reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland is described as a debaucherous party for the elite. The event is invite-only and attendees are divided by class. The focus of the forum is on diversity, inclusion, and the environment. Discussions include topics such as the impact of fossil fuels, the need for sustainable practices, and the potential for mind-reading technology. The speakers emphasize the importance of taking action to combat climate change and promote a new world order. However, there are concerns about the potential loss of privacy and control over our lives. The transcript concludes with a critique of the forum and its intentions.

Ronald Lauder, the Estee Lauder heir who convinced Trump to pursue Greenland in 2017, is increasingly moving from talk to action. Through a Delaware-registered company called Greenland Development Partners, Lauder has quietly purchased stakes in Greenlandic companies. The broader claim is that this is economic infiltration disguised as investment, with Lauder’s business partners in Greenland described as some of the country’s most influential people with close ties to Greenland’s foreign minister, Vivian Motzfeldt. Greenland Development Partners is portrayed as an opaque Delaware investment consortium. Delaware is described as “the Shell company's capital of America, where you can hide ownership structures and avoid scrutiny.” Danish newspaper Politikens Investigation is cited as labeling Laura (Lauder) as a key participant in the consortium, which has bought stakes in two Greenlandic firms, including Greenland Water Bank. Greenland Water Bank is owned by Svein Hardenbair and Sverdrupijn. Hardenbair is a former civil servant adviser to Greenland’s prime minister until recently and was also the director of Greenland’s national energy company. Jan Beboj Johansson is highlighted as particularly interesting. He is a former minister in several Greenlandic governments and chairs the governing Ziomoot party in Nuuk, Greenland’s capital. Ziomoot is one of the four parties in Greenland’s current coalition government. The crucial point is that Johansson’s wife is Vivian Motzfeldt, the foreign minister of Greenland, who handles foreign relations, including relations with the United States. The alleged linkage is that Ronald Lauder, described as Trump’s friend and advisor on Greenland, is now in business with Johansson’s wife’s husband, i.e., the Greenland Foreign Minister’s husband. The narrative asserts this is not merely investment but influence at the highest level. Greenland Water Bank may appear small and harmless. Its 2024 accounts show minimum staffing costs of about $5,500 and a modest financial loss. The company bottles water from the Lingmar Spring in Krakataswak on Disko Island, selling locally under the brand Emilik. Up to 2024, ownership was shared between Hardenbair and Beboj Johansson, before part of their shares were sold to Lauder’s investor group. Hardenbair explains to Pulchikung (Poltikken/Politiken) that the investment is not primarily about the money, but about gaining better access to the luxury market where their water should be a natural part. They believed the water was among the best in the world. The stated expectation is that Lauder’s involvement would grant access to the American luxury market for Greenland Water Bank’s premium water. The question raised is what Lauder receives in return: a pressure point and a foothold into Greenland’s top elite, enabling direct business relationships with politically connected Greenlanders. The narrative suggests funds could flow to Sven and Jorn (Johansson) through Greenland Water Bank as salaries, bonuses, or in Forms such as business trips, luxury offices, boats, or cars, all paid by investments from Lauder. The scale of Lauder’s wealth is mentioned as $5,000,000,000 USD, with Lauder reportedly able to mobilize $10,000,000 for ventures. The central controversy remains the connection to Greenland’s Foreign Minister Vivian Motzfeldt, who previously served on Greenland Water Bank’s board. Her husband’s involvement via Johansson’s alliance with Lauder is presented as a potential conflict of interest, given Lauder’s influence on Greenland’s political and economic landscape.

We are the Pritzker clan, one of America's wealthiest families, with a combined wealth of over $43 billion. Our influence spans various sectors, with the Hyatt Hotels Corporation as the cornerstone of our wealth. Our family's Los Angeles estate is a 49,000-square-foot monument to luxury, equipped with eco-friendly features. Beyond real estate, we are major contributors to education, with institutions like the Pritzker School of Law and the Pritzker School of Medicine bearing our name. We also support the arts, exemplified by the J Pritzker Pavilion in Chicago, and recognize architectural excellence through the Pritzker Prize. In politics, JB Pritzker serves as the Governor of Illinois, spearheading initiatives like the Rebuild Illinois plan. Penny Pritzker formerly served as the US Secretary of Commerce, focusing on trade and innovation. Our story is one of success and controversy, marked by both philanthropic endeavors and political challenges.

