reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Andrew Marino, a physicist and a lawyer, was the physicist and lawyer for Dr. Robert In fact, he was the guy that made good on Albert St. Georgie’s prediction that proteins were semiconductors. He worked for the military and did studies on the sanguine antenna built in Wisconsin to track submarines and found out that they caused problems. Information was delivered to the military in 1973, and Becker found that there was a lot more problems with electromagnetic pollution that’d be uncovered between Niagara Falls and New York City with power lines. When the military wouldn’t listen to him, he went on TV with Wallace on sixty Minutes, polled the nation, and literally a couple weeks after that, his lab was completely defunded. And remember, this guy was three times nominated for the Nobel Prize. The reason it never made waves, because remember, nobody back then had a salt on and nobody had a microwave oven, only the red. K? And just so you know, this was on the front page of the Boston Globe in 1977. So Marino was the guy, the physicist in his lab, who actually in congressional testimony in the early seventies, actually told the government, leading the congress, this is published in the archives. You can go read it yourself, satellites above the earth affected the magnetosphere, 80,000 kilometers from base stations on the surface of the earth. So the proof is there, my friend, but they've ignored it. So if you read his book, it's called Going Somewhere written by Andrew Marino. When I hear scientists tell me that non ADVMF can affect us because it's not ionizing radiation, that book alleviates all of them. The other thing I would say, his Roland Van Wyck’s book is beautiful to lay out all the stuff about biophotons and the stuff that the Russians have found and the biophoton research done by the Japanese and the Europeans. It's well researched. All the stuff about quantum mechanically has happened in biology from 2007 to current. We know that it's operational in photosynthesis. You now have books out written by Jim L. Callely and John Joy McFadden. The Life at the End where you'll learn about the Klitschko's experiment with European robins to figure out how birds navigate utilizing libido reception and free radical signaling in their eyes through cryptochromes. In other words, this science is well laid out. The problem is, it's not well known. And in your podcast, I'm laying out the reason why it's not well known because if you really knew what's really published, you probably wouldn't put he Jobs iPhone up to the side of your head and then you'll read Isaacson's biography and realize why Jobs didn't let his own kids use it. Why? Remember, every time Steve Jobs went to an iMac conference, everybody remembers his worn out popular Levi's. Remember that he died from a retroperitoneal camp. Don't ever forget that. Don't ever forget the story of the iPad that had an infrared detector based into it that Apple never marketed. Do you know why that was in there? Because when a child got an iPad and it touched its leg, you would turn off RF and microwave emission. So that tells you that Apple knew exactly what was going on. But they never marketed it because you would ask the question, why do you have an infrared turn on? The reason is simple, my friend. All the people listening to this, most of the young people, their digital babysitter is their iPhone and their iPad that they hand kids. And they're causing brain damage in every single child because that blue light is ruining the melanopsin sickling everywhere in their body. But the reason why that's good is because you're creating obedient idiots to make TikTok videos in the future.

Speaker 0 expresses a strong warning against working with Sam Altman and OpenAI, stating they would never collaborate with them as a developer. They emphasize that this is a warning and note that others may clip the remark. The speaker asserts that OpenAI is studying how developers use the API and points out that Altman and the company are “studying it,” implying ongoing scrutiny of API usage. They describe Sam Altman as someone who has “been around the block,” claiming the speaker has known him since “loop.” The speaker characterizes Altman as “incredibly savvy” and asserts that Altman “wants every bit of revenue from the ecosystem” and “isn’t taking no prisoners.” According to the speaker, Altman intends to study how developers are using the API and believes Altman has “the right to do” so. The speaker then pivots to a broader narrative about Altman’s perceived philosophy, stating that Altman “comes from the Zuckerberg School of Business,” which, in the speaker’s claim, is defined as giving naive people access to tools, studying them, and, “like the Borg,” stealing every innovation they have. The speaker claims Zuckerberg adopted this approach from Bill Gates and Microsoft. The narrative continues with Microsoft’s historical pattern: Microsoft had a platform and operating system, allowed third-party developers to create software such as Lotus 1-2-3, and later produced Microsoft Excel. The speaker also mentions that Microsoft allowed creation of WordPerfect and WordStar, and then built Microsoft Word. The speaker interjects “RIP,” signaling a judgment about that progression. The speaker asserts that Microsoft was “more than happy” to have a broad developer community attending their conferences, showcasing work and receiving awards, explicitly stating they are talking about Microsoft in this context. The parallels are drawn to Facebook, with the speaker claiming Zuckerberg did the same thing with Facebook’s platform, suggesting a similar dynamic of platform growth through external developers and partners. The narrative closes with a mention of Zynga as a significant partner within Zuckerberg’s ecosystem and ends with the assertion that the approach then shifted, implying a change in strategy or emphasis after the initial period.

