reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The transcript follows a chaotic, multi-voiced discussion centered on political information networks, election integrity, and coordinated activism around protests and media narratives. - Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 repeatedly question the sources of information: “Who the fuck is Jeremy? Where do I get my information? Why did I delete karaoke?” and the same for Jonathan, signaling concern about where information originates and how it is disseminated. - Speaker 2 describes a sense of purpose from sharing information and notes that Wisconsin was the first state where “the evidence that I and my one of my associates, Chris, had put together for Peter, Wisconsin was the first state where it was actually presented, under oath in, you know, a senate… the Wisconsin Senate Committee on Election Integrity.” - Speaker 3 references multiple online presences, including YouTube and Facebook (Jeremy Oliver, Onslaught Media Group), and mentions protesting activities as part of the narrative. - Speaker 4 mentions “Using other state capitals for practice dry runs,” implying rehearsal for protests or political actions. - Speaker 1 indicates a readiness to “storm the capital” and notes that participants are “all actors,” signaling a performative or coordinated element to actions. - Speaker 3, as a journalist or news producer, plans to stream live from protests to show “the real story” and “support the people that are out there fighting for our First Amendment rights.” - A dialogue involving Speaker 1 and Patrick discusses Mary Fanning and Mary Fenix, with questions about speaking to Patrick and perceived fairness in conversations, leading to a strained exchange. - Speaker 5 asserts that “Donald Trump has no business being president,” and introduces a coalition or think tank that includes Biden, Harris, Mike Flynn, and Simon Johnson (an IMF chief economist by birth in England), framing a network with both Democrats and Republicans. - Speaker 3 introduces Brian Gamble as CIO of the America Project, founded by Patrick Byrne, who sits on the Council on Foreign Relations with Stanley McChrystal. The claim is made that Flynn registered Flynn Intel Group from McChrystal’s home; McChrystal is described as an advisor for the Defeat Disinfo Pack, an AI system that detects Trump-trending content and promotes opposing viewpoints. The system is said to share opposing viewpoints, connecting to efforts involving the Flynn network to target the Patriot movement. - Speaker 6 expresses disbelief at the unfolding information, while Speaker 1 dismisses an interruption during a conversation, showing friction in interviews and onlookers. - Speaker 8 details that “the entire Flynn network was there,” naming Ali Alexander (a former CMP member) as a lead organizer, and Michael Flynn’s appearance on the CMP staff roster. The aim is stated as “creating instability as they’re trying to carry out a color revolution.” The speaker lists a list of Flynn network traits: a united and organized opposition, the ability to drive home the claim that voting results are falsified, compliant independent media to inform citizens about the falsified vote, and the mobilization of tens of thousands of demonstrators. - Speakers 9 and 10 discuss 2020 in Maricopa County, noting 395,000 in-person voters on election day (a figure they describe as low due to COVID) and debating how many Republicans intended but did not vote in Maricopa in the midterms. Projections estimate large missed numbers (700,000 or around 150,000 in later drafts), with debate on whether turnout would favor one party given demographics and turnout expectations. - Speaker 8 critiques associated figures: Patrick Byrne, Roger Richards (tattoo of Lucifer, propaganda space films with Jordan Sather), Emily Newman (ties to US Agency for Global Media, linked to Hillary Clinton and John Kerry), and Brian Gamble’s background in information warfare. - There are digressions about fundraising sources, rockefeller connections, and a tension between reform goals and control, with Speaker 12 suggesting figures like Charlie Kirk publicly advocate doing “the same things that got us into this place” to “beat the system,” implying a critique of reform vs. control within the movement. - The dialogue closes with personal anecdotes about Wisconsin politics, a case discussed with a Supreme Court justice race, and a strained, emotional confrontation that underscores distrust and the perception of manipulated information flows.

