reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In this video, the speaker discusses competitive middleware, which refers to the growing censorship industry. They explain that the censorship industry is structured through government institutions, private sector companies, civil society organizations, and news media and fact-checking institutions. The speaker breaks down the different categories of government censorship activities, such as funding, pressure, coordination, outsourcing, and laundering. They also mention the role of tech platforms and corporate social responsibility arms in the private sector. Additionally, they discuss the involvement of universities, NGOs, non-profits, foundations, and activist researchers in civil society. The speaker highlights the role of news media and fact-checking institutions in pressuring the private sector to censor certain content. They mention recent changes, including legal victories and the Missouri v Biden case, which has led to the proposed restructuring of the censorship industry through competitive middleware. The speaker explains that competitive middleware involves intermediating censorship through firms like NewsGuard, which fix news ratings to ban alternative news. They mention the plan to build up middleware institutions and the concept of capacity building. The speaker also discusses the upcoming EU disinformation regulations and how entities like NewsGuard are positioning themselves as disinformation compliance services to comply with these regulations. They compare this to the compliance industry for diversity, equity, and inclusion programs.

The speaker discusses the issue of censorship in the United States and how it is eroding freedom of speech. They explain that censorship is now being justified under the guise of fighting disinformation and misinformation, and that even factual and truthful statements can be labeled as disinformation and censored. The speaker highlights the role of the government in directing these censorship efforts, particularly in relation to the military industrial complex and the defense industry. They also discuss the censorship of the 2020 election and the manipulation of public opinion through coordinated efforts between government agencies and mainstream media. The speaker warns that platforms like X, which currently offer more freedom of speech, are under pressure and may face increased censorship in the future.

Several members of Congress have discussed media literacy in connection to disinformation and misinformation. There is a need to figure out how to rein in the media environment to prevent the spewing of disinformation and misinformation. It is one thing to have differing opinions, but another to say things that are false. This is something that is being looked into.

As a journalist who has covered world leaders, mass murderers, and war zones, the speaker says they have been targeted and falsely accused for almost a decade. They believe the media is in a crisis, facing an age of information warfare where propaganda is the entire battlefield, aided by advanced technology. The speaker contends that journalists betrayed free press principles by attacking one of their own for interviewing the Russian president, and that media companies and journalism schools have failed. Non-profit organizations are allegedly masquerading as non-partisan media watchdogs, acting as political propagandists who crush dissent and free speech. This "cancel culture" is a death sentence enabled by information dominance. The speaker claims that these non-profits are part of a censorship network including government agencies, using deception to mask their actions with goals like preventing misinformation and hate speech. Companies like Facebook, Instagram, and Google have monopoly power, controlling what billions see and hear. The speaker draws a parallel to apartheid South Africa, emphasizing the importance of the First Amendment and warning that the lights of freedom are going out, requiring action to relight them.

Several members of Congress have discussed media literacy in connection to disinformation and misinformation. There is a need to figure out how to reign in the media environment to prevent the spewing of disinformation and misinformation. It is one thing to have differing opinions, but another to say things that are false. This is something that is being looked into.

The video discusses various instances of censorship and propaganda, highlighting the silencing of religious expressions, attacks on conservatives, and the push for federal funding for censorship. It also mentions the American Psychological Association's campaign for online misinformation control. The speaker emphasizes the importance of free speech and criticizes the government's interference in religious beliefs and the media. The video concludes with a promotion for discounted supplements available on the Infowars website.

NewsGuard and GARM pose a serious threat to free speech in the US. NewsGuard's board includes former CIA and NSA heads, working to control the news narrative. They blacklisted 650 news sites during COVID-19 for questioning the origin of the virus. GARM aims to cut funding to alternative news sources spreading misinformation. These organizations collaborate with ad agencies like Publicis Group, which receive taxpayer subsidies. Congress can take action to remove funding from these agencies.

