reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The ECB has given the green light for the digital euro, entering the preparation phase. This move involves collaboration with European institutions to ensure Europe is equipped with the currency of the future. Cash will still be available alongside digital cash, providing consumers with free and convenient usage across the euro area. However, the implementation is subject to the legislative process.

"While many people rightly say that money is already digital, when world leaders say digital money today, it means cryptocurrency, which is now part of a worldwide scheme to monitor your actions and control your money." "This new form of currency will require you to have a unique digital wallet, which is essentially a digital ID." "Last spring, European Central Bank president Christine Lagarde said that the ECB will be ready to launch the digital euro by this October." "According to the Atlantic Council, a 137 countries and currency unions are preparing for a crypto digital currency." "Three countries have already launched theirs, The Bahamas, Jamaica, and Nigeria." "CBDCs in the advanced stages are the digital euro, China's digital yuan, India's e rupee, The United Kingdom's digital pound, Brazil's digital reel, and Russia's digital ruble." "The Trump family even have their own stablecoin, the USD 1 stablecoin from World Liberty Financial."

The ECB has approved the preparation phase for the digital euro, with all European institutions involved in ensuring Europe has the currency of the future. Cash will still be available alongside digital cash, providing consumers with free and easy-to-use options throughout the euro area. However, the implementation is subject to the legislative process.

The speaker addresses concerns about the digital euro, stating that the digital currency, as piloted in China, serves all citizens, not just elites or specific demographics. They claim that if well-executed and implemented, it would benefit everyone.

The ECB has approved the preparation phase for the digital euro, involving all European institutions. Cash will still be available alongside digital cash, giving consumers the freedom to choose. The digital euro aims to be free, convenient, and widely accepted.

We passed a law last summer that allows our national bank to start developing a CBDC. The law goes into effect this August, so our national bank is working with us on pilot projects in the meantime. We're considering different platforms and recently announced that one pilot will be on the Stellar blockchain. We're working with the Stellar Foundation and commercial banks in Ukraine to come up with a working concept. There are also pilots with Ethereum and the NEAR protocol underway. We should be announcing some results in a couple of months. Since the law goes into effect in August, we're trying to figure out the technical advantages and obstacles in order to potentially launch early next year or maybe even by the end of this year.

The ECB representative closes the year with holiday wishes and reflection on a year of substantial work. They note that the European Central Bank is proud to have achieved its 2% medium-term inflation target, with inflation down to where it was intended to be. The discussion includes a comprehensive review of the strategy going forward, taking stock of the work done by all teams to assess whether the strategy is fit for purpose and whether the ECB remains fit for the times being faced, described as difficult times. Two major projects for 2026 are highlighted as priorities. The first is the digital euro. The cycle of preparation has been completed, and the governing council has given its go-ahead to move to the next cycle. The ECB is now waiting for the European Parliament to come up with final legislation that will enable the pilot phase to go ahead and, subsequently, the launch. The second project is related to the banknote, a traditional but essential effort. The ECB is revamping its banknotes, with the process well underway. A new design is anticipated, and possibly new faces, and the ECB looks forward to that development as well. The speaker emphasizes that the European Central Bank stands strong, pleased to have reached its price stability target, and determined to ensure that this remains the case and that the ECB remains useful for European compatriots. The message closes with wishes for a very happy holiday to all.

The ECB has approved the preparation phase for the digital euro, which will be a collaborative effort with European institutions. Cash will still be available alongside digital cash, providing consumers with free and convenient options throughout the euro area. However, the implementation is subject to the legislative process.

Introducing the electronic euro, which aims to address the issue of cash payments above €1,000 being considered on the gray market in Europe. The digital euro will provide some level of control, but there are discussions about allowing zero control for very small amounts like €300 or €400. However, this could be risky as small anonymous credit cards were used to finance terrorist attacks in France a decade ago.