Speaker 0 says they picked up Henry Ford’s newest book from 1920, described as the original “international tiny hat.” They urge people to look into it, stating that Henry Ford was discussing the “tiny hat” in the twenties and that “here we are in 2026” with “the same issue going on.” Speaker 0 frames this as a continuity between Ford’s era and the present. Speaker 0 explains that anyone who went against the “tiny hat” was labeled an “anti tiny hat.” They present this labeling as a key part of how the idea operates, portraying it as a mechanism used to identify and categorize dissent or opposition. Speaker 0 further claims that the book goes into how “the tiny hats control everything, everything.” They describe the scope of control as total and comprehensive, emphasizing that the “tiny hats” influence or determine outcomes across many areas rather than in a limited or narrow way. They then describe the means by which this influence is said to be carried out: Speaker 0 says the “Bolshevik agenda” is used to push the “tiny hat” agenda onto the people. In Speaker 0’s account, the “Bolshevik agenda” functions as an underlying framework or strategy that helps advance the “tiny hat” agenda within society. Speaker 0 also connects the “tiny hat” to specific cultural or political themes. They mention “gender nonsense” and “all the other garbage you see” as examples of what they believe is being pushed. Speaker 0 states that these themes are “all backed by the tiny ants,” linking them to the same controlling force described earlier. Overall, Speaker 0 presents a narrative centered on Henry Ford’s 1920 book and the “international tiny hat,” asserting that the same issue is present in 2026. They highlight a pattern of labeling opponents as “anti tiny hat,” claim that “tiny hats control everything,” and state that a “Bolshevik agenda” is used to push the agenda onto the people, including “gender nonsense” and other referenced societal themes that are said to be supported by the “tiny ants.”

Speaker 0 argues that we are in a SIOP (psychological operation) right now, describing it as a “big time SIOP.” They believe “the powers that be” are trying to speed up a timeline that was designed to unfold over another sixty, seventy years because they “don’t have that time to be around for.” They suggest that either this is a deliberate acceleration or that the masters no longer “care” about being seen. The speaker notes that there is always a “they,” and acknowledges there are people “the powers that be” who have “been there a while.” The speaker identifies as someone who teaches SIOPs and asserts, “I’m the guy that teaches SIOPs,” then repeats, “we are in a SIOP. 1000% we are in a big time SIOP.” They clarify this assertion does not come with x-ray vision or knowledge of “puppet masters,” but they emphasize that they research the techniques involved and believe they are “definitely here.” The speaker contends that a similar process has occurred globally, in which psyops were sped up and were not allowed to mature before the next phase began. They acknowledge that some listeners may dismiss these claims as bonkers or crazy, noting that the phenomena appear “in your face” and come from multiple directions—“the left, from the right, from everywhere.” They insist, however, that this cross-cutting exposure is not about political alignment; “it has nothing to do with left or right,” adding that this realization is itself a separate topic of discussion. A central claim is that a timeline is being accelerated, with developments happening “more and more in the open.” The speaker suggests there is likely “not time for the previous step to make sure to get our minds ready to receive the next one.” In sum, the transcript presents a perspective that the current period exemplifies a deliberate, accelerated, and increasingly overt psyop landscape, driven by powerful actors who may be acting with urgency or impunity, and that this acceleration mirrors patterns observed in other parts of the world.

The speaker discusses the Masonic oath and its influence on politicians. They claim that congressmen are bound by this oath to cover up secrets and protect each other. The speaker also suggests that political parties and media outlets are controlled by the Masons. They mention David Sarnoff, a Mason, who played a role in the development of major broadcasting networks. The speaker emphasizes the importance of loyalty and not speaking ill of fellow Masons.

The speaker claims that "The Secret" was created by the Rockefellers and discusses a conspiracy theory about their hidden agenda. They describe a plan to deceive and control the population through various means, including poisoning, mind-altering technology, fear, and manipulation. The speaker emphasizes the goal of maintaining power and preventing people from realizing their true potential. They warn that if the truth is ever revealed, the conspirators will be exposed and hunted down. This secret is said to shape the present and future for generations to come.

Government agencies like the CIA use Hollywood entertainment to manipulate and control people. The speaker claims to have trained with the NSA and been involved in covert operations around the world. They discuss how agencies manipulate elections and overthrow governments using psychological operations. They also mention the influence of the Creative Artists Agency (CAA) in Hollywood and its connections to the CIA. The speaker suggests that the CIA and other intelligence agencies deceive and manipulate the public through propaganda and misinformation. They question the legitimacy of the US government and call for people to take back their power.

