reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The member from Spadina, Fort York, addressed the prime minister regarding national security and the upcoming Hogue Commission report on foreign interference. He questioned the prime minister's ability to work alongside ministers who may not be serving Canada's interests, implying that at least one minister could be compromised. In response, the prime minister criticized the member's comments as disgraceful and irreverent, emphasizing the seriousness of national security issues. He pointed out that the member's alignment with the Conservative Party is concerning, as their leader lacks the necessary clearance for briefings essential to keeping Canadians safe.

Bomb-sniffing dogs searched bags to ensure safety. The Montreal police put up caution tape and escorted people out. Leaders of Canada's four parties who were able to participate in the debate didn't feel they could guarantee a proper environment and are not taking questions from journalists. This is an important part of the ritual of elections, democracies, and accountability. It is part of the stress test that these leaders go through as they seek to lead the country, spend tax revenue, and make laws. Serious things are being discussed about criminal justice and using the notwithstanding clause, requiring a serious and mature debate, not financially motivated stunts. With everything going on with Donald Trump, the economy, and the world, this is where the national Canadian election debate has ended up.

Speaker 0 informs the prime minister about a reported terrorist attack at the Niagara crossing of the Canada US border, with two people dead and one injured. They ask for an update on the government's action plan for homeland security. Speaker 1, a reporter, questions the terrorism claim, citing US and Canadian officials who deny any evidence of terrorism. Speaker 0 corrects the reporter, mentioning that CP had previously made three corrections for false information in one article. They consider checking with the Guinness Book of World Records for such a case. Speaker 0 clarifies that CTV reported the Canadian government's presumption of terrorism in the incident.

There was a terrorist attack and explosion at the Niagara crossing of the Canada-US border, resulting in at least 2 deaths and 1 injury. The prime minister is being asked for an update and an action plan to ensure the security of the people. The prime minister acknowledges the seriousness of the situation and mentions that multiple agencies are involved in providing support. Four border crossings are currently closed, and additional measures are being considered across the country. The prime minister excuses himself to gather further updates. In a separate discussion, concerns are raised about government spending and its impact on inflation.

Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about calling the explosion at the Rainbow Bridge terrorism, as no officials confirmed it. Speaker 1 defends their statement, mentioning that the government of Canada presumed it was a terrorist incident based on media reports. Speaker 0 argues that media reports are not the same as calling something terrorism. Speaker 1 disagrees, stating that media reports of a terror-related event came from security officials in the Trudeau government. Speaker 0 asks if CTV was irresponsible for their tweet, to which Speaker 1 responds with a comment. Speaker 1 hopes Speaker 0 won't publish something they need to apologize for again.

Justin Trudeau is criticized by members of the European Parliament for undermining democracy in Canada while condemning Vladimir Putin. German MP Christine Anderson suggests Trudeau should not speak in the house due to human rights violations. Another representative from Croatia labels Canada under Trudeau as a symbol of civil rights violations and dictatorship.

Paola Lorigio from The Canadian Press questions the speaker's decision to label the explosion at the Rainbow Bridge as terrorism, despite no official confirmation. The speaker defends their statement, citing media reports and claiming that the government of Canada presumed it to be a terror-related event. They also criticize The Canadian Press for issuing three corrections in one article. When asked if they think CTV was irresponsible for reporting the incident as terrorism, the speaker redirects the question. The conversation ends with the speaker pointing out the contradiction in the reporter's comment.

There has been a terrorist attack and explosion at the Niagara crossing of the Canada US border. Two people have died and one is injured. The prime minister is asked for an update on the situation and the action plan to ensure the security of the people. The prime minister acknowledges the seriousness of the situation and mentions that the NSIA, Minister of Public Safety, CVSA, RCMP, and Transport Canada are all providing support. Four border crossings are currently closed and additional measures are being considered at all border crossings. The prime minister will continue to work closely with US officials and provide updates. They excuse themselves to gather further information.

The speaker defends their statement about the explosion at the Rainbow Bridge checkpoint being terrorism, citing media reports that the Canadian government presumed it to be so. They criticize CP for making false claims in an article and question CTV's responsibility for reporting on the incident. The speaker also mentions the awkward situation of CP attacking CTV's reporting, considering that CP works for CTV.

