reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Mister Miles Guo revealed that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has expanded its military presence in South America and small countries near Australia. The CCP used tactics like selling advanced and affordable drones to these countries, establishing drone bases, and using blackmail and bribery to gain influence. They also parked cargo ships near the Bahamas and Cuba, filled with military devices. The CCP built a massive underground embassy in the Bahamas and established military bases in these countries, including missile systems and satellite launch bases. Meanwhile, Speaker 1 expressed concerns about the Biden administration's China-focused policies, including the potential stacking of the Supreme Court, abandonment of energy independence, and China's influence on the White House.

UC Berkeley received $220 million from the CCP, which they failed to report. The speaker mentions that this issue extends beyond just universities, as it also affects ports. The CCP has control over cranes and data tracking systems, making it difficult to address the problem through legislation. The speaker clarifies that the issue is not with Chinese people, but with the actions of the CCP. A bill addressing this matter is scheduled for next week.

Many drones, likely from communist China, are increasingly flying near our military bases. This uptick coincides with more incursions by Chinese nationals. It seems they are preparing for a potential attack on the U.S. from within our own borders. There's no need for an explicit warning from Beijing; the threat is evident. We are at risk of being targeted, yet we are not taking adequate measures to safeguard our bases or protect the American people.

Speaker 0 argues that anyone can file a complaint with a law enforcement authority for murder conspiracy and demand arrests and prosecutions. He points to a 2013 press release claiming that DARPA awarded Moderna Therapeutics up to $25,000,000 to develop messenger RNA therapeutics, noting that DARPA is the Pentagon and claiming the Pentagon bought, paid for, and envisioned these mRNA shots. He contends Fort Detrick was involved in developing COVID-19 at the UNC BSL-3 and asserts the Pentagon is on both sides of the argument, developing the weapon and the alleged vaccines. Speaker 1 asks whether there is any liability shield for deploying a biowarfare weapon and whether the narrative about congressional liability for Pfizer is a SIOP. Speaker 0 agrees that civil liability is separate from criminal liability, stating in his book Resisting Medical Tyranny that executives at companies developing these mRNA shots are guilty of murder and conspiracy to commit murder. He cites a Portugal report claiming that upwards of 300,000 Americans had been murdered by the mRNA Franken shots and invokes the JAB resolution, describing it as a Nuremberg crime against humanity and a violation of the Nuremberg Code. He defines a Nuremberg crime against humanity as murder, extermination, and other inhumane acts committed against civilians. Speaker 1 asks about liability for government officials who approved the vaccines. Speaker 0 says FDA officials who approved the shots could be indicted for murder and conspiracy to commit murder, noting the FDA’s involvement in developing COVID-19 as an offensive biological warfare weapon at UNC BSL-3, including a cited contract listing National Center for Toxicological Research and FDA as contributors. He claims the FDA, which approves the vaccines, was involved in this development. Speaker 1 questions the CDC and media accountability, noting the CDC’s recommendation of the vaccines and media promotion of boosters. Speaker 0 says the CDC, including Director Milensky (appointed by Biden, from Harvard Medical School), is complicit, and claims the CDC has a history dating back to the Reagan administration of handling offensive biological warfare projects, including shipping weaponized agents to Saddam Hussein with implications for U.S. troops after Gulf War I. Speaker 1 asks whether there are lawmakers with intel on gain-of-function biowarfare. Speaker 0 mentions Senator Rand Paul as having a strong understanding, but asserts that some lawmakers were threatened and obstructed after consulting him, recounting an experience with Walter Jones of the House Armed Services Committee who briefly engaged but then did not follow up, implying threats prevented action. Speaker 1 asks how citizens should respond, and Speaker 0 advocates reporting to sheriffs, district attorneys, and state attorneys, noting progress with a Collier County health freedom declaration. They discuss enforcement mechanisms, seizure, and incineration of stockpiles, and trial and sentencing for those responsible. Speaker 0 condemns China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology as a bioweapons lab, alleging it was a Chinese counterpart to Fort Detrick, with the Chinese president seeking his own BSL-4 program and an offensive biowarfare arsenal. Speaker 1 notes U.S. funding and international bioweapons labs, including Ukraine and Taiwan, and ends by referencing Lindsey Graham and a speaker labeled as a professor Boyle.

Syngenta, a Chinese state-owned agri-chemical company, must give up its land holdings in Arkansas due to concerns over national security. The company's ownership, Kim China, is on the Department of Defense's list of Chinese military companies posing a clear threat. The fear is that Chinese state-owned corporations are stealing American research and sharing it with their homeland, compromising American farms. To address this, Act 525 was signed to ban Chinese and Russian made drones, and Act 758 was signed to prohibit public contracts with the CCP. If Syngenta refuses to sell, legal proceedings may be initiated to force them out of the state. Arkansas is committed to protecting its farmers and national security interests.

