reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Tariffs were once a significant source of revenue for the U.S., but in the early 1900s, the country shifted to an income tax due to pressure from other nations. A commission was formed in 1887 to address the surplus wealth generated from tariffs on foreign goods. The U.S. thrived by taxing imports, which protected American jobs. China, for example, allows foreign companies to build factories there, leading to a different economic dynamic. Elon Musk is mentioned as a notable figure who has successfully navigated these challenges, particularly with his ventures in the automotive and space industries.

150 years ago, people didn't need government permission for everyday activities like fishing, owning property, starting a business, or even setting up a lemonade stand. Now, almost everything requires government approval. If you believe you're still free, you're mistaken. You're essentially a controlled human in a tax system.

At the start of the 20th century, America was the richest country. We used tariffs to defend our workers from unfair trade policies and had no income tax. Foreign companies paid to sell to America. Now, we have the Internal Revenue Service, charging us internally. Politicians who can't manage money keep taking more from us. Donald Trump plans to fix this by creating the External Revenue Service. Foreign companies will pay to sell to the U.S. If they want to compete with American workers, we shouldn't tax our own people. This will ensure that no bureaucrat will cut your benefits.

Do it. The tariffs are said to be bringing in a lot of additional revenue, which, the speaker states, is being used to give tax relief to the American people and make it easier for average Americans to get by. So

A new golden era is approaching, and we may have found a leader akin to Lincoln. This leader understands the Constitution and the nation's issues, proposing radical solutions for recovery. Recent videos showcase a well-thought-out plan that could significantly boost salaries by cutting the budget and taxes. For instance, your income could rise from $56,000 to $88,000 by eliminating taxes. This vision doesn't aim to revert to the past but seeks to recreate the industrial boom of the 1880s, where opportunities for dreamers flourished.

The speaker discusses how the federal income tax negatively impacted Americans by shifting the government's revenue source from tariffs to taxing individuals. They argue that tariffs on international corporations would be a better revenue source, promoting American manufacturing and job growth. The speaker highlights the historical importance of tariffs and criticizes the impact of the income tax on American prosperity. They emphasize the need to educate future generations on these issues.

Speaker 0: There is no law. And to date, nobody has been able to show that there is a law for the average American citizen working day in and day out to pay an income tax. Speaker 1: But We, The People Foundation for Constitutional Education put a full page ad in The USA Today on 07/07/2000. And within the body of that ad was a $50,000 challenge for anyone that could show the law. And to me, $50,000 is a lot of money. So I went after that and did the research based on the fact that I thought, let's put this baby to bed. I'm hearing all these rumors. You know, I'm gonna kill two birds with one stone. I'll answer these people's questions they're asking me, and then I win this $50,000. And, you know, based on the research that I did throughout the year 2000 and that I'm still doing, I have not found that law. I've asked congress. We've asked a lot of people in the IRS, IRS commissioners, helpers. They can't answer because if they answer, the American people are gonna know that this whole thing is a fraud. Speaker 2: There is no law. There is no law that requires the average American worker in the private sector to pay a direct unapportioned tax on their labor and compensation for services. There is no law. Speaker 3: I really expected that, of course, there's a law that you can point to in the law book, the code, that requires you to file a tax return. Of course, there is. I mean, I don't know what it is right then as we as he was speaking to me, but sure. So, naively, I agreed to go off and research it and get back to him. Three and a half months later, I was at that point where I couldn't find the statute that clearly made a person liable, at least not me and, most people I know. And I had no no choice in my mind except to to resign. Speaker 4: I had to leave the IRS because I presented, evidence that I had accumulated indicating that the agency was violating the law and violating people's rights. And I asked the agency for a response to my sincere concerns, and the answer I got was that they would not respond to my concerns and that they would, provide me with the paperwork necessary to tender my resignation. Speaker 5: You can look through the statutes and look for the law that requires you to pay. And when you do that, you can't identify a law that requires the average person in America who earns a wage and works in private business to pay an income tax. Speaker 2: American citizens, along with the foundation, have been asking the IRS to specifically provide them with the the underlying legal foundation upon which they administer and enforce the personal income tax laws in our country. Speaker 3: At the national level, when people would attempt to contact somebody of a much higher authority, say the cons the commissioner, same kind of thing. They wouldn't get they would get answers that were in effect non answers. Speaker 6: You have to understand that an agency which will unlawfully impose a tax that doesn't exist it's not gonna care. If we, the people, don't know what our rights are, they're not gonna tell us. Speaker 4: If Americans just learned that the IRS was actually knowingly deceiving them, that that enough that would be enough for them to rise up and put a stop to it. Speaker 7: 100% of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the federal debt. All individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services taxpayers expect from government. People have been told, you know, that you need this income tax system to fund government, is absolutely ridiculous. I mean, my question is, well, if that's true, how did we fund government from 1776 to 1913? Speaker 8: The main purpose of the income tax is not to raise revenue, but to redistribute wealth and to control society. And a lot Speaker 9: of people might say, well, gee, if there wasn't an income tax, what would happen to education? They don't understand that education is paid for, for the most part, out of state and local taxes, your property tax. People might say, well, how are we going to build and maintain our highways if there's no money coming into the government? We need our highways. There is a tax on every gallon of gasoline that people buy. Proceeds from the income tax do not pay for highway construction. Speaker 10: I believe that in both spirit and substance, our tax system has come to be un American. Death and taxes may be inevitable, but unjust taxes

