reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0: I have this perception Mhmm. That the Japanese Japanese society, Japan is not at risk of the political instability that you see in America because one, you have a homogenous society where the overwhelming majority are ethnic Japanese with the same culture and religious background. Two, there's a certain element of conformism to the culture. Right? Mhmm. Is that a correct perception? It's Speaker 1: I think it's correct, but at the same time, it's under attack too. Speaker 0: Who's under attack by? Speaker 1: For example, we have strong value in family. Yes. But, you know, there is this I think it's propaganda to destroy our traditional value. Value. For example, family is not just father, mother, children, but it's like, we can create the form of a family. That kind of things. I do not say that, you know, like I I don't like LGBTQ, like I don't say I don't this I don't like them, but it's okay, but it should not be ideology, you know. Mhmm. Speaker 0: Did you did you always recognize that it has become ideology? Did you know that before you came to America? Speaker 1: I did not know. Yeah. I was shocked to know that America has turned like this. And, yes, and many Japanese people like things come from outside, especially American culture. So we love America. And so still now, the media is trying to use our tendency to introduce radical ideology too. Yes. That's what happened. Speaker 0: In your media? Speaker 1: Yes. Yes. Yes. Speaker 0: Really? Speaker 1: Yes. Yes. Yes.

Israel has a skin bank where they take skin from people they've killed, mostly Palestinians. Muslims believe in burying bodies whole within 24 hours of death, facing Mecca. Israel knows this, as Jewish customs also discourage cremation. Therefore, the skin and organ banks in Israel don't have many donations from Israelis. This practice not only robs families of the chance to bury their loved ones according to their traditions, but also desecrates the bodies.

The speaker acknowledges that their country doesn't have the same freedom of speech laws as the United States. This is because their government prioritizes maintaining a multicultural community where people can live peacefully, free from vilification and hatred seen elsewhere.

A person asks why Speaker 1 lives in a white country instead of a Muslim country. Speaker 1 says it's not a white country, and they live in the UK to tell people about Islam, engaging in interfaith dialogue with people of different faiths. Speaker 2 asks if a Christian could move to a Muslim country and freely convert people from Islam to Christianity. Speaker 1 responds that under Islamic law, this is not allowed because Christianity is false and Islam is the truth, and Islam doesn't allow harmful ideologies to infiltrate its people. Speaker 3 states that when tolerance is one-way, it leads to cultural suicide. They say that when they can fly to Saudi Arabia with a Bible and cross, go to Mecca, and attend a church, then "we're good to go," but until then, it's important to understand the objectives and goals that Islam has set forward.

The speaker congratulates Australians for rejecting the voice to Parliament and the Uluru Statement. They argue that welcome to country ceremonies and acknowledgments of country perpetuate racial division and deny citizenship and sovereignty to all Australians. They criticize the rituals as culturally wrong, disrespectful, and patronizing. The speaker calls for an end to these practices, stating that they have lost their meaning and only serve as virtue signaling. They urge unity and respect for Aboriginal culture, emphasizing that Australians want to move forward together as one nation.

