TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 asserts that packaged DNA fragments have been found en masse as vaccine contaminants. Once they reach the nucleus, short DNA sequences have an increased propensity to insert into chromosomal DNA. The possible consequences are unending, including disruption of the exquisitely tuned network that controls cell division and differentiation, which can lead to cancer and developmental defects. Mutations in sperm and fertilized egg cells could render altered traits inheritable. Speaker 0 further states that cost effective procedures to reliably separate mass produced RNA from plasmids do not exist, and therefore contamination of RNA vaccines with plasmid DNA must be expected to be the rule and not the exception. Whoever propagates RNA vaccines as being safe and effective, whoever claims that nothing can happen to your genome is either incredibly ignorant or endlessly evil. That person is turning his back on the horror scenario that is unfolding in front of our very eyes. Fellow citizens and physicians of the world are urged to turn away from the perpetrators of this monstrous crime against humanity. Speaker 0 concludes with admonitions to do this to save yourself, your descendants, and to rescue the name of your family or go down in history as one of the greatest criminals of all time. Speaker 1 responds: Thank you very much, professor Bhakti. You continue to be an inspiration both scientifically and ethically for all of us.

Speaker 0 states: I just call them Frankenshots. If you study it, the technology here, the mRNA technology, came out of the Pentagon. They the Pentagon were the people who financed these Nazi COVID Frankenshots, and they were involved in the development of them. So it's certainly my belief and the belief of the people in Florida that they have to be withdrawn from the market, prohibited, and and destroyed. They're they're just too dangerous for people. You can see Pele if you just click on the Internet. All of the adverse reactions among people and deaths that are, occurring, all the time. In fact, right at the very beginning of the pandemic, based on my, experience dealing with biological warfare weapons and their so called vaccines, frankinchots, I said quite clearly that anything that big pharma came up with that set as a that they said would be a vaccine was would be more dangerous than useless.

Dr. Robert Malone, a physician scientist, discusses the rushed development and deployment of mRNA-based gene therapy vaccinations. He highlights the breach of ethics and regulatory norms, as well as the lack of informed consent. Dr. Malone emphasizes the need for open and transparent access to data regarding the safety and effectiveness of these products. He mentions the numerous adverse events associated with the vaccines, including menstrual cycle disruptions, reproductive health issues, blood clotting, damage to various body systems, immunologic and oncologic harms, and even death. Dr. Malone urges governments to disclose the data so that scientists can evaluate it and resolve the controversy surrounding these products.

Many people who have received mRNA injections for COVID-19 may die within 3 to 5 years, even with just one dose. These mRNA vaccines were rushed into clinical trials without going through the usual testing phases. Normally, vaccines would go through phase one, phase two, and phase three trials, but these vaccines skipped phase two and went straight to phase three, which involves injecting the entire population. More than 60,000 people have died during these trials, and adverse events such as heart problems and organ failure have been reported. This is a dangerous experiment happening in real time on real people, including children and pregnant women. It is important to be honest and inform people about the risks involved.

The speaker criticizes the justification for implementing COVID-19 measures based on a high case fatality rate that turned out to be inaccurate. They argue that this rushed response disregarded ethical and regulatory norms, such as informed consent. The speaker, labeled as far-right and a conspiracy theorist, identifies themselves as a physician and scientist involved in the development of the technology behind the vaccines. They express concern about the disregard for safety and efficacy standards, as well as the lack of transparency in defining these terms. The speaker suggests that the dissemination of misleading information is a form of psychological manipulation.

My name is Robert Malone, a physician and scientist. I want to share the scientific facts about the genetic vaccine for children. This vaccine injects a viral gene that forces the body to produce harmful spike proteins, leading to permanent damage in critical organs like the brain, nervous system, heart, blood vessels, and reproductive system. It can also cause irreversible changes to the immune system. These damages cannot be reversed. Before making the irreversible decision to vaccinate your child, consider these facts.