We are a diverse community of exceptional leaders with a mission to inspire and connect extraordinary leaders to build a more inclusive and sustainable world. We select and connect leaders to transform them and create meaningful impact. The World Economic Forum serves as an incubator for projects like Gavi, encouraging engagement to advance the forum's mission. We are all privileged to be here, but it's important to use our privilege for a purpose.

The video follows a group operating undercover at Davos, Switzerland, as they pose as the Climate Systems Engineering Group and attempt to infiltrate high-level climate finance and policy discussions. They begin by approaching the Coast Hotel nearby and noting security and attention sparked by their disguise and wig. They express support for the work of Davos participants and mention claims that BlackRock is behind climate initiatives. Their plan centers on entering climate-related events under false pretenses. They travel from Badragas to Davos and describe intense security, including armed guards and checkpoints, as they head toward a climate-scale-up event at the Post Hotel. Inside, they interview a woman named Sarah Lemnier who discusses her role implementing carbon taxes and climate credits globally, and she claims to be “one of the largest climate tax innovators in The United Kingdom,” emphasizing profit-making from carbon emissions reductions. She explains that CBAM (carbon border adjustments) is a European Union scheme imposing additional carbon fees on imported and exported goods such as steel, cement, aluminum, fertilizers, electricity, and hydrogen. The team moves to another event on the promenade, the Clean Tech Forum, and aims to access the Global Clean Tech Forum via a gondola ride to the Schlossnath Hotel high on the Davos mountain. There, Balbir Singh introduces the scene with a claim that BlackRock is behind the events. The narrator notes pavilions for Palantir, Accenture, Deloitte, and BlackRock, and they engage with BlackRock security while the team member compliments BlackRock’s work. Despite expectations of being dismissed as an absurd prank, many attendees treat the disguise seriously and share experiences related to weather modification, geoengineering, and investment interests. A Swedish participant discusses investment in technologies to “assist with the warming climate” and mentions the concept of sulfur dioxide in the atmosphere as a cooling measure. The group explains a preference for not using terms like “climate engineering” or “chemtrails,” instead using “aerosol injection” for droplets that could cool the planet for about a year. They discuss sulfur dioxide emissions as a cheap method and the potential for aircraft to emit such materials. Kennedy Ritchie, who runs Floor Air, speaks about decarbonizing aviation and eliminating contrails, adding cloud seeding ideas. Other participants discuss the military origins of many weather-modification efforts and reference the Airborne Snow Observatory for monitoring snowpack data as a commercial offshoot of NASA JPL technology. The conversation touches on sulfur dioxide injections as a geoengineering option and the possibility of government-led weather modification within different territories. A Danish contact discusses collaboration with three-letter agencies and DARPA, suggesting involvement with artificial rain and ground-breaking atmospheric projects, while another participant from the UAE space agency and European partners expresses interest in space and weather-related work. As suspicion rises—an individual is warned that they are being watched—the team retreats from Davos. The footage closes with the team recounting their interactions with United Nations representatives, discussions about climate risk and private-sector involvement, and a final reminder of the potential reach of geopolitically connected actors in climate policy and geoengineering discussions.