The senator questions the speaker about their firm's client selection policy, specifically regarding their clients who are state-owned Chinese corporations. The speaker defends their rigorous selection process and claims to primarily work with multinational and private sector companies. However, the senator highlights that the firm has advised state-owned enterprises involved in activities contrary to US security interests. The speaker denies advising these specific companies but fails to provide satisfactory answers. The senator criticizes the firm for making substantial profits from both US enemies and the American taxpayer. The senator proposes a law to prohibit such activities and vows to push for a vote on it.

The speaker's testimony focuses on the federal government's failures to understand and counter the CCP's political and economic warfare. They witnessed China bypassing defensive barriers in the Pacific, endangering US territories, despite warnings. A bridge in Kiribati, funded by the US, fell into disrepair and was replaced by a Chinese-built bridge after bureaucratic delays. The speaker also highlights a subnational incursion in Michigan involving a CCP-tied lithium-ion battery manufacturer, Goshen, near Camp Grayling. Goshen declared its real estate transaction as "uncovered," and a proposed rule adding military bases for CFIUS review is not retroactive and doesn't apply to Goshen. The speaker requested the Treasury Department reexamine Goshen's declarations, citing a 2020 CFIUS rule. Court filings revealed offers by Goshen to recalled trustees, including trips to China and sweetheart real estate deals, suggesting elite capture and corruption. These deals were not disclosed, despite warnings from national security agencies. The speaker emphasizes the need for intergovernmental agency processes to acknowledge, spot, and defend against CCP threats.

China is buying up various sectors of the US economy, including technology, food supplies, farmland, minerals, natural resources, ports, shipping terminals, and even pillars of the energy industry. The speaker expresses concern about Chinese communist activity in the US and emphasizes that economic security is national security. They propose enacting new restrictions on Chinese ownership of vital infrastructure, stopping future Chinese purchases in essential industries, and forcing the Chinese to sell any current holdings that pose a risk to national security. The speaker vows to ensure that America's future remains in American hands and promises a stronger country under their leadership.

The congresswoman states the CCP is not our friend and that Chinese companies must turn over information to the CCP. Michigan lawmakers approved nearly $800 million for the Goshen plant, a subsidiary of a CCP-owned company, to implant Chinese workers and technology near an intelligence program and military facility. The US has found Chinese technology is used to spy on Americans and steal proprietary information. The previous president of Ferris State intertwined with Goshen leaders and there was a soft agreement to house unvetted PRC nationals. Goshen also had conversations with the university to support building elements. China's national intelligence laws require PRC nationals to surveil, collect, and report. Stakeholders with Goshen signed NDAs, which is a red flag. National Security Intelligence Agencies convened state and local officials to warn against being duped by business deals with China. Transparency would reveal elite capture, influence operations, and corruption. The congresswoman is concerned about the plant's proximity to a military facility and Ferris State, combined with NDAs and secrecy.

Speaker 0 suggests that if someone wanted to buy property near one of China’s military installations, they would likely be in Beijing. Speaker 1 responds that President Xi wouldn’t allow it. Speaker 1 argues that selling or removing students from the U.S. would harm both farmers and universities. They claim that China already has a lot of land, and that land acquisition occurred during the Obama administration without action. Speaker 1 says that if people “take [farm land] out of the market,” it would cause property and farm prices to change and lead farmers to lose money. They then focus on students: Speaker 1 says China has “500,000 students” and characterizes them as “good students.” Speaker 1 says that telling another country “I don’t want any students” is “very insulting” and would prompt China to start building universities all over China. Speaker 1 adds that if these students are “good and they wanna stay in America,” they “won’t give them a green card,” and this restriction would affect not only these students but others from other countries as well. Speaker 1 states that removing “a half a million people” from universities would not end the top schools, but would cause “bankruptcies at the lower end” of good colleges and widespread trouble for lower-tier institutions. They also argue that international students coming to learn American culture is beneficial, and that some people disagree. Addressing concerns about intentions, Speaker 1 says both sides worry about “nefarious intentions” and portrays the situation as a “very fine line,” stating that “they do things to us, we do things to them.” Speaker 1 concludes that school systems would not want such a scenario because it would leave “you won’t have much of a school system.”

They are concerned about land purchases near military installations like Dugway Proving Ground, Missouri Air Force Base, Virginia Naval Air Station, and North Carolina. These areas house critical defense systems such as biological and chemical weapons defense, stealth bombers, missile operations, aircraft carriers, and special operations forces for rapid deployment in international conflicts.

A Chinese company is planning to build an electric vehicle battery plant in Michigan and intends to bring 20 to 50 Chinese nationals to the United States. Concerns are raised about the potential for espionage by these individuals on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party. It is believed that the Chinese government will exploit this opportunity to gather intelligence and gain economic advantages that are contrary to the interests of the United States. It is crucial to use intelligence capabilities to monitor their activities and protect national security. The construction of these plants is seen as a significant threat and should not proceed.