The speaker describes unbridled enthusiasm and irrational exuberance for life as sacrificing safety. They state they presented autopsy work on death after COVID-19 vaccination at the American Society of Microbiology, where thousands of microbiologists, vaccinologists, and immunologists attended. As people visited, the speaker was stunned by what they call scientific seduction by messenger RNA technology. They predict a cataclysmic recognition that mRNA platforms are unsafe, claiming there is no way to break down pseudourrogenated messenger RNA. The speaker asserts that circulating messenger RNA from Pfizer or Moderna remains in patients’ bloodstream three years after the shots, described as intact.

Mr. Kevin McKernan, a former leader at the Human Genome Project, discussed DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. He highlighted the risks of insertional mutagenesis and integration into the genome, contradicting regulators' claims of little consequence. The DNA, found in lipid nanoparticles, can enter cells and potentially contribute to cancer. McKernan emphasized the inadequacy of current monitoring methods and called for a review of regulatory practices. The presence of DNA in these vaccines challenges existing safety standards and raises concerns about long-term effects.

The speaker discusses the issue of DNA contamination in mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and questions the FDA's handling of the situation. They explain that normally rigorous tests are required to ensure safety, but in this case, the FDA ignored those tests. The speaker also mentions that Moderna's own patent acknowledges concerns about DNA and insertional immunogenesis. They reveal that DNA fragments, including an antibiotic resistance gene and sequences from simian virus 40, were found in the vaccines. The speaker expresses shock at the FDA's lack of transparency and highlights the potential risks associated with DNA damage, such as cancer and birth defects.

Dr. Robert Malone, a physician and scientist, discusses the need for a rapid response capability to address emerging infectious diseases and engineered pathogens. He highlights the potential risks associated with the development of bioweapons and the justification for the mRNA-based gene therapy vaccination technology. Dr. Malone criticizes the misinformation surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic, including the exaggerated case fatality rate and the disregard for ethical and regulatory norms. He emphasizes the importance of informed consent and transparency in accessing and analyzing data to determine the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines. Dr. Malone also mentions various adverse events associated with the vaccines, such as myocarditis, reproductive health issues, blood clotting, and death. He calls for open disclosure of data to resolve the controversy surrounding the vaccines.

Dr. Robert Malone, a physician and scientist, discusses the need for a rapid response capability to address emerging infectious diseases and engineered pathogens. He highlights the potential risks associated with the technology, stating that almost anyone with an undergraduate degree in biology can weaponize pathogens. Dr. Malone criticizes the rushed deployment of mRNA-based gene therapy vaccinations, arguing that it violated ethical and regulatory norms. He questions the justification for the technology based on inaccurate case fatality rate predictions and emphasizes the importance of informed consent and transparency. Dr. Malone calls for open access to data to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of these products, citing numerous adverse events reported in peer-reviewed studies. He concludes by urging governments to disclose the data and address the controversy surrounding these products.

The speakers discuss the potential effects of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Speaker 1 explains that the idea of DNA fragments and reverse transcription in vaccines is a distinct possibility proven in vitro (in the laboratory) but not as solidly established in real-life humans. He says the machinery exists to reverse transcribe the synthetic mRNA in “these gene products” but notes skepticism about certain public figures and officials who allegedly ignored earlier communications. He cites Denis Rancourt’s data, claiming the vaccine has killed 17 million people and that the injury-to-kill ratio is 34.4. He translates this to global totals of 602 million injured or killed, with approximately 700,000 Americans killed and 2.5 million injured in the United States, describing this as an unprecedented injury-to-kill ratio in medicine and military contexts. He asserts that deadly gene products should have been removed from the market and from Florida two years ago. Speaker 0 asks whether Latipo was alerted two years ago and whether he ignored the warnings. Speaker 1 confirms that Latipo, Ashley Moody, and DeSantis did not respond to communications over the past two years, but notes that Latipo is now taking some action. The conversation shifts to how people can respond health-wise. Speaker 1 contends that health care systems and governments are corrupt, claiming the government has spent trillions of dollars to capture healthcare systems and push dangerous narratives. He urges listeners to leave the conventional healthcare system, describing it as corrupt and implying that healthcare professionals are silenced or fired for speaking out. He promotes an alternative health approach through a parallel system and mentions an emergency medical kit intended to address multiple dangerous diseases and scenarios, asserting that timely access to certain drugs is limited through ordinary medical channels. Throughout, Speaker 1 emphasizes drastic distrust of mainstream medical and governmental institutions, urging viewers to seek alternative health solutions and to prepare for potential health crises. He repeats that the traditional healthcare system is compromised and advocates a shift toward a different healthcare approach and emergency preparedness, including access to medications outside standard channels.

