reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Two studies are described as disturbing. - Carman and colleagues conducted an animal study in which rats were injected with mRNA shots that destroyed 60% of their primordial follicles, the nonrenewable egg supply in women. The treatment also destroyed all other types of eggs, including those that spawn after the primordial version, effectively decimating the ovarian system. - Manichi and colleagues conducted a large human study, analyzing data from 1.3 million women. They compared vaccinated to unvaccinated women, finding that the vaccinated woman had 33% lower successful conception rates compared to the unvaccinated women. Thus, the information presented indicates fertility effects in both animal data and large human data sets. We do know that, yes, these are indeed fertility destroying injections.

Darnell, a genetic male, exhibits female behavior and lays eggs, having been exposed to atrazine throughout his life. This is Darnell's third clutch, and he has been copulating for nearly 24 hours. This situation is remarkable from a scientific perspective, yet it raises concerns. Atrazine is a common contaminant found in ground, surface, and drinking water, and the level that caused this male to develop female traits is three times lower than the permissible limit.

Speaker discusses atrazine, described as the second most used chemical in the country and a pesticide. Claims it is banned in Europe and worldwide, but is used domestically, and is present in 63% of drinking water. Refers to a study by a famous African American scientist named Tyrler/ Tyler Hayes at the University of Berkeley. In the experiment, he put 70 African water frogs in an aquarium and added atrazine to the water at a level below the EPA’s threshold. Results reported: 60 of the frogs became sterile, and all of those were male. Additionally, 10% of the frogs turned female and were able to produce fertile eggs, indicating a sex change. The speaker notes that, given such an animal model result, the next step would typically be to test in a mammalian model and a human model, but those tests were never conducted.

The speaker outlines a series of alarming claims regarding mRNA vaccination and female fertility. They state that in a study involving rats, mRNA-vaccinated subjects exhibited a 60% reduction in primordial (premortial) follicles. The speaker emphasizes that primordial follicles represent a finite resource with no regenerative capacity, noting that women are born with a limited number of these follicles. The implication drawn is that the mRNA shots can reach the ovaries and instruct the ovarian tissue to produce toxic spike protein. According to the speaker, the body's response to this production is to attack the spike protein, leading to tissue damage and destruction of eggs. The destruction of eggs is presented as irreversible, given that primordial follicles do not regenerate, which the speaker asserts has direct consequences for fertility. Further, the speaker cites human data indicating a 33% lower birth rate among vaccinated women, linking this observation to the ovarian damage described in the animal model. They combine these points to argue that a pattern of reduced reproductive capacity is occurring and that this pattern is supported by both the animal study and the human data referenced. The speaker portrays these findings as extraordinarily worrisome and asserts that regulators have failed to address the issue. They argue that regulatory inaction is contributing to what they describe as an ongoing decline in humanity’s fertility. The overarching message is a call for regulatory attention and intervention in response to what they characterize as significant risks to fertility associated with mRNA vaccination. In summary, the speaker claims: - Rats given mRNA vaccines showed a 60% reduction in primordial follicles. - Women are born with a finite, non-regenerating pool of these follicles. - mRNA vaccines purportedly reach the ovaries and cause production of toxic spike protein, provoking an immune attack that damages ovarian tissue and eggs. - This damage allegedly leads to a 33% lower birth rate in vaccinated women, as suggested by cited human data. - The combination of these factors is described as highly concerning and in need of regulatory action, warned against as contributing to a potential future decline in human fertility.

Testosterone doesn't make you aggressive. Here's what it actually does. Take five male rhesus monkeys, put them in a group, let them form a dominance hierarchy. A defeats B three times. B never defeats A. What happens instead is C becomes a total nightmare to D and E. Testosterone exaggerates preexisting social patterns of aggression. What testosterone really does is when your status is being challenged, testosterone makes you do whatever you need to do to maintain status. You can have an economic game where people get status by making generous offers and give people testosterone, and they become more generous in the game. The trouble isn't that testosterone makes us aggressive. The trouble is that we reward aggression with status so readily. If you shot up a whole bunch of Buddhist monks with testosterone, they would run amok doing random acts of kindness all over the place.

Speaker 0 describes an experiment in which young white rats were placed directly in front of a TV set for the same time periods as bean plants and children exhibiting tired child syndrome symptoms. Using semi time lapse photography, partially speeding up the action, the results show that the young rats on the left, protected only with black photographic paper, became aggressive and more difficult to manage. In contrast, those on the right, protected with a lead shield, remained perfectly normal and docile. Autopsies were performed on all of these animals, revealing brain tissue damage in the rats protected only with the black paper, but not in those protected with the lead shielding.

