embassy in London. They authorized attacks on my European colleagues, including theft, hacking, and disinformation. My wife and infant son were also targeted. A CIA asset was assigned to track my wife, and there were instructions to get DNA from my six-month-old son's nappy. I was convicted by a foreign power for requesting, receiving, and publishing truthful information about that power while in Europe. Criminalizing news gathering threatens investigative journalism everywhere. Journalists shouldn't be prosecuted for doing their jobs. Journalism is not a crime; it's essential for a free and informed society.

The speaker discusses a court case involving a woman's death, mentioning the change in charges from voluntary to involuntary manslaughter. They criticize the justice system and claim that the French government is failing to ensure authority and security. They also express concern about the impact of mass immigration on French identity, culture, and language. The speaker believes that those in power are pushing France towards barbarism, which they define as a combination of forgetfulness and violence, contrasting it with civilization.

Today, hiding behind a desire to defend Palestinians and protesting in the streets is called anti-Semitism. If you are shocked by the Caesar of Collins, you are anti-Semitic. If you criticize the power of banks or think the media lacks anti-Semitism, you are anti-Semitic. If you want peacekeepers in Palestine or question the Holocaust, you are anti-Semitic. Being a patriot in Europe or wanting justice makes you anti-Semitic. It's not just anti-Semitism, it's denialism. If you don't leave the Marais or go to the mosque, you are anti-Semitic. And if you support Elisabeth Lévy, you are also considered anti-Semitic.

The speaker claims to have been targeted for assassination three times and suggests that the police are involved. They mention a friend named Xavier Merlin who was killed after the Bataclan attack and believed to have known important information. The speaker also mentions an individual named Merah who was intercepted by the Americans while training for jihad and then allowed to return to France. They accuse the French government of assassinating this person. The speaker claims to have written detailed accounts of their assassination attempts and brought them to the Russian embassy for safekeeping. They urge people to wake up and take action before it's too late.

La loi permet d'interdire certains réseaux pour protéger nos démocraties en Europe. Quand on parle d'interdiction, cela peut inclure des plateformes comme Twitter. Il est important de comprendre que cette loi n'est pas personnelle, mais résulte d'un processus démocratique. Bien qu'elle ait été élaborée avec mon équipe, elle a été amendée et votée par le Parlement européen. C'est une loi qui représente les parlementaires et non un individu. --- The law allows for the prohibition of certain networks to protect our democracies in Europe. When discussing prohibition, this could include platforms like Twitter. It's important to understand that this law is not personal but results from a democratic process. Although it was developed with my team, it was amended and voted on by the European Parliament. This is a law that represents the parliamentarians, not an individual.

I, Ismaël Boudjekada, an elected official, infiltrated a group of 540 Zionist extremists involved in arms trafficking. I discovered a member of the Ministry of Interior, Michael Marciano, offering to facilitate their activities at Charles de Gaulle airport. Despite making these revelations public, I have not been contacted by the national anti-terrorism prosecutor, and the individuals in the group have not been questioned. Instead, I have been notified of my own arrest next Wednesday. I believe this is a political move to intimidate me, but I will not back down. I will stand by my statements and demand an investigation into these fanatics who threaten our country. I invite you to show your support on Wednesday at 8 am in front of the town hall. Thank you, and I will keep you updated.

In this video, the speaker questions why there is little discussion about France being a country where many general practitioners have been condemned by the medical board for reporting incidents. They also mention the lack of reporting by doctors in the Outreau case, where children were hospitalized. The speaker suggests discussing the role of transnational companies, specifically mentioning Orange France Télécom, and how they organize activities for their executives in Africa. They acknowledge the seriousness of their statements and invite anyone who disagrees to take legal action. The speaker highlights that in the Orange case, the only person sanctioned was a company executive who tried to expose the wrongdoing and almost lost their life as a result. They conclude by acknowledging that all social structures seek to protect themselves and suggest fighting against this.