The speaker asserts that microwave sickness, not pathogens or contaminated water, was the root cause of the pandemic, specifically naming 5G rollout as the culprit. According to the speaker, people received upgrades to their phones and had a cell tower installed in front of their homes, and this, he claims, equated to the pandemic itself. He references “zapping of America” to describe neurological and systemic symptoms associated with microwave exposure, listing heaviness in the head, fatigue, irritability, anxiety, insomnia, partial memory loss, cardiovascular issues, slow heartbeat, reduced blood pressure, and heart pains. He links these symptoms to microwave sickness and cites that the Soviets observed similar dangers with wireless technology in the 1950s, while American doctors dismissed those concerns, calling them Soviet or not credible. This dismissal, he contends, allowed wireless frequencies to be intensified to extreme levels. The speaker argues that health issues in America have risen because electricity and wireless frequencies are at a “level 10,000,” whereas other countries regulate to a “level five,” implying that higher electromagnetic frequencies lead to illness across populations. He repeats the idea that increasing electromagnetic frequencies on Earth is directly linked to widespread sickness. He also references Laura and makes an analogy to the Spanish flu, specifically the Kansas flu, claiming there was a radio on a Kansas military base that made people sick, using it to support the claim that wireless transmission or exposure contributed to disease. Based on these assertions, the speaker states a personal stance that his house has no wireless technology, implying a preventive or precautionary measure against exposure. Overall, the speaker presents a narrative that attributes the pandemic to the rollout of 5G and associated wireless infrastructure, framing microwave sickness as the real illness experienced by the population, supported by cited historical observations, unnamed references, and a critique of conventional medical and scientific responses. The argument emphasizes a direct causal link between elevated electromagnetic frequencies and widespread health problems, arguing that higher exposure correlates with greater illness and that other nations’ more conservative frequency practices mitigate these issues.

Apple has clarified that the iPhone is not taking pictures every 5 seconds, but rather scanning our faces using infrared technology to optimize face ID and emoji features. A video shared by a follower shows that baby monitors also emit infrared lights. It is clear that this scanning is happening, but the question is whether Apple has other motives behind it. To turn off this feature, go to settings, face ID, and passcode, and toggle the attention aware features. The speaker wonders where the data collected for analysis is being stored and what others think about it.

The speaker argues that microwaves from wireless devices are causing widespread cancer and other illnesses. Key points include: - Women often keep their cell phones in front pockets, and men keep them in pant pockets; the speaker claims these placements cause cancers—prostate cancer for men and colon cancer for women—because of microwaving of the organs. - The cell phone is described as created by Raytheon (the Department of Defense), and studies allegedly showed that exposure to microwaves led to cancer and various illnesses. - The claim is made that if phones are not on airplane mode and WiFi/Bluetooth are not off, the phone constantly updates and pings the microwave frequency to that area, leading to tumors and lumps. - The speaker links wireless technology to the pandemic, claiming that the rollout of 5G in 2020, with phones upgraded and towers installed in front of homes, was the root cause of the pandemic; Laura is cited as saying it also causes infertility. - The speaker references the book Zapping of America, stating that when men were exposed to microwaves (and females as well), there was a higher chance of delivering female babies. The claim continues that men are vanishing and females are ballooning as microwave exposure increases with more cell phones and towers, i.e., more wireless technology. - The Invisible Rainbow is cited as discussing wireless exposure as the root cause of these health issues, implying that this topic is not commonly discussed. - The overall narrative connects personal device usage and wireless infrastructure to a broad pattern of cancers (prostate, colon), infertility, skewed sex ratios, and population changes, framing these as direct outcomes of microwave exposure from modern wireless technology.

