reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Former presidents of Haiti, Tanzania, Ivory Coast, Burundi, and Swaziland have all passed away between 2020 and 2021. The president of Madagascar recently survived an assassination attempt. These leaders shared a common stance against COVID vaccination.

The video argues that China has a unique, long-standing supply chain that involves state security, public security, hospitals, biotech companies, airlines, high-speed rail, and schools. This is described as a “hundred fifty year industry” that could cost lives if spoken about aloud, referencing the death of a actor as an example. The speaker explains that this concept derives from a moment when Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin discussed how humans could live to 150 years old while on the way to a military parade; the speaker asserts that Xi was expressing confidence in China’s medical system and the related supply chain. According to the speaker, a dark medical supply chain exists in which young people have become sources of spare body parts for the rich and powerful, with schools, hospitals, police, and local governments all implicated. Public discussion of this topic has surged as more people go missing. The age range of affected individuals is said to be expanding from toddlers to teenagers to young adults and now middle-aged men and women, including people in their fifties. The speaker notes that a Shanghai official told friends that people should not go to hospitals for physical exams if they are under 60, arguing that as demand for body parts rises, a 50-year-old who “still looks good” is valuable, while the biggest group affected remains children. As 2026 began, reports of missing children across China reportedly increased. The speaker cites a sequence of disappearances in Henan: a mysterious death of a 13-year-old boy, followed within a week by another boy’s disappearance in a township near Xincai County on January 9; a 14-year-old boy, Yang Jiahao, missing on January 11 in Shangji Township; a 13-year-old boy, Wang Yichun, missing January 12 in Heilong Township; and a 14-year-old girl, Xu Mengyao, missing January 12 in Dancheng County, Henan. Concurrently, helicopters were reported in busy urban areas transporting what many suspect to be organs or organ-harvesting victims. Around 2 PM on January 15, a helicopter was filmed lifting a white bag from the rooftop of a traditional Chinese medicine hospital in Xiamen, Fujian. Netizens noted the bag appeared to be moving, leading to heightened online scrutiny, while authorities began censoring the footage.

We were all bound by the recent events. The sunshine and wind touched each of our hearts, making us feel a sense of hope. Hu Jintao, the former leader, is just one of the many figures who have faced challenges. How many of the Communist Party's general secretaries have had a good ending? Have Zhao Ziyang and others had a good ending? These are questions we should ask ourselves.

China's rulers are currently engaged in various activities, including diplomatic battles, trade wars, military posturing, and changing laws in Hong Kong. They are also carrying out an anti-corruption drive, which is not new and has been ongoing since Xi Jinping's presidency. Recently, a senior official in Xinjiang, Ren Hua, was investigated for corruption, making them the fifth senior official to face such charges this year. This crackdown on corruption in Xinjiang is surprising considering the current virus outbreak. It raises questions about whether these officials possessed sensitive information that Beijing wanted to hide, as Xinjiang is a politically sensitive region for China.

The speaker discusses whether Xi Jinping will attack Taiwan. They mention that in a previous interview, Xi Jinping stated that he would not attack Taiwan until 2027 or 2035. However, many people doubt the credibility of his statement. The speaker also reveals recent information about large-scale power outages in Xinjiang, Fujian, and Beijing, suggesting that these outages may be part of military preparations. They mention that this information is a leak. The speaker concludes by mentioning that the US government officials want to verify Xi Jinping's statements.

Xi Jinping is rumored to have had a stroke, sparking discussions on Chinese social media. Speculation arose from a post by a professor and an anonymous author claiming Xi Jinping had a stroke during a meeting. Various YouTubers also spread the news. Past incidents, like Xi Jinping's unsteady gait during visits and placing two teacups during a recent event, have fueled the rumors. The credibility of the information remains uncertain due to the secretive nature of the CCP. The future implications of Xi Jinping's health are unclear. Stay tuned for updates.