This is a discussion about the Gardasil cervical cancer vaccine and a core issue believed to be at the heart of global legal actions, with a focus on contaminant DNA linked to the aluminum adjuvant and the evidence that emerged from studies conducted at that time. Speaker 0 explains that the vaccine, including Gardasil, has become the subject of surprising court cases worldwide, with large plaintiff groups in Japan composed largely of young women and girls. The central issue, according to the speaker, is the contamination of the D-N-E (DNA) in the vaccine, which has been the topic of concern since the early days, with the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare in Japan reportedly recognizing this as the core problem. In 2012, a paper made the DNA contamination issue very clear, showing that the HPV DNA fragments for HPV types 16, 18, 6, and others associated with the vaccine were found in the vaccine samples. The speaker notes that the Hepatitis B, HPV, and ERV (endogenous retrovirus) elements were involved in the analysis and that it was proposed that the DNA could bind to the aluminum adjuvant particles within the vaccine. The speaker mentions Shin Handei (Shin Han-ji) as an early voice raising alarms about the DNA contamination problem during the pandemic period, and that Kevin-sensei (Professor Kevin) referenced this work about a month earlier. The discussion highlights that doctors worldwide, listening to the voices of women and girls, observed that the same concerns about unusual adverse events after vaccination emerged globally. The claim is that residual HPV DNA from Gardasil was present in multiple samples and that the DNA, when tested, appeared to be identical in sequence to the described HPV DNA. The speaker states that eighteen types of samples were examined from countries including Australia, Bulgaria, France, India, New Zealand, Poland, Russia, Spain, and the United States. According to the account, 16 and 18 types were the primary concern, and the remaining DNA fragments were reported to be directly bound to aluminum adjuvant particles. The speaker cites that 16-part packages of Gardasil-4, when examined, contained residual HPV DNA fragments bound to aluminum adjuvant particles, and that the DNA sequences matched those identified by PCR. This was reported as having occurred in 2012. Subsequently, in 2014, the vaccine program in Japan was halted, with introduction on April 1st and cessation shortly thereafter due to the emerging concerns. In 2014, Shin Handi, Jerôme from France, and Dalma from the UK were noted as participants in a conference where the discussion continued, including claims that in 2014 the concern about residual HPV DNA led to stronger actions regarding testing and safety discussions. The dialogue then references broader regulatory contexts: a 2016 document indicating changing standards for DNA remnants (with WHO and FDA guidance) and the notion that DNA contamination thresholds were being adjusted—such as the threshold changing from 10 picograms to 100 times higher over the years, and later to roughly 10,000 picograms. The implication is that the fixed safety limits were evolving in a way that favored pharmaceutical manufacturers, with the argument that the changes in base values were not aligned with human biology, but rather with manufacturing practices. The speakers emphasize that in Japan, the issue of DNA contamination was broadcast worldwide, with researchers, journalists, and affected individuals all aware of the problem and the stakes involved, making Japan a central stage for these concerns. Speaker 1 adds that a year prior, it became clear that female safety and the DNA contamination issue were major questions in Japan, leading to discussions about stopping messenger-type vaccines and reconsidering RN-type vaccines, given the fatalities associated with those vaccine deployments, reinforcing opposition among certain groups. The exchange ends with a reaffirmation of concern about the continued risk and opposition.

Speaker 0 discusses the possibility of a Muslim majority nation in Canada and the clash between Canadian law and Sharia law. The speaker challenges the idea of displacing Canadian law with Sharia law, emphasizing the lack of respect in such a proposition. They suggest that instead of changing the law to accommodate Sharia, the laws should be changed to prevent more Muslims from coming to Canada. The speaker also expresses their loyalty to their religion over the queen, recounting their silence during the oath-taking process. The transcript abruptly ends without further explanation.

The Muslim community has a significant responsibility in the changes seen in Britain today. The country has transformed, with its original culture diminishing as various groups adapt their own customs. This shift has led to a society where everyone is focused on their individual practices, impacting schools and public services. For instance, interactions with local councils have changed; previously, there was an expectation of mutual understanding, but now there seems to be a push to accommodate diverse cultural practices. This raises concerns about the extent to which Britain has become too accommodating, leading to a loss of its foundational identity.

A Muslim majority in Canada is possible. If Canadian law is challenged by Sharia law, it raises concerns about respect for existing laws. Some believe that loyalty should lie with religion over national allegiance. There’s a suggestion to change laws to limit Muslim immigration to Canada. The speaker expresses frustration about feeling unheard during a previous discussion, indicating a lack of responsibility from others to engage in dialogue.

Birmingham has seen a significant concentration of Muslim immigration, making it feel less like an English town and more like a part of Pakistan. While there is no issue with the Pakistani community, the failure of multiculturalism is evident. Unlike some immigrants who maintain their cultural practices and demand changes to accommodate them, the speaker emphasizes the importance of adapting to the host country's laws and customs. The presence of numerous mosques and loudspeakers for prayers is highlighted as something uncommon in the West. The expectation is that newcomers should respect the existing norms rather than seek sensitivity from the local population. If newcomers find the culture offensive, they should reconsider their choice to come to the country.

If you want to marry your cousin, go ahead. Why is there a British MP trying to ban cousin marriages? Major religions like Judaism, Christianity, Hinduism, and Buddhism all permit them. No one is forced to marry their cousin. Historical figures like Queen Victoria, Queen Elizabeth II, and Albert Einstein did. Concerns about health risks are raised, but what about smoking and drinking, which also pose risks? We live in a society where individuals should have the freedom to make their own choices. There are more pressing issues to address, like the cost of living crisis and global conflicts. Let people decide who they want to marry without interference.

Japan is facing a population decline due to low birth rates and an aging population. Factors include economic struggles, lack of financial incentives for having children, and government policies. Efforts to increase birth rates through cash incentives and childcare have not been successful. The solution may lie in personal choices, as research shows a fatherhood wage premium can offset the costs of raising children. Despite societal challenges, individuals have the power to shape the future.