In September 2016, Apple removed the 3.5mm headphone jack and said it took “Courage,” framing the change as beneficial for users. The speaker argues the change was never about courage, phone thinness, or user benefit, and claims the headphone jack had long proven reliable. The speaker says the 3.5mm headphone connector, invented in 1877, was originally designed for telephone switchboard operators and remained essentially unchanged through world wars and decades of consumer electronics. They claim it required no power, no pairing, and no battery and functioned reliably whenever plugged in. Apple’s three stated reasons for removing the jack are presented as failing: 1) Thinner phones: the speaker claims the iPhone 7 (the first without a jack) was thicker than the iPhone 6. 2) Water resistance: the speaker cites the Sony Xperia Z3 as having full IP68 waterproofing (the highest rating in 2014) while keeping the jack. 3) Better audio: the speaker claims Bluetooth compresses audio and that the 3.5mm jack plays uncompressed, so Apple replaced “better audio” with “worse audio.” The speaker then claims the real motivation was financial and points to timing: three months after removing the jack, Apple launched AirPods priced at $159. They state AirPods grew into a $15 billion-per-year business and argue this scale depended on phones no longer having the old port. The speaker highlights Apple’s MFi licensing program, claiming that companies making Lightning or USB-C headphones must pay Apple, while 3.5mm is an open standard with no Apple licensing fee. They then compare competitors: the speaker says Samsung ran ad campaigns mocking Apple and specifically showed an employee telling iPhone users they need a dongle, then a double dongle. The speaker claims Samsung removed its own headphone jack in 2019 without a press release or explanation and later deleted those ads from its YouTube channel, and that major Android manufacturers followed within two years. The conclusion offered is that removing the port enabled lock-in: AirPods are said to auto-connect and switch instantly, show battery level on-screen, and work best on Apple devices. The speaker argues that switching away from iPhone would also mean switching earbuds, turning earbud compatibility into a switching cost. They state Apple framed this as “courage” for customer benefit while charging $159 for what they claim customers already had.

The speaker says they have no Wi‑Fi, no Bluetooth, and no wireless devices in their house, arguing that people do not have to have wireless technology “pinging microwaves” throughout their home. They note that someone will object by saying it’s “not microwaves,” then respond by citing a book called *The Zapping of America* and a book described as *Microwaves and the Deadly Risk*, written by Paul B. Brodeur. The speaker claims the book explains how microwave technology was “created by Raytheon,” including “the first cell phone created by Raytheon” and “the first wireless technology created by Raytheon.” They further claim that the Department of Defense, described as “Raytheon,” wants people to have wireless technology in their house because it not only “cooks them” and causes health issues (they list autoimmune, “lots of smell, lots of taste, dizziness, brain fog”), but also because wireless technology allows people “to watch the people.” They state that when you have wireless, “people can see what’s in the house.” The speaker concludes by saying *The Sapping of America* by Paul Brodeur is recommended and adds that Brodeur is “a Frenchman,” encouraging viewers to look into the books.

The speaker says it is “really important” that “there are no viruses jumping,” “no spike proteins jumping,” “no snake venom in the water,” and “no parasites or germs jumping.” They describe this as “just technology,” and reference “before and after” as evidence, stating that the same technology was “rolled out into people’s pockets.” The speaker then claims that after it was rolled out into people’s pockets, people “started getting really, really sick.”

The speaker explains that they want to keep the meter in the green band. They turn the meter on and note that in their own home, they have control of all wireless and can bounce the reading into the green area. They demonstrate what happens when they open up an earbud case, describing that the reading immediately shifts into the screaming red, which they say is as bad as it gets. They report that at home, their typical baseline is about two to three microwatts. Just by opening the earbud case, the reading jumps to 130,000 microwatts, then 152,000 microwatts, and it continues to climb. The speaker emphasizes that the goal is to be at 10 microwatts or less. They reiterate that it is not 10,000, but 10. Next, they simulate removing the earphones as if they were going to use them, noting that they don’t use them at all. They mention that they “just topped off my meter” by exposing the earbud, and they acknowledge some camera-related awkwardness. They report that with the earbud in the case, the reading was just shy of 200,000 microwatts. However, when they take the single earbud out and bring it up to the meter or “right up to the brain,” the reading reaches 3,180,000 microwatts. They reiterate the target of being under 10 microwatts and contrast it with the readings shown, indicating that a single earbud can produce a reading in the millions of microwatts. They state that this is a concern related to exposure levels. Finally, they remark that now there is a whole generation putting these ear pods up to their brains. They suggest that some people are likely sleeping with them at night, even though their bodies would be doing cell repair and regeneration during sleep, implying a potential clash between usage and natural biological processes.

