TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 weave a dual-themed argument that identifies Rome with Edom and portrays a stark, apocalyptic conflict between Israel and the nations, particularly Christianity. They claim that the Romans identified with Edom are the evil kingdom in the Talmud and that Edom’s deviousness must end. They insist that “the Romans who are identified with Edom… whenever we see evil kingdom in the Talmud is always Rome,” and they repeatedly connect Edom to Amalek as “the grandson of Asav of Edom.” They state that Edom, Rome, and Amalek are essentially the same core force and that this force will be destroyed, with its memory removed from existence at the end of time. They argue that Israel holds a unique, exclusive position: “everything in creation from beginning to end is all about Israel. And it’s all for Israel. We have the Torah which was given to us from heaven and it will be in our hands for eternity.” They declare that “that’s only us” and that “the nations” are not in this plan. God, they assert, “put his name in us” and “revealed himself to the world through us,” calling Israel God’s firstborn son. They claim Christianity and Israel can never coexist, because they are opposites: “There can never be two on top. Only one.” They illustrate this with hand motions, describing one as up and one as down, and compare Catholic rhetoric as a mirror opposite to their own. Speaker 1 adds that the end-time plan involves the destruction of Edom and the false messiah, followed by the appearance of the true messiah, with Messiah ben David gathering the exiles and a third temple being built only after Edom’s fall and the false messiah’s exposure. They connect the end of Edom to the rise of Israel and to Jerusalem being built “properly.” They identify Satan as the archangel for Edom and describe Israel as rising “when Edom and the false messiah” are defeated. There is extensive apocalyptic projection: the world will turn against Israel via the Gog and Magog framework; all 70 nations will oppose Israel; Amalek and Ishmael are fused into broader conflicts between Ishmael, Edom, Christians, and Muslims. They describe Edom’s destruction as the destruction of Western civilization—Europe and the United States—as precursors to a messianic age. They claim that “the whole world’s destruction” will occur, with wars invoked by the “two-part plan” to remove idols and to force a convergence of Jewish law with end-time prophecy. Speaker 3 contributes historical-war context, noting that wars have historically led to the collapse of nations, and that World War II is cited in their framework as part of a longer arc toward a third world war that begins with Halta Deguila (redemption) and becomes the redemption when the Edomites are destroyed. They predict that major future wars will pit Ishmael against Edom and Muslims against Christians, and they recount how the Midrash portrays events culminating in Edom’s destruction before Mashiach’s arrival. Overall, the dialogue centers on a binary cosmic struggle: Israel’s divine exclusivity versus Edom’s (Rome’s) doom, with the end-times script predicting universal opposition to Israel, the downfall of Western powers, and the eventual assembling of a messianic order after the fall of the false messiah.

In 325, the emperor Constantine made decisions about what information to include or exclude from the early Christian Bible. As a result, at least 45 books were either removed or heavily edited in our Western biblical tradition. These edits caused us to lose valuable information that emphasized the interconnectedness of everything and the language used in this field. However, we are now in the process of recovering this lost information.

A version of the Bible was edited to include support for Israel, which has been used to rally evangelical backing for the country. However, this support contradicts biblical predictions of the antichrist ruling from Israel. Jews await their messiah, who Christians believe will be the antichrist. This contradiction raises questions about the true identity of the messiah and the implications of supporting Israel.

The speaker discusses the Scofield Bible, claiming that its emergence is linked to a historical convergence of major events in the early 20th century. They state that around the time when the Federal Reserve was founded and the Balfour Declaration occurred, the Rothschild family recruited a pastor in the Deep South to produce a new version of the Bible—the Scofield Bible. According to the speaker, this Bible introduced new interpretations of biblical text. They assert that Jewish influence affected Christian interpretation through this edition, describing it as the origin of Judeo-Christian ideas and the concept that Israel represents the modern political nation of Israel as understood in the Bible. The speaker further claims that the Scofield Bible was funded by the Rothschild family. They assert that the Rothschilds owned the publisher responsible for distributing the Bible, identifying Oxford Press as the publisher. Because of these ownership and funding arrangements, the speaker contends that they had the ability to push the Scofield Bible into widespread circulation, across megachurches and across entire denominations of Christianity. As a result, the speaker concludes that Christianity was effectively “Jewified” through this process. Key points highlighted include: - The Scofield Bible was created in the early 1900s, coinciding with the founding of the Federal Reserve and the Balfour Declaration. - The Rothschild family hired a pastor in the Deep South to author a new Bible version (the Scofield Bible) with revised interpretations. - This edition introduced or popularized Judeo-Christian concepts and reinforced the idea that Israel today aligns with the Israel of the Bible. - The Scofield Bible was funded by the Rothschild family and distributed through a publisher (identified as Oxford Press) that they owned, enabling its widespread adoption. - The widespread push of the Scofield Bible contributed to Christianity being “Jewified” across megachurches and denominations.

