TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

I plan on pursuing a civil suit as my restaurant was shut down without going to court. It's a shame what happened to the hospitality industry. These past two years have been the most difficult experience of my life. They tried to break me financially, mentally, and spiritually, but with the support of good people, we fought back. Never give up hope and believe in yourself. The power of the human spirit is indomitable.

In Helsinki, Dr. Hanna Nochonek testified that Finnish health authorities knew COVID vaccines didn't fully prevent transmission since summer 2021. They advised the government to stop using COVID passes by the end of the year, but the government ignored it. A citizen, Mikka Vahokala, is suing the government over this issue. For more information, visit casecovidpass.com. Helsinki correspondent for Positivity and Good TV.

We are going to the Supreme Court next Friday at 3 PM EST. Watch on FrankSpeech.com. Visit lindaleplan.com for more info. After 3 years, we have explosive evidence to share. Join us live at the Supreme Court steps. Thank you. Translation: We are going to the Supreme Court next Friday at 3 PM EST. Watch on FrankSpeech.com. Visit lindaleplan.com for more info. After 3 years, we have explosive evidence to share. Join us live at the Supreme Court steps. Thank you.

I am honored to be here with 7 brave citizens launching a European citizens initiative against the globalist agenda. We reject the unelected power of organizations like WHO, controlled by billionaires, and demand that democratically elected governments maintain authority. We will expose any government or parliament member who disregards democracy. Elections are coming, and the people deserve to know who is responsible for undermining democracy. We are millions worldwide, and we will fight until we bring down those who oppose us. Brace yourselves, the fight is on. Let's commence.

I'm in a taxi heading to the federal court of appeal in Toronto for a hearing regarding my book, "The Libranos," published during the 2019 election. Elections Canada has been prosecuting me for five years, spending over $1 million on this case, while ignoring serious foreign interference in our elections. My book, critical of Justin Trudeau, is the only one among 24 published that has faced legal scrutiny. I'll be live tweeting the proceedings, and I'm likely to be alone in court without support from civil liberties or journalism groups. If you believe in defending free speech, please consider helping with legal costs at thelibranos.com. I'm fighting against Trudeau's government, and I appreciate any support. I'll update you soon on Twitter.

We are outside the UK high court for Julian Assange's extradition hearing. If his appeal is rejected, his last chance is the European Court of Human Rights. If any grounds are accepted, more UK hearings may follow. Assange's health is at risk in prison, and extradition could be fatal. We urge the Biden administration to drop the charges and release him for press freedom and our right to know.

Today in The Netherlands, outside the Court of Appeal in Amsterdam, a landmark case brings senior government officials, major media figures, pharmaceutical leadership, and global policy actors together as defendants in a single COVID response case. Among those ordered to appear are Albert Baller, the CEO of Pfizer, the former Dutch prime minister, senior Dutch health ministers, leading figures from the Dutch media, and Bill Gates. This makes the case extraordinary. On March 9, an important step is happening at the Amsterdam Court of Appeal. This hearing is not the main trial. The main trial is proceeding, and Bill Gates, if not appearing in person, must have representation and offer a defense. Today’s hearing concerns a procedural question: should the court allow an appeal against an earlier decision that blocked a request for preliminary evidence? In simple terms, the claimants ask the court for permission to present and examine expert evidence early before the trial, to have experts testify, documents examined, and key scientific and legal claims tested through cross examination. The lower court refused that request. The Amsterdam Court Of Appeal is being asked to decide whether that refusal should itself be reviewed. This hinges on the right to have evidence examined in public. If the appeal is allowed, expert testimony and scrutiny of the evidence could proceed; if refused, the claimants must continue without that preliminary examination. The reason for this hearing traces to the main lawsuit, begun in July 2023. Seven Dutch citizens filed a civil case in a district court, claiming they were misled about the nature of the COVID threat and about the safety and necessity of COVID vaccines. They argue that government officials, public health authorities, pharmaceutical executives, and major media figures promoted a narrative that induced fear and compliance based on unscientific claims of a novel pathogen called COVID nineteen. They claim these representations caused them to take vaccines and to suffer psychological and physical harm. The claimants describe a tort claim: the defendants breached a duty of care owed to the public by providing false or misleading information that resulted in damage. They seek two things: a declaration that the defendants acted unlawfully and compensation for the harm. Before the trial proceeds, the claimants asked for the evidence behind those claims to be examined in court, hence the provisional evidence request and today’s appeal. Central to the request are expert witnesses from multiple disciplines addressing scientific, legal, psychological, and institutional dimensions. The experts include Catherine Watt (legal researcher in public health law), Sasha Latipova (pharmaceutical regulatory processes), Doctor Joseph Sansone (psychologist studying crisis messaging and behavioral compliance), Catherine Austin Fitz (financial analyst on institutional power structures and global policy networks), and Doctor Mike Yeadon (English pharmacologist, former Pfizer VP). Yeadon has argued that the safety narrative surrounding the vaccines is challenged, claiming inadequate testing and concerns about toxicity. The point of a court is that such claims should be tested under cross examination, not dismissed without scrutiny. Allowing this appeal would enable the evidence to be heard and tested in public, with broader implications beyond the Netherlands, potentially influencing accountability, transparency, and public trust in other jurisdictions. What happens here may influence debates about open scrutiny of evidence in courts elsewhere. The speaker closes with a personal note, recalling six years spent fighting misinformation and supporting the truth be told campaign for COVID jabbed, injured, and bereaved, and underscoring that this case concerns justice in action, public scrutiny, and accountability for powerful institutions.