"Tariffs are vital to the success of this country." "They could possibly replace federal income tax." "From 1850 to 1913, in the 1887, it's about 1887, they had the Great National Tariff Act." "And then in 1929, you had the depression." "They ended them in 1913. How did that work out? And then we went to the income tax." "I settled seven different wars. One going thirty one years, one go look at the Congo and Rwanda." "Thirty one years, ten million people dead. I got it settled." "We have trillions of dollars coming into our country." "If we didn't have tariffs, we would be a very poor nation, and we would be taken advantage of by every other nation in the world."

For 137 years, America had no federal income tax until the 16th amendment in 1913. Abraham Lincoln tried during the Civil War, but it was deemed unconstitutional. Despite this, America had roads and infrastructure before 1913, as shown by the Brooklyn Bridge, New York City subway, Broadway, Penn Station, Grand Central Station, 5th Avenue, Grand Army Plaza, and Wall Street. Public schools may not emphasize this history.

In the early 1900s, the U.S. shifted from tariffs to an income tax due to pressure from other countries. Politicians were influenced by these nations, which affected economic decisions. A commission was formed in 1887 to address the surplus wealth from tariffs on foreign goods. The U.S. thrived by taxing imports, which protected American jobs. This situation mirrors China's approach, where foreign companies can operate if they build factories there, unlike the restrictions on U.S. cars. Elon Musk exemplifies this dynamic, successfully establishing operations in China, showcasing the complexities of international trade and investment.

At the turn of the century, around 1900, America's economy was booming with no income tax, only tariffs. We had so much money, the greatest businessmen gathered to figure out how to spend it. After World War I and II, we felt obligated to rebuild the world, so we lowered our protections and tariffs, taxing Americans to export our economic power. When should that have ended? The eighties, nineties, or 2000s? We're letting the world take advantage of us, and it's time to make America great again. Getting rid of tariffs was sold as helping the earth, but middlemen just wanted a cut. We have delivered victory against the globalists, but their systems are still attacking us. Support us at RealAlexJones.com to keep us on the air regardless of what happens to InfoWars. History is happening now, and we need your support to complete our victory against the globalists.

Tariffs could replace income taxes. This idea stems from historical context, as the U.S. was wealthiest in the late 1800s under President McKinley, known as the "tariff king." He eloquently advocated for tariffs, emphasizing the need to protect American jobs, factories, and families from foreign competition. The message was clear: foreign entities should pay a significant price to operate in the U.S. to safeguard domestic interests.

America has tried failed economic policies before, but we won't revert to them.

Speaker 0: In America, we don't have a tax problem. We've got a third world problem. This is not an exaggeration. The United States collects over $2,400,000,000,000 in income taxes every year and then burns $1,500,000,000,000 through fraud, waste, and third world robbery. If the elites actually did their jobs and cut out the waste, the government would only need about $900,000,000,000 to function. And here's the crazy part. That would mean anyone earning under $500,000 a year could pay zero income tax, and everything would still be fully funded. So if this money isn't funding our future, whose dream is it really building? Look at Minnesota. The Somali daycare scandal gave us the answer. Billions of dollars you worked for, money meant to feed hungry kids, was diverted through fake daycare centers, phantom meals, and paperwork designed to approve. Not question, no kids, no food, just checks. Your hard earned labor was turned into Lamborghinis, beachfront mansions, and luxury vacations most of us will never experience even after a lifetime of honest work. On top of that, your tax dollars were routed to foreign organizations The US Military is fighting. Let that sink in. We went from defending liberty to bankrolling the threat. That's not compassion. That's collapse. And when systems fail like this, they don't admit mistakes. They don't apologize for wasting your money. They dig deeper into your pockets to fund their failure.

Trump proposes replacing the income tax, which costs Americans $2.4 trillion annually, with tariffs: 20% on most countries and 60% on China. This could generate around $900 billion yearly, potentially boosting the economy by 20% and providing an extra $30,000 in income for the average American family. This shift could lead to a doubling of annual economic growth, making 5% growth the new standard. If successful, families could see significant financial benefits, enhancing wealth for future generations. If voters support this plan, Congress is likely to follow suit, benefiting middle and lower-class Americans. Voting for Trump could restore the economic opportunities of the past.