Speaker 0: In February and March 2026, I'll be back on the road in Hull, Gateshead, Derby, and Colchester. 2026 is when they want to cross the line as fast as they can into an AI controlled humanity. We stand up now or we regret it forever. That's four dates. Speaker 0: I recorded an edition of a show for iconic.com called Legacy, relating the content of my books to today. A central concept is what I labeled in the 1990s as problem reaction solution, also known as a false flag. The idea is to create a situation—war, terrorist attack, banking collapse, or something similar—then present the version of the problem you want the public to believe to provoke outrage and urgency. Then you covertly create the problem, evoke a public reaction, and openly offer the solutions you’ve already prepared. Speaker 0: Nine-Eleven is given as a classic example: attack on New York and Washington, blame Arab terrorists, claim Osama bin Laden and the Taliban orchestrated it. The reaction is “do something,” followed by the invasions of Afghanistan and other Middle Eastern countries. In response to Bondi Beach, the point is made that representatives may not truly represent the people, and a global network I call the global cult drives dystopia through digital AI means, operating through governments, intelligence agencies, and militaries worldwide. Even leaders such as presidents or prime ministers may not serve their nations’ people but the global cult’s interests. Speaker 0: One center of this global cult’s operations is Israel, established in 1948 for that purpose. The claim is that leadership claiming to represent Jewish people operates for the global cult rather than Jewish communities, and may even sacrifice Jewish lives to advance its aims through problem reaction solution. The Gaza crisis since October 7 is described as the world’s large-scale trauma, with statements about the Israeli government’s psychopathy and a super psychopathology characterized by a complete lack of empathy and deletion of compassion. The question is whether such leaders can truly have compassion for fellow Jews if they are driven by a broader agenda. Speaker 0: Regarding October 7, the Gaza border fence is described as the world’s most defended border, with sensors so sensitive that even a small animal would be detected. Yet Hamas breached the fence in multiple places, and there were reports of a stand-down by the Israeli defense forces, allowing the cross-border assault and hostage-taking. The outcome, it’s claimed, was used by Netanyahu to justify mass slaughter and destruction in Gaza, with talk of plans to take over land and expel Palestinians. The narrative then shifts to global perception, with some Christian Zionists wavering in support due to Gaza atrocities, and Israel allegedly funding influence campaigns to restore its global image, including money to American politicians and media interests. Speaker 0: When a new attack—Bondi Beach in Australia—occurs, Netanyahu publicly notes a Jewish man disarmed one of the attackers (though a Muslim did so), before retracting. This is presented as part of a pattern: calls to crack down on anti-Semitism, equating anti-Semitism with criticism of Israel and Zionism. The claim is that the only beneficiary is those who use such events to justify censorship and control of information, while the victims, including Jewish people who died or were injured, gain nothing. Speaker 0: The discussion reiterates that mind-control techniques exist and could drive individuals to commit mass violence without full awareness, referencing mind-control concepts like Manchurian candidates. The speaker urges asking “who benefits?” and considering elements of problem reaction solution and false flags in analyzing events, recognizing that appearances of representation do not guarantee genuine representation. For readers interested in more, the speaker directs to their books and content.

The speaker claims that a powerful group, including the Bilderbergers and the Rockefellers, controls the world and aims to enslave and corrupt humanity. They believe these individuals want everyone to be involved in evil and to love it. The speaker also mentions their desire for global control, including the ability to manipulate technology and the internet. They argue that spending time online allows for programming and control. The speaker concludes by stating that their own actions, such as transmitting prayers, have led to people staying home and believing in the false reality of the internet.