A discussion centers on a new proposed law, HR 8250, which would require operating system providers to verify the age of any user of an operating system and for other purposes, covering Windows, macOS, iOS, and Android, with open-source Linux considered in the debate. The claim is that this could serve as a Trojan horse to control people through a digital ID system, rather than being merely safety-focused. Speaker 1 references Catherine Austin Fitz, who says that if global elites deploy digital ID systems, they will control all aspects, including health freedoms and financial transactions. She argues that once financial transaction control is in place, all protections in health and food freedoms could be negated, and a 100% digital system with a digital ID and programmable money would allow authorities to dictate health decisions, vaccine status, gender-transition decisions for children, and other policies by turning off funds. Speaker 0 notes that Fitz is not hyperbolic and mentions Austin Steinbart, founder of the Quantum Party of America, who is joined by Speaker 0 to discuss the issue further. Speaker 2 (Austin Steinbart) asserts that the HR 8250 proposal is a disaster and goes beyond a digital ID concept by embedding age verification into the core of every device. He says the bill is six pages long and delegates enforcement to the FTC, creating ambiguity about whether biometrics, ID cards, or face scans would be used, leaving the mechanism up to the executive branch. He points out that the proposal could coordinate with companies like Apple (potentially via Face ID) and Microsoft to embed verification, while raising questions about how open-source Linux distributions would be forced to comply. He notes that Linux is open-source and typically users have root access, enabling workarounds or removal of such core files, and questions how a retrospective integration would work on devices like POS systems or hotel front-desk computers. Speaker 0 asks how the implementation would occur and whether the digital ID is the core objective beyond age verification. Speaker 2 confirms that the core goal is a universal digital ID across platforms, tying to privacy and cybersecurity concerns by requiring every service to interact with core OS files to verify age, with California already moving toward age verification that apps and websites would rely on. Speaker 0 links this to a broader move toward a central bank digital currency (CBDC) and a digital ID, quoting a sound bite from Catherine Austin Fitz about health identifiers affecting travel and other activities. Speaker 3 (a figure from the World Economic Forum) is cited, emphasizing tokenization of financial assets and the rapid rollout of a digital wallet and digitized currencies globally, with a critique that many countries are unprepared for such changes. Speaker 2 clarifies that blockchain or tokenization per se isn’t inherently bad, but concerns arise when centralized actors with anti-freedom aims design and control the system, shaping speech and policy. They discuss the potential benefits of tokenized assets in theory, while warning that centralized control could enable censorship and restricted financial activity. Speaker 0 ends by urging viewers to contact members of Congress to oppose HR 8250, urging them to “burn this thing down,” and thanks Speaker 2 for the analysis.

Speaker 0 says that each country will crash its fiat currency and there will be no paper money globally in eighteen months; it will all be digital. Once each country has its own digital currency, that’s the small step. They can’t move to a global digital currency all at once, because that would tip people off to “the whole scam.” So they are doing it one country at a time to make it look like it’s not all connected. After each country cuts off paper money and implements its digital currency, they will finish crashing the whole world’s economy, and then they will come out and say, we need a one world digital currency, but they’ve already got it. The UN is already talking about this; they’ve been working on it for two years and it’s already in place. They’ll say we need a one world digital currency to stop all these crashes and things from happening ever again. It’s for your protection. That’s how they get the one world currency in.

