reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I was teaching a class when this person came in calling me "sir." I am not a gentleman. Are you a woman? Do you menstruate, give birth, or lactate? It matters. I'm not playing games. I'm not a man, and your transformation isn't my business, but you're not women. Stop. I am respectful, but you're homeless people taking over the bathroom and yelling. You don't seem to understand you have a right to call me a man. We respect people, but you don't. I'm a paramedic. It doesn't matter. You're a sad human being. I'm a woman. The internet will teach you how to respect people. Just so you know, you're being recorded in Trump's America.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 for some history regarding their gender dysphoria to help with writing a letter. Speaker 1 explains that when they were in school, they wrote an essay expressing their discomfort with their biological sex and how they felt. However, people dismissed their feelings because they appeared to be male.

The speaker asks if the other person has received any emails from colleagues, but the other person wants to know the question. The speaker then mentions that the State Department's internal email system has added pronouns to the "from" line without people's choice. They question why this decision was made and who made it. The other person says they haven't seen this phenomenon and offers to look into it. The speaker insists that it should be a choice and not imposed by the State Department, especially if the pronouns are incorrect. The other person agrees to investigate and thanks everyone.

The speaker contacted the Disc Golf Pro Tour to request an earlier tee time to avoid a planned protest, suggesting a time slot with only three players. This request was refused. The speaker then asked to be moved to the MPO division, but this was also refused. During the conversation, the speaker was told by a Disc Golf Pro Tour staff member that they had misgendered Natalie Ryan and that disciplinary action would be taken if it happened again. The staff member initially pretended not to hear the misgendering. The speaker declined to name the specific staff member.

The speaker states they are getting kicked off due to their shirt. The speaker then addresses someone named Wendy, apparently responsible for the situation, and calls her "stupid ass."

The speaker expresses frustration about being misgendered and reacts strongly with disbelief. They attempt to correct the misgendering but are unsuccessful.

The speaker addresses the audience and points out a waitress named Shay. He explains that Shay asked him about his hat, which supports Trump, while he was at Hooters. He expresses frustration that some women don't act professionally and mentions that he was spending money at the establishment. The speaker believes that Shay's behavior was triggered by his hat and mentions that he is filming the incident. He mentions calling the police and continues to express his frustration. The speaker plans to inform the manager about the situation and hopes Shay brings the manager.

Speaker 1 expresses that the situation is traumatizing and asserts that as a woman there is a space reserved for women. She questions the right of a transgender person to be in that space, stating, "he has a penis. A full and testicle. Okay? And and I don't care what it it's a man. You got one? You're a man." She argues that if they entered the men's section based on anatomy, it would be a man, and notes that they may not like women, but that for her and many other women, they do not feel comfortable and "it's not okay." She adds, "I'm sorry to talk to Okay? So well, I yeah. Yeah. You're sorry. You should be, sweetie, and you're out of alignment, and this is not right." She implies the other person is out of alignment and suggests attention to the situation, even commenting on the other person’s personal circumstances: "it must be hard not being a real man. Try it." She urges that every woman get all of their information. Speaker 0 responds, discussing a security guard who said that this is not allowed. Speaker 1 disregards the security guard's stance, insisting she does not care what the security guard says. Speaker 0 clarifies that the security guard doesn't want to be involved, and Speaker 1 insists that the guard should not have been present or allowed in the space. The exchange centers on whether a transgender person should be in the women's space and the authorities' stance on access. The discussion highlights discomfort, boundaries, and perceived inappropriateness from the perspective of Speaker 1, while Speaker 0 defers to the security guard's position. The dialogue ends with an emphatic consolidation of their stance: "Exactly. Thank you. Exactly. No."

The speaker is wearing a MAGA hat and is being followed and "belly bumped" by someone. The speaker tells the person to not touch them and to get away. The speaker accuses the person of being a "freak" and wanting "some action." The speaker threatens to call the police and plans to complain to the management about the person's behavior. The speaker believes the person's actions are due to the MAGA hat.

I was misgendered three times in 24 hours at restaurants. At Benihana, the server referred to me as "sir," and my girlfriend corrected her, but the server didn't understand and insisted she was talking to me. We left because of the uncomfortable vibe. Later, at another restaurant, I was again called "sir," and after correcting them, I left feeling uncomfortable. At a third restaurant, I asked for the bathroom and was again called "sir," so I left once more. Servers in the food industry can be respectful without using gendered terms. Misgendering affects my day negatively, especially when it happens repeatedly.

