TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

A magnetic wand that controls the brain was tested on the speaker. Psychiatrist Mark George made the speaker's thumb twitch by zapping a specific area of the brain. The speaker also experienced their toe being affected by the wand.

Computer screens emit blue light due to government programs like Operation Paperclip, which involved experiments on monkeys by drilling into their heads. Professor Delgado discovered behavior control wirelessly using RFID chips and semiconductors. The CIA then utilized electromagnetic radiation through screens to influence behavior. This technology is now used by companies like Google and Meta. The idea originated from the mafia in Las Vegas, who used blue-lit slot machines and free alcohol to manipulate people. This led to the CIA's MK Ultra program.

Speaker 0 discusses Dr. Jack Cruz and claims about blue light from screens. They say the impact grew out of CIA and FBI experimentation that began with mind control and electrodes on monkeys' brains, and that they realized they could create the same impact with blue light. They claim that when choosing screen colors, blue was chosen over red because it makes you more lethargic, apathetic, and easier to control. They also mention that red light saunas would have the additional benefit of exposure to red light on the opposite side of the spectrum.

The speaker demonstrates the levels of electromagnetic radiation emitted by various devices. They show that when the microwave is off, there is minimal radiation. However, when it is turned on, the levels increase significantly. They compare the radiation levels from using mobile data and Wi-Fi to being close to a microwave oven. The speaker also measures the radiation levels inside a car and finds that it is consistently high. They mention experiencing a headache after a test drive, attributing it to the constant exposure to radiation from mobile phones.

They argue that centralization—big pharma, the FCC, and other captured agencies—drives a problem that includes tech giants like Motorola, Nokia, Apple, Meta, and Google. They claim that programs government-sponsored at Tulane Neurosurgery and Neurology, known as MK Ultra, taught that people could be controlled through light waves. They describe a progression from cutting monkeys’ heads and wiring their heads to study behavior to the claim that we are controlled by light waves, not just by light in our environment. They point out that blue light is used by Dell, Apple, Meta, Google, and others on screens, and question why efflux or iris isn’t preloaded, suggesting the reason is that blue light lowers dopamine and melatonin, making people addicted. They attribute the discovery of this effect to the mafia rather than the CIA, linking it to the Las Vegas model: a desert city with great light and casinos that used blue light and alcohol to lower patrons’ dopamine so they would spend more money. They claim the CIA then redirected researchers to explore how to control without wires, moving from direct brain wires to semiconductors and LEDs through light. They recount that silicon valley developments with semiconductors produced LEDs, and that the early work included Delgado, a PhD researcher who implanted wires in a bull’s head to stop the animal via remote control, demonstrating a transition to wireless control. They assert that the next step was to eliminate wires and implant microchips in the brain, akin to Neuralink, enabling electrical, photoelectrical, and wireless control. They claim that researchers discovered that light could be used to control mammals, and that Meta and Google codified this through patents for blue light technology used in screens, owning the patents via patent attorneys. They reference Maria Manoulas in Los Angeles and her circle of friends connected to screens, asking whether these tools have been used to influence people and situations around them. They argue digital babysitting is successful for parents because a child becomes easier to control with screens, comparing this to a heroin addict needing a fix, explaining that exposure to electromagnetic pollution reduces beta endorphin (the natural brain opiate) and drives a need for external dopamine from drugs, alcohol, sex, or food. They claim this entire line of research originated in covert work at institutions such as Tulane, Johns Hopkins, Mayo Clinic, and Harvard, then moved into big tech. They explain the transition from old CRT screens to blue-lit modern screens, noting that those who own the patents control the algorithms and centralize medicine for profit. They suggest a cynical view of doctors: their burnout is tied to blue-lit electronic medical records like Epic, Cerner, and Meditech, which require data input rather than patient interaction. They ask who that serves and imply it harms both patients and doctors. They challenge the idea that technology saves money, asserting instead that it increases data collection and profit through big data. They warn that AI will be used to train computers to replace dermatologists, predicting that in twenty years people will visit Walgreens and consult AI-generated, Google-algorithm-created centralized medicine. They name Maria Manoulas and her circle as part of this ecosystem.

The speaker discusses the Tyrone Maze Rat Experiment, which took place in 1940. The experiment involved dividing rats into two groups: one in a good environment and the other in a bad environment. The rats in the good environment thrived, while those in the bad environment struggled and exhibited negative behaviors. The speaker draws parallels between the rat experiment and the challenges faced by marginalized communities, suggesting that external factors play a significant role in shaping behavior. They argue that these communities are being psychologically experimented on and express a motivation to break the cycle and bring about positive change.