- Speaker 0 expresses humility before the Knights of Malta, describing the order as ancient and its history as a calling that prompts gratitude rather than pride. - Speaker 1 asserts that the Vatican is the “most serious evil organization on the face of the earth” and connects the Knights of Malta to the founders of the CIA in America, noting that six founders were Catholics and members of the Knights of Malta; he claims that banking families and institutions in the U.S. (Bank of America, Union Bank in California) were started and are run by Knights of Malta, Catholic Masons, and that European rulers rule by “divine right” granted by the Pope. - Speaker 2 expands on this by describing the Pope as representing God, and claims the Pope designates certain families to rule in France, Germany, and Britain, with the Pope’s authority underpinning “divine right.” - Speaker 2 notes Archbishop Edward Cardinal Egan of New York as a knight of Malta heading all three tongues of the Knights of Malta in the United States, overseen by Jesuits of Fordham University, mentioning Avery Cardinal Dulles (son of John Foster Dulles) as a knight of Malta who, as a Jesuit, allegedly oversaw Cardinal Egan in a conspiracy to bring down the World Trade Center and bomb the Pentagon, with George J. Tennant as a central figure who allegedly received the presidential Medal of Freedom. - Speaker 3 claims the deep state is above governments, consisting of the Rothschilds and the Vatican (including both the Black Pope and the White Pope) as well as Chabad Jews, using Freemasons and the Knights of Malta as fixers, with World Banks as their managers. - Speaker 4 describes the Knights of Malta as a Christian Masonic degree emphasizing Christian virtues, noting their diplomatic immunity and the ability to import/export goods without customs, and that they cannot be arrested or charged by law enforcement. - Speaker 5 supports this, saying members carry diplomatic passports, and that the order began as citizens of the United States of America. - Speaker 6 discusses the Templars creating banking and usury, contrasting with other claims about Jewish bankers, and asserts the Rothschilds are “keepers of the Vatican treasury,” wearing Maltese crosses, and that Rome needed Jewish bankers to be the bankers, with the Maltese cross as a symbol tied to the Vatican and Rome. - Speaker 7 points to Epstein in a claimed image bowing before Pope John Paul II, describing the Maltese cross as an insignia of a knight of the Catholic Church and tying it to Nazi-era symbols; they also connect Adolf Hitler to Jesuit influence and the funding of the Third Reich, naming Franz von Papen as a knight of Malta. - Speaker 8 references the Rothschilds again, the Vatican’s connection to World War II and the Jesuits, and asserts that the Third Reich and Holocaust were birthed by Rome and the Jesuits; mentions the connection between Napoleon’s campaigns and Jesuit guidance, and alleges the Knights of Malta, Teutonic Knights, and other Catholic orders influenced 20th-century events. - Speaker 9 claims the papacy is a military operation, with archbishops and cardinals as military officers under the Jesuit general and the papal guard; notes that the FCC leadership includes a Knight of Malta on the board and that Jesuit influence pervades U.S. institutions. - Speaker 11 asserts that P2 Freemasonry is tied to Opus Dei and the Knights of Malta, describes P2 as promoting right-wing death squads and drug cartels, and alleges Vatican CIA involvement, with the Vatican owning the Watergate Hotel and the CIA conducting dirty work there to remove Nixon. - Speaker 12 and others interject on love and marriage while reinforcing the overarching conspiracy framework, including references to the Knights of Malta, the Jesuits, the Crown, and various symbols linked to Catholic power, while claiming decades of hidden influence over global events.

The speaker describes a “super secret CMP,” stating that “influencers play dumb” and that it “is not on TV.” They frame the situation as involving “a council of political technocracy,” and claim that if they “won’t tell the truth, then you’re really free.” They characterize the context as being “on the brink of the end of humanity,” and say to “trust the AI science.” They also reference a “blackmail scheme” and describe it as “a real big club you’re not allowed to see.” They further claim that “the plans for your life is a working b,” presenting this as part of the same hidden structure. The speaker then shifts to additional organizational framing, saying “Root and hive.” They describe this as a “secret society,” and reiterate the idea of hidden control by calling it “the secret CNP telling you what you ought to believe.” They present the overall message as a connected set of concealed systems—CMP, political technocracy, AI science, blackmail scheme, and the big club you’re not allowed to see—paired with influence that is supposedly not openly broadcast (“not on TV”) and supposed control over what people believe.

The transcript presents a claim that the most powerful people in the world are targeting individuals using four specific weapons, and that the impact extends beyond the body. The speaker frames this as a deliberate, coordinated effort rather than incidental harm, and emphasizes that the targeting is pervasive and systemic. The central claim is that a movement driven by big corporations seeks to "take the soul away from people, to disconnect people from the higher world," and that to achieve this, there must be an effort to destroy the pineal gland. The speaker states that this palm of a threat has been studied, and argues that the pineal gland is the most sensitive part of the central nervous system, being "highly, highly, highly sensitive to four things." Those four things are identified as Aluminum, glyphosate, fluoride, and WiFi. The implication is that exposure to these four factors makes the pineal gland particularly vulnerable, thus enabling the alleged targeting. In the speaker’s view, the United States stands out as "the only country in the world" that has pushed these four elements into everyday life for people growing up over the past sixty years or so. This claim supports a broader narrative of deliberate manipulation through everyday environmental factors, rather than isolated incidents or ordinary risk. A further element posits that the targeting is the product of a coordinated protocol designed by an "ultra intelligence group of scientists." According to this claim, the protocol involves several interlocking components: fluoridating the drinking water, introducing "nano nylon aluminum" into the air, placing glyphosate in the food supply, and then activating these interventions by "spark it with the right frequencies." The language suggests a planned, technical system intended to exert control or influence through these mechanisms, rather than random exposure or casual policy choices. Taken together, the speaker’s assertions describe a comprehensive scheme in which four substances and a specific environmental technology are alleged to converge on the pineal gland, with the aim of eroding spiritual or higher-order experiences and influencing a broad population through a long-running, covert program orchestrated by powerful interests.