The talk argues that “digital ID plus money plus social media access, all running through one government app” creates new leverage for censorship and control. In April 2026, Ireland launched a pilot government digital wallet to store IDs, birth certificates, and driver’s licenses. The speaker says the wallet is legally required to be available for public services by end of 2026 and extended to private sector by end of 2027, and that even “voluntary” access has an “expiry date.” They connect this to parallel EU identity and payments plans, including the digital euro (pilots in 2027, official launch in 2029) and proposed requirements to use the digital wallet for social media access. The speaker also claims France plans to ban under-15s from social media by September, alongside Denmark, Spain, and Greece. The talk links centralized identity systems to dependency and censorship. The speaker describes a framework for sovereignty and “counting control points,” explaining that the more interfaces someone has with systems they do not control, the more exposure they face—not only for individuals, but for businesses and institutions that rely on intermediaries such as payment processors, major platforms, app stores, and banking rails. They describe how governments, payment firms, and big tech profit from these dependencies, and how agendas can be gated through finance and compliance. The speaker recounts personal experiences with censorship and account removals that they attribute to centralized platforms and identity-linked access. They say credit cards were “unreliable” and that Visa/Mastercard/Amex can arbitrarily approve or decline transactions while operating through permission and KYC. They claim Stripe blocked them due to KYC policy, forcing them to move Substack subscribers to another platform (describing a move to Zaprite for direct payments in bitcoin and fiat). They also say Telegram deleted their account overnight without explanation, and that they were stuck in AI customer service. After being banned, they describe switching focus to Nostr, a decentralized protocol, saying their follower “social graph” can be carried to other Nostr-based apps using their private key, and framing this as censorship resistance. They also describe Substack locking their blog for three weeks related to Australia’s Online Safety Act, which required age verification and digital identity access; they say access remained restricted even after leaving Australia, then was restored after pressure, while warning it could happen again. They further describe a LinkedIn takedown of a post related to “self-custody” education. The speaker formalizes “sovereignty” on three levels: spiritual (values, mission, what one refuses to compromise on), digital (keys, platforms, rails, data), and physical (where one lives, what jurisdictions and dependencies enable). They argue the “battlefield” is controlling identity at every level, and they outline a sequence they claim is being built: chat control, age verification, and then VPN restrictions, which they say would make private internet access effectively illegal while privacy tools are criminalized under child protection. As evidence of risk in centralized identity, the speaker cites a breach of an agency handling French passports, national IDs, driver’s licenses, and vehicle registration: they say 18 million records were stolen, affecting roughly one third of France’s population, including passports and birth data. The speaker concludes that tools like bitcoin and decentralized networks help, but that clarity on one’s spiritual foundation must come first. They argue that mission-driven identity and sovereign communities reduce vulnerability to capture. They recommend reducing dependencies by diversifying rails and platforms, using self-hosted infrastructure, and adopting privacy and key-custody practices. They end by summarizing the thesis: Bitcoin demonstrates resistance is possible, and the rest of sovereignty requires control over identity, voice, values, and infrastructure, built in layered “citadel” form. They also reference the book *The Sovereign Individual* and four predictions from 1997, linking them to identity and censorship trends described in Europe.

The ECB has given the green light for the digital euro, entering the preparation phase. This move aims to equip Europe with a future currency, while emphasizing that cash will still be available. The digital euro will offer consumers a convenient and free option for transactions across the euro area. However, it's important to note that these plans are subject to the legislative process.

The European Union has reached an agreement on the implementation of digital identity, which is concerning news. Commissioner Breton has also mentioned the possibility of introducing the digital euro, or Central Bank Digital Currency. This connection between digital identity and digital currency is worrying, as it goes against previous promises and has raised concerns among privacy and security experts. However, there is still a chance to voice opposition to this development by contacting your Member of European Parliament (MEP) and expressing your disagreement with this tool.

The European Union has reached an agreement on the implementation of digital identity, which is concerning news. Commissioner Breton has also mentioned the possibility of introducing the digital euro, or Central Bank Digital Currency. This connection between digital identity and digital currency is worrying, as it goes against previous promises and has raised concerns among privacy and security experts. However, there is still a chance to oppose this development by contacting your Member of European Parliament (MEP) and expressing your opposition to this tool.

The speaker has been working on the digital euro since the beginning of their term five and a half years ago, following initial work by Benoit Curry. Fabio Panetta and later Piero Cipollone have led the project with a dedicated team. The focus is on accelerating progress and engaging with stakeholders like the European Parliament, European Council, and European Commission to realize the digital euro. The deadline for this project is October 2025, and preparations are underway to meet it.

The European Central Bank has approved the preparation phase for the digital euro, emphasizing that cash will still be available. The goal is to provide a free and convenient digital currency option for consumers across the euro area. The process will involve collaboration with European institutions, ensuring that Europe is equipped with the currency of the future. However, the implementation is subject to the legislative process.