The speaker discusses the media literacy scam, which has been accelerating in recent years. Media literacy is being implemented in education systems, colleges, academia, and censorship institutions. It aims to control what sources of media individuals consume, labeling those who don't follow official or government-backed media as illiterate. The speaker explains that media literacy programs discourage critical thinking and independent research, instead promoting reliance on top Google search results and Wikipedia-approved sources. The state of California recently passed a mandatory media literacy law for all public K-12 schools, providing significant financial support to the censorship industry. The speaker emphasizes the need to challenge this trend before it becomes deeply rooted and leads to a generation of censorship professionals dependent on government-backed operations.

This video discusses a government scandal involving the censorship of social media posts during the 2020 and 2022 elections. The speaker highlights the deceptive tactics used by the Washington Post to downplay the scandal. The so-called "academics" involved in the censorship were actually government cutouts, funded by and working closely with the government. They actively flagged and pressured tech platforms to remove posts, using the threat of regulatory action and crisis PR. They also pushed for a terms of service policy called "delegitimization" that banned discussions about election integrity. The speaker exposes the collusion between these academics and the tech platforms, as well as the revolving door between government and academia. The censorship efforts targeted millions of posts and narratives, effectively silencing dissenting voices.

The defining characteristic of the United States is freedom of speech, guaranteed by the First Amendment. However, this fundamental right is rapidly eroding due to censorship disguised as combating disinformation and malinformation. This censorship, directed by the US government, is not limited to the private sector. Mike Benz, an expert on this issue, explains how the foreign policy establishment and defense contractors manipulate this. Internet freedom, initially used for supporting dissident groups globally, has become a tool for censorship since 2014. NATO now views controlling media as crucial for political influence, targeting even domestic groups. This shift accelerated after the 2016 election, with Russiagate providing cover for domestic censorship. The 2020 election and the COVID-19 pandemic saw massive censorship, with government agencies and private entities working together to suppress dissenting voices. This system uses AI-powered tools to identify and remove content deemed harmful to "democratic institutions," effectively creating military rule disguised as democracy. The fight to preserve free speech is now centered on platforms like X (formerly Twitter), which are facing immense pressure from both governmental and international entities.

Every institution dedicated to public truth-seeking is under simultaneous attack and in a state of collapse. Experts who resist are coerced, marginalized, or forced out, while those seeking truth outside these institutions face attacks on their integrity and expertise. Research universities spend public money to reach preordained conclusions. Newspapers report stories only after they are common knowledge. The CDC advises the opposite of what protects health. Courts are used as a coercive weapon against those who threaten elites. The Department of Homeland Security attempted to set up a truth ministry and declare accurate critique of government as terrorism. We are being systematically denied the tools of enlightenment and the rights guaranteed in our constitution. We must fight this battle courageously, or the result will be a dark age with powerful coercive instruments wielded by those who will rule us.

The problem of fake news is not solved by a referee, but by participants helping each other point out what is fake and true. The answer to bad speech is not censorship, but more speech. Critical thinking matters more than ever, given that lies seem to be getting very popular.

This video discusses a government scandal involving the censorship of social media posts during the 2020 and 2022 elections. The speaker highlights the deceptive tactics used by the Washington Post to downplay the scandal. The so-called "academics" involved in the censorship were actually government cutouts, funded by and working closely with the government. They actively flagged and pressured tech platforms to remove posts, using the threat of regulatory action and crisis PR. The speaker exposes the manipulation and censorship tactics used by these government-backed entities, emphasizing the violation of free speech and the lack of transparency in their actions.

This video discusses a government scandal involving the censorship of social media posts during the 2020 and 2022 elections. The speaker highlights the deceptive tactics used by the Washington Post to downplay the scandal. The so-called "academics" involved in the censorship were actually government cutouts, working closely with tech platforms to flag and remove posts. They were funded by the government and had revolving door relationships with government agencies. The speaker exposes how these academics actively pressured the tech platforms to adopt censorship policies and targeted millions of posts for removal. The video also reveals the manipulation of terms like "studied" and "misinformation narratives" to justify the censorship. This is just a summary of the extensive information covered in the video.

