reSee.it - Related Video Feed

People who believe in Western medicine often think that those in natural health haven't seen the data. However, the data they refer to comes from institutions that took over the medical model and removed natural health from the curriculum. I don't base my beliefs solely on their data. Instead, I consider the 5000 years of natural health modalities used worldwide. The US represents less than 5% of these modalities but consumes 41% of the world's pharmaceutical drugs. So, we don't look at the same data. I have trust issues with the sources of their information.

Drug companies won't test natural substances because they can't be patented. FDA requires testing for safety and efficacy, but natural products won't be tested due to lack of patentability. This creates a cycle where natural remedies are deemed unproven by the FDA.

The FDA is no longer allowed to refer to a horse paste due to social media messages. The FDA clarified that they do not give personalized medical advice, but oversee clinical trials and regulate pharmaceutical companies. While not recommended for COVID treatment, excessive doses can be dangerous. Remember to use it responsibly.

Fenbendazole is an overlooked cancer drug with at least 12 proven anti-cancer mechanisms. It disrupts microtubule polymerization, induces cell cycle arrest, blocks glucose transport, increases tumor suppressor levels, inhibits cancer cell viability, migration, and invasion, induces apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis, and inhibits angiogenesis and drug resistance. Mebendazole, a similar drug, is already approved by the FDA and in clinical trials for brain and colon cancers. However, there are no Fenbendazole clinical trials for cancer, likely because it is cheap, safe, and effective. Big pharma may not see a profit margin in it, which raises concerns about their motives. This highlights the issue of a society designed to make people sick, with pharmaceutical companies profiting from remedies.

Medical schools allegedly don't teach nutrition because they are incentivized to prescribe drugs. The drug lobby ensures this by subsidizing medical school professors. Professors, therefore, promote drugs instead of alternatives like vitamin C. Over a century ago, foundations like Carnegie and Rockefeller allegedly engineered the curriculum through grants and donations.

Drug companies are not interested in natural substances that cannot be patented. The FDA requires substances to be tested for safety and effectiveness before they can be used legally. However, since natural substances cannot be patented, drug companies are unlikely to spend the money to test them. As a result, the FDA will always consider natural substances unproven and condemn them.

Speaker 0: Under the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, a drug is defined as anything that is intended for use in the cure, treatment, prevention, or mitigation of disease. The example given is prune juice: if you drink prune juice for chronic constipation, the FDA regards prune juice as a drug. The assertion is that the FDA defines it as a drug to protect drug companies from competition. Speaker 1: The implication is that if a natural remedy, plant, herb, or even a food improves an abnormal state of the body, it is now classified as a drug. For instance, if someone claims that garlic can actually help your cholesterol and reduce the risk of a heart attack, and they are selling garlic, they would be subject to regulations. By using a disease claim, garlic is no longer just something used to season food; it is considered a drug.

The FDA only approves emergency use authorization if there are no other alternatives. Ivermectin's effectiveness could have impacted vaccine approval. Powerful interests oppose Ivermectin due to financial reasons. Drug companies profit greatly from vaccines. Ivermectin is cheap and widely available. Merck's stance on Ivermectin changed after its patent expired. Paid articles may not always provide accurate information.

There are 250,000 drugs in the PDR, but none are designed to cure anything except maybe antibiotics for strep throat. Pharmaceutical companies focus on making money from insurance policies rather than creating cures. Laws do not require them to produce drugs that cure, despite their ability to do so.

Today, we'll discuss the war on natural remedies. The AMA formed the Committee on Quackery in 1963, leading federal agents to arrest those selling vitamins and supplements. Independent health practitioners faced persecution by the AMA, American Cancer Society, and Arthritis Foundation. People were jailed for herbal formulas, while harmful drugs were freely distributed. The Rockefeller Medical Monopoly funded these aggressive actions, targeting elderly women for selling herbal teas.

Anything from nature cannot be patented, so drug companies won't spend millions testing natural substances for FDA approval. The FDA requires efficacy and safety testing, but since natural substances can't be patented, no company will invest in the testing. Therefore, according to the speaker, the FDA will always condemn anything from nature as unproven, regardless of its potential effectiveness.

Genetically modified food is not labeled in the US due to FDA regulations, as it's considered equivalent to unmodified food. Consumers are kept in the dark about GMO ingredients to prevent confusion. The FDA relies on safety assessments from the patent-holding companies like Monsanto, Pfizer, or Syngenta, without conducting independent studies. FDA scientists have expressed concerns about this practice, urging against allowing GMO foods on the market due to unknown consequences.