In the early nineteen hundreds, around the Federal Reserve’s founding and the Balfour Declaration, the Rothschild family hired a pastor in the Deep South who made a new version of the Bible called the Scofield Bible, with new interpretations. They didn't change Jewish influence. Yes. Literally. That's where Judeo Christianity kinda came from. And the idea that Israel is this modern Israel thing is the Israel of the Bible. It came from that Bible. And the Scofield Bible was funded by the Rothschild family. Then it was pushed because they owned the publisher that publishes like all the books. I think it was Oxford Press. And so they had the deals that they could make to get that Bible into all the mega churches across whole denominations of Christianity. And so that was when Christianity got kind of Jewified.

During the era of pre-Nicene Christianity, the victors not only wrote the history books but also deleted them, along with the memory of people, buildings, and statues associated with them. The two main camps of Christians during this time were the Judeo-Christians and the Cairo Christians. The Judeo-Christians believed in Yahweh and Jesus as the son of God, while the Cairo Christians believed that Jesus descended and ascended to heaven in human form. The Cairo Christians had their own Bible, which included the gospel of the Lord and Paul's original epistles. However, the Judeo-Christians, led by Eusebius and Constantine, gained power and created their own Bible, which included the Torah and excluded the gospel of the Lord. This marked the transformation of Christianity into Judeo-Christianity.

The Bible is often referred to as the greatest story ever told, not merely a collection of facts. Understanding its symbols and narratives is essential. Many religions before Christianity shared similar teachings. The Jewish rejection of Jesus as the Messiah is not rooted in hatred but in their understanding of the story. While the Bible contains valuable spirituality, it has been manipulated by political powers to maintain ignorance. Relying on a divine return for help is misguided; true salvation lies in education, personal spirituality, and critical investigation of the story. The church, particularly in Western civilization, serves as a tool of government, with both institutions working together to shape public thought.

The Bible's collection of books wasn't always the same. Early Christianity had many versions, with some books considered canonical (divinely inspired) and others apocryphal (rejected). The councils of Hippo and Carthage in the fourth century formalized the canon we know today, excluding books like the Book of Enoch and the Gospel of Thomas. These exclusions stemmed from various factors: later writing dates, radical ideas (like reincarnation), and the desire for a unified Christian doctrine to combat heresy. The Vatican didn't create the canon, but its library holds many ancient manuscripts and it's been central to preserving and interpreting the Bible throughout history, sometimes leading to conflict, as seen during the Protestant Reformation. The exclusion of these books significantly shaped the Bible we have today, highlighting ongoing debates about religious authority.

Jesus was a Jewish rabbi living in two thousand years ago. He was a rabbi from the Galilee. He came to Jerusalem. He turned the money tables. I think people forget that the world of Jesus was a Jewish world. His name is Jewish. Jesus is standing in synagogue. He's holding the scriptures. But what are the scriptures? He's holding the Old Testament. He's holding the Hebrew scriptures. For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son, Jesus, the Jew. Salvation is of the Jews. The patriarchs, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, are all Jewish people. Christian, there's a Jewish man living in your heart. The scriptures are Jewish scriptures. Our Messiah is a Jewish Messiah. As Gentiles we are grafted into the root system of Israel. The church has not replaced the Jews.