The Prime Minister previously supported ENSCOCOP's role in examining foreign interference in Canada's democracy, but there seems to be a shift in stance. Questions arise about whether a recent ENSCOCOP report revealed involvement of Liberals seeking political and financial gain. Is the Prime Minister still committed to transparency and public trust in institutions, or has external influence changed this approach? In response, the Minister for Public Safety emphasizes the importance of oversight, noting that the government established a committee of parliamentarians to monitor security agencies for the first time. This committee includes members from all political parties, and their recommendations have been acted upon to enhance national security and combat foreign interference.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau addressed a serious situation at the Niagara crossing of the Canada-US border. There was a vehicle explosion at the Rainbow Bridge crossing, resulting in two deaths and one injury. The government is working closely with NSIA, CVSA, RCMP, and Transport Canada to provide support and gather information. Four border crossings, including Rainbow Bridge, Whirlpool Bridge, Queenston Bridge, and Peace Bridge, are currently closed. Additional measures are being implemented at all border crossings nationwide. The government is taking this situation very seriously and will continue to provide updates. In question period, Conservative leader Pierre Poliyev criticized the government's spending, accusing it of causing inflation to rise.

Justin Trudeau addressed a serious situation regarding border crossings in Canada. There was a vehicle explosion at the Rainbow Bridge crossing in Niagara Falls, resulting in two deaths and one injury. The government is working closely with NSIA, CVSA, RCMP, and Transport Canada to gather information and provide support. Four border crossings, including Rainbow Bridge, Whirlpool Bridge, Queenston Bridge, and Peace Bridge, are currently closed. Additional measures are being implemented at all border crossings nationwide. Trudeau assured that they are taking the situation very seriously and will continue to provide updates. He excused himself to gather further information. In question period, Conservative leader Pierre Poliyev criticized the government's spending, accusing it of causing inflation to rise.

Bomb-sniffing dogs searched bags to ensure safety. The Montreal police put up caution tape and escorted people out. Leaders of Canada's four parties didn't feel they could guarantee a proper environment, so they won't take questions from journalists. This is an important part of the ritual of elections, democracies, and accountability. It is part of the stress test that leaders go through as they seek to lead the country, spend tax revenue, and make laws. Serious things are being discussed, like criminal justice and using the notwithstanding clause. This requires a serious and mature debate, not financially motivated stunts. With everything going on with Donald Trump, the economy, and the world, this is where the national Canadian election debate has ended up.

The speaker discusses Canada becoming interesting in January and February due to protesters in Ottawa. The job of reporters, according to the speaker, is to go out and ask protesters why they are on the streets, why they are there with their kids, and why there is a bouncy castle in the middle of Ottawa, to discover the story. The speaker claims the Government did not want that and that the Prime Minister decided in advance that the protesters were all the modern excommunications—Nazis, white supremacists, anti-Semites, probably homophobes, misogynists, probably transphobes, etc.—and then he brings in the Emergency Powers Act. The speaker asks what the mainstream media would do at such a time, and asserts they would question it, but claims the Canadian mainstream media did not and instead acted as an Amen Chorus of the government. Several examples are provided. A CBC host described the Freedom Convoy as a feral mob. A Toronto Star columnist said, “sorry for the language, it's a homegrown hate farm that was then jet fueled by an American right funded rat fucking operation.” The speaker notes that CBC claimed two indigenous women who were scared to go outside in Ottawa because of racist violence did not bother to mention that indigenous drummers had led the truckers in an 0 Canada rendition. The National Observer allegedly stated that many black and indigenous freedom convoy supporters were, in fact, duped by the truckers. A Globe and Mail reporter claimed, “My 13 year old son told me to tell protesters I'm not a Jew” out of fear of antisemitic violence, without mentioning that one of the convoy leaders was Jewish. The speaker argues this demonstrably rancid and corrupt behavior is rooted in a system where in Canada, the media is funded by the government. It is stated that in 2018, election year, there was a coincidence with the government funding; the Canadian media allegedly received $595,000,000 over five years, and the Toronto Star estimated it was going to be getting $3,000,000 from the Government in the first half of the year. The government is described as able to tell banks to shut down people’s bank accounts, and able to tell the media what to do, with the media then doing the bidding of the government camp. The speaker concludes that this is not a free society’s media.

Justin Trudeau's office has been the target of protests by individuals who believe that showing up in front of a terrorist's office is necessary. The speaker questions how many times this needs to happen before they can move on.

An individual questions a reporter about third-party advertising spending in the election, specifically referencing Rebel News and Ford Canada, both allegedly owned by Ezra Levant. The reporter denies any spending and accuses the individual of lying and not doing their homework. The individual insists that Rebel News Network Limited is registered with Elections Canada under Ezra Levant's name and accuses the reporter of using third-party advertising trucks. The reporter claims the truck is for Canada, a separate entity. Accusations of lying and emotional outbursts are exchanged, with the reporter telling the individual to control their emotions and calling them "tantrum boy." The individual defends their facts and questions the reporter's journalistic integrity.

