TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

There's concern about the lack of good data on vaccine adverse effects. The CDC's surveillance system captures less than 1% of vaccine injuries, which is inexcusable. Congress and the Institute of Medicine have repeatedly ordered the CDC to improve it. Now, with Kennedy sworn in, there's a new commission and a congressional caucus to address these issues, targeting big agriculture, pharma, and food. The HHS Secretary is announcing a new, more accurate vaccine injury reporting system designed to be more transparent than the old one and release secret studies. The goal is to revamp the system to reveal the real picture of vaccine injuries and encourage doctors to report them. This approach aims to strategically show the data and address problems rather than outright banning anything, similar to discrediting fraudulent systems. We're coming for the globalists' assets.

Over 1.6 million adverse event reports have been filed to VAERS for COVID-19 vaccines, with a significant increase in 2021. The underreporting factor is estimated to be around 31 for severe events like hospitalizations and death. The speaker believes the mRNA platform was used to gather data for future gene therapy applications.

The speaker discusses the underreporting of adverse events related to COVID-19 vaccines in the VAERS database, highlighting safety signals like myocarditis and death. They compare the number of deaths reported to VAERS to past incidents that prompted product removal, questioning why COVID-19 vaccines have not been halted. The speaker presents data showing a significant increase in adverse events with COVID-19 vaccines compared to other vaccines, particularly in younger age groups. They emphasize the need to follow standard procedures for analyzing safety signals and suggest that the CDC, HHS, and FDA are not properly addressing the issue.

You need to know the risk profile for products like the COVID vaccine. Many discuss adverse effects, but we lack sufficient data, which is unacceptable. Our surveillance system doesn't work. In 2010, the CDC had the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, meant to detect injuries. However, a CDC study revealed it captures less than 1% of vaccine injuries. This is inexcusable. Congress, the Institute of Medicine, and the National Academy of Sciences have repeatedly directed the CDC to develop a better vaccine surveillance system. We will require it and address it immediately.

The speaker claims epidemiological studies are easily manipulated and that proper studies comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated groups are lacking, except for a CDC study in 1999. This CDC study, led by Thomas Verstraten, allegedly compared children who received the hepatitis vaccine within the first thirty days of life to those vaccinated later or not at all. The speaker asserts the study found a 1,135% elevated risk of autism in vaccinated children, which "shocked" researchers. The speaker alleges the CDC then kept the study secret and manipulated it through five iterations to bury the link.

There have been unprecedented injuries, disabilities, and deaths from COVID-19 vaccines. By January 22, 2021, 182 deaths were reported to the US vaccine adverse event reporting system. The FDA and CDC, who co-administer the program, lack experience in vaccine campaigns. Pfizer knew about 1,223 deaths within 90 days of their vaccine but kept it confidential. Moderna has not released their data. There are over 34,100 peer-reviewed papers on vaccine injuries, disabilities, and deaths.

The government tracked vaccine side effects through the VAERS system and the new v safe system for COVID-19 vaccines. V safe required all Americans to sign up and report any adverse events after vaccination. Around 7.7% of the 10 million participants sought medical care within the first 6 months, with over 70% needing emergency or urgent care. The CDC published 40 studies based on this data.

The speaker criticizes Mr. Kennedy for spreading disinformation about COVID vaccines. They mention an incident where Kennedy used unvetted data from VARs to claim that vaccines were killing people, leading to vaccine hesitancy and unnecessary deaths. The speaker calls this science denial and questions Kennedy's credibility. In response, Kennedy argues that VARs is an unreliable system for reporting vaccine adverse events due to voluntary reporting. He claims that CDC's own studies show that VARs undercounts vaccine injuries by a hundredfold. Kennedy also mentions a Harvard study that developed a more accurate system, but CDC allegedly shut it down and refused to address the issue. Kennedy questions why CDC doesn't have a better system in place.

The speaker claims that the CDC commissioned six epidemiological studies using fraudulent techniques, instead of comparing health outcomes between fully vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. According to the speaker, a 1999 CDC study led by Thomas Verstraten compared children who received the hepatitis vaccine within their first thirty days of life to those vaccinated later or not at all. This study allegedly found a 1,135% elevated risk of autism among vaccinated children. The speaker states that the CDC kept the study secret and manipulated it to bury the link by removing older children and stratifying the data. The speaker asserts that over 100 external studies indicate a link between vaccines and autism.

