reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In 1865, as the U.S. rebuilt after the Civil War, the government prioritized connecting its fragmented territory via railroads, especially from the Midwest to the East Coast. William Wallace Cargill recognized an opportunity: connecting farmers with distant buyers. He bought a grain flat house next to an Iowa railroad line, betting on movement over production. Cargill's bet proved correct, marking a major transformation in the American economy. The arrival of the railroad in the Midwest revolutionized the region, expanding horizons and transporting goods, including grain. Railroads opened the Western frontier, enabling farmers to increase wheat production and transport it further. Cargill became the intermediary between supply and demand.

During the pandemic in the United States, wealth moved upward with the number of billionaires increasing significantly. The Central Bank injected $5 trillion directly into the economy, benefiting big companies while small businesses suffered. This led to job losses and a shift in market share towards larger corporations. The imbalance in wealth distribution became more pronounced as a result of these actions.

The speaker asserts that the consolidation of the meat processing business, enabled by the government, has negatively impacted the national economic health. They claim that two foreign government-controlled companies acquired major players in the industry. One is controlled by the Chinese, who bought Smithfield, and the other is a Brazilian company. According to the speaker, 85% of the industry is now controlled by four companies, dictating market conditions. They express concern that the government allowed over 50% of beef processing to be controlled by foreign entities, which they believe compromises food source security, especially given the current geopolitical climate. They question why a potential adversary would control 25% of US meat processing.

In 1993, the World Economic Forum’s Global Leaders program, specifically the Young Global Leaders, began, with Bill Gates among the first into the camp. The speaker notes that about 4,000 individuals have progressed into senior positions since 1993, implying a broad pipeline of influence over time. The argument presented is that this setup helps explain why events around 2020 unfolded in a coordinated way. In 2005, the World Economic Forum hosted a large gathering of these Young Global Leaders for the so-called 2020 initiative. They brought them together and had them brainstorm what they would do, informing them of what they should do. The claim is that when 2020 arrived and a big pandemic emerged, these leaders were already positioned and had already discussed how to respond to misinformation and lockdowns, implying a premeditated or preplanned approach. The speaker characterizes this as “Pavlov’s dogs,” suggesting predictability and rehearsed responses. The speaker then references the Global Risk Report from 2006, produced by the Rand Corporation in collaboration with the military–industrial complex and the World Economic Forum. The report allegedly identified pandemics as the big risk for the world around 2020, even noting this risk “for zero reason whatsoever.” It is asserted that the report also identified misinformation as a major problem, predicting that ordinary people might start talking and spreading fear, which would hinder whatever outcomes were anticipated. The speaker asserts that those involved were aware that ordinary public discourse could decrease fear and undermine the “scam,” hence their stated need to stop the spread of fear by censoring information. This is presented as the rationale behind censorship measures described in the 2006 context. Key points emphasized: - The 1993–present pipeline of Young Global Leaders through the World Economic Forum, including Bill Gates, with roughly 4,000 reaching senior positions since 1993. - The 2005 2020 initiative to brainstorm and direct actions for 2020, implying foreknowledge of potential misinformation and pandemics. - The 2006 Rand Corporation Global Risk Report, in collaboration with the military–industrial complex and WEF, identifying pandemics as a major risk and misinformation as a key problem, and arguing for censorship to prevent public discussion from inflaming fear.

The Federal Reserve hired BlackRock to manage its scheme for buying corporate bonds, effectively bailing out corporations overwhelmed by pandemic-related debt. Notably, BlackRock holds significant stakes in many of these same companies. While the Fed's published list includes 794 companies, the discussion focuses on just the top 10 holdings. Larry Fink, the CEO of BlackRock, emerged as a powerful figure in both the post-bailout and post-pandemic economies. Despite his influence, he remains largely unknown to the general public.

The speaker says the cattle industry has changed dramatically due to government allowance of meat processing consolidation. Four giant companies consolidated, which has a detrimental effect on national economic health. The government allowed two giant companies controlled by foreign governments to acquire US companies. One is controlled by the Chinese, who bought Smithfield, and the other is a Brazilian company. Four companies now control 85% of the industry and dictate who gets what, where, and when. The speaker claims the government has allowed over 50% of beef processing to be controlled by countries outside of the US. The speaker questions why the US would want an antagonist controlling 25% of its meat processing, citing food source security and the geopolitical situation.

