reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Some batches of the vaccine may have serious side effects or be degraded. The batch number can be checked to see what to expect. Documentation shows that certain batches have more serious adverse effects. Even the best batches from Pfizer and Moderna had a high rate of serious adverse events in the short term, around 1800.

- The speakers discuss data on vaccination, noting that “月 15 日 な ん と 1 800 万 人 の 接 種 回 数 人 数 分 の デー タ が 蓄 積 さ れ て お り ま す” – roughly, a large accumulation of data on vaccination counts (about 18 million vaccination events). - Speaker 1 attempts to compare vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. They say the unvaccinated “は 山 ま 行 け な っ いう は 特 に 当たり 前 な ん ですよね 。 打っ て も 別 に 殴ら れ る わけ じゃ な 打っ て い ま せ ん の で 、何 の 問 題 も なく 、 フラ ット に な る わけ です 。” In other words, the unvaccinated are described as obviously not having issues even if they are not vaccinated, while vaccinated people may become “flat” or experience issues. - The main focus is on the vaccinated group. They describe a “緑 の 裏” that starts low, with a peak over one to two weeks. They note a pattern beginning around two months, with large peaks around three to four months. They interpret this as possibly reflecting a reaction pattern in doctors, who after vaccination might observe effects on the day, the next day, or about a week later, suggesting a vaccine effect or adverse response that diminishes over time. - There is mention of sending information to PM DA (a recipient or channel for information), indicating that the information is being transmitted to PM DA as part of the data flow. - Another finding is that as vaccination numbers increase, the “山” (the peak) of the adverse or death-related data shifts to the earlier positions, described as moving “前の方、左 の 方 に 移 動 し て い る.” The implication is that the distribution of the peak shifts with increasing vaccination counts. - Speaker 1 then asserts that “接 種 回 数 が 増 え て い く と 、死 亡 者 の 山 の 湿 原 が 早 く なり ます。” meaning that as vaccination numbers rise, the peak of fatalities or deaths “湿 原” becomes earlier, i.e., happens sooner. - They conclude that if there were no toxicity or lipid adjuvant effects from vaccination, the peak would not occur. This is presented as a finding: “ワクチン 接 種 に 毒 性 だ と か 脂 肪 を 誘 導 する 効 果 が なけれ ば 、山 に まず な ら な い わけ です よ .” In short, the absence of toxicity or adjuvant effects would mean the peak wouldn’t appear. - The overall takeaways emphasize observed patterns: the vaccinated group shows a rising and shifting peak over time with increasing vaccination counts, and there is a suggestion that the vaccination might be associated with a pattern of adverse observations that intensify or appear earlier as more people are vaccinated.

Vaccines are seen as magical but expectations should be tempered. Pfizer's vaccine is 95% effective, but efficacy drops over time. Boosters may be needed annually. Moderna is working on a combined flu and COVID vaccine. The future is uncertain, but we must adapt.

There is a new mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, but there is no evidence to support its effectiveness or safety in human trials. Additionally, several studies from different countries suggest that these vaccines may actually increase the risk of contracting COVID-19 over time. This is concerning and not a typical outcome.

We are witnessing a significant increase in cases of myocarditis, with thousands reported in recent studies compared to only a few cases in the past. The potential long-term effects of vaccine-induced myocarditis are concerning, with some cases leading to cardiac arrests years after vaccination. This suggests that the current cases may just be the beginning, and regulatory concerns should extend for at least 5 to 15 years post-vaccination.