A Globe and Mail reporter asked about a Liberal candidate's ties to China-friendly groups and the speaker's meeting with the Jiangsu Commerce Council of Canada, a "pro-Beijing group." The reporter questioned if the Liberal party is comfortable with Peter Yen's closeness to the Chinese consulate, given the foreign interference inquiry. The speaker denied ever hearing of the Jiangsu Commerce Council of Canada and refuted having a "setup meeting" with them. They stated that attending events and taking pictures with people does not constitute a meeting. Regarding Peter Yen, the speaker defended him as someone who has served his community for decades, including as deputy police commissioner. They asserted that Yen's meetings with community groups were part of his job and that they are proud to have him as a candidate.

Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about calling the explosion at the Rainbow Bridge terrorism, despite no official confirmation. Speaker 1 defends their statement, citing media reports and corrections made by CP. Speaker 0 argues that it was irresponsible to make such a statement without proper evidence. Speaker 1 counters by mentioning that CTV reported the incident as terror-related, based on information from security officials in the Trudeau government. Speaker 0 avoids answering the question and ends the conversation.

Speaker 0: Hello Mr. Trudeau, Alexandre from Rebel News. I want to quickly address what happened yesterday. You demonized one of the few media outlets that doesn't receive government funding. You expressed your opinion that we spread misinformation. If that were true, the Supreme Court wouldn't have allowed us to be here today. Will you kindly answer my question as the Prime Minister, or will you continue to demonize my profession? I shared my perspective on your organization last night, and I have nothing more to say. It makes one wonder who you really are. Thank you.

I have mixed thoughts on Pierre Poliev and the conservative party. Pierre is the current leader and a skilled communicator, but his main focus seems to be gaining power rather than having genuine convictions. I believe the conservative party is morally and intellectually corrupt. For instance, when I made a controversial tweet, Andrew Scheer, another conservative member, called me and advised me to consult their PR team before posting anything. This shows that everything they say has been tested through polling and focus groups.

We are proud of our influence in government. A constituent asked about outside interference in democracy, specifically regarding Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum. He claimed that the WEF has infiltrated over half of Canada's cabinet. In the interest of transparency, could you name the cabinet ministers aligned with the WEF's agenda? Order, please. The question is important, but the audio and video quality are poor. I apologize for that. The younger generation, including Prime Minister Trudeau, is involved.

There was a terrorist attack and explosion at the Niagara crossing of the Canada-US border, resulting in at least 2 deaths and 1 injury. The prime minister is being asked for an update and an action plan to ensure the security of the people. The prime minister acknowledges the seriousness of the situation and mentions that various agencies are involved in providing support. Four border crossings, including Rainbow Bridge and Peace Bridge, are currently closed, and additional measures are being considered for all border crossings. The prime minister excuses himself to gather further updates. In another topic, the government's spending is criticized for causing inflation to rise.

A scientist at the National Microbiology Lab collaborating with Chinese agencies raised security concerns. The government is investigating and taking steps to ensure safety. The Conservative party's focus on political attacks and conspiracy theories is hindering progress. Responsible leadership is needed to address national security issues effectively.

An individual questions a reporter about third-party advertising spending in the election, specifically by Rebel News and Ford Canada, alleging both are owned by Ezra Levant. The reporter denies any spending and accuses the individual of lying and not doing their homework. The individual insists that Rebel News Network Limited is registered with Elections Canada under Ezra Levant's name and accuses the reporter of being a disgrace to journalism. The reporter counters that the individual is out of control emotionally and that their facts are wrong. The exchange escalates, with accusations of lying and being an embarrassment. The individual defends their ability to do the work of multiple reporters, while the reporter suggests they don't understand what they're looking at.

Speaker 0 emphasizes the media’s important role while acknowledging that many public assertions were not accurate. He notes that the media can provide editorials and that editorial boards can have stances. He says there were claims based on information he was not privy to and that he wondered why. He accepts that information at a classification above his level might exist, citing the Communications Security Establishment of Canada, the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, or the Integrated National Security Enforcement Team. From his perspective as commander of Hendon and the joint force operation, he did not see information that substantiated what was said publicly and in the media. He argues that subjective assertions were sensationalized and exacerbated conflict.