The segment centers on what hosts and guests describe as a “great fertilizer shock” that could trigger a global food crisis or famine. They argue that data and events point to a looming famine, potentially guaranteed to occur from late 2026 to mid-2027 if strategic chokepoints like the Strait of Hormuz remain closed. The discussion highlights that current visible food availability in U.S. stores masks deeper fragility abroad, noting that much food in shelves may be from last year’s harvest rather than current production. The guest, Michael Yon, a former U.S. Green Beret turned journalist, has been warning for years about global famine linked to disruptions in fertilizer supply and key shipping routes. He cites data and warnings from various observers, including a reference to Mike Adams of Natural News, who notes that countries like Sudan are highly exposed because more than half of their fertilizer comes from the Gulf, and that civil conflict compounds planting timelines (Sudan’s planting season runs June–July). Other nations cited as facing ticking time bombs include Ethiopia, Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka. He also notes that even with buffers in India and Brazil, the systemic fragility remains, and the poorest smallholders in the Sahel may struggle to obtain an adequate diet. Yon explains that fertilizer disruption is part of a broader pattern of efforts to create famine to reduce the global population and control populations through various means, including AI and geoengineering. He argues that the “beast” is aiming to create famine and osmotic pressure that drives mass migration, which he connects to observed migration patterns across the Darién Gap, the U.S.–Mexico border, and elsewhere. He also discusses strategic chokepoints and potential war dynamics: closing the Strait of Malacca would be a critical blow to global trade, given its traffic, and he mentions that Indonesia is a focal point due to its leverage and regional politics with China and Israel. He suggests that closing Hormuz, Malacca, and Turkish and Danish straits could be moves to induce hunger and disrupt food flows, with Panama’s canal and interoceanic trade playing a pivotal role in these dynamics. He also references the Baltic region, the Arctic, and Denmark’s Maersk influence, implying a broad web of logistics and geopolitical maneuvering around food supply. The conversation weaves in the idea that various geopolitical actors—described as Zionist and Chinese/CCP factions, along with Russian and other oligarchic groups—are in conflict over control of resources and routes, and that these clashes manifest as attempts to degrade global food systems. They connect these tensions to depopulation theories and to specific incidents and alignments in places like Argentina and the Malvinas, suggesting long-running strategic competition over food security and shipping corridors. Note: The discussion includes speculative claims about geopolitical actors and depopulation strategies. Promotional content present in the original transcript (unrelated product advertising) has been omitted from this summary.

History is at a turning point, with global energy, food systems, and supply chains being greatly impacted. Governments play a crucial role in times of crisis, as challenges like climate change are interconnected and demand collaborative solutions.

JBS and National Beef, controlling 85% of the US beef market, are owned by Brazil. Brazil also owns Cargill's Pork Production, the second-largest pork producer in the US. Smithfield Meats, owned by China, is the number one pork producer in the US. This is alarming to the US public.

Cargill is the largest privately owned company in America, with revenue exceeding the combined revenue of the third, fourth, and fifth largest companies. They profit from almost every food purchase due to a century of consolidating and acquiring other companies. Cargill's power has suppressed wages, weakened worker power, pushed family farms to near extinction, and manipulated consumer prices. The company once had an intelligence operation larger than the CIA. Cargill is planning to acquire a chicken empire, which will further expand their reach.

In 2020, a powerful organization known as stakeholders initiated a 10-year shift towards stakeholder capitalism, marking the decline of shareholder capitalism. Their agenda includes controlling the food supply chain by 2030, with Bill Gates becoming the largest individual farmland owner. They promote GMO foods and aim to ban livestock, suggesting alternatives like artificial meat and insects as food sources. Climate change is used as a justification for these changes, with warnings about food insecurity and famine. Protests by farmers are escalating globally, with thousands demonstrating against government policies that threaten family farms. The situation raises concerns about food security and the future of agriculture. For more information, visit yellow.forum.

By the mid-20th century, Cargill transformed into a global agricultural powerhouse. Under John Macmillan Jr.’s leadership, Cargill became a dominant force in grain trading, using logistics and government relationships. During the 1950s, Macmillan Jr. modernized operations, expanding facilities and securing government contracts. Whitney Macmillan spearheaded Cargill's move into commodity trading. Facing competition from Archer Daniels Midland and Bungee in the 1960s, Cargill pursued international markets under Whitney Macmillan and Cargill Macmillan Jr., integrating into shipping, animal feed, and oilseed processing, with operations in Canada, Latin America, and Europe. In 1976, Whitney Macmillan became CEO, diversifying into petroleum, steel, and financial services, acquiring facilities and forming transportation partnerships. Cargill faced accusations of manipulating grain prices. Throughout the 1980s, the Macmillan family navigated geopolitical tensions.

Greeley, Colorado, is near a JBS USA slaughterhouse that kills up to 5,400 cows daily, totaling nearly 2,000,000 annually, and is surrounded by CAFOs. JBS, the largest animal protein company, has been linked to corruption scandals. In Brazil, JBS executives admitted to paying over $150,000,000 in bribes to over 1,800 politicians, including two presidents, to secure loans, dodge fines, and fuel expansion. In the US, JBS faced fines for price fixing, endangering workers during COVID-19, and polluting air and water near rural communities. The current food system involves corruption, collapse, and public dependence on a private empire. An animal-free, transparent, and just system is possible. Rethink food, power, and Greeley.