Taxpayer dollars fund transgender animal testing, involving surgically altering mice, rats, and monkeys with hormone therapies to mimic gender transitions. Research explores the effects of these transitions on their biology, psychology, and physiology, including vaccine responses and effects of substances like testosterone and estrogen. One grant, for example, involved giving female rats testosterone and then a party drug to study overdose likelihood. Accessing information on this funding is extremely difficult. Dr. Fauci funded approximately 95% of these experiments. The Trump administration planned to reduce EPA animal testing by 30% by 2025 and eliminate it entirely by 2035, a move that would save taxpayer money because animal testing is time-consuming, expensive, and inaccurate in predicting human health effects. The Biden administration reversed this plan.

The speaker discusses the Tyrone Maze Rat Experiment, which took place in 1940. The experiment involved dividing rats into two groups: one in a good environment and the other in a bad environment. The rats in the good environment thrived, while those in the bad environment struggled and exhibited negative behaviors. The speaker draws parallels between the rat experiment and the challenges faced by marginalized communities, suggesting that external factors play a significant role in shaping behavior. They argue that these communities are being psychologically experimented on and express a motivation to break the cycle and bring about positive change.

Speaker 0: The study aimed to investigate the effects of the Pfizer BioNTech mRNA vaccine on human granulosa cells and their influence on menstrual patterns. The researchers conducted an in vitro study using human granulosa cells extracted and exposed to the Pfizer vaccine. They found that the vaccine did not have a toxic effect on cell vitality, but it did affect the activity of those cells by altering the mRNA transcripts. In their observations, the granulosa cells produced hormones, including inhibin B and AMH, and the study reported that inhibin B was significantly upregulated—more than 200% increase. Inhibin B is notable for inhibiting the secretion of FSH (follicle-stimulating hormone), which plays a crucial role in stimulating the growth and maturation of ovarian follicles containing the eggs in women. Thus, the finding indicates that inhibin B inhibits FSH. Speaker 1: The reaction emphasizes how shocking this finding is, highlighting the role of FSH in egg release and pregnancy, noting that without FSH, the process leading to ovulation and potential pregnancy is impacted. The speaker reiterates the importance of FSH in the development and release of eggs, underscoring the potential implications of the observed upregulation of inhibin B. Speaker 0: The discussion reiterates that the observed effect was on the activity of granulosa cells rather than their vitality, with a focus on the upregulation of inhibin B and its downstream effect of reducing FSH secretion. The exchange underscores the potential relevance to reproductive physiology by connecting inhibin B’s increase to its function in suppressing FSH, which is essential for follicular growth and egg maturation. The speakers emphasize the implications for fertility processes through the documented in vitro changes in granulosa cell hormone regulation.

The speaker discusses a line of research comparing fat mice and skinny mice and how their own experiments align with those findings. They mention studies of the fat-versus-skinny mouse dynamic and describe an experiment they conducted in which skinny mice were given soy. As a result, the skinny mice began to gain weight, and a change in their microbiome was observed, shifting from a composition associated with skinny mice to one more characteristic of fat mice. The speaker then references broader studies that have examined the effect of transferring gut microbiota between mice. Specifically, they note that there have been studies showing that transplanting stool from a skinny mouse to a fat mouse leads the fat mouse to become skinny, and conversely, transferring stool from a fat mouse to a skinny mouse can cause the skinny mouse to become fat. This describes a bidirectional transfer of weight-related phenotypes through microbiome transplantation. A caveat is added regarding adult mice: while these stool-transplant studies have shown such effects, they have not yet been reproduced in adults. In other words, the phenomenon has not been consistently demonstrated in adult mice within the cited research, implying potential limitations or conditions required for replication in adult subjects. Overall, the speaker links dietary input (soy) to weight change and microbiome alterations in mice, and connects this to microbiome transplantation studies that suggest a causal role for gut microbes in determining weight phenotypes, while acknowledging that the adult replication of these effects remains unestablished.

The discussion centers on ivermectin and various claims about its origins, promotion, and effects. One speaker asserts that ivermectin is made by big pharma, specifically naming Merck and vaccine companies, and that people are using it because influencers told the public to take pharmaceutical pills after the pandemic, while not disclosing that cell phone towers are in front of their houses. The speaker claims that people took ivermectin instead, and states that ivermectin is linked to liver toxicity, jaundice, brain damage, and infertility, suggesting these risks are part of a broader strategy to reduce fertility in the population. The other speaker counters by describing ivermectin as having productive toxicity, noting this is observed in animal studies, including rabbits and other mammals, and rejecting the idea that its toxicity is limited to arthropods like crabs or cockroaches. This speaker claims it is a well-proven reproductive toxic substance for many mammals. They reference another video discussing the neurotoxic effect of ivermectin and mention that veterinarians discuss routine use and continued use of ivermectin, associating it with various adverse outcomes.