I was jailed for speaking out, do you agree? I don't want another lockdown. The speaker presents a book exposing research fraud behind vaccine mandates to a senator.

Good morning, everyone. I'm on my way to the Commonwealth Court in Harrisburg for a hearing at 9:30 AM regarding our whistleblower case against Kathy Bookbar. This appeal, which we've awaited for three years, involves evidence from a sting operation during the 2020 election that exposed public officials committing felonies. We fought for oral arguments, which we won, and the hearing will be live-streamed. Thank you to everyone for your support; we ask for your prayers today. We will discuss obstruction of justice and the lack of forensic analysis on our evidence, despite the closure of criminal investigations. We believe there was election fraud in 2020, and we will continue to fight for the truth. Please share this video and tune in to the live hearing. God bless.

I am honored to be here with 7 brave citizens launching a European citizens initiative against the globalist agenda. We reject the idea of granting unelected bodies like the WHO governing powers. Democratically elected governments should not be replaced by billionaire-controlled organizations. This goes against the principles of democracy and shows contempt for the people. These 7 citizens and we will not tolerate this power grab. I will expose any government, whether in a member state or elsewhere, that supports this.

An international group, including Mark and me, delivered a letter to the UN rapporteur on torture, calling for an investigation into the unlawful imprisonment and torture of Dr. Reiner Fumich in Germany. He has been held for over a year, mostly in solitary confinement, which is effectively torture. This situation must end, and Fumich's imprisonment needs to be investigated. He played a crucial role in exposing COVID-related crimes, and his work has made some powerful entities fearful. If the courts want to maintain credibility, they must adhere to the law. Fumich is a leading figure in class action lawsuits and has gathered significant expert testimony, concluding that a false PCR pandemic was used to justify abuses against citizens. His findings have been validated by recent reports.

In Europe, we lack the First Amendment, limiting our ability to freely criticize the government or certain groups. Tomorrow, my friend Raisa Blomestang stands trial in the Netherlands for allegedly offending a group while criticizing the government's mass migration policies. This reflects a politically motivated judiciary that targets right-wing politicians, as seen with others like Geert Wilders. I can't attend the trial due to health reasons, but I want to raise awareness about the situation in Europe. Raisa's case highlights the risks of expressing dissenting opinions, especially regarding immigration policies. I encourage everyone to support her and remember how fortunate those in America are to have the freedom of speech that we do not enjoy in Europe.

I am Thomas Bintur, a doctor with 35 years of experience in respiratory infections. I believe there is a pandemic of severe illnesses and unexpected deaths from various causes. The modified RNA vaccine is a medical crime and a humanitarian disaster. It injects a foreign protein into the body without control over its production or duration. This vaccine should be banned immediately. The government is negotiating a pandemic treaty with the WHO, which would limit our freedom of choice. We need to stand up against the manufacturers, experts, government, and authorities who have failed us in the COVID scandal. It's not too late to take action for a better future for our children and grandchildren.

The speaker acknowledges the risks of their actions but believes that exposing the truth is worth it. They are prepared to face imprisonment and are confident that the world will support them. The IT worker accused of accessing sensitive health data and spreading misinformation about vaccine-related deaths appears in court. The health agency is working to recover the data and reassure the public about the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine. The speaker lists several cases of individuals who allegedly died after receiving the vaccine. They express their willingness to be targeted and emphasize that their goal is to stop the situation.