The cattle industry has changed due to meat processing consolidation by 4 giant companies, two of which are controlled by foreign governments (China and Brazil). This raises concerns about national security and control over our food source. It is alarming that countries outside the US have significant influence over our meat processing, posing a risk to our geopolitical situation.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the global economy amid conflicts and energy disruptions. Christine Lagarde, head of the ECB, is cited as warning about food rationing and broader inflationary consequences from disruptions in fertilizer shipments through the Strait of Hormuz. Lagarde notes that the third of fertilizers pass through Hormuz, affecting the Southern Hemisphere where planting and fertilizer needs are urgent. She argues that if energy-related disruptions persist, inflation expectations could rise because people monitor food prices and gas prices closely. She identifies three indirect consequences: prolonged disruption could shift from price increases to rationing with different economic outcomes; higher prices would be inflationary, while shortages would directly hit output and growth. So far, there are limited signs of global supply-chain disruption, but local tensions exist: jet fuel prices have roughly doubled since the conflict began, with rationing at some European airports since April. The remark extends to Asia, where low-income economies are experiencing more severe hits and moving toward rationing. Speaker 0 highlights Lufthansa canceling hundreds of flights due to fuel shortages and reiterates Lagarde’s signals about Hormuz and fertilizer movements. Speaker 2 (Professor Jiang) interprets Lagarde’s message as forewarning a major catastrophe for the global economy, noting that one-third of the world’s fertilizer passes Hormuz and fertilizer sustains global food production for billions of people. He emphasizes global fragility and the just-in-time supply chain system, which lacks resilience and was designed for efficiency, not resilience. He predicts policymakers may use crises to expand control, including digital currency and digital IDs, arguing that rationing could lead to a control system. He connects these ideas to a broader narrative about an AI surveillance state and governance tools. Speaker 3 references U.S. policy movements: the Pentagon reportedly requested American carmakers like Ford and General Motors to shift toward weapon production, signaling a wartime footing under the Defense Production Act. He compares this to World War II-era rationing and Rosie the Riveter, and notes the notion of living under a wartime economy. Speaker 2 adds that a stock-market collapse or cyberattack could precipitate a depression, enabling a shift to a wartime economy and military production. The discussion expands into a broader control-theory framework. Speaker 2 outlines two major pieces of an AI control grid: an enforced mechanism such as ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) with a large budget, and Operation Stargate, which involves building data centers across the U.S. as part of a control grid. He asserts OpenAI and similar entities fit into this context. Speaker 0 and Speaker 2 debate how such a grid could be justified by food rationing, national security, or a selective service-based draft, with Palantir reportedly pushing for a return to the draft. Speaker 2 ties AI surveillance, the control grid, and mass mobilization to depopulation theories, arguing elites aim to preserve vast wealth while the majority bear the costs. The conversation then turns to energy infrastructure: many oil refineries, including BRICS-aligned nations, appear to be going offline, with a recent high-profile refinery fire in India just before inauguration of a new refinery. The causes are attributed to war, accidents from overcapacity, and sabotage, with examples like the Geelong refinery fire cited as suspicious. Towards the end, the participants discuss the space program’s role in societal narratives: NASA’s programs and the mystique around space exploration, the Optimus robot, and the possibility that space endeavors could serve as instruments of control or unity. They speculate about the potential for a fake alien invasion as a means to push through a control grid, though acknowledge this as a disturbing possibility. Professor Jiang concludes by urging a shift from materialism toward spirituality, community, and family to better weather the anticipated economic storms, while signaling concern about the depopulation agenda and the strategic use of crises to consolidate power.

A biopharmaceutical complex, consisting of organizations like the World Health Organization, Gates Foundation, and Rockefeller Foundation, has formed a syndicate. They have been meeting in Davos, Switzerland for years, realizing that during a medical emergency, governments will pour money into the complex. The complex invests in itself, colluding with anyone necessary and rewarding them with future jobs. Regulatory agencies like the FDA and CDC are part of this complex. Notable figures like Scott Gottlieb and Deborah Birx are involved, with connections to Pfizer and Moderna, respectively. The Gates Foundation's investment in BioNTech yielded a massive return. This complex is currently experiencing a financial boom.

The cattle industry has changed due to meat processing consolidation by 4 giant companies, two of which are controlled by foreign governments (China and Brazil). This raises concerns about national security and control over our food source. It is alarming that over 85% of the industry is now controlled by these companies, impacting who gets what, where, and when. Allowing foreign control of such a vital industry poses risks to our economic and geopolitical stability.