The speaker argues we must address spiritual warfare and Satan’s theft of our weapons, calling this the final link in a conspiracy. He cites several scriptures to illustrate Jesus’ authority over unclean spirits and the apostles’ empowerment: Matthew 7:28-29; Mark 1:27; Luke 4:32; Luke 9:1; Mark 22:29; Matthew 8:16. He then identifies a figure in the wings: the antichrist. He cites 1 John 2:22-23 and 4:1-3 to define antichrist as one who denies Jesus’ come-in-the-flesh with two criteria: denying Jesus as Christ or denying the Father and the Son; and warns to test spirits to distinguish true from false prophets. The term antichrist can mean one who opposes Christ or one who imitates Christ—false Christs warned about by Jesus (Matthew 24:4-24; Mark 13:22) and Paul (2 Corinthians 11:4). The speaker contends that the conspiracy behind many cults and the New Age is the near-perfect counterfeit of Christ. He suggests the church has been spiritually disarmed by Satan’s plan to remove its warfare weapons. He断 asserts that many Christians resist spiritual warfare, preferring not to engage in militant language or hymns seen as aggressive, while contending that this capitulation enables Satan’s smoother con “con job.” He quotes Billy Sunday on the Bible’s removal from public life to illustrate cultural decline in Scripture and prayer. A central point concerns Bible versions. He claims the NIV (and NASB) are drawn from corrupt manuscripts (Westcott and Hort; Grisbach). He asserts the NIV’s deviations include denying the virgin birth in some renderings, denying that Jesus has come in the flesh, omitting the Trinity in some passages, and removing the deity and blood of Jesus in key verses (e.g., Colossians 1:14). He contrasts this with the King James Bible (Authorized Version, 1611), arguing that the King James preserves a perfect, inerrant text, while modern versions introduce antichrist elements. He emphasizes the need to distinguish between the living Word of God and a “dead book” if readers study from corrupted texts. The speaker elaborates a defense of the King James Bible: it endures persecution and has produced biblical revivals and faithful preaching (Spurgeon, Finney, Moody, Whitefield, Jonathan Edwards, Billy Sunday, Billy Graham). He claims the KJV exalts Jesus and his blood far more than modern versions, attracting hostility from liberal theologians and anti-New Age figures like Helena Blavatsky. He asserts the KJV’s authority is evidenced by its impact, its textual features (for example, a center word being “The Lord” in the exact middle of the book), and Psalm 12:6-7’s promise of the word being preserved seven times through languages and generations. He argues that the Authorized Version’s authority arises from the fact that it was authorized by a king (King James), aligning with the biblical idea that “where the word of a king is, there is power.” The speaker contends the modern Bible glut creates confusion (the law of fives and dialectic), where competing authorities—scripture versus tradition, scholars, or church bodies—undermine sole divine authority. He warns of the dangers of parallel canons, arguing that the final authority must be God’s word, preserved and perfect. He asserts the King James Bible is uniquely blessed and despised by the adversary, and he urges believers to rely on it as the “sword of the Spirit” to drive back darkness. He closes by highlighting that prayers and preaching from this book provoke spiritual power, and that using other versions may yield a weaker spiritual impact. The conclusion appeals to the audience to choose the authorized King James Bible as the living, authoritative word of God in spiritual warfare.

In 1775, a Bible shows evidence of a 13-month calendar with Sunday as the first day and Saturday as the Sabbath. Constantine changed worship to Sunday to align with pagan practices. He also moved Jesus's birth to December 25, linked to pagan rituals involving trees and balls. The Bible warns against adopting pagan customs like cutting trees for decoration.

For the first 1500 years, Christianity was only in Europe with white figures. Christianity is seen as exclusive to Europeans, a covenant between God and the Israelites. The Jesuits forcefully converted non-Europeans, leading to artificial Christianity needing Western aid. European acceptance of Christianity was voluntary, leading to great civilizations. Without Europeans, Christianity and civilization would not exist, only paganism.

Bible is crystal clear. Jesus said to the Jews, the kingdom of God shall be taken from you and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof. In the Old Testament, Israel was God's chosen people. God chose Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and he used the nation of Israel as a pattern; they were supposed to be a light to Gentiles. They failed in that mission. The Lord Jesus Christ came as the Messiah, and he came unto his own and his own received him not. The Bible squarely places the blame for the death of Jesus on the Jews. In Acts, the Romans protect Christians, while the Jews try to rip them apart and stone them; Romans restore law and order. This is why I reject Zionism and being pro Israel. I read the Bible cover to cover, 20 times, and I didn't see it because you're brainwashed.