The speaker claims the medical landscape is dominated by COVID vaccine injuries, disabilities, and deaths, and that they submit multiple entries daily to VAERS, facing scrutiny and potential penalties for falsification. They state they diagnosed an executive in her late thirties with Guillain Barre syndrome from COVID-19 vaccination. The speaker estimates that only 1% of manuscripts on COVID vaccine injuries are being published, suggesting a tremendous bias, and that there are about 4,000 papers on the vaccine debacle, which is about 1% of reality. They claim to have never seen myocarditis, heart failure, or blood clots from eating frosted flakes, but are seeing people devastated by the shots. The speaker advocates for removing COVID-19 vaccines from the market, a critical reevaluation of the vaccine schedule, dropping all vaccine mandates, and rescinding the 1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation Act.

Everything regarding vaccine policy will change due to better information. No vaccines given in the first six months of life have been tested, except for the DTP vaccine. According to the Institute of Medicine, the one study done on DTP found a link, but it was thrown out because it was based on the CDC's surveillance system, which they deemed no good. The speaker questions why the CDC lacks a functional surveillance system, especially since vaccines are exempt from prelicensing safety testing. The CDC's system captures fewer than one percent of vaccine injuries, rendering it worthless. The speaker pledges to fix the system and follow the science, including publishing all data sets, replicating studies, and publishing peer reviews, which the CDC has never done. This will provide the public with real answers for the first time.

The speaker describes a committee conflict investigated by the office of inspector general and Congress, who urged change, but nothing happened. They claim medical malpractice by this group is evident in the approval of vaccines. The speaker states that in 1986 there were 11 vaccines, which increased to 69, then 92. They assert that, except for the COVID vaccine, none had a pre-licensing safety trial involving a true placebo. According to the speaker, these vaccines were introduced without safety studies, resulting in a lack of understanding regarding the risk profiles of these products. The speaker attributes this to corruption and agency capture.

The speaker states that vaccine policy will change due to better information. They claim that none of the vaccines given in the first six months of life have been tested, except for the DTP vaccine, which a study linked to issues, but was dismissed due to problems with the CDC's surveillance system. The speaker asserts the CDC lacks a functional surveillance system to capture vaccine injuries, with their own study showing it captures less than 1% of injuries. They plan to fix this by implementing a functional surveillance system, using data management, and providing answers to the public. The speaker promises to follow the science, use gold standard science, publish all datasets, replicate studies, and publish peer reviews, which they claim the CDC has never done, to provide real answers.

The speaker discusses the vaccine's link to death and disability, citing over 37,000 deaths globally reported on VAERS. They criticize regulators for not addressing this issue earlier and mention a conversation with Francis Collins about vaccine-related deaths. The speaker also mentions a conversation with Dr. Redfield, who admitted downplaying vaccine injuries to avoid creating hesitancy. Dr. Redfield acknowledged that there are more injuries than reported.

An analysis of clinical trial data showed that for every eight hundred people vaccinated, one suffers a serious adverse event. The goal is to end the silence for the one in eight hundred. It is time to stop politicizing vaccine injuries and start building meaningful recognition, research, competent care, and fair and just compensation.

David Ketzer and others have stated the current vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS) does not work and needs replacement. VAERS is voluntary, and doctors face disincentives to report vaccine injuries, including time constraints, uncertainty about causality, and emotional reluctance. In 2010, the CDC designed a machine counting system using cluster analysis to identify unique injury patterns associated with specific vaccines. This system, developed by a team led by Lazarus, was tested at Harvard Pilgrim HMO. The results indicated that VAERS captured fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries, while the new system captured over 95%. The data revealed injuries in approximately 2.7% of all vaccines, or about one in every 37 vaccines. Despite the system's accuracy, the CDC shelved it in 2010 and continues to use VAERS, even though it is known to be ineffective.

The CDC planned to analyze VAERS data for COVID-19 vaccine safety signals using Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), where a score above two would trigger further inquiry. ICANN requested the PRR results via FOIA and found "incredibly concerning results," with some harms having PRRs of 30, 50, or 100. The CDC then switched to Empirical Bayesian (EB) analysis by the FDA. ICANN requested this data via FOIA, leading to two federal lawsuits before the data was released. This data was also "very concerning." Both the PRR analysis and the EB data are available on the ICANN website. The speaker encourages independent scientists to analyze and publish on the data, which confirms "incredibly concerning reports of harm from the COVID-19 vaccine." The speaker claims federal health officials hid this data from the public.