The ECB has approved the start of the preparation phase for the digital euro. This will involve collaboration with European institutions to ensure Europe has a future-ready currency. Cash will still be available alongside digital cash, providing consumers with free and convenient options throughout the euro area. However, the implementation is subject to the legislative process.

I just left the negotiations on digital identity, and I have concerning news. The member states and the European Parliament reached an agreement, meaning the digital identity will soon be implemented in the EU. Commissioner Breton announced that we now have the digital identity wallet, which he intends to fill with the digital euro, or central bank digital currency. This is troubling, as they previously assured us there would be no connection between the two. Privacy and security experts have warned that this development poses significant risks to our privacy and freedom.

We are preparing for the possibility of a new currency, but the decision won't be made until October 23. We don't want companies like Meta, Google, or Amazon to create a currency that takes over Europe's sovereignty. Currently, in Europe, cash payments above €1,000 are considered on the gray market, risking fines or jail time. The digital euro will have some level of control, but we are considering allowing no control for very small amounts, around €300 or €400.

The speaker discusses Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), specifically the digital euro, and its upcoming introduction planned for 2029, noting that the European Parliament has some resistance. Rapporteur Naharete Rogas opposes the plan, arguing that the current design adds nothing for ordinary people, i.e., ordinary citizens like you and me. The speaker counters a common claim that CBDC is not a replacement for cash and that the digital euro is not programmable. The speaker argues that, by definition, central bank money can be programmable. The explanation focuses on how the central bank’s balance sheet works when money is spent. When the central bank issues money (spends), it increases its balance sheet. Cash sits on the right side of the balance sheet. To keep the balance, on the asset side there are government bonds (and potentially other bonds) that earn interest, which means the central bank collects money from society. The Dutch central bank has written in a report about design choices for a digital euro that the central bank can influence society by increasing the money supply, because it earns interest, a process often referred to as seigniorage. The speaker emphasizes that if cash exists in a given quantity and the central bank issues CBDC in addition to that cash, the central bank’s balance sheet grows. To prevent this imbalance, the only way to keep the totals equal is implied: every time you issue 1 euro of CBDC or even a 10-euro note in digital form, you would need to keep the physical cash in ATMs from being replenished or refreshed. Under the digital euro scenario labeled “scenario 4,” CBDC would thus be the replacement of cash, with the overall sum being kept in balance through this mechanism. The speaker concludes with “Dus dut,” underscoring that the outcome depends on how the total money supply is managed and whether CBDC is deployed in a way that maintains or replaces cash.

Privacy protection is important, not anonymity. Addressing conspiracy theories is crucial for success. The timetable for the project includes a decision in October by the governing council on further piloting. The pilot phase will likely take at least 2 more years before the final decision is made based on the legislative proposal. Considering all factors and adapting to suitable technologies, the goal is to provide Europeans with a key transaction option.

We are introducing the electronic euro to reduce cash payments over €1,000 in Europe. The digital euro will have some control, possibly exempting very small transactions under €300-€400. However, this could pose risks, as small anonymous credit cards were used to finance terrorist attacks in France a decade ago.

Many people are a little worried about what will happen to them with the digital euro. Can you encourage them? Why is the digital euro good for people like you and me? The digital currency, where it has been piloted, and there is only one which is clearly now launched in in a very small country, but it is piloted on a fairly large scale in in China, is of use and of service to all citizens. So it is not something that is good for the elite or is good for the young or is good for some versus others. If it is well done and if it is well implemented, it would be of service to all citizens.

The speaker suggests that the agenda to implement CBDCs has been delayed, but the technology has been ready since 2015. They mention that CBDCs could initially be phone-based apps, but the ultimate goal is to implant a small chip under people's skin. The speaker believes this violates human dignity. They explain that to convince people to accept this, there will be a push for universal basic income due to unemployment and crises. However, to efficiently run this system, the speaker suggests the need for a CBDC chip implant. They acknowledge that a surprising proportion of people may agree to this.