There is evidence suggesting that the Chinese Communist Party leaked the virus from a laboratory in Wuhan. They hid the truth about person-to-person transmission, which hindered our response. The Chinese Communist Party continues to conduct risky research, even using American funds. We recently discovered they are working on a COVID virus that affects the brain. We need a moratorium on this type of research. Witnesses who could provide information have mysteriously died, and the Chinese Communist Party has removed DNA sequences that could prove our theory. We must prevent future situations by stopping gain of function research and not aiding our enemies. The scientific community in China collaborates with the military and the CCP, posing a serious threat to us.

On May 15th, Xi Jinping visits San Francisco and Elon Musk tries to impress him. However, there seems to be a problem with posts related to Neil Shen and Sequoia Capital on Twitter. When searching for Neil Shen, there are no results in the latest posts. Even Sequoia Capital's latest posts are limited to only three hours. The same issue occurs when searching for Sequoia China. Only a few posts are available, with the last one being 21 hours ago. It is clear that Sequoia China and Neil Shen's presence on Twitter has been wiped out. This happens at a time when the China Committee is investigating funding for weapons.

The discussion centers on six American scientists working on advanced materials and plasma technology who have suddenly disappeared, with a parallel pattern of missing Chinese scientists. The speakers debate where the technology originated (with sources suggesting it came from downed UAPs/UFOs) and why these individuals are vanishing, including both U.S. and Chinese scientists who worked on similar high-end military applications. Brandon Weichert outlines a sequence of events and connections: - In mid-March 2026, three Chinese defense scientists — Zhao Jingkang (nuclear weapons expert), Wu Manching (radar and metamaterials expert), and Wei Yiyan (missile systems expert) — were quietly erased from the Chinese Academy of Engineering’s website, signaling they are no longer among the living. - A few days later, hypersonics expert Yan Hong (a key figure in plasma aerodynamics) died suddenly at 56. - Weichert pairs these five Chinese scientists with the six American scientists who were working on related technologies, noting massive overlap in their work and suggesting that the Americans’ and Chinese’ programs mirror each other in advanced plasma and weapon systems. - He concludes that there is shadowboxing between the United States and China, describing it as a shaping operation in the run-up to a potential major conflict, with both sides attempting to eliminate the other’s brainpower—the human capital essential to sustaining high-end warfare. - He recalls historical precedents where nations targeted each other’s scientists (the Americans reportedly killing Soviet scientists and vice versa; Israelis targeting Iranian scientists) and argues this is not unprecedented. - Weichert cautions that the topic is not necessarily about aliens; he suggests that the systems discussed may be advanced technologies developed in the U.S., Russia, and China for years, potentially including non-alien sources and even Nazi-era technologies that were inherited, while acknowledging that alien explanations exist in public discourse. - He notes that there is a broader geopolitical dynamic at play, including the possibility that the timing of alien-related talk may be designed to distract from conventional advances in technology and the fact that China may have caught up to or surpassed the U.S. in some conventional technologies. The conversation also addresses satellites and space warfare: - There are reports on meteors or fireballs in the sky, but the speakers believe some debris could be from satellites shot down in low Earth orbit. - SpaceX Starlinks have suffered “an explosive fragmentary event,” potentially from being hit by anti-satellite weapons; Starlinks have previously been used for protests (in Iran) and supplied to Ukraine, and the Russians have developed systems like Klinka and TOBAL to knock down Starlinks. - There is a longstanding concern that electromagnetic pulse (EMP) weapons on satellites could disrupt or destroy the U.S. electric grid, with a claim that one EMP detonated 50 miles above the continental United States could knock out 90–95% of the grid and take at least two years to restore, especially given reliance on Chinese-made restoring equipment. - The discussion returns to the importance of human capital and education, with a provocative claim that the Department of Education may be the single greatest national security threat due to its impact on human capital, alongside the national debt. The speakers acknowledge disagreement about whether the origin of the advanced plasma technology is extraterrestrial or terrestrial, emphasizing instead the strategic implications of missing scientists on both sides and the ongoing modernization and counterspace dimensions of the conflict.