This video discusses a patent from 2003 about manipulating the nervous system through electromagnetic fields emitted by computer monitors and TV sets. The patent explains that certain frequencies can excite sensory resonances in human subjects, causing physiological effects. The manipulation can be done remotely without the person being aware of it. The patent includes drawings illustrating the concept. The effects on the individual can vary depending on the frequency used and the area of the skin stimulated.

The speaker explains that they want to keep the meter in the green band. They turn the meter on and note that in their own home, they have control of all wireless and can bounce the reading into the green area. They demonstrate what happens when they open up an earbud case, describing that the reading immediately shifts into the screaming red, which they say is as bad as it gets. They report that at home, their typical baseline is about two to three microwatts. Just by opening the earbud case, the reading jumps to 130,000 microwatts, then 152,000 microwatts, and it continues to climb. The speaker emphasizes that the goal is to be at 10 microwatts or less. They reiterate that it is not 10,000, but 10. Next, they simulate removing the earphones as if they were going to use them, noting that they don’t use them at all. They mention that they “just topped off my meter” by exposing the earbud, and they acknowledge some camera-related awkwardness. They report that with the earbud in the case, the reading was just shy of 200,000 microwatts. However, when they take the single earbud out and bring it up to the meter or “right up to the brain,” the reading reaches 3,180,000 microwatts. They reiterate the target of being under 10 microwatts and contrast it with the readings shown, indicating that a single earbud can produce a reading in the millions of microwatts. They state that this is a concern related to exposure levels. Finally, they remark that now there is a whole generation putting these ear pods up to their brains. They suggest that some people are likely sleeping with them at night, even though their bodies would be doing cell repair and regeneration during sleep, implying a potential clash between usage and natural biological processes.

Wi-Fi may be degrading our mitochondria and opening our blood-brain barriers. Radiofrequency radiation exposure has been shown to affect the permeability of the blood-brain barrier and alter microRNA expression in the brain, potentially leading to neurodegenerative disease. One person found an article stating this, but was unsure of its validity. A doctor conducted a study that was expanded upon by researchers in China, resulting in a published article. These findings were followed by suppression, misinformation, and a shutdown of government-funded research in the United States. This can cause a "leaky brain."

In the video, Speaker 0 explains that LED lights are being pushed aggressively, even given away for free, because they will connect everything in the Internet of Things. These LED lights can be connected to a cellphone, a tablet, all home appliances, the thermostat, cars, the garage, and more, allowing monitoring and data collection from these devices. They can also be used to turn off devices based on climate reasons and other factors, meaning you are connected up to the Internet of Things. What’s interesting, according to the speaker, is that these LED lights “ping a lot of microwave radiation,” which will be demonstrated in the next video. The speaker describes using a TriField EMF tester to check the radiation coming off the LED lights and shows results labeled as “off the charts.” The claim is that by bringing these lights into the home, microwave radiation is being pinged into the house. The speaker asserts that this microwave radiation can impact health, listing effects on the heart, brain, eyes, skin, and other organs. The LED lights’ capability to connect to the Internet of Things is highlighted again as part of this scenario. The video then notes a claim about a 2016 announcement from the AMA, stating that LED lights can increase the risk of cataracts and eye degeneration, implying long-term harm to eyesight while allegedly promoting environmental aims. In summary, the narrator claims: - LED lights are being pushed and given away because they enable the Internet of Things, connecting to smartphones, tablets, home appliances, thermostats, cars, and garages for monitoring and control. - These LEDs allegedly “ping a lot of microwave radiation,” detectable with an EMF tester, described as “off the charts.” - The radiation entering the home is claimed to impact health, including the heart, brain, eyes, skin, and other organs, in addition to enabling IoT connectivity. - The speaker cites a 2016 AMA statement asserting that LED lights can increase the risk of cataracts and eye degeneration.

In another experiment, time lapse cameras were used in a standard first grade classroom and several hyperactive children may be noted, especially the boy in the immediate foreground. Ninety days after the regular cool white fluorescent tubes were replaced with the new type full spectrum fluorescent tubes with radiation shields, there was a marked improvement noted, and the extremely hyperactive boy has voluntarily moved up to the front row. He raises his hand for recognition and is now up at the blackboard taking part in classroom activities. Prior to the time that this new lighting was installed, this particular boy had an extreme learning disability problem, but quickly learned to read within ninety days after the new lights were installed. There was further noted a general average improvement in both the behavior and academic achievement of the entire class.