The speaker recounts an incident where a Delta employee intentionally misgenders them multiple times. The speaker confronts the employee, who apologizes but denies intentionality. The speaker warns the employee about their condescending behavior and threatens to have them escorted out of the building. The speaker ultimately decides to let the matter go and proceeds with their own actions.

The speaker demands an apology. They ask if the term "tranny" is derogatory.

The speaker asks where the boys' section is and is directed to it. They express surprise multiple times, questioning if certain items are also part of the boys' section. They comment on finding a boy shirt and confirm that they are indeed in the boys' section. They express frustration and disbelief, suggesting that this is pushing an agenda. They mention being at Target and comment on the availability of items that allow someone to look like their sister.

I'm starting a new teaching job and I'm non-binary, unsure whether to be called mister, missus, or mix. I worry about explaining my identity to 4-year-olds. Another person questions my ability to teach young kids due to my gender identity. They believe I should prioritize clarity for the children over my own comfort. They criticize my uncertainty and changing pronouns, emphasizing the importance of consistency. Despite their concerns, they acknowledge my kindness but urge me to consider the impact of my identity on my students.

The speaker demands an apology. They ask if the term "tranny" is derogatory.

I went to physical therapy at 7 in the morning and got misgendered by someone I had already told my pronouns to. I reminded them that my pronouns are they/them, and they acknowledged it. However, I had to repeatedly explain to my physical therapist that I didn't want to do an exercise that made me uncomfortable due to gender dysphoria.

Speaker 0 checks if the gender list has been updated, expressing frustration that there are 63 genders listed but not their own. Speaker 1 apologizes for assuming their gender. Speaker 0 insults Speaker 1 and claims to identify as an attack helicopter. They explain their desire to have surgical modifications to resemble a helicopter and request to be called a pilot. They demand respect for their right to harm others.

The speaker criticizes the medical industry and doctors for their lack of knowledge and understanding regarding trans rights and gender affirming care. They address a person named Barbara who suggests treating them as a female. The speaker, a trans guy, explains that they have undergone surgery and hormone therapy, which has transformed their body. They argue that it is dangerous and transphobic for Barbara to insist on treating them as a female. The speaker plans to report Barbara to the medical board for negligence and ignorance, emphasizing the importance of treating people based on their actual bodies and identities.

Trans women are women, but the speaker disagrees. They argue that nobody confronts the speaker's opinion and questions why anyone would want to be close to a trans woman. The speaker insults the trans woman, saying she doesn't look or act like a woman. The trans woman defends herself, stating that many people accept and support her. The conversation becomes heated, and the speaker asks the trans woman to leave their store. The trans woman mentions that some people find the situation hurtful, but the speaker dismisses their feelings, claiming not to care at their age. They mention their service in Vietnam as a reason for their indifference.

A person recounts an incident where a Delta employee intentionally misgendered them multiple times. The person confronts the employee, who denies it was intentional. The person warns the employee about their authority to escort them out of the building if they continue. The person decides to ignore the situation and puts on something.

The speaker angrily confronts someone, using offensive language and threats. They express their frustration and warn the other person to stop their behavior.

The speaker shares a bad experience at a bar where they were misgendered. They tried to explain that not everyone identifies as a lady, but the bar staff got angry and kicked them out. They felt hurt because it was the first time they had opened up about their identity. They tried talking to another person, but he also dismissed their concerns. The speaker expected a positive experience at a queer bar but found it to be dominated by gay white men. They felt embarrassed and wished for acceptance. The speaker mentions that their wife was also mistreated and referred to as a lady. They conclude by expressing their disgust at the presence of transphobia within the community.

A person is requesting that an individual named "mister Patel" obtain the identification of a woman before she leaves. The speaker claims the woman assaulted them and expresses concern that she will disappear into the crowd, making it impossible to find her later.

The speaker is upset and threatens to call the police because of someone named Faith. They repeatedly refer to a man and express their frustration with him. The speaker feels discounted or dismissed by this man.

Speaker 0 asks Steve how he is doing, but Steve makes a comment about Speaker 0's hair, which Speaker 0 finds offensive as a black person. Speaker 0 explains that they face similar microaggressions at work and asks Steve to stop making comments about their hair. Speaker 0 mentions that they don't need Steve to constantly clarify that their hair is different each time, as it makes them uncomfortable. Speaker 0 emphasizes that they are not seeking validation, just asking for respect and understanding.