reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Trump is clearly leading in the polls, and if he doesn't win, something has gone wrong. The past four years haven't been great, and things seem to be getting worse. However, I believe that God is in control and has a plan, even if we can't predict what will happen next.

China will face a crisis that will spread globally, leading to a third world war with nuclear exchanges. There are preparations for a major geophysical event every 11,500 years, possibly linked to Atlantis. Information on this is rumored to be in the Vatican library, not public knowledge.

We may be sleepwalking into World War 3 due to a series of foolish decisions. It's important for people to reflect on their predictions and consider their track record. In the investing and VC world, track...

I believe that before the 2024 election, there will be a collapse in Washington due to our fragile economic and financial condition. It's possible that banks may close for a few weeks, causing disruption. Additionally, the high levels of violence and crime in our cities will start to affect people who thought they were immune to these issues. The situation in Ukraine will also contribute to the collapse, as people will realize that the information they were given was misleading. All of these factors will prevent us from maintaining the status quo and focusing on another election.

We are living in the end times.

Alex Kraner and Glenn discuss the geopolitical and economic fallout from Iran’s weekend strikes and the broader shifts in global risk, energy, and power blocs. - Oil and energy impact: Iran’s strikes targeted energy infrastructure, including Ras Tanura in Saudi Arabia, and crude prices jumped about 10% with Friday’s close around $73.50 and current levels near $80 per barrel. Prices could push higher if Hormuz traffic is disrupted or closed, given that one in five barrels of crude exports pass through the Hormuz gates. The potential for further oil disruptions is acknowledged, with the possibility of triple-digit or higher prices depending on how the conflict evolves. - Market dynamics and energy dependence: The guest notes a hockey-stick pattern in uptrends across markets when driven by large asset holders waking up to energy exposure, referencing shadow banking as a driver of rapid moves. He points to vast assets under management (approximately $220 trillion) among pension funds, hedge funds, endowments, and insurers that could push energy markets higher if they reallocate toward oil futures and energy-related assets. He emphasizes that energy is essential for broad economic activity, and a curtailed oil economy would slow economies globally. - European vulnerabilities: Europe faces a fragile energy security position, already dealing with an energy crisis and decreased reliance on Russian hydrocarbons. Disruptions to LNG supplies from Qatar or other sources could further threaten Europe, complicating efforts by Ursula von der Leyen and Christine Lagarde to manage inflation and debt. The panel highlights potential increased debt concerns in Europe, with Lagarde signaling uncertainty and the possibility of higher interest rates, and warns of a possible future resembling Weimar-era debt dynamics or systemic stress in European bonds. - Global geopolitics and blocs: The discussion suggests a risk of the world fracturing into two blocs, with BRICS controlling more diverse energy supplies and the West potentially losing its energy dominance. The US pivot to Asia could be undone as the United States becomes more entangled in Middle East conflicts. The guests anticipate renewed US engagement with traditional alliances (France, Britain, Germany) and a possible retraction from attempts to pursue multipolar integration with Russia and China. The possibility of a broader two-block, cold-war-like order is raised, with energy as a central question. - Iran and US diplomacy optics: The negotiations reportedly had Iran willing to concede to American proposals when the leadership was assassinated, prompting questions about US policy and timing. The attack is described as damaging to public opinion and diplomacy, with potential impeachment momentum for Trump discussed in light of his handling of the Iran situation. The geopolitical optics are characterized as highly damaging to US credibility and to the prospects of reaching future deals with Iran and other actors. - Middle East dynamics and US security commitments: The strikes impact the US-Israel relationship and the US-Gulf states’ security posture. Pentagon statements reportedly indicated no signs that Iran planned to attack the US first, raising questions about the strategic calculus of the strikes and the broader risk to regional stability. The conversation notes persistent supply chain and defense material challenges—including concerns about weapon stockpiles and the sustainability of military deployments in the region. - Long-range grim projections: The discussion concludes with caution about the potential long arc of decline for Western economic and political influence if current trajectories persist, contrasted with the rise of Eastern blocs. There is warning about a possible long-term, multi-decade period of geopolitical and economic restructuring, with energy security and debt dynamics at the core of those shifts. - Closing reflections: The speakers acknowledge the unpredictability of markets and geopolitics, refraining from definitive forecasts but underscoring how energy, debt, and alliance realignments will likely shape the coming period.

The Evergrande crisis in China is predicted to cause a chain reaction, leading to the collapse of domestic and international stock markets, financial institutions, and the entire financial system. The speaker suggests that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) may resort to destructive measures, such as imprisoning people in their homes or causing harm. Additionally, they warn of a potential global virus outbreak. It is advised to be cautious and prepared.

We are at a decision-making point and very close to a recession, but something worse than a recession is possible if things aren't handled well. The monetary order is breaking down because we cannot spend the amounts of money we are spending. This issue is connected to the dollar and tariffs. Profound changes are occurring in our domestic order and the world order. These times are very much like the 1930s.