The speaker clarifies they are injured by an mRNA therapeutic, not a vaccine, and highlights issues with lipid nanoparticles and synthetic mRNA, which can persist for hundreds of days. They claim that instructing cells to produce a protein that presents on the cell surface can trigger autoimmune disorders. The speaker states that the spike protein itself is biologically active, causing cells to grow and divide inappropriately, and was known to damage the placenta and lungs. They assert they knew early on that the shot didn't stay in the arm. They cite 2005 research showing the SARS-CoV-1 spike protein alone could harm animals. The speaker references 2015 gain-of-function research at UNC, NIH, and Wuhan labs, where a more lethal and transmissible SARS virus was created. A traditional vaccine attempt for this virus caused harm and lethality in animals, with pathology slides showing similar vascular lung damage seen with SARS-CoV-2. The speaker concludes that "they" knew about these risks but still rolled out the vaccine, profiting from it while falsely claiming it was safe and effective.

Technology was proven unsafe long before 2021. The COVID-19 vaccines contain lipid nanoparticles that carry synthetic DNA into various organs, risking genomic instability, cancers, autoimmune diseases, and hereditary disorders. Contamination levels are far above permissible limits, and we're seeing evidence in patients. Cancer-free patients are relapsing with aggressive cancers post-vaccination, including unusual and rapid tumor growth. There's a rise in blood cancers too. The vaccines also contained endotoxin, which causes shock and can lead to death. The lab-leak possibility was dismissed without investigation, leading to devastating lockdowns. The "safe and effective" mantra was a lie; these injections have caused unprecedented harm. Ethical principles were ignored, and informed consent was violated. These mRNA gene therapies shouldn't have been used on anyone. We must halt distribution, monitor cancer trends, develop testing, and research vaccine-related conditions.

The speaker argues that an irrational, unbridled enthusiasm for new possibilities leads to a sacrifice of safety. This enthusiasm, in their view, has adversely affected precautionary considerations and risk assessment. They reference presenting autopsy findings related to deaths following COVID-19 vaccination at the American Society of Microbiology, an event attended by thousands of microbiologists, vaccinologists, and immunologists. In conversations with attendees, the speaker was surprised by what they describe as a scientific seduction surrounding messenger RNA technology. The core concern expressed is that this eagerness to embrace mRNA platforms is accompanied by a neglect of safety considerations. The speaker asserts that there will be a cataclysmic recognition that messenger RNA technology represents an unsafe platform. They emphasize that, as they understand it, there is no way to break down certain aspects of the technology they refer to as “pseudourogenated messenger RNA,” noting this within the context of their work in research laboratories. The statement implies a belief that the degradation or metabolic processing of this form of RNA poses unresolved issues. A central, striking claim presented is that circulating messenger RNA from Pfizer or Moderna has been found in their patients’ bloodstream three years after vaccination, and that this RNA is intact. The speaker underscores this as evidence tied to their observations and research experiences, asserting the persistence of the RNA in the circulatory system over an extended period. Overall, the message conveys a perspective that rapid adoption and optimism around mRNA vaccines and technologies have overshadowed safety considerations, and it anticipates a future realization of safety concerns associated with these platforms. The speaker ties their warnings to concrete experiences at a major scientific conference and to specific, long-term biomarkers observed in patients, presenting a narrative of ongoing research findings and anticipated paradigm shifts in how the safety of mRNA vaccines is perceived.

The speaker, a viral immunologist, discusses the presence of bacterial plasma DNA in the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines. They explain that the DNA is not supposed to be there and that its presence indicates improper manufacturing. The speaker highlights the potential dangers of bacterial DNA, including its ability to activate the immune system and promote inflammation. They also suggest that the DNA could lead to prolonged expression of the spike protein and raise concerns about legal immunity for the manufacturers. The speaker calls for a worldwide moratorium on the technology until further research is conducted.