I am honored to be here with 7 brave citizens launching a European citizens initiative against the globalist agenda. We reject the unelected WHO's attempt to govern us and strip away our freedom and democracy. Governments should be elected by the people, not controlled by billionaires. We will expose anyone who disrespects democracy and the people. Elections are coming, and we will hold those responsible for undermining democracy accountable. We are millions around the world, and we will fight until we bring down the globalists. Brace yourselves, the fight is on.

I am honored to be here with 7 brave citizens launching a European citizens initiative against the globalist agenda. We reject the unelected power of organizations like WHO, controlled by billionaires, and demand that democratically elected governments govern. Any government supporting this power grab shows contempt for the people. We will expose those who disrespect democracy and the upcoming elections will hold them accountable. We are millions worldwide fighting against this minority. Brace yourselves, the fight is on. Let's commence.

Dr. Miley Trinh, a GP based in Sydney, Australia, joins Jim Ferguson for her first appearance on the show. She explains she has practiced as a GP for nearly thirty years and has been suspended since late 2021 amid a dispute with the health regulator over her license. She describes her suspension as part of a broader fight with regulators and regulators’ attempts to cancel her medical license. Trinh recounts how her concerns about the COVID-19 situation began in 2019, while following global events and studying debt-based economic systems. She states she became alarmed by reports of Wuhan’s lockdown timing, noting that authorities announced a lockdown five days earlier and allowed travel before it commenced, which she found alarming. She observed what she called unusual global coordination in reporting and policy responses to the pandemic, with early treatment being suppressed and a tightly controlled narrative across countries. Regarding ivermectin, she says she concluded after months of research that it was a key medication for treating COVID-19, particularly when given early. She describes participating in doctor groups and Zoom meetings to discuss how to treat patients and notes she treated a patient by telephone during lockdown who was deteriorating. She reports that the patient improved after her treatment but later faced complications requiring hospital care. She says two complaints were filed against her in September 2021—the first from a patient she had helped, and the second from an individual named John Smith who obtained a prescription that belonged to a family member for ivermectin. She asserts John Smith did not belong to her practice, and that the prescription was allegedly handed to an APRA (Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency) agent, a fact she says regulators overlooked when investigating her practice. Trinh emphasizes that she had never before faced a complaint in nearly thirty years of practice and that the suspension hearing concluded with her being deemed a danger to public health, despite her insistence that she saved a life. She has remained suspended for over four years. She describes the regulatory process as involving claims of prescribing ivermectin “below standard” and accusations of professional misconduct for not handing over 20 to 30 patient medical files, which she says she refused to provide because she did not know the patients’ names and because none of the patients had filed complaints against her. She notes that hearings occurred in December, March, and August, with subsequent issues over transcript integrity and requests for recusal of the presiding judge. She says a decision on the main case is imminent, but a cancellation of her license could entail a three to five-year suspension and substantial costs, complicating the possibility of reinstatement. Beyond her case, she argues the fight is about medical autonomy and the right for physicians to tailor treatments to individual patients, not be dictated by politicians or rigid guidelines. She criticizes what she views as a heavily censored environment for doctors who questioned the pandemic narrative or advocated for therapeutics like ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, vitamin D, and zinc. She asserts that the COVID-19 Task Force guidelines opposed ivermectin and other therapeutics, and she contends such guidelines restrict doctors’ ability to provide individualized care. Trinh links the censorship and regulatory pressure to broader concerns about global governance, citing media suppression, removal of dissent on platforms like Facebook and YouTube, and increased control over platforms such as X (formerly Twitter). She mentions public support, including her presence on X and Facebook, as important to her ongoing legal battle and the broader struggle over medical autonomy and truth during the pandemic. She concludes by inviting people to follow her on X and Facebook to learn more and to show support as she pursues potential appeals if the judgment does not go in her favor. She frames her case as about more than COVID-19 alone: it is about challenging what she views as a long-standing, disproportionate control of doctors and a fight for fundamental rights, including the right to a hearing before the tribunal and the right to medical decision-making free from political interference.

The World Health Organization worsened global health during the pandemic by supporting coercive mandates for harmful pharmaceutical products. They have not apologized for the harm caused. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, a major funder, profited from investments in COVID mRNA vaccines. We must resist and refuse to comply with these actions. Our voices must be heard to protect our rights. Thank you to everyone standing up with courage.