The image being highlighted is a set of 36 blacked-out documents, referred to as “kuro-nuri so-ryo” (blackened documents). Of these, eight-tenths are blacked out. The relatives who received these documents are introduced: a woman in her 40s living in Sapporo, Hokkaido, who is the wife of the deceased; she had heard that her husband was a tutor at a cram school. He died at home, and the police prohibited a full investigation, so she wanted to know the cause of death and went to Northern Hokkaido to see the autopsy results. The narrative then shifts to the sequence of events for a different case: a 42-year-old man who died six days after vaccination. The wife wanted to know the details of her husband’s death. The husband received the first Pfizer vaccine on October 15, 2021. Soon after the vaccination, he developed a reaction: arm pain, fever up to 38.5°C, and a fever that lasted about three days, during which his wife acknowledges the fever was present but notes he did not usually discuss symptoms beyond that. Six days after vaccination, around 2:30 a.m., the wife heard noises on the first floor and came down; the husband had collapsed, coughing up white foam, with blood in his mouth and difficulty breathing. He then fell into cardiopulmonary arrest and died. Medical professionals were asked to comment on the cause of death. They stated that the exact cause is not clearly known; it could be the vaccine, but there is no evidence to confirm this, so they could not definitively say it was the vaccine. They described the death as an acute circulatory system disease and mentioned possibilities such as vascular issues, heart or blood vessel abnormalities, and conditions like myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, or aneurysm, but could not specify. One doctor suggested that the death might be attributed to an acute circulatory system disease, while another indicated that the precise cause remains uncertain. The wife wanted the autopsy results from the police to understand why her husband died, and she expressed that she regrets not having had an autopsy performed. When asked about performing an autopsy after national guidelines advised against it, officials reportedly suggested that delaying the man’s return home would be problematic, and thus the autopsy was not performed. The speaker notes that in other cases they have covered, some relatives feel that an autopsy would have helped them understand the death, while others question whether an autopsy would have changed anything. The report concludes that the death is suspected to be due to an acute circulatory system disease, but the pathway to that conclusion remains unclear because much of the evidence is redacted. The speaker emphasizes that if autopsies had been pursued more actively, such cases in Sapporo might be less common.

Jeremy Schwab, an independent journalist from Japan, attempts to engage with a respondent for a comment. He reiterates his identity by saying he is from Japan and that he is an independent journalist. The respondent signals that they are currently moving on to the next thing and are running late, indicating they cannot stop for comments at that moment. Despite the time pressure, Schwab thanks the person for their time and expresses appreciation. The interviewer asks which media outlet Schwab is with, and Schwab answers that he is an independent journalist from Japan. The interviewer again thanks him and acknowledges the situation with polite farewells. Schwab expresses a desire to ask just one more question, even as he prepares to move on, and thanks the interviewer once more while indicating that he will simply walk up and ask. The conversation reveals that the interviewer is in a rush, with multiple engagements or commitments that night. Schwab recognizes the constraint, noting that there are “so many things tonight” and that the moments are precious, implying the difficulty of obtaining interviews in a busy schedule. The interviewer reflects on the reality that if they stopped for every inquiry they would be overwhelmed by the volume of interactions, describing it as an unfortunate situation. Both parties exchange thanks, and Schwab again attempts to pose one more question despite the time pressure. The interviewer acknowledges the challenge of accommodating many people asking for comments and thanks Schwab for trying. The exchange ends with Schwab asking, “Do you know the voice that worry about globalism?” followed by a courteous closing of “Thank you” and “Nice evening.” In summary, the exchange centers on a brief, time-constrained attempt by a Japan-based independent journalist to obtain a comment from an interview subject, set against the practical realities of a busy schedule and the difficulty of stopping for multiple inquiries. The dialogue includes a final, somewhat unclear question about “the voice that worry about globalism.”

The former rector of Batman University received a message from a colleague in Palestine, urging Muslim countries not to hold funeral prayers as it could lead to more deaths. This situation is concerning.

Europe is the cradle of Western civilization, and the cultural and religious bonds between it and the U.S. will last beyond political disagreements. However, Europe is at risk of civilizational suicide. Many European countries are unable or unwilling to control their borders, but they are starting to push back, which is good. They are also starting to limit the free speech of their own citizens, even as those citizens protest against border issues. Europe needs to respect its own people and sovereignty, something America can't do for them. If a country like Germany takes in millions of immigrants who are culturally incompatible, Germany will have killed itself. The speaker loves Germany and wants it to thrive.