Syngenta, a Chinese state-owned agri-chemical company, is required to give up its land holdings in Arkansas due to concerns about national security. The company's ownership, Kim China, is on the Department of Defense's list of Chinese military companies posing a threat. The fear is that Chinese-owned corporations are stealing American research and sharing it with their homeland, potentially targeting American farms. To address this, Arkansas has banned Chinese and Russian-made drones and public contracts with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). If Syngenta refuses to sell, legal action may be taken to remove them from the state. Arkansas is committed to protecting its farmers and national security interests.

Lydia Tang Williams, a congressional candidate in New Hampshire, is calling for a review of a land purchase in Nashua, New Hampshire, by Zhong Shang San, China's richest man, and his company, Nongfu Springs. Williams states the purchase, which includes a building and 23 acres, is within 93 miles of Joint Base Cape Cod and other strategic military installations, thus triggering the need for investigation. Williams is calling on the Treasury Department Secretary Bassett to review the project. Williams also claims that Sailor Stack Industrial has Vanguard and BlackRock as its biggest shareholders, and that they are also shareholders of Nongfu Springs, which she says warrants further investigation.

Syngenta, a Chinese state-owned agri-chemical company, must relinquish its 160 acres in Northeast Arkansas, primarily used for seed research. The parent company, Kim China, is listed by the Department of Defense as a Chinese military company, posing a significant threat to our state and agricultural technology. These corporations are known to funnel American research back to China, potentially compromising national security and endangering American farms. This situation represents a clear risk to both our farmers and our nation's safety.

Goshen, a CCP-affiliated company, plans to build an electric vehicle battery factory in Speaker 0's district. The company has received a large sum of money from federal, state, and local taxes. Goshen intends to bring Chinese nationals to Michigan, raising concerns about potential espionage. Speaker 1 explains that the issue stems from the blurred line between the Chinese government and its private sector. The Chinese government's authority and access could be used to undermine national security.

South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem discusses the need to ban China from owning US land due to their increasing control over American agriculture. She highlights the vulnerability of the US supply chain, as China controls 80% of prescription drug ingredients. Governor Noem also mentions China's use of state-run propaganda during the COVID-19 pandemic, threatening to withhold prescription drugs from the US. She supports a bill to prevent the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and other adversaries from owning US farmland, citing their aggressive tactics to acquire land near strategic air force bases and national defense resources. The goal, she argues, is to eliminate the United States and establish China as the dominant global power.

Secretary Mayorkas has put national security at risk, allowing terrorists and enemies to flood across the border. There's been a surge in Chinese nationals, many military-age men with ties to the PLA and CCP, released into the U.S. by Secretary Mayorkas. It's likely China is using Russia's template of sending military personnel into the U.S. There are 10,000 Chinese nationals illegally crossing into the U.S. being released into the country this fiscal year. Today's hearing will investigate the details and effects of Mayorkas' dereliction of duty. The speaker hopes the American people, the press, and the President will take note of these failures.

Recent reports indicate a rise in drone activity near 17 U.S. military bases close to Chinese-owned farmland. These sightings have been observed near bases in Hawaii, as well as installations in Utah, California, Maine, and Florida.

A bill was filed to deny student visas to Chinese students due to a new Chinese law requiring all nationals, including students abroad, to gather intelligence and report back. The speaker questions why a law preventing student visas wouldn't be passed, citing past instances of Chinese students gathering information on military bases and college campuses. The speaker emphasizes the responsibility of lawmakers and policymakers to address this issue.

Earlier this year, a Chinese company bought a piece of land in Nashua. Local experts and officials are worried that there might be national security concerns here. Nongfu Springs is China's biggest water packaging supplier. They're owned by a man named Zhong Shang Shang, and according to Forbes, he's China's wealthiest man. The mystery is why this company bought the property for $67,000,000 when it was assessed at being worth $15,000,000. Congresswoman Maggie Goodlander told us that she is pretty concerned about this too, especially because it's within 100 miles, the property that is, of important military bases like Joint Base Cape Cod and the new Boston Space Station. So she's asking the Treasury Department to retroactively look into the sale of this property.

The speaker points out the Chinese government's funding of farmland near strategic US military bases, like Dougway proving ground and Whiteman Air Force Base. They express concern over allowing foreign ownership of land near military facilities.

Communist China is America's biggest threat. As the first governor to take action, I kicked a Chinese state-owned company off our farmland and received a $280,000 check for violating laws. My administration recommended two other CCP-linked companies for investigation. One of them operates crypto mines in the state. Loyalties matter more than where you're from. We can't trust those who pledge allegiance to a hostile foreign power.

In this video, the speakers discuss the concerns surrounding CCP-linked companies building battery factories in Michigan and other states. These companies receive large amounts of money from taxpayers, which is tied back to Beijing and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The speakers highlight the potential for espionage and spying in these operations. They emphasize the need to stop funding CCP-linked businesses and prevent their acquisitions. The speakers also mention the CCP's military expansion and espionage purposes, including the utilization of political projects and business acquisitions to establish overseas military bases. They urge law enforcement to be vigilant in identifying potential threats from CCP agents, who can have different identities and backgrounds.