Geneva hosts organizations like WHO and WEF, promoting global injections of nano lipids to billions. The WEF should lose diplomatic immunity. Bill Gates and others push for poison injections. We must stand up, refuse to comply, and bring justice to those responsible. Our light will overcome evil.

Many people want to move on from COVID-19 and the vaccine, including those who regret getting vaccinated. However, the speaker believes it is a mistake to move on without accountability for the coercion that led to vaccination. The speaker intends to continue fighting until those responsible admit wrongdoing. The speaker claims T-Mobile's treatment was inhumane, disrespectful, and a violation of the Nuremberg Code. They will use their right to free speech to repeatedly call out T-Mobile until the company admits fault or experiences a decline in brand appearance or stock valuation.

Speaker describes ongoing experiences challenging corona mandates in Switzerland: leading court proceedings as a Swiss lawyer against unconstitutional mandates, representing individuals seeking compensation for injuries from mRNA injections, and initiating a major criminal court proceeding against Swissmedic, the Swiss medical safety agency. Despite over three years of hard work, results regarding justice remain unseen. From these efforts, the speaker identifies a lesson: in Europe, in all involved courts and health authorities, they protect their governments with deceptive information policies, wrong decision making, and, most of all, with totally illegal authorizations of mRNA products granted in Switzerland by safety agencies. The speaker notes that no justice has been done and no lesson learned in the official European world. The speaker then asks what can be done about this and first seeks input from the MAHA team and Doctor Robert Malone about any hope from the United States, where positive signals have emerged, notably on January 20 with the present president Trump’s declaration to exit the WHO and other steps. From today’s event, the speaker derives hope, but contends that the hope must come from Europe. A plan is articulated: Europe will take its destiny into its own hands. The speaker intends to ensure that people can see the true effects of the WHO and the true effects of the industry after many proceedings have resulted in authorities claiming that the WHO was setting Gold standards. The speaker aims to contribute, together with the MEHA movement, all of their experience and investigations conducted against the WHO, and to work together to make Europe healthy again. The commitment is clear: they will never give up.

The speaker claims to be the only person in the U.S. with a viable lawsuit against the PREP Act, which has shut down approximately 100 other lawsuits. The speaker's lawyer, Michael Connet, believes a loophole exists because the lawsuit is based on a contract with specific commitments that were allegedly not met. The court date is set for October 29th. The drug company's defense relies on the PREP Act. The speaker argues that because they were in a vaccine trial, the initial contract should hold the company responsible. The speaker believes this case could set a precedent and is fighting for all Americans who could face similar situations with vaccines or pharmaceuticals. They contend that fundamental constitutional rights, such as free speech and fair jury trial, should not be suspended for public health or pharmaceutical profits.

I warned about the risks of the swine flu vaccination and now face arrest in Austria. The government wants to silence me because they plan to launch more vaccination campaigns and artificial pandemics. I previously filed charges against Baxter for attempting to trigger a bird flu pandemic. The World Health Organization supplied the virus and is responsible for global vaccination campaigns. We are currently under a pandemic level alert 6, which means forced vaccination and quarantine are possible. Legislation in the US and Europe aims to pressure people into taking vaccines. These vaccines can destroy our ability to feel emotions like anger and fear, which are necessary for responding to danger and injustice.

We are gathered here today to oppose the World Health Organization (WHO) and express our discontent with unelected officials. The past four years have been incredibly difficult for humanity, as we have faced vilification and ostracization. There are many misconceptions and myths about vaccines that need to be addressed. We read nonsensical claims on social media from uninformed individuals. We must take into account the evidence and ongoing criminal investigations surrounding these shots. Those who do not comply with the vaccine mandates are complicit in crimes against the people, and we will hold them accountable. We have been poisoned, but together we will overcome this. We must resist being told what to do and make people aware of the criminal investigation surrounding these mRNA shots. It may be hard to see the dangers now, but we must remember why we started fighting and act before it's too late. Victory will be ours.

We just finished a 2-hour testimony in court. The speaker felt it went well, covering issues like evidence-based medicine, industry influence, and whistleblower suppression. They mentioned ASEAN's strong defense against attacks on credibility, with recordings from court to be released. The testimony involved deep personal details, implicating figures like Donald Trump and Boris Johnson. Overall, they hope justice will prevail.