reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I'm running out of time. You seem to be pro-vaccine but have started a group, Children's Health Defense, which sells baby clothing with anti-vaccine messages, like "unvaxxed, unafraid" for $26. Can you assure us that your organization will stop selling these products? I have no control over that organization; I resigned from the board. You founded it just a few months ago. Are you supportive of these onesies? I support vaccines and want good science. Will you tell your organization to stop selling those items?

The speaker states they are fine with adults being gay or transgender, believing people should live as they choose, as long as they are allowed to do the same. They do not believe children should be allowed to medically or surgically affirm their gender until they are adults, preferably in their mid-twenties. They find drag shows for kids to be weird, but are fine with drag shows for adults. They are not okay with transgender women participating in women's sports. The speaker intends to discuss these topics further in the future, including a discussion about T-Mobile.

Speaker 0 presents an ongoing mock quiz, starting with math questions that are intentionally disrupted. "One plus one. Yes. Two. Incorrect." The class then moves to "Multiculturalism. Well done, Simon." The next question is "What is three times three?" with responses "Yes?" and "Nine." but it is followed by "Wrong. Yes, Penelope. Gender equality. Very good, Penelope." Speaker 1 questions the situation: "Is this a joke? You think gender equality is a joke? No. But isn't this a math class? Don't be so racist." They insist, "I just asked a question. We don't ask questions. Questions are offensive." They comment on the handwritten display: "They've just written equality and drawn love hearts on a piece of paper. He expressed himself and it's beautiful. He didn't even spell equality correctly." Speaker 2 interjects, "We don't discriminate." Speaker 1 follows, arguing that the issue is not mathematics: "This has nothing to do with mathematics. You think you're so great with your maths and your science and your facts. What about feelings?" Speaker 2 responds, "Yeah. Feelings are more important than fact." Speaker 1 pushes back further, declaring, "This is wrong. You're all crazy. Crazy. Stop violating me with your different opinions. I have the right to speak my mind." Speaker 2 counters, "No. We have the right not to be offended." Speaker 1 concludes with, "And that's more important."

"Hi. Good evening. I'm a parent in the Davis Unified School District, and I'm here today to talk about the policies you have for the locker rooms in the junior high schools." "Right now, we require our students to undress for PE class." "depending on a child's transgender identity that they can pick which bathroom they want." "So we have right now at this school district, we have children self identifying into into different bathrooms just based off of No. Their You cannot." "I have my bathing suit on." "Excuse me. This this is allowed." "We're gonna recess. I'm gonna finish my comments." "So you are violating my first amendment right." "I am putting on my You are disrupt."

I have an issue when it comes to targeting our kids and trying to change their gender. I don't care if a 40-year-old person wants to undergo gender reassignment, but I don't want to hear about it, pay for it, or be forced to acknowledge their chosen identity. Leave me alone and stay away from our children.

It's concerning how people use euphemisms like "houseless" and "minor attracted persons" instead of calling things what they are, like homelessness and pedophilia. Politicians need to address the real issues, not sugarcoat them. Drag Queen Story Hour may seem harmless, but it involves adult men performing for children, which is uncomfortable. Children should be protected from inappropriate topics, not exposed to them. Adults should prioritize children's well-being over their own interests.

Why do you want to harm children? What is wrong with you? It shouldn't be about gender or profession; it's about the actions being taken.

In Oregon, a person can be naked in public, even around children, if it's not for sexual gratification. A person claims someone came onto their property and exposed themselves to their two-year-old child. The speaker called 911, but the officer said that the nudity itself isn't a crime unless it's for sexual gratification. The speaker is concerned that the police won't intervene until the person does something more serious.

Speaker 0 defends being naked in front of kids, claiming it's natural and about love winning. Speaker 1 questions the appropriateness, pointing out kids being present. Speaker 0 brushes it off, saying it's fine as long as nothing inappropriate is happening. Speaker 1 highlights the discomfort of nudity around children, but Speaker 0 remains unfazed, insisting it's not a big deal.

I feel physically ill after attending San Francisco Pride. There were nudists fully exposed in front of children, adults grabbing genitals, and people masturbating. The Fetish Zone had people peeing on each other. Shocked and horrified, especially with children present. Adults were essentially having sex in public. I will not cover pride events again after this experience. It was the worst.

My mom sent her art. I saw her through the window. I don't want to be a sex educator, just don't want to give kids porn in school. Miami is great, but there are concerns about bad weather. Criticizing gender affirming procedures versus cosmetic surgeries. I keep my house warm, people joke I'm a lizard person. I don't disclose my age online. I'm not trying to ban any books.

I went to Miami for a podcast and came back to chaos. People twisted my comments on showering with kids, claiming I said it's okay. I only shared expert opinions on when it's inappropriate. Critics sexualized it, but I clarified I never condoned it. Different cultures have different norms, and memories can be from a young age. Some supported my stance, while others attacked me. I just presented facts, and if you disagree, engage respectfully.

Speaker 0 asks why Speaker 1 claims to hate children in interviews. Speaker 1 explains that in today's world, it's easier for a single man like him to say he doesn't like children. Speaker 0 suggests that Speaker 1 says this to avoid tabloids speculating about him being a pedophile. Speaker 1 agrees and questions how anyone can truly know if he is or isn't.

One speaker suggests killing unwanted children in foster care. They ask for statistics on the percentage of foster children who are abused, molested, or enslaved. Another speaker says they would be okay with killing babies in foster care and killing children who have been abused. One speaker states that if they don't want to have a baby, they should have the choice not to, because people should still have the choice, and that the other speaker doesn't understand the magnitude of having a child.