Where is the body of Thomas Matthew Crooks? A report reveals that the FBI quickly cleaned up biological evidence from the crime scene after the assassination attempt on Donald Trump on July 13, 2024. Congressman Clay Higgins, who investigated the scene, found alarming actions by the FBI that raise questions about the investigation's integrity. Notably, the FBI released Crooks' body for cremation just ten days after the incident, without informing local authorities, hindering the verification of autopsy reports. Higgins expressed concerns that without examining the body, the accuracy of the reports cannot be confirmed. This situation, along with the rapid cleanup of evidence, suggests possible obstruction of justice in the investigation.

This action has had a huge impact. We received information that Xi Jinping was restless after returning from the investigation. It's not just a reaction to Western countries like the United States, but he didn't expect the New Alliance to have such a significant influence at this time. Despite the strict control, they were able to make their voices heard and have a big impact. They also obtained information about the party and the government. Many outsiders thought that Guo was losing confidence, but that's not the case. He didn't expect things to happen so quickly, and the situation changed drastically. This poses the biggest danger to the Communist Party. Even in this critical situation, the situation remains the same. So, it's good for him to sit tight.

Many Western corporations are unaware of the true nature of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its leader, Xi Jinping. Throughout history, no organization has survived when dealing with the CCP. Xi Jinping has transformed the party into his own, and it is no longer representative of communism. It is crucial for corporations to realize this for their long-term benefit. The New Federal State of China is a group that possesses internal intelligence about the CCP. They can provide valuable information and protection, not just for profit.

The Chinese Communist Party is planning a shock experiment to address multiple objectives. Firstly, it aims to protect the 20th National Congress and ensure the leadership of Xi Jinping. Secondly, it prepares for a potential conflict with Taiwan. Lastly, it serves as a shock therapy for the global society before an anticipated world economic collapse. The future economic and military situation in Asia is uncertain.

Xi Jinping is rumored to have had a stroke, causing speculation on Chinese social media. Various posts and videos suggest his health issues, with some hoping for his recovery and others for his demise. The credibility of the information remains uncertain due to the secretive nature of the CCP. The situation could lead to either a quick recovery or a long-term absence, leaving the political future in uncertainty. Stay tuned for updates on this developing story. Thank you for watching.

In this video, the speaker discusses a concerning incident in China where six doctoral students studying cancer mechanisms were diagnosed with fatal cancers. The incident took place at a renowned hospital, and there are suspicions of a hidden conspiracy and the development of a genetic weapon by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The speaker provides details about the affected individuals, their mentor, and the hospital's response. They also speculate on possible causes, such as toxic reagents or gene inhibitors used in the lab. The speaker raises concerns about the CCP's involvement and compares it to the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. They urge caution and skepticism towards the CCP's scientific research.

Xi Jinping reportedly suffered a stroke during a CCP session, sparking rumors on Chinese social media. Various posts and videos speculate on his health, with some claiming he was rushed to the hospital. The credibility of the information remains uncertain due to CCP's secretive nature. If true, Xi Jinping's recovery or deterioration could have significant political implications in China. Stay tuned for updates on this developing situation.

