TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The Alberta government's COVID-19 response review calls for an immediate halt to modified RNA vaccines, particularly for children. The report, commissioned by Premier Danielle Smith, highlights significant data gaps regarding vaccine safety and effectiveness, citing alarming statistics from Pfizer's post-authorization trial, including over 1,200 deaths and 42,000 injuries. It criticizes the abandonment of Alberta's pandemic plan and urges a return to localized approaches. Recommendations include halting vaccine use without full risk disclosure, further research, and establishing support for vaccine-injured individuals. The review raises concerns about the lack of long-term safety data and the high risk of adverse events, particularly in young, healthy populations. It emphasizes the need for transparency and informed choice in future vaccination initiatives.

The Canadian government encouraged COVID-19 vaccination but mandated consequences for the unvaccinated, including restrictions on travel, public service employment, and access to certain venues. Critics claim a University of Toronto study, led by David Fisman, was flawed and politically motivated to justify these mandates. This study allegedly misrepresented data from the Omicron surge, which showed higher COVID-19 rates among the vaccinated, to falsely portray the unvaccinated as a risk. Media outlets widely publicized the study, warning against contact with unvaccinated individuals. The Public Health Agency of Canada reportedly admitted that scientific evidence did not support mandatory vaccination for air travelers. Despite this, the government cited studies indicating that the unvaccinated disproportionately risk the safety of vaccinated individuals. Critics argue that the mandates led to the demonization of unvaccinated Canadians. A parliamentary secretary accused those questioning the science behind the mandates of being far-right anti-vaxxers. The government maintained that while vaccination was a choice, there would be consequences for remaining unvaccinated without a legitimate medical reason.

Politicians daily reported COVID cases and deaths, but now 29,000 excess deaths raise concerns. A document blames Pfizer and Moderna vaccines for the rise in deaths. The Australian Senate rejected investigating excess deaths. Politicians pushing vaccines are accused of lying about the threat of COVID. Lockdowns were unnecessary, and the vaccine rollout was called a theater.

Politicians and health bureaucrats are denying their role in advocating for lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and school closures during the pandemic. Justin Trudeau, the Canadian Prime Minister, claims he never insisted on mandatory vaccinations for everyone, despite evidence to the contrary. Anthony Fauci, a key figure in the COVID response, also tries to distance himself from the heavy-handed measures. Both leaders are attempting to rewrite history and avoid responsibility for the negative consequences of their actions. It is important to hold them accountable for the overreach and inhumane policies imposed on free people in the name of safety.

Health authorities and the media have been accused of misleading the public about the safety of COVID injections, with evidence suggesting they concealed adverse event data. Recent emails from Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) reveal that officials acknowledged the potential for DNA fragments from mRNA vaccines to integrate into human genomes, contradicting their public statements. Despite this, the TGA focused on dispelling public fears rather than investigating risks. Concerns have been raised about the lack of testing for DNA integration and the overall safety of the vaccines. Senator Gerard Renick criticized the TGA for its poor quality assurance and lack of accountability, highlighting the need for greater scrutiny of vaccine safety and the political failures that allowed these issues to persist. The situation reflects broader frustrations with government transparency and public health decisions in Australia.

Mandating vaccines, similar to France's approach, is sensible for reopening. The federal government compensates Australians with vaccine injuries, including serious conditions like heart inflammation and autoimmune disorders. Customers want assurance that employees in stores and restaurants are vaccinated. News Corp should mandate vaccines for its employees. Currently, 1,000 individuals are awaiting compensation claims. Most Australians are likely to get vaccinated, and there should be incentives for those who choose not to, such as the No Jab, No Pay policy. It's crucial to expedite the assessment of these claims, as there’s no reason for delays in 2023.

Mandating vaccines, like in France, is seen as a sensible approach to reopen. The Australian government compensates hundreds of citizens for COVID vaccine injuries. It is important for customers to know that store employees are vaccinated. COVID injuries include heart inflammation, damaged capillaries, and autoimmune disorders. News Corp supports mandating vaccines for its employees. Former Deputy Chief Medical Officer, Nick Coatsworth, suggests incentives or penalties for those who choose not to get vaccinated. He also emphasizes the need to assess compensation claims promptly. Currently, 1,000 individuals are awaiting approval for compensation. Mandating vaccines is considered a sensible approach.

Today, we discuss an inquiry in Australia that intentionally avoids discussing excess deaths. This COVID inquiry aims to maintain the status quo and not bring about significant changes. It is disheartening to see that 30 million vaccine doses are being wasted because of low demand. People are becoming more aware of the importance of vaccines, but there still needs to be further investigation into vaccine injuries and their causes. It is known that AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson vaccines have caused adverse effects, and since they do not prevent transmission or infection, it is not surprising that some people are hesitant to take them.