The speaker discusses AirPods and their potential use of brainwave data collection. They claim that at a World Economic Forum convention, it was explained how AirPods could be used to make people more productive and help authorities fight crime. The speaker says they posted in 2020 about patents for AirPods that scan brainwaves and pick up on vitals. They further claim that AirPods use microwave technology on the cortex, "cooking the brain" and causing memory loss. The speaker advises listeners to get rid of their AirPods.

The speaker describes a legal victory, stating that they won a major suit against the Federal Communications Commission in the court of appeals for lying to the public about cell phone radiation and cell phone safety. He claims that, as a result, the FCC must go back and redo all of its regulations concerning cell phones. He presents this as a corrective action prompted by the truth about radiation and safety, implying that prior rules were incorrect or misleading. Moving to specific cautions, he asserts that if you have a child, you should never let the child put a cell phone near the head, and you should not let the phone be carried in a front pocket. He adds that, if the user is a girl, you should not allow the cell phone to be carried in a breast pocket. He further warns against carrying the device anywhere near the ovaries. He emphasizes that the farther the cell phone is from the head when you are talking, the better off you are, framing distance as a key factor in reducing exposure. The speaker reinforces his position by claiming a vast body of scientific support, stating that there are tens of thousands of studies that show the really extreme dangers of cell phone radiation. He contends that these dangers are not receiving adequate attention from the public. He notes that many children sleep with a cell phone right next to their heads, sometimes on the bed, and he urges listeners not to allow this practice. He asserts that this proximity at night is a common and troubling habit that increases exposure. Finally, he offers a practical nighttime precaution, suggesting that you should try to get the phone away from children at night so they can obtain eight hours of sleep without the device near them. He frames this as an important safety measure, implying that reducing overnight exposure is a simple and essential step. Throughout, the overall message is presented as a safety-focused stance grounded in legal action and cited studies, urging immediate adherence to the proximity and placement guidelines to minimize cell phone radiation exposure.

The speaker rejects Apple Watch and any smart tech, saying: "I would not put an Apple Watch on my body. I would not microwave myself with an Apple Watch or AirPods or any type of smart technology that they try to sell you." They claim the data is "being sold back to the government," it's "tracking and tracing you" and sold to "the medical system." They warn, "I wouldn’t purchase anything like that," and "I wouldn't even upgrade half your stuff. Now they got new Apple intelligence and all this other weird stuff. Just buy the older versions." They add, "That's all people have to do. You don't need any fancy technology to track your steps." "All you do is you go outside and you take steps." "Everyday I get up, I work out, I be active, I take care of myself, I spend time in nature." "In the book, Doctor John Nutt, Health and Light, he talked about when people would wear watches, it would make them weaker." "He actually also talked about fake clothes and fake lights which we just talked about a second ago."

Andrew Marino, a physicist and a lawyer who worked for doctor Robert Inkbeck, is the guy who made good on Albert St. Georgie’s prediction that proteins were semiconductors. He worked for the military and did studies on the sanguine antenna built in Wisconsin to track submarines, and found out they caused problems. Information was delivered to the military in 1973, and then Becker found out there were a lot more problems with electromagnetic pollution that’d be uncovered between Niagara Falls and New York City with power lines. When the military wouldn’t listen to him, he went on TV with 60 Minutes with Mike Wallace, polled the nation, and literally a couple weeks after that, his lab was completely defunded and all the military money was taken away. Marino was three times nominated for the Nobel Prize. The reason it never made waves is that back then nobody had a cell phone, nobody had a microwave oven, only the RIP. This was on the front page of the Boston Globe in 1977. Marino was the physicist in his lab who actually gave congressional testimony in the early seventies, telling the government, published in the archives, that satellites above the earth affected the magnetosphere 80,000 kilometers from base stations on the surface of the earth. The proof is there, but they've ignored it. If you read his book, Going Somewhere, written by Andrew Marino, you’ll understand. When scientists tell me that non-ADVMF can affect us because it's not ionizing radiation, that book alleviates all of them. Roland Van de Wick’s book is cited as beautiful for laying out biophotons and the biophoton research done by the Russians, and the Japanese and the Europeans. It’s well researched, and all the stuff about quantum mechanics in biology from 2007 to current has happened; we know it’s operational in photosynthesis. There are books Life at the Edge by Jim L. Callely and John Joy McFadden, which discuss the Klitschko experiments with European robins to figure out how birds navigate utilizing lead meter reception and free radical signaling in their eyes through cryptocrons. In other words, this science is well laid out, but not well known. The reason it’s not well known, as laid out in the podcast, is because if you really knew what’s published, you probably wouldn’t put your iPhone next to your head and read Isaacson’s biography and realize why Jobs didn’t let his own kids use it. Jobs died from a retroperitoneal cancer. The story of the iPad had an infrared detector built in that Apple never marketed, because when a child touched it to their leg, you would turn off RF and microwave emission. That suggests Apple knew what was going on. The reason is simple: most young people’ s digital babysitter is the iPhone and iPad handed to kids, and they’re causing brain damage in every child because blue light is ruining melanopsin signaling everywhere in their body, which, the argument goes, is good because it’s making obedient idiots to make TikTok videos in the future.