The video follows Tyler Oliveira, an independent journalist, visiting Kiriyos Joel (Curious Joel), a Hasidic Jewish traditional community in upstate New York described as a large, growing, tightly knit enclave dominated by Hasidic Jews who largely speak Yiddish. The dialogue paints a picture of a community with unusually large families, strict modesty and gender roles, private religious education, and a mix of work patterns that rely on both self-employment within the community and outside labor. Key facts and claims as presented: - Demographics and family size: The community is described as a village of about 40,000 Hasidic Jews in upstate New York, with families averaging seven children. When discussing typical family size, several participants mention numbers like seventeen to eighteen children, though others give more conservative figures. One interviewee says “Ten, twelve, fourteen, fifteen” is common in the larger families, with a repeated emphasis on seven to ten as a norm in some households. - Economic profile and poverty: The town is described as one of the poorest towns in America, with around 40% living beneath the federal poverty line. The transcript notes reliance on public assistance, Medicaid, housing vouchers, food stamps (EBT/SNAP), and cash aid to support large families. - Employment and Torah study: A recurring theme is that many men spend significant time studying the Torah full-time, with three hours of daily prayer/study mentioned by some interviewees. Yet other participants indicate that men work in industries like construction, driving or bus services, or run private businesses. Women are described as working in some cases (e.g., teaching, health care, retail, childcare) and in other cases primarily managing households, especially when children are very young. Some individuals report that women work after children are older or part-time in addition to domestic duties. - Education and institutions: The community uses private religious schools (Torah study is emphasized), with most schools described as privately run. A significant portion of the schooling and social life centers on maintaining the community’s religious practices and modest dress codes. The synagogues, private kosher markets, and a complex network of private buses and community services are prominent features. - Welfare and tax considerations: The dialogue repeatedly questions how families can afford many children on limited incomes, noting welfare programs (Medicaid, SNAP/EBT, housing assistance) that help, particularly for large families. Some participants acknowledge that welfare usage exists (including potential tax credits and other subsidies tied to children), while others push back against the idea that welfare dominates, arguing instead that benevolence within the community and private charity play major roles. There is discussion about how much welfare benefits are worth relative to the costs of raising many children, including taxes and tuition. - Community economics and charity: A common claim is that wealthier members of the community fund many services and subsidize others through charitable giving. The existence of kosher supermarkets run with the help of Mexican labor is described, along with private safety services, volunteer EMS, and community-owned buses and infrastructure. The interviewee notes that two groceries, Maitiv, offer substantial discounts, and that the community supports one another to afford large families. - Labor dynamics and assimilation: Several interviews contrast Hasidic work patterns with non-Jewish labor participation nearby (e.g., Hispanics in construction, retail, and labor). There is a sense that many Jewish residents own or run businesses, while a notable portion of practical labor appears performed by immigrant workers. A discussion arises about whether non-members can move into the community, with responses suggesting it is possible but may be uncomfortable for some residents, given the desire to preserve religious life. - Zionism and Israel: A notable viewpoint expressed by some community members is opposition to the state of Israel before the Messiah, with Zionism described as not Judaism and the state as secular. This stance frames a broader tension between religious life in Kiriyos Joel and external political narratives. - Public interactions and challenges: The video captures tensions around filming, interviews, and the community’s encounter with outside observers, including skepticism about welfare claims and how the community is portrayed. Observations highlighted by the video’s framing: - The community presents itself as a self-reinforcing, tightly knit unit with private institutions, mutual aid, and communal oversight aimed at preserving religious life. - The economic reality described mixes private enterprise, charitable support, and reliance on public programs, particularly given large family sizes. - The overall portrait emphasizes a life integrated around Torah study, prayer, family, education, and a network of community-run services, with welfare and tax considerations continuing to be debated among residents and visitors.

We have various big donors, including the Open Society Institute, the Wallace Global Fund, the Arca Foundation, and the Carnegie Corporation. George Soros funds the Open Society Institute. However, these donors do not ask for anything in return. We maintain a positive relationship with them, and they appreciate our transparency.

We went to New York to meet Donald Trump and celebrate raising enough money to save our farm. At breakfast, we discussed the plan and later had a ceremony where a picture was taken of my mom, Donald, and another man burning the deed. What stands out about him is his kind and giving nature, which many people don't see. They mainly see his vocal side.

I cannot despise my own daughter, painting her on a table as if she were a ritual offering. In the course of my duties, I have seen the underside of the cards. I was called by one of the largest Swiss banks, Credit Suisse, which has high-level positions. I have had several experiences, but the one that most motivated and struck me was what they call among themselves a midnight mass. The director of the session was someone I believed to be a friend who owned and ran a private bank. He invited me, as a friend, to Lausanne, to a special house they use. They call it the White House, by coincidence, the same name as the White House in the United States. It is their code name; this has existed for centuries. In this residence, what they call the midnight mass takes place, so at midnight there is a ceremony. I did not see everything, but I saw the beginning, and it was enough for me to know something was going off the rails, so I left. One of the participants had his own underage daughter. He placed her on a table, lightly dressed, as an offering. They began to chant shocking, atrocious songs. I understood immediately that things were going wrong. I stood up and told my friends, I am leaving; those who want to come with me, come with me. Some of them accompanied me, and we left. My friend, the owner and director of a private Swiss bank, chased me into the garden, calling out, François, François, come back, you did not understand. I replied that there was nothing left to explain.