- The conversation centers on Congress’s upcoming hearing about MKUltra, prompted by Representative Anna Paulina Luna. The hosts note Luna’s history of revisiting old conspiracies that later proved real and caution that expectations for the hearing should be modest, recalling past revelations about JFK. - Kevin Shipp, a CIA whistleblower and author of Twilight of the Shadow Government, joins the discussion to discuss MKUltra, CIA secrecy, and the current relevance of past programs. He notes that MKUltra was a covert CIA program that ran for decades, focusing on mind control, behavior modification, and interrogation techniques with experimental drugs like LSD, sensory deprivation, and hypnosis, often conducted without consent or knowledge. He emphasizes that the program’s full details remain murky because the CIA destroyed large portions of records in the 1970s. - Shipp asserts that while the CIA claimed MKUltra ended in 1973, there is no evidence they actually did end it. He cites Victor Marchetti, author of The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence, who suggested the program continued under a different cover name. He argues that the same “matrix of secrecy” and “special access programs” persist today in the CIA, and oversight committees have failed to reform the agency; they meet less frequently and are subject to CIA secrecy agreements. - On historical exposure, Shipp mentions Operation Paperclip, where Nazi war criminal scientists’ files were falsified and handed to Truman; some of these scientists were hired by the CIA and used in MKUltra and related programs. He claims the CIA has a “bloody and deceitful track record” and questions whether the CIA has terminated MKUltra, suggesting it could continue in a different form. He also references his interviews with Carol, the daughter of John Warner, who says her father resigned in response to the CIA’s actions, including MKUltra, and that she has counseled patients who exhibit MKUltra-like damages. - The discussion turns to the possibility that MKUltra exists today outside the CIA’s direct umbrella, via NGOs and other facilities. Speaker 2 mentions an upcoming MKUltra whistleblower interview revealing astonishing claims about experiments on children and ongoing concerns about the hearing being sabotaged by false information to distort public perception. - The speakers discuss the plausibility of “Manchurian candidates”—mind-controlled operatives at high levels of government and industry. Shipp confirms that MKUltra involved training in forensic psychophysiology and manipulation of the mind, and that former agents could still be operating under new programs. He argues that the CIA’s morality is lacking, that “human life is cheap,” and that the agency would engage in such activities, though not all CIA personnel share these views. - The conversation covers the shift to more covert technologies: targeted energy weapons, nanobot and drone-like surveillance, and the integration of the CIA into an “ Directorate for Digital Innovation” merging with artificial intelligence. Shipp warns of risks associated with AI and nanotechnology, arguing for Congress to conduct a genuine church-style committee to break up the CIA or place its functions under the DIA. He asserts that many elected officials are influenced or controlled by the CIA, and that public pressure is essential to demand thorough investigation and reform. - The program closes with praise for Shipp’s book, Twilight of the Shadow Government, and with well-wishes regarding his son’s recovery after directed-energy-related incidents. The hosts encourage viewers to subscribe and share the video.

The speaker argues that visible evidence from 1783 demonstrates that people were already in the air, suggesting the existence of air technology in the 18th century. They claim that this establishes a precedent for staging large-scale events from the sky, such as alien invasions, while the general public remains unaware of the true capabilities of aerial technology at that time. The assertion is used to question contemporary portrayals of early flight, such as the Wright brothers, by implying that their apparent airplane demonstrations are misleading or staged, and that humanity was already airborne long before. According to the speaker, in the 1780s there were published articles stating that UFOs and flying saucers were invading towns, and the speaker identifies what they see as blimps as the actual objects described in those accounts. The overall point is that an “alien invasion” narrative has been, in the speaker’s view, constructed or perpetuated for a long time, with aliens allegedly preparing to arrive from outer space for an extended period. The speaker emphasizes continuity of control by a particular group, asserting that the “same people” or the “same tiny hats” who run the government in the 1800s are the same individuals deemed to be in power in 2026. This framing ties the alleged long-running alien invasion narrative to a claim about enduring political power and hidden influence across centuries. In summary, the speaker contends that: - 1783 demonstrates people were in the air, implying advanced aerial capabilities existed long before commonly acknowledged milestones. - This underpins a theory that alien invasions could be staged or leveraged using air technology, while the public remains unaware of the true capabilities. - Historical references in the 1880s to UFOs and flying saucers invading towns are interpreted as blimp-based occurrences. - The idea of an ongoing alien invasion has persisted for a long time. - A recurring group described as “tiny hats” supposedly runs the government from the 1800s through to 2026, implying a continuity of influence across eras.