Speaker 0 argues that tin foil hats actually work and demonstrates how a small amount of aluminum foil can reduce RF electromagnetic fields (RFEMF) from a WiFi router. He shows a RFEMF meter reading standing a few feet away from the router, noting measurements between 100 and 200 microwatts per square meter. As he moves right up to the WiFi router, the reading climbs to over a million, sometimes 2,000,000 microwatts per square meter. He states that generally you want to be working and living in an environment that's less than a 100 or 200 microwatts per square meter. He shares that when he is sitting ten to fifteen feet away, the reading is 18,000 to 20,000 microwatts per square meter. He asserts that this is not an environment he wants to be working in all day. Mentioning that there is a lot of debate about RFEMF and its harm to humans, he says there are a significant number of studies suggesting that RFEMF from a WiFi router or your phone can affect human biology negatively. The proposed solution is to wrap the router with aluminum foil. He states, “Literally just wrap this around the WiFi router, and now you're officially a conspiracy theorist. It's modern art,” yet demonstrates the result. After wrapping around the router, the reading between 500 and 1,000 microwatts per square meter is observed, representing a 10- to 20-fold reduction. He notes that right before wrapping, the reading was 100,000 microwatts per square meter, and after wrapping it, the reading is five to 7,000 microwatts per square meter just in front of the router. He emphasizes that the router remains still very high right at the device, but that the levels are significantly lower throughout the rest of the house. He concludes by stating, “Tinfoil hats work. 5¢ of tinfoil on your WiFi router, something that's in every home, can significantly decrease your exposure throughout the day while you're working.” He ends by encouraging viewers to send this to somebody they know who works very close to a WiFi router.

Checklist for summary approach: - Identify and preserve the core claims about cell phone radiation effects on animals. - Retain the quantitative detail: “20 times below the legal safety limit” and the mention of a “weaker form.” - Capture the comparison between weaker exposure and stronger levels (5G/4G) and the claimed effects. - Report the specific harms cited: brain damage, neurodevelopmental issues, DNA damage in stem cells. - Include the assertion that studies not funded by big tech/cellular industry report deleterious effects (oxidative stress, DNA damage, cancer, neurological injuries, blood abnormalities). - Avoid adding commentary, evaluation, or new information not in the transcript. - Translate to English if needed and preserve exact phrases where possible. Subjected rats to to cell phone radiation, like normal cell phone radiation, not four g, five g, even a weaker form. They exposed them at 20 times below the legal safety limit, and it caused brain damage and neurodevelopmental issues in these rats. Like, it was causing DNA damage in stem cells. So, I mean, it's just it just decimates the number what you Just said. 20 times below the legal limit, but you were saying this wasn't even five g. This was a weaker a weaker signal, and it was doing that. So what is the five g doing? What are the stronger levels doing? Yeah. The stronger levels are absolutely terrible. Every time they test the biological effects of five g, four g, and they're not funded by big tech and big cellular industry, they always find extremely deleterious biological effects, including oxidative stress, including DNA damage, cancer, neurological injuries, blood abnormalities. Right? All these things. So it's not good for any any bodily system.

They literally went into the rooms. They went into these babies' rooms, in over 50 households. They literally measured the physical EMF radiation that was in the babies' rooms. That accounts for smart TVs, baby monitors, cellular tower distance, and Wi-Fi. All this stuff combined contributes to this total EMF load here. And those babies who were in the high EMF rooms, high EMF households suffered triple increased risks of neurodevelopmental disorders, and they accounted for below birth rate. So this wasn't because they were born too early. They accounted for income. It wasn't because, you know, they had a lot of money and a lot of, you know, going to the doctors often and getting screened. It appeared because it was due to these little babies that are just developing, getting bombarded with artificial electromagnetic radiation, which appears to be influencing their development process.

Time-lapse cameras in a first-grade classroom showed several hyperactive children, particularly one boy in the foreground. After replacing regular cool white fluorescent tubes with full-spectrum fluorescent tubes and radiation shields, a marked improvement was observed within 90 days. The hyperactive boy voluntarily moved to the front row, participated in class, and his extreme learning disability improved, allowing him to read. A general improvement in behavior and academic achievement was noted across the entire class. Other factors must be considered, but the biological effects of light and radiation, as observed through time-lapse photography, have implications.