Jessica Headley and Ryan Wolf state: “Our greatest responsibility is to serve our Treasure Valley communities. The El Paso, Las Cruces communities. Eastern Iowa communities. Mid Michigan communities.” They express pride in the journalism they produce: “We are extremely proud of the quality, balanced journalism that CBS four news produces.” They then describe their concern: “But we are concerned about the trouble that training their responsible one-sided news stories plaguing our country.” They warn about the spread of biased and false information: “The sharing of biased and false news has become all too common on social media.” They add that “More alarming, some media outlets publish these same fake stories without checking facts first.” The message repeats the core worry: “The sharing of biased and false news has become all too common on social media. And this is extremely dangerous to our democracy.” The refrain is reiterated multiple times: “This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.”

Freedom of speech is under attack, with a censorship industrial complex choking expression and debate. Federal and state governments fund censorship technology, directing big tech to censor speech. Academic institutions research disinformation for the censorship regime, and think tanks groom journalists to promote pro-censorship propaganda. Nonprofit censorship groups produce blacklists to favor left-wing media and silence dissenting voices. The Federalist has been targeted for critiquing corporate media coverage of Black Lives Matter riots, which caused over $2 billion in damages. A House report documented Stanford's collusion with government entities to censor information, including political reporting. 70% of Americans distrust corporate media. Blacklists from groups like NewsGuard rate left-wing outlets higher than those challenging orthodoxies, impacting advertising revenue. The Federalist exposed the Russia collusion hoax and media lies against Justice Kavanaugh, even suing the State Department for promoting censorship tools. Despite facing censorship, The Federalist will continue reporting the truth.

This video discusses the erosion of freedom of expression in the United States due to censorship. The speaker explains that censorship is driven by the fight against misinformation, but it does not consider the truthfulness of statements. Both the government and the private sector are involved in this censorship, with the military-industrial complex and foreign policy establishment playing a role in suppressing free speech. The creation of a massive censorship industry involving government agencies, private companies, and NGOs is also highlighted. The speaker provides examples of government censorship and election manipulation. They emphasize the impact of the censorship industry on democracy and warn about the threat to platforms like X, particularly from European laws on digital services. The speaker calls for understanding and addressing this transatlantic attack on free speech.

Media literacy is described as a “regime media installation” and a form of censorship embedded across K through 12 schools, higher education, academia, and researcher or “censorship for-profit” institutions, supported by government money for “capacity building.” The speaker says the term “media literacy” misdirects attention to “literacy,” but that the actual premise is that people are deemed “media illiterate” if they do not read “the right” media sources—specifically “official state-backed” or government/regime-compliant sources—so students are trained to avoid dissenting narratives. The speaker claims the underlying presupposition of the field is that critical thinking leads to becoming a heretic, wrong thinker, dissident, or heterodox person. The speaker says media literacy programs teach methods “about how not to do your own research” and cites the SIFT method as an example, describing it as a directive to not “go down the rabbit hole” or think independently, but instead rely on “the top 10 results of a Google search in Wikipedia and Wikipedia approved sources.” The speaker adds that Wikipedia currently lists Elon Musk as a “far-right conspiracy theorist” and bans the ability to cite most conservative or centrist outlets, which the speaker says “pre-bans” access to news institutions that might challenge government narratives. The speaker emphasizes acceleration over the past year, particularly in the past month, and highlights specific legislation. The speaker says California passed a mandatory media literacy law requiring every public K through 12 school in the entire state to have mandatory media literacy classes, calling it government-mandated funding flowing to the censorship industry. The speaker states that a large number of educators—“10,000 people, at least”—will be needed in California schools to teach these classes. The speaker says similar laws have already passed in Illinois and Rhode Island and are now in New York. The speaker frames the change as broader than curriculum, describing it as training and funding an “army of educators” to teach students not to trust alternative news, social media influencers, and viewpoints that disagree with public health, electoral politics, environmental issues, abortion, immigration, or energy narratives. The speaker also references efforts at the federal level involving major class action lawsuits (including “Missouri v. Biden” and “America First”), as well as congressional investigations and subpoenas, but says the focus is shifting to state governments through “capacity building” to destroy the alternative news industry. The speaker predicts opponents may argue that stopping media literacy later would lead to “hundreds of thousands” of public employees losing jobs, and describes this as a justification similar to coal miners in West Virginia fearing mine shutdowns. The speaker concludes by urging viewers to share a link whenever they hear “media literacy” or see someone promoting it.