A: The conversation opens with references to the Epstein files and a sense that people are ignoring shocking information, including an incident at the Atlanta Airport involving a well-dressed Black man who freaks out, which they say they saw on social media. B: They discuss reading the Upstate files and criticize others for going on with their lives as if nothing is happening, describing the public as “zombies” and likening society to invasion of the body snatchers. They mention revelations such as a global pandemic and aliens, and claim that “Miles have been released,” yet people act normal. C: They express a belief that a small group of about 8,500 people is manipulating events, including media such as the Colbert show, and that reality as they know it is fake. They discuss the idea of predictive programming and insist that by presenting certain material or jokes, the public becomes desensitized and complicit. A: They argue there is a grand design behind these phenomena to desensitize the public to the idea of demons or occult wrongdoing, including references to Luciferian influence and spells cast on the world. They discuss a Colbert skit in which a baby is handed to Moloch and a dramatic red furnace, claiming the audience’s laughter signals hypnosis or conditioning. B: They claim there is a coded language in the Epstein emails, where references to “pizza” and “beef jerky” are used as code, and that such codes exist even if others dismiss them as paranoia. They note that some language is cryptic and argue that there is a recognizable code, contrasting it with the public’s dismissal of such interpretations. A: They mention the Epstein indictment and a claim about sulfuric acid: right after he was indicted, he allegedly ordered large quantities of sulfuric acid (six hundred and fifty-five-gallon containers, with figures like 8,000 or 50,000 gallons discussed) to process bodies. They repeat the claim that “they’re eating babies,” underscoring a belief in extreme horrors behind coded communications. B: They expand the discussion to alleged ongoing sacrifices in Los Angeles, suggesting high-level musicians are involved in daily sacrifices, including claims about killing chickens as part of those activities. They hedge about naming individuals, expressing concern about legal risk and safety, and reaffirm their position that such activities occur at a high level. A: The conversation repeats the sense of omnipresent manipulation and secrecy, emphasizing that a hidden group is controlling information and that people are afraid to confront it, with ongoing claims about decoding messages and real-world horrors behind public narratives.

The speaker shares the "secret covenant" allegedly created by the Rockefellers and higher powers. The covenant outlines a plan to control and manipulate society through deception, poison, mind-altering technology, and division. The goal is to keep people ignorant, fearful, and distracted, while the elite maintain power and control. The speaker emphasizes the importance of being aware of this plan in order to break free from its influence and create a life outside the system. They believe that as more people become aware, the control of the elite will weaken, leading to a collapse of their plan.

The speaker shares a secret covenant allegedly created by the Rockefellers and higher powers. The covenant outlines a plan to control and manipulate the masses through deception, poisoning, and distraction. The goal is to keep people ignorant and easily controlled, while those in power prosper. The speaker emphasizes the importance of being aware of this plan in order to break free from the system and regain control. They believe that as more people become aware, the plan will crumble and a new generation will emerge.

There are powerful individuals who manipulate society, whether they are called communists, capitalists, republicans, or democrats. They may also be referred to as satanists, zionists, or high-level Illuminati. We are constantly under attack, and it is uncertain what their next move will be. Some speculate it could involve UFOs, world war 3, economic collapse, or a power outage. The intention behind all of this is clear, as evidenced by hidden data on vaccine responses and the manipulation of diseases in laboratories. They have the ability to make anyone sick through various means, including environmental factors and microwave frequencies. We must stay vigilant and aware of their actions.

Speaker 0 says they will discuss “things that people may not know,” arguing that many people are aware that COVID is a scam, while “everyone understands there’s disease.” They claim the fear “they’ve pushed” has been used to control and manipulate the public. They state they will focus on “who’s actually behind it,” and they contrast common political framing by saying people typically talk about Republicans and Democrats, but that both are “wings of the same bird.” Speaker 0 describes what they call the “COVID agenda” and asserts that it involves identifying who was in charge of the CDC and what they claim the CDC controlled or recommended. They say the CDC was “telling our government to shut down small businesses” and “what they recommend for the mandates of the vaccines and Pfizer and all this.” To support this, they announce they will “read off the staff of who’s in charge of this CDC” at the time COVID was enacted. Speaker 0 then lists specific roles and names, each accompanied by the claim that the person has “dual citizenship with Israel” and is “Jew,” stating: - Rochelle Walensky, director of the CDC - Ann Chowalczyk, Deputy Director of the CDC - Sherry Berger, CDC Chief of Staff - Mitchell Wolfe, CDC Chief Medical Officer - Jeff Zaints, “COVID czar” - Jeff Rezic, director of the CDC of the Washington office - Andy Slavitt, “COVID senior advisor” Speaker 0 frames the list as a way to identify leadership they say was involved in controlling and directing the government response, including shutdowns of small businesses and vaccine-related mandates.