The conversation begins with a sleep-deprived recap of ongoing news, focusing first on Iran. A pro-monarchist/pro-Pahlavi account revived a theory that Iran’s supreme leader Mustafa Khamenei is dead, citing New York Times reporting about severe burns and leg injuries, Trump’s March quote that they “don’t know if he’s dead or not,” and a new claim based on PDF metadata matching the same software setup used by Mohammad Ghalibaf’s publication office. The claim concludes Mushtaba (Mustafa) is dead and Ghalibaf’s office is ghostwriting him. One guest argues the shared metadata could be explained by written statements delivered via human couriers rather than computers, while another focuses on what the death rumor would change: potential fracturing within the IRGC. They discuss a Strait of Hormuz incident as evidence of internal pressure, including factions allegedly causing “havoc,” attacking a ship after it violated Iranian protocol (including transponder/route requirements), and the idea that some actors want to provoke a response to show proof of life. Attention then shifts to a broader Hormuz “power struggle” involving Oman and Iran. The discussion describes Oman opening an alternative transit route and the rejection of an Oman IMO transit corridor by the IRGC as “unacceptable and completely dangerous.” Iran then required vessels to use Iran’s declared routes and coordinate via VHF Channel 16, leading to ships turning around and at least three vessels (including two oil supertankers) changing course near Oman’s coastline, after Iranian naval broadcasts reportedly instructed ships not to proceed. A vessel was struck near Oman, and the Wall Street Journal reports, citing senior U.S. officials, that IRGC was responsible. One guest frames the conflict as about long-term control and influence rather than money. A separate thread looks at marinetraffic.com and the Persian Gulf Shipping Authority (pgsa.ir). The guest describes using a PGSA form requiring vessel and cargo details, and notes a “funny” observation that “Israel” is not available in an origin-country dropdown but “Palestine” appears, with discussion of whether that relates to trolling or messaging. They add that “there are none now on the Omani side,” with debate about transponder behavior and concealment. They then connect regional tensions to Lebanon. Israeli forces are described as advancing toward Beit Yehoun while Hezbollah ambushes and clashes reportedly last over an hour; Israel responds with airstrikes, and the discussion portrays a regional pattern of things “going back downhill.” The Gulf and U.S.-Iran negotiation context is discussed through MOU disputes over unfrozen assets and conditions. A key debate centers on U.S. options if ships are attacked. One guest argues the U.S. cannot practically escalate via ground forces, confronting in the Strait of Hormuz, or launching new airstrikes without triggering retaliation and killing the MOU. They also bring up an energy-analyst claim about diesel vs aviation fuel constraints at refineries: increased bombing would raise jet-fuel demand and cause fuel shortages within two weeks. The conversation also notes concerns among some Iranian voices that Iran is not doing enough during Lebanon clashes, while another replies that Hezbollah’s fighting and casualties against Israel may be preferable to dramatic retaliation that could disrupt strategic timing. Further negotiation details include a claim that Iranian negotiators insist on an Israeli withdrawal from occupied Lebanese territories as a “red line” for any deal, and an article alleging Netanyahu persuaded Trump not to withdraw from southern Lebanon while remaining committed to a ceasefire, with negotiations focusing on pilot zones instead of withdrawal. They ask whether Netanyahu could prevent Israel from withdrawing and whether Trump might become more hawkish after U.S. midterms. A separate “wild card” is a reported Syrian military buildup along the Lebanese border. The discussion says Syrian troops have been amassing since April, with pace increasing after Trump’s June 14 announcement involving al-Shara and targeting Hezbollah. One guest reports an explanation that the buildup is defensive—aimed at potential internal threats or protecting corridors—rather than an attack plan against Hezbollah, while broader reports refer to thousands of troops, rockets, armored vehicles for border security, smuggling prevention, and a Qusair corridor connected to Captagon trafficking. They argue logistics/resupply signs would matter if troops are truly assembling. They pivot briefly to broader regional diplomacy through a J.D. Vance comment: Emiratis have conversations with Iranians, including the IRGC, about economic incentives. Another guest interprets this as a sign the Gulf states may adjust to a new reality and that more regional alignment could follow. The latter part of the discussion turns to Russia-Ukraine. They discuss Zelensky’s warning about Belarus moving equipment and debate its practicality, then discuss claims about Russian fuel shortages in multiple regions, including mandatory gasoline/diesel sales restrictions and long lines. One guest rejects the credibility of the Moscow Times, citing prior alleged misinformation, and argues Ukraine is striking refineries and terminals enough to cause localized issues but disputes the scale of nationwide shortages. They also discuss Russia’s expanded offensives across a wider front, including actions around Sumy, Kharkiv near Kupyansk, Konstantinovka, Krasnyi Liman, Slavyansk and Kramatorsk, Zaporizhia, and Kherson, framing it as a shift from prior concentrated campaigns. Finally, they discuss escalation risks and NATO concerns. One guest argues the West is “fully participating” through attacks inside Russia that kill civilians, and expects Russia to retaliate with strikes inside European countries if escalation continues. Zelensky is also described as approving a 40-day operation by Ukraine’s security service to influence Russia to end the war, but the guest portrays Russian resolve as increasing rather than decreasing, citing the shift to offensive operations in multiple locations this year. The segment ends with a brief wrap-up that the Iran rumor about Mustafa’s death is discussed but not treated as central, emphasis on conflicting messages in the MOU (assets, obligations), continued tension in the Strait of Hormuz, and ongoing Lebanon clashes with no full ceasefire. The host concludes with mention of upcoming interviews and plans for further coverage due to exhaustion.