Speaker 0 speculates on the possibility of not having a 2024 election due to unforeseen events, referred to as black swans. He acknowledges that he doesn't know how this would happen, but suggests that such an event could occur.

I don't believe Donald Trump will be president again. If Putin is betting on that, he will be in for a surprise. That's my first point.

I am worried that 2024 could bring a black swan event, a national security threat that is hard to predict. The ongoing conflicts in Israel and Ukraine, along with our divided country, make us vulnerable to adversaries like North Korea, China, and Iran.

Speaker 0 believes things will be difficult in a few years due to climate and geopolitical issues. Speaker 1 agrees, stating the problem is gigantic and coming from many angles, and there's little we can do because nobody listens. Speaker 1 suggests preparing oneself and loved ones for bad times ahead, given we may have more information than the average person. Speaker 2 mentions rumors of significant UAP-related events within 10 years, possibly a natural disaster, and asks if Speaker 3 has heard of these claims. Speaker 3 confirms awareness but cannot discuss them. Speaker 3 emphasizes the urgency of having a collective conversation, stating that time is not a luxury.

I am concerned about a potential black swan event in 2024 due to national security threats and global tensions, especially in Israel and Ukraine. The division in our country could make us vulnerable to adversaries like North Korea, China, and Iran.

The next crisis is looming, ready to strike at any moment.

I believe we're about to enter a time warp over the next five years, driven by five major forces, especially the rapid advancements in artificial intelligence and related technologies. The world five years from now will be radically different. The emergence of quantum computing and its implications raise profound questions about the future. While it's hard to fully grasp what that world will look like, it's clear that significant changes are on the horizon.

Speaker 0 believes things will be difficult in a few years due to climate and geopolitical issues. Speaker 1 agrees, stating the problem is gigantic and coming from many angles, possibly unavoidable because nobody listens. He questions how to prepare oneself and loved ones for coming bad times, suggesting having more information than the average person might offer some comfort. Speaker 2 mentions rumors of significant UAP-related events within 10 years, possibly a natural disaster or something else big. Speaker 3 confirms awareness of these rumors but cannot discuss them. He stresses the urgency of having a collective conversation about these issues, stating that time is of the essence.

I think the market sell off is just being driven by globalists. They see how rich our country is going to be, and they don't like it. They've been ripping off this country for years, but now everyone's gonna do great. We can't let this continue to happen to America, otherwise, we're not gonna have a country any longer.

They're coming. Something bad is going to happen. Evil is behind it all. It seems like an effort to destroy certain countries. More extremists and terrorists will emerge. People are questioning the future of Germany and France.

I'm not sure if AI will lead to totalitarian social controls or just anarchy. What I do know is that we're about to enter a time warp over the next five years. This shift is due to major forces at play, especially the rapid advancements in artificial intelligence and related technologies. The world five years from now will be radically different from what we know today.

It's certain that a terror attack will occur. The current level of immigration into our country is unprecedented, and I hope I'm wrong about the potential consequences.

Here's what's coming: Banks will announce a security action on a Friday, forcing their computers offline all weekend, and digital money will vanish. Following that, strategic electromagnetic pulse bombs will detonate, knocking out major grids. This will appear as an attack on America by terrorists or Russia, or even a simulated alien invasion using existing alien replica vehicles. I know it sounds crazy, but the Russians tried this in '47. Some people think saying these things is fear mongering and irresponsible, techno paranoia, bogus, dangerous, and stupid. But I believe it's irresponsible not to say it, especially if it's the truth.

I am concerned that 2024 may bring a black swan event, a hard-to-predict national security crisis with significant impact. The ongoing conflicts in Israel and Ukraine, along with our deep divisions as a nation, create fertile ground for our adversaries like North Korea, China, and Iran.

The speaker believes a coming international war panic cycle in 2026 is unstoppable. Even Trump's demands for lower rates are meaningless long-term, and thirty-year bonds must close above $12.84 to survive the year. Historically, war causes interest rates to rise due to increased spending and the risk of bond devaluation if a country loses. The computer models are showing long-term interest rates going up, irrespective of Trump's actions regarding the Federal Reserve. The spread between long-term and short-term rates will widen, reflecting war. Tensions are expected to rise starting in July and continuing through the fall. NATO requires war to remain relevant and is provoking conflict. Putin has had red lines crossed and China will back Russia against Europe because if Russia falls, China is next.

Speaker 0 believes things will be difficult in a few years due to climate and geopolitical issues. Speaker 1 agrees, stating the problem is gigantic and coming from many angles, possibly unavoidable because nobody listens. He questions how to prepare oneself and loved ones for bad times ahead, suggesting having more information than the average person might offer some comfort. Speaker 2 mentions rumors of significant UAP-related events within the next 10 years, possibly a natural disaster, and asks if Speaker 3 has heard of these claims. Speaker 3 confirms awareness but cannot discuss them. He emphasizes the urgency of having a collective conversation, stating that time is of the essence.