Once there was a law proposed by Darmanin, I'm not sure where it stands now, that would punish scientifically or medically stating something contrary to the government with a fine of 15,000 euros or imprisonment. It's quite something. It's as if they were considering silencing those who disagreed with the government at any given moment. I don't think we've ever had constraints or obligations to only communicate the official version of science in our country's history. It's reached an unimaginable level of dictatorship. This existed in Gaullist countries under Stalin. Translation: Once there was a law proposed by Darmanin, I'm not sure where it stands now, that would punish scientifically or medically stating something contrary to the government with a fine of 15,000 euros or imprisonment. It's quite something. It's as if they were considering silencing those who disagreed with the government at any given moment. I don't think we've ever had constraints or obligations to only communicate the official version of science in our country's history. It's reached an unimaginable level of dictatorship. This existed in Gaullist countries under Stalin.

I've traveled to over 60 countries in my life and have never incited violence or terrorism. I abhor violence and have no criminal record. It's absurd to hear a government representative claim I'm a threat to the Netherlands. I am banned from most of Europe for agreeing to speak at a peace rally two years ago. This situation raises questions about whether the judiciary protects citizens from government abuse or serves the government's interests. If it's the latter, the Netherlands is no longer a liberal democracy but a tyranny. I've been accused of threatening democracy, yet the current prime minister is unelected and has never faced a ballot. This entire situation is a farce. I have nothing more to add.

The speaker discusses the controversy surrounding President Macron's vaccination status. They mention that the speaker, Jean Lassalle, a former deputy, made a statement claiming that Macron was not vaccinated. The interviewer asks why Lassalle made this claim, highlighting his history of political activism, including a hunger strike. Lassalle asserts that he spoke the truth and had confirmation of his claim. He also mentions the importance of protecting sources and adhering to journalistic and parliamentary ethics. Lassalle believes that Macron was not vaccinated and suggests that there may be evidence to support this claim.

I am being pursued for posting images of Daesh in response to a journalist's comparison between Daesh and the National Rally. I found it disgraceful, so I said Daesh is this, and now I am being pursued. They also want to subject me to a psychiatric evaluation. I published the psychiatric evaluation to inform the French people because I think it's not insignificant that the leader of the main opposition party in France is being subjected to a psychiatric evaluation. I am being pursued for publishing a psychiatric evaluation. Do you not feel there is a persecution? If it means pushing our compatriots to hate this barbaric organization, I fully accept it. We need to know where good and evil lie and if we don't dare to say what evil is, then we cannot effectively fight it. The media in Germany, the UK, and the US were scandalized by this, saying how can they pursue a politician for denouncing Daesh. No one understands this.

I am Wassmus Munk Sunego, an attorney specializing in human rights. I view the 18-month prison sentence for journalist Tommy Robinson as a severe injustice and a violation of free speech. This case originated from Robinson's comments about Jamal Hejazi, which contradicted the prevailing media narrative. Robinson was found guilty of libel and subsequently faced an injunction prohibiting specific statements about Hejazi. Despite this, he continued to speak out, leading to his contempt conviction. I argue that the injunction may violate Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protects freedom of expression. The legal proceedings against Robinson raise serious concerns about fairness and the treatment of journalists. The imprisonment of journalists for defamation is widely condemned in Europe, and I assert that Robinson's sentence should be overturned, emphasizing the importance of free speech in a democratic society.

I want to announce an action I have decided to take against Jean Lassalle. As you may have seen in several videos, Lassalle claims to have evidence that the President and government members are not vaccinated. This is crucial for us, as victims' families. Macron locked down the country, encouraged vaccination, and suspended unvaccinated healthcare workers. He even expressed a desire to annoy the unvaccinated. That's why I have initiated legal action against Lassalle. Many bailiffs have refused to get involved due to fear. However, an official will be going soon. If Macron is found to be unvaccinated and lied to the French people, it would be an absolute scandal. I urge Lassalle to speak up because there are deaths, injuries, and a scandal surrounding Covid. It's concerning that some bailiffs refuse to visit Lassalle, which raises questions about the Covid situation. Thank you.