John Ott presents time-lapse photography revealing the impact of light on plant and animal life. He shows a primrose plant dancing to music by synchronizing light, temperature, and moisture. A banana plant produced fruit without pollination, and pumpkins yielded different sex blossoms based on fluorescent light type. Morning glories required red wavelengths filtered out for proper blooming. Tomato plants recovered from a virus under full spectrum sunlight. Chloroplasts streamed normally under full sunlight but clumped under filtered light. Animal studies showed mice developing tail lesions under pink fluorescent light, reversed by natural daylight. Blue plastic improved mink breeding, while pink plastic led to aggression. Blacklight UV improved fish health in aquariums. Rats bred under full spectrum fluorescent lights showed better parental instincts. A school with high leukemia rates had teachers keeping curtains closed and using pink-toned fluorescent lights. C3H mice lifespan was longer under full spectrum light. Experiments showed Mimosa pudica anesthetized by ether and reacting to wavelengths beyond visible light in a coal mine. Bean plants near TVs showed stimulated growth, while rats became aggressive. Hyperactive children improved when TV sets emitting X-rays were removed. Geraniums grew better near the center of full spectrum fluorescent tubes. Time-lapse of slime mold sporulation depended on cool white fluorescent light. Chelated iron improved gardenia growth. Fertilizer did not alter root growth patterns. Temperature affected black spot spores on roses and insect metamorphosis. Cancer cell division occurred after chilling. Fungi in nasal discharge and pollen activity were captured. Radar affected aphids. Tungsten filaments became rough with use. Sperm were attracted to eggs. Red blood cell clumping was reversed by full spectrum light.

Speaker 0 describes higher frequencies as potentially impacting bees and insects because the wave size can resonate with insect size, leading to greater absorption. He shows a study with heat-map images of higher frequencies on the honeybee, noting five insects were examined and bees at different life stages were tested; higher frequencies resonated with the bees and were more highly absorbed, potentially causing biochemical changes that can affect bee behavior. He notes other studies on their website showing impacts to honey production and bee reproduction, including cases where bees did not return to a hive when wireless radiation was near it. Speaker 1 states, “For decades, there has been irrefutable evidence that electromagnetic waves have an influence both thermally and non thermally on living beings, including people.” Speaker 2 adds that five g has triggered irrational fears, but experts are concerned, and Daniel Favre is among hundreds of scientists who think precautionary steps should be taken. Favre signed appeals to the United Nations and European Union asking for the health effects of it to be reassessed. Danielle has been looking into the impact of electromagnetic fields on honeybees for years. Speaker 1 elaborates: in a practical setup, a cell phone emits the waves while another phone receives the waves, and a device records the sound of the colony in the beehive via a microphone under the hive. The waveform thickening indicates greater colony sound intensity; when phones are active, the colony is disturbed, and once the phone is off, the colony returns to normal noise. Speaker 2 emphasizes that implementing five g safely for people and the environment requires more time for independent research and for digesting information from thousands of published papers, citing Enrico Stura, an electronic engineer specializing in molecular biophysics. Speaker 1 adds that “The electromagnetic waves produced by personal telecommunication systems during reasonable periods of time lead to demonstrable and proven DNA damages.” Speaker 0 references a study on radio frequency radiation injuries around mobile phone base stations, conducted as a field study for years, observing trees in line of sight of cell antennas showing damage that led to felled trees over time. He notes photographs showing the antenna and the crown fitting, and mentions studies on impacts to plants, stressing the broader concern about widespread antennas in Montgomery County, the United States, and the world.

The speaker asserts that all computer screens are blue-lit because the original technology emerged from a government program associated with Operation Paperclip. He says this program originated at Tulane Neurology and Tulane Neurosurgery in the mid-20th century, where the CIA conducted experiments on monkeys involving drilling into the skull, placing wires into the thalamus, and applying electricity to observe behavioral changes. One participant, Professor Delgado, reportedly proposed wireless control after seeing that wired devices could alter behavior. Delgado allegedly demonstrated wireless control in monkeys and bulls using RFID chips and semiconductors. The speaker claims the CIA then expanded the concept to light and screens, suggesting that electromagnetic radiation through screens can influence behavior, and asserts that this is why computer screens operate at certain frequencies. He connects this idea to a meeting arranged by a patent attorney who allegedly safeguarded the interests of Google and Meta to enable control over people’s activities. In a broader backstory, the speaker asserts that the original idea behind this development began with the CIA and traces it back to the Mafia in Las Vegas. He contends the Mafia wanted to build a new city in a desert, enclosed it, blacked out windows, and invented blue-lit slot machines. They supposedly discovered that money could be extracted more efficiently by offering free alcohol, which then inspired the CIA to initiate the program. The speaker emphasizes that this chain of events links Operation Paperclip, the CIA’s research, and modern tech platforms. He references Bobby Kennedy in connection with the topic, and notes his medical school background at LSU.