The CDC funded a machine counting system, designed by a team led by Lazarus, to analyze vaccine injuries through cluster analysis. This system was tested at Harvard Pilgrim HMO, comparing its findings to VAERS data. The study found VAERS captured less than 1% of vaccine injuries, while the new system captured over 95%. The data revealed injuries in approximately 2.7% of all vaccines, which is about one out of every 37 vaccines. Despite the system's accuracy, the CDC shelved it in 2010 and has continued using VAERS for 22 years, despite knowing it doesn't work.

The speaker claims a committee experienced typical conflict, but a specific conflict was particularly obvious. The Office of Inspector General and Congress investigated and urged change, but nothing happened. The speaker asserts this group committed medical malpractice by approving vaccines, increasing the number from 11 in 1986 to 69 and then 92. They state that, except for the COVID vaccine, none had pre-licensing safety trials with a true placebo. According to the speaker, these vaccines were introduced without safety studies, meaning the risk profiles are unknown. The speaker attributes this to corruption and agency capture.

The speaker discusses the reliability of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which is used by the CDC to test vaccine safety. They explain that VAERS is a poor system because it relies on voluntary reporting from doctors, who often do not see the connection between a vaccine and adverse events. The speaker suggests that a machine counting system would be more effective. Despite its limitations, VAERS has reported more deaths and injuries from vaccines since 1986 than any other vaccine in history, making it the most dangerous vaccine according to CDC's measure.

It is possible to understand what is happening with vaccines without a statistics degree. VAERS was in place during the rollout of many vaccines, including measles, rubella, and COVID. One speaker had not heard federal officials reference VAERS. The idea with VAERS seems to be that people are complaining and should be quiet. The technology in these shots was brand new and never deployed before at scale, and the trials were a joke. It is hard to get up-to-date cancer numbers. While one speaker does not see a lot of cancer in their practice, friends at MD Anderson say they have never seen anything like the young people coming in with very advanced tumors. That is what we have to be worried about now.

As of February 2024, the number of reports for COVID-19 vaccines in VAERS is significantly higher than all other vaccines combined since 1990. The government was not fully prepared for this overwhelming influx of reports. They had to quickly reassign people and hold numerous meetings to increase their capacity to review these reports.

The CDC funded a machine counting system designed to identify unique injury clusters related to vaccines. This system, developed by a team led by Lazarus, was tested at Harvard Pilgrim HMO. The machine counting system's data on vaccine injuries was compared to VAERS data from the same period at Harvard Pilgrim. The study found that VAERS captured less than one percent of vaccine injuries, while the new system captured over ninety-five percent. Data showed injuries in about two point seven percent of all vaccines, approximately one out of every thirty-seven. The CDC then shelved the system in 2010 and continues to use VAERS, a system they know doesn't work. The speaker advocates for changing VAERS or creating a supplementary system that actually works.

Speaker 0 states that the committee now has over 8,000,000 pages of information. In the first tranche, they discovered that someone in the federal health agencies, through interagency communication, hid the signal and admitted there was a signal on myocarditis, but they hid it and didn’t warn the public or doctors. This is described as one instance of corruption and lies told by the CDC, with many more to be rolled out. He notes that they held their first hearing in permanent subcommittee investigation on that hiding of the signal myocarditis and that they have heard a lot of studies. He mentions that, as he has looked into science, it has been thoroughly corrupted, and he requests to enter a data sheet into the record, saying he has been publishing this chart since early 2021. He references being on talk radio shows where they get deplatformed due to censorship in the Biden administration. He then presents what he calls “the facts” about the VAERS system, which was touted in October 2020 as a great safety surveillance system on COVID. A few months later, they denigrated their own system. Despite this, VAERS shows that there have been 38,742 deaths reported on VAERS worldwide associated with the COVID vaccine. He specifies that 9,252 of those deaths occurred on the day of vaccination within one or two days.

The speaker claims the current vaccine injury surveillance system, VAERS, captures less than one percent of vaccine injuries, according to a 2010 CDC study. They state that the CDC had a machine counting system to roll out to HMOs but shelved it. The speaker intends to improve surveillance, gather data sets, and create data-sharing agreements with scientists worldwide. They aim to investigate the contribution of vaccines, mold, EMF, food, and other exposures that began in the late 1980s to health issues.