The speaker claims to have won a suit in the court of appeals against the FCC, alleging the agency lied to the public about cell phone radiation and safety, and asserts that the FCC must redo its regulations on cell phones. He asserts that if you have a child, you should never let the child put a cell phone near the head and should avoid carrying it in front pockets; for girls, he says not to carry the phone in the breast pocket and to keep it away from ovaries. He emphasizes that the farther the cell phone is from the head during a call, the better. He asserts, “there are tens of thousands of studies” showing the extreme dangers of cell phone radiation and claims that people are not paying attention. He notes that many children sleep with a cell phone right next to their heads, sometimes on the bed, and he advises against that. He recommends removing the cell phone at night so that children can get eight hours without it and stresses that this is really important.

The speaker says they do not have Wi‑Fi, Bluetooth, or any wireless devices in their house, arguing that there is no need for wireless technology to “ping” microwaves throughout the home. They reference a recurring claim that wireless technology is not microwaves, then respond by pointing to a book titled *The Zapping of America*, described as “microwaves and the deadly risk,” written by Paul B. They state that the book argues all wireless technology is microwaves and that it was created by Raytheon, citing the first cell phone and first wireless technology as being created by Raytheon. The speaker then claims that the Department of Defense wants people to have wireless technology in their houses because, they say, it “cooks them” and causes health issues including autoimmune issues, loss of smell, loss of taste, dizziness, and brain fog. They also claim that with wireless technology, people can “watch the people” and see what is in a house. The speaker recommends the book *The Zapping of America* by Paul Broder and suggests viewers look into Paul Broder, describing him as possibly French.

We've discovered that Apple's voice-to-text feature exhibits some strange behavior. When you use voice note to text and say the word "racist," the text displays an odd visual glitch. It seems like a deliberate form of subliminal programming, similar to other instances where tech companies manipulate information, like Google did after Trump got shot, or how headlines mislead users with false information. This isn't isolated; others can replicate it on their iPhones, too. We'll be going live at 11AM Central to discuss this further and provide HD screenshots. Follow me at RealAuctions for more updates.

In the iPhone settings, under legal and regulatory, there is a warning about radio frequency radiation. The device was tested at a distance from the body, so it should not be placed near the head, in a bra, pocket, waistband, or back pocket. There has been a rise in colon, rectal, and breast cancers. To minimize exposure, it is recommended to use hands-free options like speakerphone.

The speaker discusses assault weapons and shows a device that emits radiation. They argue that this device is an assault weapon because it exceeds the acceptable radiation level. The speaker suggests that instead of focusing on banning traditional assault weapons, efforts should be made to ban devices that emit harmful radiation. They mention going to a business to give them the device as a way to make the community safer.

In this video, the speaker shows how to access a menu on an iPhone to find information about radiofrequency radiation exposure. The speaker warns against placing the device close to the body, such as near the head, in a bra, pocket, or waistband, due to potential health risks. They mention the increasing rates of colon, rectal, and breast cancers. The speaker advises using a hands-free option, like a speakerphone, to minimize exposure. These are the main points discussed in the video.