Oh my gosh. Whose baby is that? Excuse me? It's ours. Okay. I'm sorry, but gay gay people can't have a baby? Yeah. But, like, where did it come from? We didn't pull it out of your vagina, if that's what you're asking. People think they can ask gay people anything. It's not okay. I loaned you $10,000. I think we're just wondering who the mother is. Well, between the two of us, I'm more emotional and I like shopping, so me, I think. Yeah. But I mean, I have long hair and he is an alcoholic. So I guess it's like two moms, I guess. What do you want us to say? That we stole her? Did you? Well, we like to think of it as she stole us. English is my eighth language and even I know what that expression means.

The speaker expresses strong opposition to the sexualization of children and accuses the individuals present of being pedophiles. They argue against discussing sex with children and advocate for protecting their innocence. The speaker claims to be addressing the school board about the curriculum and accuses them of allowing children to be sexualized. They insult and berate the individuals present, calling them pedophiles and expressing disgust towards them. The speaker also mentions a banned curriculum from 2019 and accuses the government of being involved with pedophiles. The transcript ends with a profanity-laden insult.

Are you saying parents cause problems? Should someone in charge of family outreach be complaining about parents? I don't know what you're talking about. Is that me in that video? I have no idea. I have no comment, so stand back. You can keep your hands off me.

"A human being with a soul, a free man, has a right to say what he believes, not to hurt other people, but to express his views." "that thinking that she just articulated on camera there is exactly what got us to a place where some huge and horrifying percentage of young people think it's okay to shoot people you disagree with, to kill Nazis for saying things they don't like." "Well, there's free speech which of course we all acknowledge is important so so important." "But then there's this thing called hate speech." "Hate speech, of course, is any speech that the people in power hate, but they don't define it that way." "They define it as speech that hurts people, speech that is tantamount to violence." "And we punish violence, don't we? Of course, we do."

In this video, the speaker asks how to differentiate between boys and girls. They mention that boys have short hair, but what if both individuals have short hair? The speaker suggests another way to determine gender is by removing their clothes. They also mention being asked explicit and sexual questions that made them uncomfortable, comparing it to how they would feel talking that way to their own child.

The speaker was asked how many civilians have been killed in Gaza. The speaker responded, "Who gives a shit? Okay." The speaker then stated, "Children grow up to be Arabs."

The speaker discusses the right to protest and counter protest in a free country. They believe that as long as it remains peaceful, a counter protest should be allowed to take place in order to engage in conversation with those they disagree with. However, the other speaker argues that counter protesting is an infringement on their rights as parents trying to protect children. They question whether the other person would be okay with counter protests at pride festivals, as they disagree with that lifestyle. They suggest that opening this discussion could lead to a contentious situation.

Speaker 0 asserts "There is a long correlation between anarchism and pedophilia and support for pedophilia," then shifts to a game-like critique of queer theory framed as "pedophilia Jeopardy." Clues include: "Commonly called the godfather of queer theory"—"Foucault?" and "Foucault ... argued for the eradication of age of consent laws as in down to infants." The "founding document of queer theory" clue points to "Gayle Rubin" (transcribed as "Gail Rubin") and notes "the amount in that article that was a defensive pedophilia, specifically quote boy lovers." It cites "the founding document of queer theory" line about "boy lovers" and a quote comparing pedophilia to a "preference for spicy food." It also covers Pat Califia's pro-pedophilia stance, quoting: "any child old enough to decide... is old enough to decide whether or not she wants to run around naked in the sun, masturbate, sit in someone's lap, or engage in sexual activity, by which she does not mean play doctors." The "Judith Butler" segues, mistakes, incest remark, and ends with: "Zero. Zero. ... Not a single one."

Men don't have a say in women's sex life. Do you think the sexual empowerment of women in any way contributes to their own objectification? No. Does the fact does the fact that porn and OnlyFans exist prove that women are okay being objectified as long as they're getting paid. No. It means that we can use our body the way that we want to without men's control. Do you consider sex work to be real work? Yes. Yes. And if you don't, you suck. Why are women more accepting of women who can sell sex but are less likely to accept a man who can buy it? Because it's empowering to be able to do what you want with your body when you want to be able to do it. Because it's my fucking body. Body mind choice. My body

Speaker 0 Launches a pointed accusation, asking, “I am wondering if you are all pedophiles because you don't seem to care that children are being sexually abused.” They claim, “the only thing I could ascertain is that you guys probably enjoy child porn,” asserting that the group is not looking or acting. The speaker states, “If somebody claimed that I was, I would say, I absolutely am not,” and contends the group “love to let it stand as fact that that's what's going on because you're not willing to stop it.” They challenge the group to shake their heads or do something, insisting, “No, Monica, you're not a pedophile. Then why aren't you doing anything about the child abuse that's happening in the county?” The speaker frames care as a moral test: “If you cared, you'd wanna stop it.” They extend the question to personal stakes: “If it happened to your child, you'd wanna stop it. If it happened to you, you'd wanna stop it.” They address Jim directly with, “Jim, what if it happens to your grandchild? What if? Would it matter then? Probably.” The rhetoric emphasizes the emotional intent and accountability, culminating in a confrontational appeal to action and responsibility. After laying out these accusations and moral appeals, the speaker concludes with a directive to move on: “Right. So horrible to think about. Right. Next speaker, please.” The overall thrust is a confrontational challenge to the audience’s alleged indifference toward child sexual abuse, combining provocative accusations with appeals to parental and familial protection. The speaker characterizes inaction as complicity and demands immediate accountability from named individuals, linking the issue to personal stakes for family members. The passage ends by transitioning to the next speaker, signaling a shift in focus or continuation of the public forum.

It's unfortunate another child's bad choice will affect him for life. The speaker has compassion for every human being. This is not a race issue, nor a black and white issue. The speaker does not want the situation politicized. The speaker does not appreciate online remarks from people who weren't present during the event.