DMSO was touted as a miracle drug for various ailments, but the FDA hasn't approved it for general use due to a lack of proof of effectiveness. Oregon and Florida legalized it for prescription, leading to a nationwide black market. Dr. Stanley Jacob champions DMSO, citing its potential to relieve pain, reduce inflammation, improve blood supply, and stimulate healing. Patients travel to Dr. Jacob for treatment, including intravenous administration for paralysis. Athletes like June Jones use it topically for pain relief. Emily Rudick uses it for arthritis and fever blisters. The FDA acknowledges DMSO's relative safety, noting side effects like skin rash and garlic odor. The FDA's Dr. Richard Kraut says DMSO hasn't been scientifically proven effective for most claims, lacking controlled, double-blind tests. Dr. Jacob disagrees, citing his research and experience. Sandy Sherrick, suffering from severe whiplash, found relief with Dr. Jacob's DMSO treatment after other methods failed. The lack of drug company interest is attributed to DMSO being an unpatentable, inexpensive solvent. The FDA maintains that testimonials don't replace scientific evidence. DMSO is available in other countries, and a House committee is investigating its restricted availability in the US.

**Italiano:** Un'indagine biennale condotta da giornaliste mediche rivela che la FDA statunitense ha approvato centinaia di farmaci senza prove di efficacia, e talvolta nonostante prove di dannosità. Su oltre 400 approvazioni tra il 2013 e il 2022, il 73% non soddisfaceva i criteri fondamentali per l'efficacia, come gruppi di controllo e studi replicati. La FDA ha spesso optato per percorsi accelerati, ma molti studi di follow-up non vengono completati o non dimostrano l'efficacia. Più della metà delle approvazioni si basava su dati preliminari. In oncologia, solo 3 farmaci su 123 hanno soddisfatto tutti gli standard. Esempi includono Kopictra, che ha ridotto la sopravvivenza, e Elmiron, ancora in commercio nonostante la mancanza di efficacia e gravi effetti collaterali. Tra il 2018 e il 2021, sono stati spesi miliardi per farmaci con studi di follow-up incompleti. Si stima che 128.000 americani muoiano ogni anno a causa di farmaci prescritti correttamente. Molti medici non comprendono il processo di approvazione della FDA. Si evidenzia la dipendenza dell'agenzia dai finanziamenti dell'industria farmaceutica. **English Translation:** A two-year investigation by medical journalists reveals that the U.S. FDA has approved hundreds of drugs without proof of efficacy, and sometimes despite evidence of harm. Of over 400 approvals between 2013 and 2022, 73% did not meet fundamental efficacy criteria, such as control groups and replicated studies. The FDA has often opted for accelerated pathways, but many follow-up studies are not completed or do not demonstrate efficacy. More than half of approvals were based on preliminary data. In oncology, only 3 out of 123 drugs met all standards. Examples include Kopictra, which reduced survival, and Elmiron, still on the market despite lack of efficacy and serious side effects. Between 2018 and 2021, billions were spent on drugs with incomplete follow-up studies. An estimated 128,000 Americans die each year from correctly prescribed drugs. Many doctors do not understand the FDA approval process. The agency's dependence on pharmaceutical industry funding is highlighted.

Animal testing is purportedly needed to see how humans interact with drugs, find cures for diseases, and identify pharmaceutical side effects. However, some argue that animal and human bodies are too different to justify these experiments. It is claimed that the idea that we need to "poison puppies" to get cures for humans is fear mongering. Data from the NIH, Defense Department, and FDA allegedly shows that 90-99% of drugs fail in humans after being safe and effective in animal tests because animal tests don't accurately predict human reactions. Pharmaceutical companies supposedly lament being forced by the FDA and EPA to experiment on animals, as it doesn't provide useful data. RFK Jr. stated that the FDA is working to reduce animal testing because AI and other modern technologies are more accurate at predicting human reactions. The speaker asserts that animal testing continues due to bureaucracy, institutional inertia, and because it's a profitable business.

The FDA's website advises against using ivermectin for COVID-19, yet links to clinical trials, half of which indicate it may be effective. For three years, the FDA has warned against ivermectin while referencing studies that support its use. Additionally, there is increasing research suggesting ivermectin could be a vital treatment for COVID-19. The strong opposition from the federal government appears to be linked to the desire to maintain emergency use authorization for COVID vaccines. For more insights, consider subscribing for additional videos.