Speaker 1 described findings from a study of Navy SEALs. They reported that SEALs, on average, exhibited a stress-enhancing mindset. This was observed as a notable characteristic among individuals who were on the path to becoming SEALs, given the demanding nature of the field. The researchers measured this mindset at the outset of SEALs’ basic training, specifically during BUDS training, and then tracked how well these individuals progressed through the program, which is known for its extreme rigor. The core result was that the measure of a stress-enhancing mindset predicted the rate of progression through the program. In other words, SEAL candidates who, within the observed range, possessed a higher tendency toward viewing stress as a potential source of strength were more likely to complete the training successfully and eventually become SEALs. Additionally, the researchers found that those with a more stress-enhancing mindset showed faster performance on obstacle course times, indicating quicker or more efficient physical task execution during testing. They were also rated more positively by their peers, suggesting a higher level of peer-perceived performance or character during the training period. In summary, the study indicates that among SEAL candidates, a stress-enhancing mindset at the beginning of basic training was associated with higher completion rates, faster obstacle course performance, and more favorable peer evaluations as they progressed through the rigorous BUDS program.

We need to consider messaging about farm cats as pets. On a positive note, mink farms in BC were shut down, while Ontario still has them. A lawsuit against us was recently dismissed.

This transcript recounts a premise called “the mouse paradise,” a scientific experiment from the nineteen sixties. It describes placing four females and four males and letting them multiply. The population exploded—“Hundreds and thousands.” Then “something strange happened. They stopped mating. And within four years, they were extinct.” The stated reason was “social interaction overload.” The mice faced “twenty four seven interaction with thousands of others,” leading to “too much stimulation, too much competition for social status.” As a result, many males became so called “the beautiful ones,” losing interest in females and groomed themselves all day, withdrawing completely. The females, in turn, followed by losing interest in males. The outcome: “no mating and they all just died without having babies.” The narration draws a parallel to humans, asserting that “since twenty ten smartphones, humans are living the same social interaction overload.” It describes “twenty four seven status competition, income and lifestyle comparison with thousands of others,” and “physical looks to impossible standards.” It contends that many young people “just choose to withdraw.” It claims, “For the first time in history, young people are having less sex than their parents.” The data point given is that “Thirty percent of men 30 had no sex for a year.” The speaker labels this trend as a “loneliness epidemic” that “hits us harder than any virus could.” The closing lines emphasize a contrast between the mice and humans: “The mice couldn't turn this off.” Yet the speaker asserts personal agency for the listener: “But you, you can.”

The speaker investigated a commercially available microbe, typically given to infants in small doses. To increase the dosage, they created a yogurt-like substance to amplify the bacterial counts a thousandfold. The speaker observed effects in the mice they studied. Surprisingly, the speaker claims that every observation seen in mice has also been observed in humans.

Experiments by behavioral researcher John B. Calhoun at the National Institute of Mental Health began in 1947 with the Rockville Rat Colony Experiment, in which a quarter-acre outdoor enclosure housed wild Norway rats. Predators were excluded and rats had access to fresh air and sunlight, with enough food, water, and nesting material for a population of 5,000. Until the experiment ended in 1951, the colony maintained a population of around 200, with rats behaving as natural healthy rats and maintaining violent equilibrium similar to the wild. From 1958 to 1962, Calhoun ran the Rat “Universe” experiments indoors in smaller enclosures and coined the term “behavioral sink” for overcrowding, describing outcomes such as social withdrawal, changes in sexuality, and increased aggression. From 1968 to 1972, Calhoun ran “Universe 25” experiments for mice. A nine-by-nine-foot metal enclosure held about 3,800 mice with unlimited food, water, and nesting supplies, climate control, and no predators or disease. Universe 25 started on 07/09/1968 with four breeding pairs. In the first year, the mice thrived: the population doubled about every two months, peaking on day 560, then declined over the next two years. During the two-year decline, behavioral changes occurred. Initially dominant alpha males became passive and stopped defending their territory. Other males became hyper-aggressive and attacked without provocation. Many males became “the beautiful ones,” who spent their time alone, avoided social and sexual behavior, obsessed over grooming, and appeared physically healthy. Males lost interest in sex with females, and females lost interest in being mothers. Aggression expanded toward offspring: mice began killing and eating offspring, and their bodies began miscarrying. Even as population dropped and living space increased, the mice did not recover. Calhoun interpreted the collapse as “spiritual death,” writing that “the first death is that of the spirit” and that diminished spirit led to loss of “complex behaviors compatible with species survival.” He said this would affect humans and that preventing social breakdown in crowded environments would require the establishment to change. Speaker 1 stated that people need better structures to protect from too many contacts while making the contacts that do occur more meaningful, through compassion and helping others fulfill their roles, with many roles involved. The transcript also claims that studies show people living in large cities are less happy and have less meaningful lives than those in small towns, and that living in large crowded cities is unhealthy for humans. It further states that studies in China and the USA show residents in more populated areas spend more money and consume more products because social interactions become comparative and competitive, focusing on having the same things as neighbors rather than meaningful friendships. It also states that “fifteen minute cities” will grow, along with small communities, as many humans reject the establishment and take responsibility for their own lives.