The narrative centers on the idea that victors control not only history books but also memory, describing Dominatio Memoriae as the Roman practice of erasing people, buildings, and even entire histories, with the first Christian Bible of January and its key figures suffering this fate. The timeline runs from January to March, with the Council of Nicaea marking the end of the Pre Nicene Christian era. Two main camps emerge. The first camp, the Judeo Christians (also called Messianic Jews or Ebionites), later evolving into the various forms of what becomes the Roman Catholic Church and its many denominations (Baptists, evangelicals, Anglicans, Orthodox, Protestants, Mormons, etc.), all share a single denominator: belief in Yahweh as God and that Jesus Christ was born of Jews. Their Bible is Judeo-Christian, with the Jewish Torah stapled to the front, referred to as the old testament after a third‑century renaming. Rivalry within this camp is intense, with disputes over whether to be Jews or “kinda Jewish,” illustrated by the Council of Jerusalem in 48 AD. The second camp, the Cairo Christians, is less known due to the Demnatio Memoriae. The Cairo Christians use the symbol chi-rho (the first two Greek letters of Christ) as identification, a predecessor to the Latin cross after Nicea. Both camps acknowledge Jesus as the Son of God and place extreme importance on the Apostle Paul, but beyond that, their beliefs diverge widely. The Cairo Christians have a Bible in which Jesus’s arrival and life are clearly dated in the first sentence of the first Christian Bible of January: “In the fifteenth year of Tiberius Caesar, Pontius Pilate being governor of Judea, Jesus descended into Capernaum, a city in Galilee.” Some groups like the Marcionites even pinpoint November 24 at around 11 AM as the exact moment, noting a solar eclipse in that time frame visible over Capernaum. The first Bible consists of the gospel of the Lord, plus Paul’s original ten epistles; this version is contrasted with the later Judeo-Christian canon assembled centuries later with four Gospels, Acts, 62 other books, and Torah front matter. Marcionites are described as the largest Cairo Christian denomination, persecuted by Romans, Jews, and Judeo Christians. Fragments of their influence persist, including the oldest inscription bearing Jesus’s name on a Marcionite church arch in Syria. The Vatican Library allegedly hosts manuscripts showing Saint Jerome’s source material for his Latin translations attributed to Marcion of Sino. Marcion is depicted as a target of Demnatio Memoriae, with defaced paintings of him and his head scratched off. A standalone page for Pre-Nicene History is mentioned at prenicene.org, with cross-links to firstbiblenetwork.com, and the Marcionite Church (marcionitechurch.org) is cited as existing today. The turning point arrives with Eusebius and Constantine. Eusebius, known as the father of church history, is portrayed as a PR operator who would omit inconvenient facts and even advocate deceit for the “greater good,” excommunicated for Arian beliefs but later rehabilitated by Constantine, who becomes Pontifex Maximus and uses Eusebius to advance a Judeo Christian narrative. The Council of Nicaea (May 20–June 19, in March of the same year) supposedly unites the empire under Judeo Christianity, with Constantine ordering confiscation and destruction of Cairo Christian property, torching Bibles, and transferring wealth to the new church. Demnatio Memoriae targets Marcion and his first Bible, and within six years Constantine issues 50 copies of Eusebius’s revised Judeo‑Christian Bible, which staples the Torah and alters Paul’s epistles, becoming the official Bible of the Roman Catholic Church, signaling a wholesale hijacking of doctrine in a span of twenty-nine days. The narrative closes with “And now you know.”