The speaker criticizes the media and their desire for censorship. They argue that the left defines "disinformation" as any information that conflicts with their ideology. They mention Francis Fukuyama, a respected historian, who suggests rethinking the First Amendment. The speaker claims that those in power frame censorship as combating bad ideas, but it is really about maintaining control. They argue that power is the only principle that matters to those in the hierarchy.

Thank you, Senator Johnson. It’s an honor to discuss media censorship and the First Amendment. We are in a critical moment for free speech, facing unprecedented information warfare. Journalists must unite to defend the truth, yet many have failed, attacking colleagues like Tucker Carlson for simply doing their jobs. Media companies and organizations masquerading as watchdogs have become tools of censorship, undermining free speech and manipulating narratives. This includes government-funded NGOs that promote partisan agendas while silencing dissent. The power of technology has allowed a few companies to control information, reminiscent of oppressive regimes. We must remember that the First Amendment is foundational to our freedom. If we don’t protect it, we risk losing the light of freedom both here and globally. We, the people, must hold our government accountable and stop funding those who undermine our rights. Thank you.

The speaker discusses the erosion of freedom of speech in the United States due to censorship. They explain that censorship is now being justified as a means to combat disinformation and misinformation, but it is being used to silence individuals and control the narrative. The speaker highlights the role of the military industrial complex and defense contractors in this censorship, particularly in the context of global conflicts. They also discuss how the government, including the US government, is involved in directing these censorship efforts. The speaker emphasizes the need for awareness and understanding of how censorship operates in order to protect freedom of speech.

Several members of Congress have discussed media literacy in connection to disinformation and misinformation. There is a need to figure out how to reign in the media environment to prevent the spewing of disinformation and misinformation. It is one thing to have differing opinions, but another to say things that are false. This is something that is being looked into.

The speaker claims censorship and disinformation efforts are at another level, referencing a Department of Homeland Security initiative to destroy reputations, deplatform, and de-bank individuals. They assert global control of social media platforms is at risk from governments and the "deep state," jeopardizing free speech and democracy worldwide, specifically mentioning Australia, Brazil, Ireland, Scotland, Europe, Germany, France, Czech Republic, Britain, Canada, and the United States. They criticize Orwellian justifications like "countering disinformation" used to mask censorship, advocating for fighting misinformation with accurate information, not government-backed censorship. The speaker alleges Facebook was "captured" years ago and expresses concern over government-favored fact-checkers dictating censorship. They state there is a push for total control over platforms like X. The speaker also criticizes "media literacy" programs as brainwashing that replaces critical thinking with obedience and authoritarianism. They cite a military contractor handbook advocating information warfare tactics, including those used in the Arab Spring, now being deployed domestically. They suggest these efforts aim to program people before stories emerge, suppressing dissenting voices and undermining Western enlightenment values.

Two years ago, we were labeled as bought-off journalists for questioning digital censorship. I was shocked to see my party seemingly endorse censorship. John Kerry even lamented that the First Amendment hinders the government's ability to control information and build consensus, essentially complaining that people choose their own news sources. Building consensus isn't the media's job; it's our job to make governing hard, and many of our allies have already embraced draconian speech laws. The EU's Digital Services Act is the most comprehensive censorship law in a Western democracy. USAID is funding organizations that promote unified messaging and discourage diverse opinions, spending millions of dollars to transform the free press into a consensus machine. You've taken taxpayer money to tell people they're wrong about what they can see, you sold us out.