This video provides a comprehensive overview of the problems and potential risks associated with mRNA vaccines. The speaker identifies five main issues with the current technology, including dose, pharmacokinetics, localization, fidelity, and innate immunity. They argue that the technology is not yet fully understood or controlled, and that it has been introduced prematurely. The speaker also highlights the lack of tools to measure the production and distribution of the vaccine in the body, as well as potential risks and side effects. They discuss modifications made to the mRNA sequence and how they can impact protein production. The speaker also mentions the potential for immune system suppression and increased risk of infections, parasites, and cancers due to the inhibition of innate immunity. The lack of transparency and proper regulation in the approval process for these vaccines is criticized, and the need for further research and long-term monitoring of their effects is emphasized.

The speaker asserts that COVID-19 shots do more than affect the immune system; they can damage the brain and worsen mental health. They claim a wave of studies shows sharp increases in various strokes: ischemic strokes up to 44%, hemorrhagic strokes up to 50%, and transient ischemic attacks (mini strokes) up to 67%. They also report increases in neurological and autoimmune conditions, including myasthenia gravis up 71% and Alzheimer’s disease up 22%. Cognitive impairment is claimed to have risen by nearly 138%, while depression is up 68%, anxiety disorders up 44%, and sleep disorders up 93%. The speaker links all of these increases to “toxic spike protein accumulation and persistence in the brain.” The speaker states this is not a conspiracy theory and cites what they describe as documented peer‑reviewed research and studies by experts. They name epidemiologist Nicholas Holcher, who allegedly says that using mRNA to hijack cells in various organ systems to produce a highly toxic spike protein that persists in the body for months or years was “one of the worst ideas in medical history.” The speaker then asks, “So what can you do?” as a transition to presumably recommendations or actions, though no specific actions are listed in the provided segment.

The speaker discusses the issue of DNA contamination in mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and questions the FDA's handling of the situation. They explain that normally rigorous tests are required for genotoxicity and immunogenesis, but the FDA seemed to ignore these requirements. The speaker also mentions that Moderna's own patent acknowledges the concerns related to DNA and insertional immunogenesis. They reveal that DNA fragments, including an antibiotic resistance gene and sequences from simian virus 40, were found in the vaccines. The speaker expresses concern about the potential risks associated with DNA damage, such as cancer and birth defects. They criticize the FDA for downplaying the issue and emphasize the importance of transparency.

Dr. Robert Malone, a physician and scientist, discusses the need for a rapid response capability to address emerging infectious diseases and engineered pathogens. He highlights the potential risks of bioweaponization and the justification for developing mRNA-based gene therapy vaccines. Dr. Malone criticizes the misinformation surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic, including the exaggerated case fatality rate and the disregard for ethical and regulatory norms. He emphasizes the importance of informed consent and transparency in accessing and analyzing data to determine the safety and effectiveness of these vaccines. Dr. Malone also mentions various adverse events associated with the vaccines, such as myocarditis, reproductive health issues, blood clotting, and death. He calls for open disclosure of data to resolve the controversy surrounding these products.

The speaker states that while messenger RNA (mRNA) can be used to produce missing proteins like insulin, using mRNA for vaccines is a failed and dangerous concept. They criticize the US government for not being honest about their involvement in mRNA research, specifically the Adept p three program, which aimed to use mRNA to end pandemics within 60 days.

The speaker expresses concern about the mRNA vaccines, specifically the Pfizer and Moderna ones, stating that they believe there are deliberate toxicities built into these materials. They explain how the immune system normally distinguishes between self and foreign substances, but when mRNA is used to make a piece of a foreign protein, the immune system goes into attack mode. The speaker argues that these vaccines cannot be safe for mass market use as they may cause the immune system to attack its own cells. They also claim that all four companies developing COVID-19 vaccines intentionally chose the spike protein, which they believe is biologically active and potentially toxic.