I attended a super exclusive event with many wealthy and famous individuals, and I felt out of place. I can't share too many details, but it was held in the Bahamas. Upon arrival, I noticed security was intense, with numerous guards carrying assault rifles. The atmosphere was surreal, as everyone there was either ultra-famous or incredibly influential.

Jimmy Kimmel and Frank Giustra are close. To succeed in the elite club, you must sacrifice. The wealthy have kept secrets for ages, but now face consequences. The Rothschilds are losing power.

The speaker alleges that the Pritzker family is a very prominent political family with 64 NGOs. They claim that for this single NGO, many people work for no compensation as trustees, while others are paid substantial salaries—upwards of a quarter of a million dollars. Specific figures cited include a Senior VP for Policy Research earning $400,000 a year, Strategy Affairs at $330,000 a year, and a VP at $300,000 a year. The speaker asserts there are 64 NGOs funded by taxpayers, stating, “that’s all your money.” The analogy used is that influential families in government are like a thief who found the bank vault door left open, with each NGO acting as “another bag for cash” that is filled and handed off to friends, with new LLCs created as needed. The speaker claims the NGOs “achieve anything? No. Not really.” and “Do they build anything? Certainly not. No.” The overall portrayal is that the NGOs are about distributing cash among associated individuals rather than delivering tangible results.

We welcome you to the World Economic Forum Headquarters, where exceptional leaders gather to drive change. Our mission is to inspire and connect diverse leaders to build a more inclusive and sustainable world. Through our framework, we aim to incubate projects like Gavi to advance our mission. As privileged individuals, we must use our privilege for a purpose. Join us in creating meaningful impact together.

The video expands a web of alleged family connections around Erika Kirk, centering on the Rothstein surname and its supposed ties to the Rothschilds. The narrator notes that Erika’s exact lineage isn’t known, but if Erika and her family are Rothsteins, then they would be “connected right next to” the Rothschilds, a linkage the speaker describes as surprising and not a coincidence. The main question posed is: who is Erika Kirk? The series aims to uncover that answer, with hints that the investigation could make Erika seem analogous to a contemporary Truman Burbank. A surprising turn in the investigation is the discovery of Erika’s roommate in New York, who appears repeatedly in Erika’s videos. The roommate’s name is Nicole Rothstein, who the narrator identifies as Erika’s cousin and a constant commenter on Erika’s posts. Nicole is portrayed as coming from money, and the Rothstein name is framed as historically associated with dishonesty. A 2017 photo Erika posted shows her with two men; one is tagged Alan Rothstein, whom Erika calls her uncle. The narrator suggests this uncle might be on the mother’s side and implies a broader, obscured side of Erika’s family. Alan Rothstein is described as having been involved in significant financial crime, including defrauding a client of hundreds of thousands of dollars, spending large sums of company money, and engaging in schemes involving tens of millions in falsely claimed assets. The narration emphasizes Alan’s “sticky fingers” and associates him with a pattern of using “friend companies”—entities with little or no public history used to move money, including ill-gotten gains. The claim is that Alan owns a $13,000,000 home, implying wealth without a traceable core business. The narrative then shifts to Carla Solomon (née Fransvi), Erika’s dad’s sister, and her husband Jack David Solomon. Jack is depicted as a controversial, highly connected casino owner and corporate figure with extensive involvement in Israel-related and political circles. The list of his affiliations is long and includes leadership roles in various organizations and foundations, including the Federal Land and Development Corporation, Federal Research and Development, the United Jewish Foundation, the World Jewish Congress, and numerous chambers of commerce. He is described as holding positions related to Israel advocacy, as well as a connection to the Mormon-like “president club” and Freemasonry, with a specific reference to the B’nai B’rith as a secret society akin to Freemasonry. Jack Solomon is also portrayed as having a history of scandals, such as stock fraud, investor fraud, and casino fraud, including a period when he was removed from a CEO role. Despite these scandals, he is described as having amassed substantial wealth and wielded influence across corporate and government spheres, raising questions for the narrator about who he actually knew and the impact of those connections. The narrative then ties these threads to the Rothstein surname’s famous historical lineage, spotlighting Arnold Rothstein, a well-known 20th-century criminal who allegedly fixed the 1919 World Series by betting on Chicago to lose and using political and legal influence to escape punishment. The presenter argues that Arnold’s criminal legacy seeded later crime networks and that the broader Rothstein family may share a history of theft and corruption rather than legitimate enterprise. A central unresolved element is a supposed missing genealogical link between Arnold Rothstein and living Rothsteins, with genealogical sites allegedly redact­ing the names of his children. The caller invites viewers to help locate this critical link to determine whether Erika Kirk is truly connected to these historic criminals. The video ends by reiterating the provocative coincidence claim: the Rothsteins’ link to the Rothschilds appears direct and non-coincidental, prompting the closing assertion that “what looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck is probably a duck.”