Speaker 0 presents the view that great academies of the rabbis were established, thousands of new laws formulated, and that the Pharisees who killed Jesus Christ remained the rulers of Judaism. He asserts that in Babylon the Pharisees codified oral traditions into the Babylonian Talmud, which he claims reveals Israel’s apostasy and supports Christ’s descriptions of the Pharisees as hypocritical and malignant. He cites a Talmud passage in Treatise Sanhedrin claiming a Pharisee may kill indirectly, giving an example where binding a neighbor leads to starvation and liability is avoided. He contends the Pharisees manipulated Romans to kill Christ, arguing Romans were the direct cause of Christ’s death but the Pharisees claimed Romans as the guilty party. He states Christ called Pharisees adulterers and that the Talmud provides “loopholes” for adultery, providing examples such as exceptions for sex with a minor or a heathen’s wife, and endorses seduction of unwed adolescent girls described as designated bond maids. He emphasizes death penalties differ for natural versus perverse sexual acts, alleging that rape in a perverted form falls outside legal jurisdiction, and claims sexual perversion was a long-standing practice in Babylon. Speaker 1 continues by noting three major Talmudic treatises contain passages endorsing the seduction and marriage of three-year-old girls, with Simeon Ben Yohai among prominent rabbis upholding this privilege. He states that in Israel today, many venerate Simeon Ben Yohai. He quotes Simeon Ben Yohai and the great Raba approving intercourse with a little girl under three years and a day, comparing virginity to tears returning to a little girl, and asserts the same section covers sexual activity with small boys. He adds that the Good Samaritan story portrays Pharisees as racial bigots, unwilling to respond to a non-Jew’s suffering. He notes that God’s command to the Canaanites was harsh and that by New Testament times, separation and the sword had become obsolete, with God no longer making racial distinctions. Speaker 1 and Speaker 0 discuss Gentile status in the Talmud and Jewish encyclopedias, claiming the Talmud’s critical attitudes toward Gentiles, including that Gentiles are not men but barbarians, lack legal rights, and that a Gentile’s suit in Jewish courts favors the defendant if the plaintiff is Jewish. They claim Christians are curses within the Talmudic framework, that Jesus is portrayed as a bastard, and that Gentiles face death for Sabbath observance or for providing testimony in a Jewish court. They assert that the Talmud equips Jews with an ethic fostering bigotry, isolation, and persecution, leading to the expulsion of Jews from Babylon to the West by the eleventh century. Speaker 2 reframes as a positive counterpoint: the tradition of Talmudic questioning, continuous inquiry, and a culture of learning that never ends, which exploded when the walls of the ghetto fell, and remains part of contemporary Jewish culture. Speaker 3 declares solidarity with Israel, insisting “Israel’s fight is our fight,” vowing unity and resistance to anti-Semitism, and asserting they will not be discouraged, defeated, or silent. Speaker 4 interjects with a hostile confrontation, expressing willingness to “kill Christ again,” accusing Jews of killing Jesus, and making violent threats toward a pastor and others; a rabbi’s circumcision practice is described graphically as supportive of Talmudic Judaism, followed by a denunciation aimed at Christian Zionists.

Speaker 0 asserts that if you have a Scofield Reference Bible, you need to know the author of that reference Bible because he’s not who people think he is; he is not Doctor Scofield. Speaker 1 corrects: Never was a doctor. Speaker 0 specifies: Nelson Darby is the man who created dispensationalism, and Larkins basically packaged it in his books, but it was Scofield who distributed it. John Nelson Darby’s doctrines supposedly went nowhere in Britain among the Plymouth Brethren through the 1800s, with only pockets in the United States aware of them, until Cyrus Schofield became the propaganda meister for Darby’s doctrine. Speaker 2 defines the Scofield Reference Bible as a King James Bible with notes in the margins acting as a commentary, in which dispensational truth is taught, and the Bible was shipped around the world. Speaker 3 adds: Many contributors to the Scofield Reference Bible helped sweep the movement across the United States. Speaker 2 explains: Somebody financed publication of many Scofield Bibles, and they were mailed to churches across America. Speaker 0 elaborates: The Bibles were given to Baptist young preachers in seminaries and Bible colleges, facilitating the spread of dispensationalism across pulpits and the country. Speaker 0 continues: Conferences, the establishment of Bible colleges, and Dallas Theological Seminary were part of a coordinated effort to spread the dispensational movement, which was very successful for a time. Speaker 1 notes: The Bibles were distributed widely in rural America and small town churches. Speaker 0 adds: Millions were distributed. Speaker 1 explains: Bible salesmen would get the Bibles for free, then sell them for whatever they could get. Speaker 1 answers: They got them for free from the publishing company—Oxford. Speaker 4 states: C. I. Schofield is placed on a pedestal by independent fundamental Baptists; pulpits across America feature a Schofield Reference Bible. Yet this is a man who preferred to use the Revised Version over the King James for his references, and he used the King James 1611 only because of its popularity at the time. So, he supposedly “threw the King James Bible under the bus” and said it’s not a good one, but used it because it was most popular. The speaker questions why Baptist, King James Only advocates promote a heretic who downplayed and disliked the King James Bible as a man of God who can teach good doctrine. Speaker 0 claims: They infiltrated American evangelical churches with Zionist propaganda, and the Baptist, Pentecostal, Assemblies of God, Church of God, and other denominations progressively bought into it. Speaker 1 adds: People actually believe the notes are sacred as the texts themselves. Speaker 5 contributes: A person with a Schofield Bible wants to read Schofield’s notes on Acts 15, noting that dispensationally, this is the most important passage in the New Testament, giving the divine purpose for this age and for the beginning of the next.