China's political atmosphere is tighter now, with increased surveillance and restrictions. Some citizens report plainclothes police monitoring Tiananmen Square. Despite this, more people are becoming aware of the situation, though the younger generation may be unaware. Schools are monitoring students closely. Media coverage on the issue has decreased, with the "iron curtain" now tightly shut.

Sean Ryan discusses breaking news about a high-ranking Chinese military figure under arrest for potentially sharing nuclear secrets with the Americans, noting it could signal a coup attempt and highlighting broader concerns about corruption within the Chinese military. He points out that corruption is a historic and persistent issue, citing the 1980s shift of the military into business and the practice of channeling profits through military channels. He mentions that five of the seven people on China’s Central Military Commission have been arrested or under investigation over the last two years, suggesting this could reflect internal power struggles or anti-corruption measures. He argues this situation makes armed aggression toward Taiwan unlikely in the near term, given the military’s current focus on corruption and factional balance. George adds that Taiwan–Mainland China relations show unusually high engagement between the KMT and CPC, with former Taiwan president Ma visiting Mainland China and the current KMT chairman seeking talks with Xi. He notes subsidies and benefits for Taiwanese in Fujian to buy housing, access education, and seek medical care, and asserts that disarray in the Chinese military and pragmatic politics make large-scale armed action against Taiwan unlikely. He rejects the notion of a deal between Xi and Trump in which Xi takes Taiwan and Trump takes Venezuela. Sean agrees and shifts to Xi Jinping’s anti-corruption campaign, describing it as a potential driver of legitimacy alongside improvements in air pollution and living standards. He contrasts pollution levels and public health improvements since Xi’s rise, praising reductions in pollution and increases in access to medical care and education. He cites the cost of education as an example of government support for the 90% of China’s population, while acknowledging remaining problems. Sean argues that the CPC prioritizes the 850 million people in the low- to middle-income bracket, focusing on improvements in daily life as part of governance, rather than policies catering to the wealthy. Turning to the economy, Sean’s book on China’s economy is praised as essential for understanding opportunities for the West and capitalism within China. He critiques Western governments for hostility toward China and urges European engagement with China. He argues that Europe should follow the example of Australia and Canada by negotiating deals with China to benefit from the economy, and suggests European nations could attract Chinese investment and factories, hiring local workers, such as NEV makers like BYD or Xiaomi establishing presence in Europe. He cites Huawei’s failed French factory project as evidence of fearmongering and bad policy in Europe, lamenting leaders who simultaneously welcome Chinese investment and denigrate China as a threat. The conversation shifts to Canada’s Carney and Donald Trump. Sean expresses concern about Trump’s approach, describing him as potentially unstable and referring to a “backbone” in Carney for standing up to Trump. He notes Carney’s balancing act between the United States and China, given Canada’s trade with both, and cites Trump’s sanctions as harming small countries and families. Sean describes Trump as having narcissistic personality traits and expresses worry about the impact on political leaders and their families, including Carney’s daughter at Harvard, arguing that Trump’s actions are morally wrong and destabilizing for global relations. He asserts a fear for the world and highlights the potential for unpredictable, punitive measures under Trump.

China is currently experiencing a cultural revolution similar to the one in the past. The chairman's goal is to achieve common prosperity, which has led to the takeover of private industries and companies. Jack Ma, the CEO of Alibaba, was forced to retire and disappeared for a few months after criticizing China's regulators. There is a power struggle between different factions within the government. Chairman Xi changed the constitution to allow for unlimited presidency, and he is known as a hardcore communist. Many celebrities and wealthy individuals have become quiet and low-profile, as they fear disappearing or facing consequences. People still disappear in China, and there are secret prisons known as prisoners conscious.