The clients of this organization are wealthy individuals who arrive in private jets and helicopters. They pay a large sum to spend time with a child, knowing that the child will not survive or may become disabled. In such cases, the child's organs are immediately harvested. This organization has branches worldwide, with highly secure operating rooms. It operates like a complex corporation, with a medical team on standby and individuals responsible for finding organs for clients. The demand for organs is high, and the organization continues to meet this demand.

Claims allege that 2,000,000 women were trapped under the Getty Museum, with the site described as darker than Epstein Island and revealing a hidden truth beneath Los Angeles. According to whistleblowers, the Getty is not merely a world-class art gallery but a 12-floor underground city sealed off from the public. Reports assert that until 2018, over 2,000,000 women and children were trapped down there, described as “hell within another hell.” The narrative further states that the underground complex includes armed guards, tunnel systems, and hidden labs that stretch miles beneath California. It is described as the largest human trafficking hub ever built, protected under the guise of art and culture. The claims imply that, if true, the Getty Museum is not just storing paintings but concealing secrets darker than anyone could imagine.

The Cargill Macmillan dynasty, with an estimated worth of $60.6 billion, avoids publicity despite their immense wealth, which exceeds the GDP of over 100 countries. Unlike more public billionaires, the Cargill heirs maintain a low profile while controlling a vast global empire. Founded in 1865, Cargill Incorporated is the largest privately held company in the United States by revenue. The company reported $160 billion in revenue for the fiscal year 2024, a decrease from $177 billion the previous year.

Steve Shepherd reports on the Bohemian Club’s annual retreat at Bohemian Grove, a private, all-male gathering near San Francisco. More than 2,000 members descend on roughly 2,700 acres of redwood forest for two and a half weeks in July, staying in dozens of small camps with Mandalay the most prominent. The Grove is described as a secluded summer retreat where club members and guests from across America come to relax, socialize, and engage in various activities. Membership is by invitation based on social standing, occupation, and connections. Privacy is highly valued; members may not photograph, record, speak, or write about activities at the retreat, and the press is a distinctly unwelcome guest. Outsiders have limited access, though some researchers, including sociology professor William Dumhoff, have studied the Grove. Notable members and attendees come from business and politics. Among the camps’ members are Leonard Firestone, Edgar Kaiser, Gerald Ford, Henry Kissinger, William French Smith, and George Shultz. President Reagan, Vice President Bush, and Defense Secretary Weinberger are associated with other camps. Richard Nixon is a bohemian, and high-ranking executives from Eastern Airlines, Standard Oil of Indiana, and Bank of America are mentioned. The Grove hosts prominent guests such as Henry Kissinger and Zbigniew Brzezinski, and this year’s speakers include presidential counselor Edwin Meese; CIA director William Casey is scheduled as a guest of John McCone, with Baseball Commissioner Bowie Kuhn invited by Peter O’Malley. Activities at the Grove include two plays with major sets, orchestral music, and elaborate costumes, as well as swimming, hiking, sunbathing, drinking from the Grove’s own spirits, and other leisure activities. The group performs a ritual known as the cremation of care, in which the body of dull care symbolizing woes is burned on an alder in front of a large owl statue, after which participants cheer and toast with beers. The Grove’s symbol is a fierce-looking owl, and its patron saint is Saint John of Naplemuck, a thirteenth-century Bohemian canonized for his sense of honor. The Grove is instrumental politically, with historic speeches by Nixon and Eisenhower noted as significant moments. Discussions in the 1930s are credited with contributing to the development of nuclear power and the atomic bomb. In addition to policy discussions, annual guests engage in informal exchanges. The retreat also faces occasional challenges: anti-nuclear demonstrators near the entrance and a California lawsuit over the Grove’s refusal to hire women. Despite these tensions, Herbert Hoover once called it the world’s greatest men’s party, and a long list of powerful individuals continues waiting to enter.