Speaker 0: I have three friends. All three of them had stage four cancer. All three of them don't have cancer right now at all. And they had some serious stuff going on. And what did they take? Yep. Jesus. They took some what you've heard they've taken. Speaker 1: Ivermectin. Fenbendazole. Fenbendazole. Yeah. Speaker 0: That's it. Speaker 1: Yeah. I'm hearing that a lot. Speaker 0: They drank hydrochloride something or other? There's studies on Speaker 1: that now where people have proven that they've Speaker 0: drinking methylene blue and stuff Speaker 1: like that. Yeah. Methylene blue, which was a fabric dye. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. It was a textile dye, and now they find it has profound effects on your mitochondria. Yep. Yeah. Speaker 0: This stuff works, man. There's a lot of stuff that does work, which is very strange Speaker 1: Mhmm. Because, again, it's profit. When you when you hear about things that are demonized and that that turn out to be effective, you always wonder, well, what is going on here? Mhmm. How is how is our medical institutions how have they failed us so that things that do cure you are not promoted because they're not profitable?

Animal testing is purportedly needed to see how humans interact with drugs and to find cures for diseases. However, the similarities between animal and human bodies are vastly different, so there may not be scientific justification for these experiments. It is argued that it is fear mongering to suggest that animal torture is needed for human cures. Data from the NIH, Defense Department, and FDA show that 90-99% of drugs fail in humans after being safe and effective in animal tests because animal tests don't accurately predict human reactions. Pharmaceutical companies lament being forced to experiment on animals because it doesn't provide useful data. RFK mentioned an FDA initiative to reduce animal testing, finding that AI and other modern technologies are more accurate at predicting human reactions. Mice and rats are not similar enough to humans to provide relevant data. Animal testing continues due to bureaucracy, institutional inertia, and because it's a profitable industry.

The main issue with vitamin C is that it cannot be patented, which means there's no financial incentive for companies to invest in it. Without a patent, there’s no profit, and without profit, there’s little motivation to pursue its potential benefits. Ideally, saving lives should be the primary incentive, but unfortunately, that’s not how the healthcare system operates.

A few years ago, the New York Attorney General discovered that 79% of supplements from Target, GNC, Walmart, and Walgreens did not contain the ingredients they claimed to have. Some even contained sawdust instead. Only 4% of Walmart products tested had DNA from the listed plants. To ensure you're getting quality supplements, it's important to buy from companies that conduct third-party testing and have high-quality facilities. The speaker, who has experience in pharmaceutical sales, recommends trusting certain brands that do their own due diligence.

Medical doctors are trained in allopathic reductionism, which focuses solely on drugs and surgery. While these interventions have their place, MDs receive training limited to this area. The pharmaceutical industry influences medical education and research in the United States, prioritizing pharmaceutical research over other areas like homeopathic or botanical medicines, acupuncture, or medical nutrition. The focus is on developing new drugs or gene splices. Just as one wouldn't seek advice from a Republican about social programs or a Democrat about military funding, medical doctors are not trained in medical science, but rather in allopathic reductionism, which exclusively values drugs and surgery.

Like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin are no are out of patents. So because they're out of patents, you cannot make any money on these drugs. The most you could sell them for is, $300 Pharmaceutical companies are no longer interested in $300 drugs. They're interested in orphan drugs where they can get name your price for a drug. We're going to put it under an orphan and now we can bill whatever we want. From like $300 to $10,000 a month. Then all these companies started copying and doing biologic at $10,000 a month. But there is a movement that is controlling the research and stopping innovations, that is stopping out of patent drugs, drugs that are basically like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. So I think that's the number one thing and the attacks on that.

The FDA issues emergency use authorization for medical products when there are no approved alternatives. The effectiveness of Ivermectin as a treatment is questioned, as it would have affected the authorization of vaccines. Powerful forces with financial interests oppose Ivermectin, as it threatens global vaccination policies. Pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer, BioNTech, and Moderna have made significant profits from COVID-19 vaccines. Ivermectin is a cheap and widely available drug, but its safety is disputed by Merck, despite distributing it when it was under patent. It is important to be cautious of articles that may be biased or paid for.

Fenbendazole, a potential cancer drug, has at least 12 proven anti-cancer mechanisms. It disrupts microtubule polymerization, induces cell cycle arrest, blocks glucose transport, increases tumor suppressor levels, inhibits cancer cell viability and migration, induces apoptosis and autophagy, inhibits angiogenesis and drug resistance, and sensitizes cells to chemo and radiation therapy. Mebendazole, a similar drug, is already in clinical trials for brain and colon cancers. However, there are no clinical trials for Fenbendazole, possibly because it is cheap, safe, and effective. Big pharma may not see a profit in it. This raises concerns about withholding information and preventing people from using potentially beneficial treatments. The current society seems to promote sickness, allowing big pharma to profit from remedies.

Americans are programmed to trust only FDA-approved drugs, but Big Pharma buys the FDA's approval. The FDA stopped independently reviewing all drugs about 30 years ago. Drugmakers can pay a lump sum upfront, such as $10,000,000, to get immediate approval to sell their products. The approval is granted if the drugmaker believes and can prove through their own research studies that the drug is safe and effective.