Tariffs are a key part of economic independence and were the main source of US government revenue before 1913, allowing the country to fund itself without income tax. Tariffs protect American workers and industries from being undercut by lower-cost foreign goods, allowing American businesses to compete. Levying tariffs maintains jobs and encourages domestic production, which is crucial for national security and prosperity. Tariffs help the U.S. negotiate better trade deals by pushing other countries to lower their trade barriers. Globalists, corrupt politicians, and crooked elites oppose tariffs because they benefit from cheap labor and lax regulations abroad. Tariffs value American workers, consumers, and the nation. The U.S. needs tariffs, not taxes, to put America first and begin a new golden age.

We went from fighting a 2% tax on tea during the revolution to being taxed on money in various ways today. Taxes are imposed on income, spending, saving, investing, and even driving. The government takes more as you earn more. The federal tax code is 26,100 pages, with over 9,000 additional IRS regulations. Despite this, infrastructure funded by taxpayers is deteriorating. Our founding fathers would be displeased with the current tax system.

The speaker discusses tariffs and questions their logic, arguing that tariffs are supposed to replace the income tax, but pointing to a pie chart that shows income tax and social security as the large portions, with a small line at the top representing proposed tariffs, and asks how tariffs could replace the income tax unless the system is off the charts and business becomes untenable. The speaker asserts that a recent development shows significant harm to farmers under the tariff regime, noting that Trump plans a $14,000,000,000 bailout for farmers because the tariffs are hurting their income. This is presented as part of the broader argument that tariffs have negative effects on agricultural interests. Turning to historical context, the speaker references the 1893 McKinley tariffs, which Trump allegedly quotes, and claims that such tariffs would lead to an economic depression and an agricultural depression, suggesting a cyclical or predictable downturn as a consequence of protectionist policy. The speaker then recommends reading Secrets of the Federal Reserve by Eustace Mullins, asserting a strong critical stance toward taxation. It is stated that no tax has ever helped the people, that all sides have implemented taxes, and that bankers have “screwed the people.” The speaker emphasizes the importance of being aware of these dynamics, linking taxation to a broader critique of financial and political systems.

The policies under Donald Trump led to low inflation, rising wages, and stability. However, under Joe Biden, there is rising inflation and economic stagnation. It's important to acknowledge Trump's success and consider bringing him back for another term to restore a growing economy and peace globally.

Tariffs are presented as vital for economic independence, having historically served as the primary revenue source for the U.S. government before income tax. They are said to protect American workers and industries from unfair foreign competition by ensuring domestic businesses can compete and thrive. Tariffs are claimed to maintain jobs, encourage domestic production, bolster national security and prosperity, and improve trade deal negotiations. Those who oppose tariffs are characterized as globalists, corrupt politicians, and elites who exploit cheap labor and foreign regulations. The speaker advocates for tariffs to value American workers, consumers, and the nation, keep jobs in America, and protect the economy. The conclusion is a call for tariffs over taxes to put America first and usher in a new golden age.

It's time to pick a side: are we for the Constitution or TikTok, law and order or open borders? An actor with a new movie about Ronald Reagan says the issues of the 1980 election are similar to today. Back then, there was inflation, 20% interest rates, and Iran hostages. The nation was said to be in decline, but Ronald Reagan said no. Similarly, President Trump, the speaker's favorite president of the 21st century, also rejected national decline.

The speaker claims that America was once rich due to tariffs, which taxed other countries for taking American jobs, similar to China's current policies. They state that in the 1880s, a commission was formed to decide what to do with the excess money generated from tariffs. The speaker asserts that America switched to an income tax system in the early 1900s because other countries pressured America to stop using tariffs, implying these countries controlled American politicians. They contrast this with China's policy of requiring companies to build factories there to sell cars, referencing Elon Musk as an example and praising him.

Historic economic accomplishments have been made through science, technology, and investment in the American workforce. These accomplishments include growing the American workforce, rising wages, and bringing down prices. It is important to inform people about the source of these accomplishments.

Thank you. It’s good to be here. We've been discussing how to pay for my plans. They're logical, but Washington isn't. How will I convince a divided Congress to support them, given their past behavior? It will involve taxes. Economists across the spectrum agree, although Congress isn't made up of economists. I understand the concern, but that's the reality.

When America was founded, our founding fathers were insurgents who defeated a powerful empire. However, over time, the insurgent becomes the favorite and starts apologizing for its success. This is happening today. To make America great again, we need to remember what made it great in the first place: intellectual curiosity. Our founding fathers valued education, self-learning, and a desire to explore and improve the world. We should revive this combination of curiosity and confidence. We should expect more from ourselves and our leaders. We need to stay true to the culture of exploration and curiosity that allowed America to succeed. If we don't, we risk losing our freedom of thought and becoming an incumbent that gets unseated by another nation.