The presentation examines the pattern of deployment of toxic vaccine batches using the VAERS dataset. It notes that the Covid vaccine was deployed in batches or lots, each with a number, and the batches are listed in VAERS in the order they were created, with adverse reactions recorded for each batch. A graph was produced with adverse reactions on the vertical axis and the sequence of batches in time on the horizontal axis, showing patterns of deployment in 2021. Each dot represents a batch, and the speaker highlights that about 95% of batches lie close to the x-axis, forming a thick line, with 80% of all batches generating only one or two adverse reaction reports and thus considered harmless. In contrast, the “clouds” and spikes above the x-axis represent toxic batches, with all such dots categorized as toxic. The breakdown given is: - 5% of all batches belong to these clouds and spikes. - The truly toxic batches generate 1,000 to 5,000 adverse reaction reports and are found above a red line, causing harm across every state in the USA where deployed. - These very toxic batches comprise about 0.65% of all batches (roughly one in 200). Total batches deployed in 2021 and recorded in VAERS: 28,330. Eighty percent are harmless (1–2 reports) within the x-axis line; the remaining 20% are more toxic, with the most extreme range up to 5,000 reports. Lesson two asks: “Who did it?” It identifies three companies appearing in VAERS: Moderna, Pfizer, and Janssen (Johnson & Johnson). By filtering VAERS data in Excel, the speaker presents the contributions of each company to the toxic-batch deployment. In the full picture, Moderna accounts for every batch in the first half of the chart except two spikes pre- and post- Moderna, which are attributed to Janssen. Pfizer’s results (from their batches) match the latter half of the chart exactly, suggesting Pfizer appeared to have taken over supply for every USA batch in the latter portion. The deployment is described as carefully compartmentalized, with phases where Janssen, then Moderna, then Janssen again, and then Pfizer dominate in sequence, followed by Moderna exiting and Pfizer continuing. Lesson three describes the purpose behind Moderna’s deployment of toxic batches: Moderna appears to randomly distribute toxic batches, with the intention of harm, possibly to induce fear of a pandemic and justify stronger policies. Janssen’s initial spike is interpreted as a test before Moderna’s deployment. Pfizer is described as carrying out rigorous dosage testing, deploying the most lethal batches systematically and recording effects, and acting as the only company administering batches at that stage to avoid interference from others. Lesson four details the fine art of lethal dosage testing. Pfizer’s deployment is shown as highly clustered in time, forming distinct periods of toxic batches separated by intervals of harmless batches. Toxic batches cluster in discrete ranges (e.g., 3,000–2,500; 2,000–1,500; 1,500–1,000), with abrupt transitions between clusters and harmless periods. Toxicity ranges are not random but follow a stepwise, linear decline across clusters. The speaker concludes that Pfizer deployed highly toxic batches for discrete dosage testing across all states, implying thousands of hospitalizations, injuries, and deaths. The presentation ends by contrasting that 80% of batches are harmless, while a minority exhibit wide toxicity ranges, with claims of systematic, non-random deployment designed for testing, and notes an ironic statement about American exposure to what is described as German-led testing.

Dr. Umesh Adalja mentions a small segment may be harmed by any vaccine. However, recent statements from various sources suggest an attempt to downplay vaccine injuries as insignificant. Despite claims of minimal harm, data shows over 33 million Americans have been affected by the COVID-19 vaccine since 2021, with 1.1 million deaths, 4 million disabilities, and 28.6 million injuries leading to chronic illness.

Vaccinated individuals are still at risk of getting COVID, but may have milder symptoms. Vaccines were introduced late in the pandemic, and early treatment and natural immunity were key in saving lives. There is controversy over vaccine safety, with reports of deaths following vaccination. Some studies suggest vaccinated individuals are at higher risk of severe outcomes. Calls have been made to remove vaccines from the market due to safety concerns. Translation: Vaccinated people can still get COVID, but may have less severe symptoms. Early treatment and natural immunity were important in saving lives. There are concerns about vaccine safety, with reports of deaths after vaccination. Some studies indicate vaccinated people may be at higher risk of severe outcomes. There are calls to remove vaccines from the market due to safety concerns.

I'm not a scientist, so I can't discuss vaccination, but there will be more pandemics in the future due to climate impacts and the emergence of new bacteria caused by greenhouse gases and methane emissions. We lack immunity to these new bacteria. COVID-19 is just one example of a pandemic, and it will continue to affect us.

The speaker claims that the vaccine is toxic and could have caused the deaths of 17 million people worldwide. They argue that after each vaccine rollout, there is a temporary increase in overall mortality. This pattern is observed consistently across countries with sufficient data. Another speaker points out that typically, deaths decrease in the summer and increase in the winter, but during the COVID vaccine campaign, there are spikes in mortality right after the campaigns, even in the summer. They mention that this pattern is seen in both the northern and southern hemispheres. The speakers emphasize that this is a new phenomenon.

There have been no concerning long-term side effects of the vaccine so far. The vaccine has only been in use for about a year, and we haven't seen any alarming issues with other vaccines that have been used for a long time. While we can't say for certain what might happen after several years, there is no scientific reason to believe that problems would suddenly arise. Although the vaccine is new, we have no plausible reason to expect any issues in the future.