The speaker describes being subjected to satanic ritual abuse, child sex trafficking, and torture from birth in 1964 until age 18 in 1982, when they left, moved to the United States, and changed their name, describing involvement through their Italian family line. They say they were tortured in an underground facility in Rome with tunnels connecting it to the subterranean levels of the Vatican. They claim they witnessed child sacrifice there, were trafficked from there, and were trafficked within the European elite. They state satanic rituals occurred in the Vatican and also in elite mansions in underground tunnels and in private outdoor areas. When asked about common forms of abuse, the speaker lists: rape and gang rape; forced witnessing of torture and murder of animals and humans from babies to adults; electric shock; waterboarding; being buried alive with dead bodies; being put in coffins; being defecated and urinated on; watching people be disemboweled with entrails placed on them; “various forms of mind control”; horrific experiments on themselves and witnessing them on others; being locked in a freezer; being kept in cages and isolation boxes for long periods of time; and witnessing satanic rituals below the Vatican, including the brutalization and sacrifice of babies and children, ritualized drinking of their blood and organs, and the summoning of demonic entities via the ritual. The speaker’s personal message to humanity is that the world is controlled and run by satanic pedophiles and psychopaths in the highest positions of authority and power globally. They say media, medicine, religious institutions, education, intelligence agencies, military, global agencies, and governments have been infiltrated at the top layers by this global cult. They state that pedophilia undergirds their system and is used for blackmail and control and as part of the satanic religion. They claim children are still being ritually abused, trafficked, and murdered in the millions today. They say they are sharing their testimony to stop the abuse of children and of all of humanity, arguing that the perpetrators used trauma-based mind control with secrecy and deception and that exposing them is “of paramount importance.” The speaker claims the perpetrators poisoned food, water, air, bodies with pharmaceuticals and vaccines, and minds with media and miseducation, convincing people they have authority over humanity. They add that wars, terrorism, violence, weather warfare, poverty, scarcity, and engineered diseases have traumatized humanity. They claim the end game is genocide of most and complete enslavement of remaining, and that the perpetrators want people to worship Lucifer and normalize pedophilia, which they say is happening today. They conclude that the perpetrators can only succeed with compliance, consent, and cooperation, and call for knowing the truth and doing inner work to heal, restore, and come together to co-create a better way forward.

The speaker claims that "The Secret" was created by the Rockefellers and possibly even higher powers. They describe the secret as a plan to control and manipulate people without their knowledge. The plan involves using various methods such as poisoning, mind-altering technology, fear, and division to keep people docile and unaware. The speaker emphasizes the importance of secrecy and the need to maintain control over the masses. They state that if people were to discover the truth and unite against them, their power would be threatened. The speaker concludes by saying that this secret will continue to shape future generations.

The speaker claims there is a “mask,” described as a controlled revelation and as part of a narrative presented for decades in *Mission: Impossible*, involving masks, doubles, impostors, and progressive normalization. The speaker says the same pattern appears with Jim Carrey, and that this year “they officialize anomalies for a controlled awakening.” The speaker asserts that a 1995 “Illuminati card game” already encoded these elements, including impostors, “unmasked cabals,” assassination attempts, Donald Trump, a fake pandemic, quarantine, adrenochrome, “NASA in studio,” a fake space conquest, UFOs, climate manipulation, and events tied to September, the Pentagon, and the Twin Towers. The speaker states that these events are coded to create maximum confusion, with the goal of pushing people to leave their biological bodies and be assimilated by entities “we called or.” The speaker then claims the focus has shifted to Silicon Valley, artificial intelligence, and Neuralink, arguing that the invasion is not external but internal. The speaker concludes that the “worst” part is that individuals finance their own disappearance.