Cargill faced heavy financial losses after World War I due to plummeting grain stock values, revealing the risk of relying solely on grain. This led to a pivotal decision to diversify revenue streams, marking the beginning of the Cargill empire. In the 1920s, Cargill began investing in grain storage and transportation, acquiring barges and ships to control distribution. In the 1930s, the company entered the animal feed business, which proved resilient during the Great Depression. Cargill further diversified into vegetable oils and financial services related to agriculture. The onset of World War II in Europe brought a new wave of market growth and wartime profits, aligning with the expansion of US power abroad.

Speaker 1 argues that the outcome mentioned in the headline is already baked in due to the lack of energy and fertilizer coming out of the Strait of Hormuz. He notes we are in week nine of the conflict, and there doesn’t appear to be a solution in sight. If the conflict lasts a few more months, it becomes catastrophic on a global scale. The countries most impacted will not be the United States but nations that already have tens of millions on the edge of famine, including Sudan and Yemen. Egypt is close to that category, and India and Bangladesh will also have a lot of difficulty. He explains that Bangladesh has its own nitrogen production plants but relies on imported natural gas to produce nitrogen. Two of Qatar Energy’s 14 natural gas trains, which are production pipelines, are out of commission for three to five years, taking 17% of Qatar Energy’s gas offline. The Haber-Bosch chemical process, which turns gas into ammonia and then into urea and other nitrogenous fertilizers, underpins this. Therefore, the world is already going to face starvation of millions in 2027, and that number could grow to tens of millions or even hundreds of millions if the Strait of Hormuz is not open soon. Speaker 0 asks for a global explanation of how the food system works and why countries depend on inputs from abroad. Speaker 1 responds that about 8,000,000,000 people globally, or roughly 4,000,000,000 or more, live today because of the Haber-Bosch process that turns hydrocarbons into ammonia and then nitrogenous fertilizers. If the supply chain is lost, and while not all natural gas comes from the Strait of Hormuz, a large amount—25% or more—comes from there for fertilizer production. The destruction of Nord Stream pipelines affected BASF (BASF is a German company) which produced nitrogenous fertilizers from Russian gas, and that cut off years ago. China and Russia have now halted all exports of fertilizers, including to India, which asked China for emergency fertilizer and was told that China needs it for its own populations. The bottom line is that not only is the natural gas feedstock being cut off that would normally feed 4,000,000,000 of the 8,000,000,000 on the planet, but countries are becoming more nationalized with their supplies, leaving vulnerable countries like Bangladesh, Thailand, and India hanging in the wind.

Bill Gates has allegedly taken control of the WHO, using it for philanthrocapitalism to profit from public health policy. He purportedly leverages the WHO's influence over African health departments to mandate vaccines made by companies in which he has a financial interest. Similarly, Gates allegedly pushed African countries to abandon traditional agriculture for GMO monocultures, benefiting corporations like Coca-Cola, Kraft, McDonald's, Monsanto, and Cargill. This initiative, the "Green Revolution," has purportedly led to 30 million more people becoming food insecure in Africa, while Gates and his companies profited immensely.

The largest pork producer in the US is Chinese-owned, leading to negative impacts on small farms. The hog industry has seen a drastic decline in independent producers due to vertical integration. Smithfield Farms, the top pork producer, is Chinese-owned, raising concerns for consumers. While reversing the hog industry's consolidation may be challenging, efforts can be made to prevent similar issues in the cattle industry.

There is a concerning connection between Monsanto and regulatory bodies, with Justice Clarence Thomas being a former Monsanto attorney. He wrote the majority opinion in a case that allowed companies to prevent farmers from saving their own seed. Monsanto had close ties to both the Bush and Clinton administrations. Over the past 25 years, our government has been dominated by the industries it was meant to regulate. The issue lies in the interests these regulators choose to represent. This centralized power is being used against farmers, workers, and consumers who are kept in the dark about their food.

Bill Gates has taken over control of WHO, and it's become his vessel for, you know, what he calls philanthrocapitalism. This approach leverages the WHO’s influence to mandate vaccines for children in African countries, vaccines made almost invariably by companies in which Gates has a private financial interest or which his foundation has a private financial interest. It was the same thing with the Green Revolution in Africa, where African countries were switched from traditional agriculture to GMO monocultures. Gates brought in corporations—Coca Cola to buy the corn syrup, Kraft, McDonald's, Monsanto, Cargill—to build the infrastructure for HMO products, to build the supply chain, and then create those products and sell them to US corporations. It’s been a calamity for the people of Africa, with 30,000,000 additional people who have become food insecure as a direct result of Gates' Green Revolution. Gates and his companies have made a killing on it.