The speaker claims that the vaccine is toxic and could have killed 17 million people worldwide. They argue that after each booster rollout, there is a peak in all cause mortality, which is consistently observed across different countries. Another speaker points out that normally, deaths decrease in the summer, but during the COVID vaccine campaign, there are spikes in mortality right after vaccine campaigns, even in the Southern Hemisphere where it should be a low death period. They mention that this pattern is seen in all 17 countries they studied. Overall, they emphasize that these observations are unprecedented.

Taixin Media from China asks about concerns regarding the long-term effects of mRNA vaccines. Richard acknowledges that mRNA vaccines have only been administered for a limited time, but emphasizes that the number of people who have received the vaccine greatly outweighs the reported side effects. He believes that the limited side effects make long-term concerns less significant. Another participant adds that mRNA vaccines cannot integrate into DNA, ensuring safety. The main adverse effect observed is mild myocarditis or pericarditis, primarily affecting young males, but it typically resolves without long-term consequences.

The speaker discusses a paper from Denmark that reveals a significant variation in suspected adverse reactions to the Pfizer vaccine. The data shows a 1,000-fold difference in incidence depending on the batch of vaccines administered. This information is currently gaining popularity.

Today, many people are concerned about the Pfizer vaccine and its connection to the Communist Party. I want to explain why this vaccine, produced by Pfizer, is seen as another disaster caused by the dark forces and the Communist Party working together. It is clear from the beginning that this vaccine is a deliberate poisoning by the Communist Party.

Four studies are cited as showing significant lot variability in the vaccine batches. The speaker notes that the variability is substantial across lots, with some batches from the early 2021 period appearing to be the most dangerous. They state that some lots are linked to large numbers of adverse events, while other lots are linked to no adverse events at all, describing these as “duds.” According to the speaker, these problematic batches may result from several issues: the mRNA being degraded, or the cold-chain failure such as being left out of the refrigerator for too long, or problems in the manufacturing process that rendered the batch ineffective. The implication is that these dud batches were not manufactured properly. The speaker emphasizes that some of these batches had devastating effects on individuals. They further claim that these batches were probably contaminated with high levels of DNA plasmids from the manufacturing process, extremely high levels of mRNA, and even heavy metal contamination. The range of issues is described as broad, indicating multiple types of contamination or quality problems in different batches. The overall assertion is that not a single batch appears to be the same as another; there is clear heterogeneity across batches, with some batches causing major adverse events and others causing none.

The document titled COVID world 10/09/2022 presents estimates alleging that over a three-year period the SARS-CoV-2 virus and vaccine bioweapons caused 31 million extra deaths and 1.9 billion serious adverse effects. Two main changes from the prior 10/01/2022 estimates are highlighted: (1) 11 additional countries (about 600,000,000 people) were added to the estimate base, bringing the total to 47 countries for roughly 2,300,000,000 people, making the estimates more representative globally; (2) for serious adverse effects, the extra deaths of 2021 and 2022 are fully included as input rather than half as in the previous estimates. Extra deaths for 2020, 2021, and 2022 are described as based on officially reported and factual deaths in the listed countries. Data sources are referenced to Our World in Data. Extra deaths (ED) for each year are calculated as the difference between the factual number of total deaths and the expected deaths. Missing months in 2022 are estimated by extrapolating the monthly average from January 2021 onward. The yearly evolution uses a corrected five-year average (2015–2019). A yearly correction factor of 0.75% is applied, with 2020 ED having the factor applied three times, 2021 ED four times, and 2022 ED five times, effectively representing excess deaths after adjusting for expected yearly evolution and for a year without mass vaccination or bioweapons. To compute the 2020 world ED, the ED per 100,000 people by country (ED100 ks) is calculated and aggregated to 112 extra deaths per 100,000 people, yielding nine million extra deaths worldwide in 2020—the first year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. For 2021, the metric ED21M (extra deaths per million doses) is calculated and aggregated to 961 extra deaths per million doses, resulting in twelve point one million extra deaths globally in 2021—the first year with the vaccine bioweapon and the second year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. For 2022, ED22M yields 763 extra deaths per million doses, leading to nine point six million extra deaths worldwide in 2022—the second year with the vaccine bioweapon and third year with the COVID bioweapon deployed. The serious adverse effects are estimated by multiplying the estimated extra deaths in 2021 and 2022 by a reported adverse effects-to-deaths ratio of 87.6, derived from an article on estimated probabilities after COVID vaccination. This results in an estimated 1.1 billion serious adverse effects for 2021 and 0.8 billion for 2022. The document asserts, in strong terms, that there are about ten million extra deaths yearly worldwide since 2020, which would total about 110 million extra deaths by the end of 2030 if continued. It also claims that the mass propaganda, corrupted science, censorship, and elites lead many to think SARS-CoV-2 is a naturally evolved virus, while the document asserts truthful science shows the virus is designed and made by humans in a biolab, citing genetic insertions such as PRRA (HIVGP120) and arguing these inserts are not natural mutations. It references documents, testimonies, patents, and scientists (e.g., Doctor Richard M. Fleming, and Montanier) to support the claim that the virus and vaccines are lab-made bioweapons and contain harmful components, including the spike protein, with assertions about the vaccines’ toxicity and contamination. Sources and data are attributed to Our World in Data Excess Mortality Raw Death Count, with a note to download the CSV from Our World in Data. The piece includes several prompts to view additional images and cites the article COVID World 10/09/2022 by Pak Osmol (10/09/2022) and Appendix A Data Source.