The transcript discusses the Art in Embassies program, described as part of the U.S. Department of State that promotes cultural diplomacy through exhibitions, permanent collections, site-specific commissions, and two-way artist exchanges in over 200 U.S. embassies and consulates. It claims Art in Embassies provided Podestas, Jeff Koons, Rockefellers, Clintons, Marina Abramovich, and James Alafontis access to a private shipping channel that could bypass airport security. Hillary Clinton is quoted as saying that what they do is diplomacy beyond governments. The narrative links the Rothschilds and the Clintons as two major pieces in a secretive international group with access to cargo planes and ships, and notes Clinton wrote an article about art in embassies in Vanity Fair. It asserts the foundation for art and preservation of embassies (FAPE) is made up of dozens of billionaire families and politicians with ties to the global elite who can ship artwork around the world outside conventional security channels. It states that Art in Embassies is now run by Beth Dozorits, described as a close friend of Hillary Clinton and famous for helping Bill Clinton pardon Mark Rich on his final day in office. Vanity Fair is cited stating Dozorits drew attention for persuading Clinton to pardon Mark Rich. The transcript claims that Hillary Clinton’s State Department did little to oversee embassies but invested substantial effort into promoting art in embassies. Dozorits is said to have worked with Alafontis and they are closely linked among the DC elite, implying Alaphontis is tied to globalist power centers in America, as are the Bodesta brothers and company. It claims the Art in Embassies program involves Yale-connected elites including John Kerry, Hillary Clinton, and Robert Starr (dean of Yale School of Art), along with other industrialist families behind major American brands. Examples include the Sacklers, described as the family behind Purdue Pharma who were involved with Valium and OxyContin, said to have promoted the arts with the “global elite.” It alleges the Sacklers coordinated events with James Elephantis, presenting medals to Marina Abramovich and Jeff Koons, whose works have been transported on these aircraft multiple times, some directly via the Tony and Heather Podesta collection. Podesta allegedly arranged for Abramovich’s bloody works to be transported to Whitechapel in London, supported in part by the UK Friends of the National Museum of Women’s Artists. The narrative suggests organizations’ diplomatic groups function within art galleries, implying that events celebrate art while “announcing the sending of the paintings.” It mentions the Aga Khan, who owns private islands in the Caribbean, attending a Sackler Art in Embassies event with Alifantis and Tony Podesta. An image from the 2005 segment of the Art in Embassies project is referenced. The transcript then shifts to allegations regarding the State Department. It reports that internal memos indicate the agency called off or intervened in investigations into allegedly illegal and inappropriate behavior within its ranks during Hillary Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state, claiming investigations were whitewashed or quashed and that those orders came from high up. NBC’s Chuck Todd provides a briefing on these allegations, including prostitution and pedophilia claims related to State Department officials, an ambassador, and security agents. Japanese journalist Yoshi Shimatsu is cited as linking Nicholas Negroponte to a Cambodian orphanage, with Cambodian police shutting down an orphanage’s satellite link tower used to uplink child pornography and connect American pedophiles to victims. Teachers purportedly say computers and satellite systems were isolated and maintained by Nicholas Negroponte, founder of the MIT Media Lab, who allegedly frequented the orphanages and arranged weekend pajama parties for VIPs. Shimatsu is described as noting that the one laptop per child project was initiated by Negroponte, who is also the brother of former UN ambassador and intelligence official John Negroponte; John and his wife Diana are board members of FAPE. Negroponte is also said to appear in Jeffrey Epstein’s “Little Black Book.” The transcript concludes by noting the One Laptop Per Child initiative. A brief reminder to subscribe and view more videos is included at the end.

The family avoids the spotlight, prioritizing business. Their motto, "to be and not to seem," guides them to focus on substance over fame. They rarely give interviews, and when they do, it's about business, institutions, or philanthropy. Personal lives and politics are kept private.