The transcript argues that Oxford University Press launched a deliberate attack on Christianity by publishing the Schofield Reference Bible in 1908, a Bible whose notes purportedly inject reinterpretations that connect the future state of Israel to access to God. It states the book’s importance led OUP to open its first American branch, publishing it and promoting it through key American seminaries and Bible schools, thereby shaping future pastors’ beliefs to align with a peacemaking tradition favorable to the state of Israel. The speakers claim many pastors were unaware of the danger at the time, and that the Schofield Bible would later be used by secular powers to steer Christians toward political and financial servitude to present-day Israel. They assert American Christianity became increasingly Zionized after 1948 with the appearance of the state of Israel, aided by Oxford University Press’s Zionist influence and its New York publishing branch, which published the Schofield Reference Bible as a foundational document for Christian Zionism and evangelicalism, contributing to its growth through deception. The narrative links the founders of world Zionism, especially Chaim Weizmann, to efforts to involve the United States in World War I and to gain land in Palestine, arguing that a small number of dominant American scientists influenced President Wilson to enter the war, resulting in substantial American casualties while enabling Zionist aims in Palestine after the Balfour Declaration. The Schofield Reference Bible is described as copyrighted in 1909, an old and new testament with many notes added originally in the Old Testament, with later additions in the New Testament and a radical 1967 revision. The cover features Cyrus I. Scofield and an editorial board including James M. Gray, president of Moody Bible Institute, and other seminary leaders. Distribution allegedly occurred through seminaries, influencing new pastors who returned to churches with the Schofield Bible in hand. A critical examination of a page from Genesis 12:3 is used to illustrate the alleged distortions: the verse, part of the Torah and quoted in the Koran, is presented as a basis for Christians and Zionists to claim that present-day Israel should own all land in the Middle East beginning with Palestine. The 1967 Scofield edition reportedly contains more footnotes than the 1909 version, with a footnote claiming an unconditional promise of land to Israel forever, which the speakers assert is not stated in the passage. They argue that the footnotes render Abraham’s promise as a perpetual land grant to Israel, and that the note uses the later term “Jew” unjustly to describe biblical figures from before the existence of Judah or the Jews. The transcript contends that Oxford’s notes imply blessings or curses based on support for Israel, and that a nation’s supposed sin for not aiding Israel would invite divine judgment, a claim the speakers label as a form of antisemitism manufactured by Christian Zionism. They argue that the concept of national sin is flawed, and that individuals alone sin, not nations. Historical figures like Philip Morrow and Doctor F. Furman Curley are cited as Orthodox Christian critics who warned against dispensationalism and Christian Zionism. Morrow warned in 1927 that Schofield Bible had usurped authority from Scripture, while Curley in 1983 linked premillennialist advocacy of Israel to wars in the Middle East and urged Christians to seek peace rather than war, criticizing figures like Hal Lindsey and Jerry Falwell. The final note emphasizes that Jesus’ simple New Testament teachings do not support Christians taking life abroad, urging a reconsideration of the doctrine behind Christian Zionism.