I demonstrated how our EMF shield reduces radiation from electronic devices. By using an electromagnetic radiation detector, we tested a television in standby mode. With the shield in place, the radiation dropped to 0, but when removed, it spiked to over 1000. The shield effectively reduced radiation to 0.

The video discusses blocking EMF radiation from entering the bedroom to alleviate headaches. Initially, aluminum foil and wire were used, but lead was found to be more effective. Lead was wrapped around the smart meter, reducing radiation levels. Another option is to place lead behind a picture to block radiation. Translation: The video explains how to block EMF radiation from entering the bedroom to reduce headaches. Lead was found to be more effective than aluminum foil and wire in blocking radiation from the smart meter. Another option is to use lead behind a picture to block radiation.

In an experiment conducted in a standard first grade classroom, time lapse cameras documented behavior, with several hyperactive children observed, particularly a boy in the immediate foreground. Ninety days after replacing the regular cool white fluorescent tubes with a new type of full spectrum fluorescent tubes equipped with radiation shields, a marked improvement was noted in the classroom dynamics. The extremely hyperactive boy moved voluntarily to the front row, began raising his hand for recognition, and participated at the blackboard during classroom activities. Before the installation of the new lighting, this boy exhibited an extreme learning disability problem. Ninety days following the installation of the full spectrum lighting, he quickly learned to read. This notable change in his reading ability occurred within the same ninety-day period after the lights were introduced. In addition to the improvements observed in this individual student, there was a general average improvement reported in both the behavior and the academic achievement of the entire class. The observations suggest a broad positive impact on classroom performance following the switch to full spectrum fluorescent tubes with radiation shields, as documented by the time lapse footage.

Lou shows an image of a guy running with ear pods and checking a device like an Apple Watch, asking how much that is doing inside his body and noting many people are likely using them. Speaker 1 says we’ve all been sold sexy products that are fun, but the risks aren’t being shared. They offer a free public education webinar every month, two hours, to walk through the science, and for cliff notes they provide the following immediate observations people may notice: - Headaches - Nosebleeds - Anxiety - Depression - Insomnia They describe this as a neurotoxin that pulsates our biological system many, many times per second, more than the Earth’s natural electromagnetic field. The brain perceives this invisible light energy as the lights are on, which disrupts the circadian rhythm in the wee hours of darkness. Melatonin suppression is singled out as a major consequence, affecting sleep and the nighttime cell repair and regeneration processes. The blood-brain barrier is a membrane surrounding the brain that helps keep toxins out of sensitive brain areas. The speaker claims that constant pulsing with man-made microwave radiofrequency opens up or permeates the blood-brain barrier, allowing toxins to accompany blood into the brain and contributing to increased neurotoxicity today. The speaker also mentions something called rouleaux formation. When radiating devices like a phone are held, the pinky finger tingles. Citing Dr. Magda Havas and Dr. Rob Brown, they say this exposure leads to rouleaux formation. The speaker explains rouleaux as red blood cells that are normally free-floating and deliver oxygen throughout the body being affected by microwave radiation, causing red blood cells to become magnetized and stick together, forming chains like a stack of coins that cannot efficiently reach tissues and organs to deliver oxygen. Rouleaux formation is described as a very serious concern.

Time lapse cameras were used in a 1st grade classroom to observe hyperactive children. After replacing the fluorescent tubes with new ones and radiation shields, there was a significant improvement. The hyperactive boy moved to the front row, participated in classroom activities, and learned to read within 90 days. The entire class showed improved behavior and academic achievement. It is important to consider other factors, but the biological effects of light and radiation, as observed through time lapse photography, are evident.

"Never ever ever put a cell phone on your ear." "Tell your kids. I'm gonna prove it to you and to them." "This right here is measuring." "So we're at point two, point six. Now watch it when it comes closer. 28, 33, 29, 39." "Do you see the difference?" "What was that?" ""30 times the amount of radiation going into my head." "Always use speakerphone." "Make sure your kids see this because they're the biggest offenders." "Oh, and don't put it back in your pocket." "If you put it on your body, always have it on airplane mode."

There have been numerous studies since the 1930s on the dangers of microwave radiation, with 5G testing conducted in the 1970s. The speaker believes that microwave radiation is extremely dangerous and that we should eliminate it. They suggest using fiber optics instead, which is safer and provides the same benefits. Another concern is that microwave radiation disrupts our frequencies, which should be in sync with those of the Earth and the universe. The second speaker advises against using lead paint and recommends setting up optic lines to avoid Wi-Fi. They claim that Wi-Fi is a weapon and that various electrical devices, such as smart meters, stoves, microwaves, smartphones, and computers, can negatively impact sleep and cause headaches.