It's alleged that there is a "super secret CMP" and that "Influencers play dumb and it's not on TV." A "council of political technocracy" is invoked, with the claim that "If they won't tell the truth then you're really free." The speaker asserts that humanity is "on the brink of the end of humanity" and advises to "trust the AI science, blackmail scheme." There is mention of "a real big club you're not allowed to see," and the idea that "The plans for your life is a work and be." Further, the transcript references "Root and hive" and a "Secret society," describing it as "the secret CNP telling you what you ought to believe" and calling it "the great deception sustainability." It asks, "Don't you remember the end of slavery?" and attributes it to a "crafted by way, Rick the modern culture war." It mentions "The Delphi charts always dictate the score" and a "Heritage mall, a majority store" where "the souls come cheaper than a Vegas Romney Rhine is the racing way." The speaker talks about "Legion a leader" and "shadows in the light," with "United fronts hide in plain sight." Individuals named include "Neil Patel" who "always keeps it tight," and "Dick Carlson" described as an operative who was "right and we're candid." It notes "Some ratings match only by Tucker." It states that the "CIA won't cover heritage mother." The closing lines assert that "This is really happening" and reference "Satanic pedophiles really" as part of the asserted reality.

Speaker 0 discusses Wernher von Braun’s warning about a potential hoaxed alien attack on the planet. He says the idea is “it will trick and fool almost everyone,” and that those with certain technologies could stage it, fooling the public for decades. He notes that people have long been misled into thinking alien events are real, while military or covert aerospace programs are behind what’s observed. Speaker 1 asks what the goal would be in staging a false alien attack on the world. He inquires what would be accomplished by such an act. Speaker 0 explains the objective: to unite the world around a military junta and a totalitarian system. He asks how to get a single race, ethnicity, or nation to stop fighting each other, suggesting that creating a larger external threat would unify everyone against a common enemy. He asserts that such unity could allow the imposition of totalitarian controls during a supposed world war rather than in peacetime. He cites a seventy-year plan and claims to have a CIA document from 1953 or 1954 stating that the UFO issue can be used “to great advantage for its quote psychological warfare value.” He says that after mastering the technology in the mid-1950s, there has been a long-term program to brainwash the public into believing there’s a threat from space. The discussion then shifts to whether this brainwashing could also affect political leaders, including President Trump, noting there are “devils on these deep state operations around the president giving him the opposite perspective.” Speaker 0 continues by describing the tension between true narratives and false flag narratives, and notes that with a very busy president who receives a one-sheet summary amid many duties, it would be easy for bad actors within the system to influence him, portraying them as “foxes in the hen house.” The overall claim is that there is an ongoing, deliberate manipulation of public perception regarding extraterrestrial threats, with the potential to steer political decisions by presenting a false flag scenario as real.

The speaker warns that “they have taken control of our society” and urges everyone to stand up, from the White House to every American, insisting that surrender is not an option and that time is running out, with a comparison to the urgency seen in Hong Kong. The speaker claims the attack on the capital was carried out by Antifa but was enabled by political figures—McConnell, Schumer, Pelosi, and the mayor—who allegedly knew it was coming and were lax on security, allowing Antifa to act before the media picked it up. The speaker criticizes media coverage as disgraceful, referencing an affiliation with Fox for almost seventeen years and asserting that Rupert Murdoch and his sons are driving a merge with the rest of the mainstream media. The assertion is made that this consolidation represents a serious, expanding threat. Attention turns to alleged cyber and information warfare, with the speaker mentioning new information about battleground states where cyber warfare was used. The speaker claims that former FBI director James Comey sold HAMR and Scorecard, a top-secret program, to the Chinese. According to the speaker, HAMR is a program that simulates an iPhone-like app inside the voting network, enabling it to be installed and to modulate voting to favor one candidate over another, rather than by a large margin. The speaker recounts a specific telephone claim: on a Tuesday night at 11:30, they were told that the ISI of Pakistan was in the voting machines in Georgia. They say they informed someone about it. The claim is made that, in Georgia, the two candidates Loeffler and Purdue were ahead, but one hour later, they were behind, suggesting a dramatic and rapid shift attributed to external manipulation. Throughout, the speaker emphasizes urgency, global and domestic conspiracies, and the need to act immediately to counter perceived control over society, media, and the electoral process. The narrative ties together political figures, media influence, alleged clandestine cyber tools, and foreign involvement in U.S. voting systems, presenting a cohesive but controversial account of systemic manipulation and imminent danger.

Government agencies like the CIA use Hollywood entertainment to manipulate and control people. They have divisions dedicated to psychological operations (PsyOps) to manipulate information and deceive the public. The speaker claims to have trained with the NSA and been involved in fixing elections and overthrowing governments. They argue that the United States has been infiltrated by the intelligence agencies, and that the entertainment industry is used as a tool for propaganda and cultural manipulation. The speaker also discusses the role of the CIA in the creation of the film industry and its influence on global culture. They suggest that the agency is involved in election interference and the spread of disinformation. The speaker questions the legitimacy of the current government and calls for people to take back their power.