The current leadership landscape is precarious, where making the wrong judgment can end careers. Conversations about opportunities are complex, and there's a fear of losing jobs for revealing unfavorable information. Access to vaccination data is controlled, and reporting it could lead to job loss. Reliable conclusions about vaccine-related deaths require individual record inspections, as death certificates may not tell the full story. Forensic investigations into medical records can reveal causal links between vaccines and adverse events. However, there are concerns that the CDC is removing codes related to vaccine-related deaths, obscuring the truth.

She successfully became the dictator by gradually seizing power with the help of her rivals. She declared herself president for life in the 2022 National Congress, purging over 8 million Chinese Communist Party members and their families. This amounts to around 30 million people. She also intensified the persecution of Uyghurs, building concentration camps and jails. Hong Kong's democracy was destroyed when China implemented the national security law in 2019, breaking their promise of freedom and democracy. Additionally, the COVID virus was released, resulting in nearly 100 million deaths due to the bioweapon and the secondary humanitarian crisis.

The segment compiles a series of high-profile disappearances and deaths connected to prominent scientists and military-related figures from July 2023 through the present, noting that some cases remain unexplained or lack full public detail while others appear sudden with few answers. The overarching implication presented is that these cases involve individuals tied to advanced national security work, prompting calls for heightened inquiry. Most recently, retired Air Force General William McCaslin vanished in February. He walked out of his Albuquerque home, leaving behind his phone, after having previously overseen some of the Pentagon’s most advanced aerospace programs. In the same month, astrophysicist Carl Grillmeier—who worked closely on NASA missions—was killed outside his home; a suspect has been arrested in that case. Eight months prior to these events, US rocket scientist Monica Reza disappeared while hiking in California’s Angeles National Forest; records indicate she worked on advanced aerospace materials. The report notes that Congress is weighing an FBI involvement: Congressman Eric Burleson is calling for an FBI investigation, underscoring the perceived severity of the cases and the potential implications for national security. In supporting remarks, a statement attributed to Burleson emphasizes the unusual nature of the individuals involved and the seriousness of the situations. Speaker 1 (the reporter’s interlocutor) adds context by describing these victims as not ordinary citizens but “some of the most advanced scientists that are working on our some of our most critical, nation’s secrets.” The speaker frames the situation as having “all of the hallmarks of a foreign operation,” signaling a belief that foreign involvement could be a factor, and stresses the need for investigation. The report notes that, to date, no local authority has publicly connected these mysterious deaths and disappearances. When the inquiry was directed to the FBI, they declined to comment. The segment closes with a follow-up acknowledgment from the host that these cases have heightened curiosity and understanding but remain unresolved in many aspects. Overall, the compilation highlights a pattern involving high-profile scientists and aerospace professionals with missing or violent end-points, the call for federal scrutiny, and the lack of publicly disclosed connections by local authorities, while the FBI maintains silence on the matter.

Military facilities and armies are not supposed to be built near civilian facilities that house children, women, and the elderly, according to international conventions. However, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plans to use children, nursing homes, and hospitals as cover and hostages to wage war against Taiwan and the United States. The CCP's military facilities are strategically located in densely populated areas, using the people as shields. The CCP prioritizes the safety of its leaders over the lives of its citizens, even constructing underground bunkers to protect them. The CCP's military facilities are primarily defensive, but they also possess attacking facilities, including nuclear bomb bunkers. This strategy of state kidnapping and terrorism on the Chinese people is considered extremely evil.

The CCP, with its extensive knowledge of the COVID-19 virus and future events, anticipates being held accountable by Western countries and the world. As a result, they plan to initiate economic, technological, and military conflicts against the United States, the West, Iran, North Korea, Russia, Cuba, and South America. The CCP's weapons development aims to bring about global destruction. The party, now dominated by Xi Jinping, is engaged in a fierce internal political battle, sidelining Hu Jintao's faction. Disregarding people's livelihoods, Xi's party will eventually face destruction due to the Taiwan conflict and internal issues.