Residual effects from one or two COVID shots can include late blood clots and cardiac arrests years later. The mRNA and spike protein from the shots can linger in the body, causing various health issues like heart and brain damage, blood clots, and immunologic problems. A spike detox program is recommended to address these concerns.

Vaccinated individuals are not less likely to get infected with COVID, but may have milder symptoms. Vaccines were introduced late in the pandemic, and data on vaccine status in hospitals may be inaccurate. Reports show a significant number of deaths following vaccination, raising concerns about vaccine safety globally. Calls have been made to remove these vaccines from the market due to their perceived dangers. Translation: Vaccinated people may still get COVID but might have less severe symptoms. Vaccine safety is being questioned due to reports of deaths following vaccination. There are concerns about the accuracy of hospital data on vaccine status.

Speaker 0 asked about the visibility of the medium to long-term effects of the vaccine in three to five years. Speaker 1 responded that they cannot predict how things will be in three to five years, but mentioned that 92-93% of the population will be vaccinated. Speaker 0 expressed confusion, and Speaker 1 clarified that 92-93% is the current vaccination rate. Speaker 0 raised concerns about potential side effects, but Speaker 1 reassured them that if there are any, the majority of the population would be affected. Speaker 0 remained unconvinced and expressed hesitation about getting vaccinated.

It is important to consult with your doctor or a trusted person to understand the risks and frequency of side effects associated with vaccination. While these side effects do exist, they are very rare and mostly mild. Within 48 hours of vaccination, one may experience a headache or a slight fever. With this information, we can have confidence in the vaccination process.

As of February 2024, the number of reports for COVID-19 vaccines in VAERS is significantly higher than all other vaccines combined since 1990. The government was not fully prepared for this overwhelming influx of reports. They had to quickly reassign people and hold numerous meetings to increase their capacity to review these reports.

We are vaccinating millions, and while there are reports of deaths following vaccinations, there is no evidence that the vaccine causes these deaths. Adverse reactions must be reported, but many go unreported, potentially skewing data. For instance, only 5% of adverse reactions may reach the monitoring database. There have been serious cases, including hospitalizations, that are not being documented properly. Despite the numbers, experts assert that the vaccine is safe and effective. It's crucial for the public to understand that while adverse events will occur, they are often coincidental. The vaccine remains vital for public health, and getting vaccinated is strongly encouraged.

Approximately 15% of people are injured by COVID-19 vaccines, with around 2.5% experiencing heart damage. The pharmaceutical industry suggests that not all vaccine vials are the same. It has been discovered that 80% of deaths from Pfizer vaccines come from 30% of the lots, while 80% of deaths from Moderna vaccines come from 20% of the lots. These lots may have varying concentrations of genetic material and contaminants, affecting their quality. This issue is currently receiving significant attention.

On COVID, there's a perception that credit isn't given where it's due. While the vaccines were developed quickly, they don't prevent infection or transmission and may have serious side effects. In hindsight, would anything be done differently? Studies on the vaccines are ongoing, and results will emerge over time. It's important to note that Pfizer marketed its vaccine as safe for pregnant women, but reports indicated that over half of the 458 pregnant women who received the vaccine experienced adverse events. The ongoing studies will help clarify these concerns.