Two thousand years of Christian history have been horrible to the Jewish people. Unspeakable atrocities have been committed against your family under the banner of the cross and in the name of Jesus. Even with many lifetimes of repentance, it would not be sufficient for all that has happened. Yet tonight there is a message: a new breed of Christian is alive in the world today. There is a new breed of Christian that says, along with you, for Zion's sake, I will not be silent, and for Jerusalem's sake, I will not be still. We have been divided. There is fear. Evangelicals are all missionaries who want to return everyone to Jerusalem so the apocalypse can come, or to have nefesh ben nefesh have a good year so Jesus can return. We know the stereotypes. Jesus both unites and divides us. For Christians, Jesus is our favorite Jew; for most Jews, he’s the cousin you don’t talk about at Pesach. But in this pivotal moment of history, we have an opportunity not to be divided, but to be unified. Everyone in this room—Christian and Jew—prays for the same thing: the coming of Mashiach. May he come soon and quickly and in our day, so we can all sing. And when Mashiach comes, there will be a great press conference in Jerusalem. The BBC and the New York Times will not be invited. The Jerusalem Post will conduct the interview with Mashiach and ask, is this your first visit or your second? The answer will be yes. None of us need to be ashamed or embarrassed or wrong. We are together ascending the hill of the Lord. Until Mashiach comes, we must unite and work. We must become partners—evangelical Christians, eagle's wings, and Jews—as partners in the divine will, working as never before, because we face the same threat. We face radical Islamic ideology on one hand, and radical wokeism and communism on the other hand, an unholy alliance against Western civilization. Against that unholy alliance, there must be a holy alliance that arises of Jews and Christians working together for the betterment of all the human family. It must happen, and it must happen now. Speaker 1: I’m now going to invite CEO of the Jerusalem Post, Ibn Bar Ashkenazi, to give the Shield of David Award to Bishop Stearns.

Speaker 0 says they bought this Bible in an antique store, dating roughly 1825 or 1836. The first page has “a map A map? Of Palestine,” which he finds very interesting, and he notes some verses are “gone” or not there anymore, including “Matthew seven verses 21 through 23.” He quotes: “Many will say to me on that day, Lord, Lord, … we used to pray in your name, in the name of Jesus, … Get away from me, you evildoers. You lawless people. You workers of iniquity. Get away from me.” He claims this is Jesus on the day of judgment disowning his own people for not worshipping God, even though they did works in Jesus’ name. Speaker 1 adds: “The key to this is to realize that even Jesus realized and knew that you shouldn't pray to him because he was merely a mortal man. He knew that we needed to pray to a higher power, whether you wanna call it source, God, spirit, nature.” They claim “They removed these verses” to push energy into Jesus and to torture on the cross and through the Eucharist, calling the Bible tainted “to bend to the will of man, tainted to evil” and noting “evil doers who prayed to Jesus.” What do you make of that?

During the collapse of the Roman Empire, Constantine restructured it by controlling history and religion. The empire shifted from nonmonotheistic to monotheistic, persecuting non-Christians and destroying ancient groups like the gnostics. The library at Alexandria was burned, and ancient civilizations were eradicated to erase echoes of the past. This led to the Dogon people settling in Mali due to religious persecution. The Roman Empire's actions, including the crusades, aimed to eliminate pre-Christian influences.

"He wasn't a Palestinian teacher. He was a Jewish teacher with a Jewish name, Yeshua." The speakers stress Jesus' Jewish context: the world of Jesus was a Jewish world, and he taught in a synagogue using the Hebrew scriptures, the Old Testament. They argue Christianity rests on the Hebrew Bible and that the New Testament is a Jewish document; the first Jews and first Christians were all Jews, and the New Testament was written by Jews. Key claims include "Salvation is of the Jews" and that everything Christians have was given by the Jewish people. Jesus kept the law of Moses and did not come to destroy it but to fulfill it. The Messiah is Jewish—the King of the Jews. They condemn replacement theology and urge standing with Israel, Zionism, and that the throne of David will be on Mount Zion.

The speaker explains that the Gospels were considered more dangerous to Judaism than pagan writings. They mention a Talmudic rabbi who believed that Christian writings should be burned because Christianity posed a greater threat than paganism. Another speaker shares their personal experience of being raised in Judaism, stating that modern Judaism has little connection to the patriarchs and prophets of the Old Testament. They explain that the authority of the rabbis, based on the Jewish Talmud, shaped their understanding of God and the world. The speaker also mentions that the rabbis emphasized Jewish superiority over Gentiles in intellect, morality, and race.

A version of the Bible was edited to include support for Israel, which has been used to rally evangelical backing for the country. This contradicts Christian beliefs, as supporting Israel could align with the arrival of the antichrist according to biblical predictions. Jews await their messiah, who they believe will rule the world from Israel, while Christians predict the antichrist will do the same. This creates a paradox in evangelical support for Israel.