Speaker 0: The speaker discusses AirPods and describes them as connected to a broader conspiracy discussed at the World Economic Forum (WEF). The central claim is that brainwave data collection can be used by ear devices, such as AirPods, which would be used by the boss to make you more productive and help authorities fight crime. This is framed as reminiscent of the movie Minority Report. The speaker notes having posted in 2020 about patents that are placed into AirPods to scan brainwaves and pick up on all vitals while wearing them. The claim is that AirPods do more than play audio; they allegedly monitor brain activity and vital signs. The speaker states that these capabilities enable brainwave scanning and monitoring while the user is wearing AirPods, tying this to productivity enhancement and law enforcement objectives. The narrative ties these potential uses to a broader surveillance or control framework, implying a link between wearables and oversight by authorities, with the Minority Report reference serving to illustrate the anticipatory policing concept. In addition to data collection, the speaker asserts that AirPods also microwave the mind, alleging the existence of microwave technology placed on the cortex that cooks the brain. This claim is presented as a mechanism by which memory loss occurs, and it is connected to the use of AirPods as the vector for such effects. The speaker uses strong language to describe the impact, suggesting significant cognitive harm as a result of the technology. The overall message urges listeners to discontinue use of AirPods, recommending that they “get rid of them” and instead “listen to all the beautiful sounds around you.” The rhetoric positions AirPods as dangerous devices that extend beyond audio functionality into brain and health concerns, backed by references to patents and a WEF discussion, and culminates in a precautionary directive to avoid their use altogether.

The transcript argues that smartphone design and settings are highly intentional and may be aimed at managing health risks related to radiation exposure. It claims that a phone’s settings can show how far it must be kept away from the body to “prevent cancer,” highlighting an “RF exposure” section. The speaker describes navigating the phone interface: going to Settings, then General, then scrolling to Legal and Regulatory, and clicking the item at the very bottom labeled “RF exposure,” which stands for radio frequency exposure. They say the phone displays a required separation distance from the body, claiming the speaker’s device lists about “five millimeters separation off of your body,” compared to the size of a pencil eraser. They state that this coverage is meant to reduce risk from using the phone against the body, specifically saying it is “covered when you get brain cancer because you put your phone to your head.” The speaker emphasizes using speaker phone rather than holding the phone to the head. The transcript also claims that a newly released study found that the further the phone is away from the body, “the better,” and it links this to higher rates of testicular cancer in young men, alleging that placing phones near the testicles contributes to increased risk. It further claims that when phones were smaller and women put them in their breast, there were cases of breast cancers matching “the shape of that lithium battery in there.” Finally, the speaker advises keeping phones off the body, not putting phones to the head, and avoiding use in conditions like driving “down a road in a metal tube,” where the phone supposedly works harder to find a cell signal and emits more electromagnetic fields.

Speaker 0 asserts that there is no security whatsoever and that cybersecurity professionals face this problem daily. They state that while people are watching their phones, their phones are watching them. The operating system is designed to watch and listen to users, to know who their friends are, what is being said in text messages, and to listen at times. They claim that, although people look at their phones and it has many facilities, it is the world’s greatest spy device, designed as a spy device. Now, this.

The speaker says they use an iPhone, claiming “everybody I know” and “everybody at the CIA” uses an iPhone. They explain that when iPhones were unusual and hard to find, they used Android phones, and that all staff were assigned Androids; they also mention that they were originally assigned Nextels, described as walkie-talkie devices. The speaker recounts taking a Nextel to Bulgaria, where it beeped all night and people tried to send walkie-talkie-style messages, leading them to turn it in. They say the group transitioned to iPhones because Android phones are “so hard to crack,” and they advise against using Android devices. The speaker associates the risk with “the Chinese, the Russians, the Iranians, the Cubans,” and “most importantly, the Israelis,” and urges not to “do an android.” They then broaden the point beyond phone choice, suggesting people should consider what other aspects of life expose their secrets. They conclude by recommending that people assume “these bad guys are everywhere,” since, they say, they actually are everywhere. The speaker’s key takeaway is to make stealing personal secrets as hard as possible, and they close with a directive: “number one on your things to do today list, drop that android,” repeating “drop that Android.”

Today we'll discuss the Apple AirPod patent, which reveals the data collected by the AirPods while in use. The question arises: where does this information go? Additionally, Apple phones have a fitness tracker that monitors steps, body motion, brainwaves, and more. It is advised to disable this feature. Interestingly, AirPods can be configured to provide health-related data like heart rate, blood pressure, and diet information. The concern is who is collecting this data and if it aligns with the narrative of Elon Musk's chip implantation. It seems the AirPods may be connected to this concept. What are your thoughts?

"Never ever ever put a cell phone on your ear." "Tell your kids. I'm gonna prove it to you and to them." "This right here is measuring." "So we're at point two, point six. Now watch it when it comes closer. 28, 33, 29, 39." "Do you see the difference?" "What was that?" ""30 times the amount of radiation going into my head." "Always use speakerphone." "Make sure your kids see this because they're the biggest offenders." "Oh, and don't put it back in your pocket." "If you put it on your body, always have it on airplane mode."