Australia's healthcare system, supported by dedicated workers, is facing unprecedented challenges, including rising sickness levels among healthcare professionals. Concerns have been raised regarding synthetic DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines, with findings indicating contamination levels far exceeding safety limits. A report co-authored by 52 scientists highlights the potential risks, including cancer mutations from minimal contamination. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) has been criticized for dismissing these concerns without proper investigation, using inadequate testing methods. The Port Hedland Council has called for a suspension of these vaccines following alarming cancer trends in their community. Urgent action is needed to ensure the safety of all Australians, invoking the precautionary principle until independent testing can confirm or dispel these contamination claims. Transparency and accountability are essential to protect public health.

In 2022, Australia had over 10 million COVID cases, with over half the country infected despite vaccination efforts. The excess deaths in 2021 were higher than expected, and there were over 140,000 reported vaccine injuries, three times higher than previous years. The TGA, responsible for monitoring vaccine injuries, ignores these signals. The head of the organization, Professor Skerritt, has a conflict of interest as it is funded by Big Pharma. The chief health officer, Professor Brendan Murphy, hadn't read the non-clinical report on the Pfizer vaccine and made incorrect statements about it. The law in Australia states that vaccination cannot be coerced and individuals must be properly informed about the vaccine's contents.

The UK faces scrutiny over vaccine safety as individuals share their vaccine injury experiences with Rishi Sunak. In Australia, Senator Jared Rennick presses for transparency on vaccine batch details, met with redacted information. The TGA's lack of disclosure raises concerns about vaccine safety and accountability. Senator Rennick's persistence in seeking answers is commended.

The Australian government is accused of suppressing COVID vaccine adverse reactions and deaths. Excess deaths in 2022 are around 26,000, but no questions are being asked. Doctors are not reporting adverse effects or deaths, with only 14 deaths officially attributed to the vaccine out of over 1,000 reported. Doctors fear losing their livelihoods if they report accurately. The spike in deaths after COVID was attributed to the vaccine, leading to anger over the situation.

In this video, the speaker discusses the COVID situation in Australia. They mention that despite a high vaccination rate, over half the country has contracted COVID. They also talk about excess deaths in 2021 and a high number of vaccine injuries. The speaker criticizes the Australian health department for not addressing these issues and accuses the head of the organization of having a conflict of interest due to funding from Big Pharma. They also mention that the chief health officer hadn't read a report on the Pfizer vaccine.

California's governor was asked who will be held accountable for COVID-19 vaccine mandates for children, which were allegedly unnecessary and ineffective, and who will take responsibility for increased myocarditis and cancer cases among them. The governor was also asked if he felt remorse for decisions influenced by pharmaceutical companies' desire for profit. The governor denied the claim, citing progressive laws against big pharma. He stated California, like other states, worked with the Trump administration on COVID-19 mitigation strategies. He has tasked his team with an objective review of California's COVID-19 response, including interviews with those who opposed mandates and stay-at-home orders, and comparisons to other states. While maintaining that vaccines save lives, the governor acknowledged concerns about children and vaccines. He used advisors from other states to review federal recommendations. The report, due next month, will be an objective review of what went right and wrong during the pandemic. He stated that no one knew what they were up against at the time, including the former president, whom he worked closely with.

Over 100 million Americans were required to get vaccinated due to job mandates. The government claimed vaccines were safe and effective, but data showed vaccinated people could still carry the virus. Despite promises of freedom, there have been 1 million adverse events reported from COVID-19 vaccines, with only 11 compensated cases. Big Pharma has immunity from liability for vaccine injuries.

The lockdowns during the COVID pandemic were unnecessary and caused significant harm, with Australia following a global trend except for Sweden. The rollout of vaccines, particularly mRNA vaccines, has led to severe side effects, including an increase in cancer cases. Vaccinating children, who are at low risk from COVID, was especially misguided, as it was primarily aimed at protecting others. The vaccines were misrepresented as safe and effective, despite evidence to the contrary. The pandemic response appears to have been a controlled experiment, with significant negligence from health authorities. The origins of the virus point to a lab escape, raising further concerns about accountability and transparency in the handling of the pandemic.

A key insight from the report is the failure to transition from an initial precautionary approach during the pandemic to a more evidence-based strategy that considered risks, benefits, and non-health impacts. This lack of shift has significant implications for public trust. The report highlights insufficient transparency regarding the rationale and evidence behind government decisions that affected Australians' lives and freedoms. Consequently, trust has declined significantly compared to pre-pandemic levels. The panel indicates that many measures implemented during COVID-19 are unlikely to be accepted by the public in the future due to these issues.

During the COVID pandemic, the Australian government granted Pfizer blanket immunity, allowing them to develop and distribute COVID injections without accountability. However, Pfizer has a history of criminal acts, including bribery and suppressing adverse trial results. The manufacturing process of the injections was also questionable, with evidence of live DNA derived from e coli found in the Pfizer product. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) did not conduct thorough testing on each batch of injections, relying instead on the US FDA's word. The lack of long-term safety testing is concerning, especially considering Pfizer's record-breaking profits. The Australian taxpayers are left with an unknown liability, while those who question the injections are labeled as "anti-vaxxers." The speaker opposes the forced administration of untested experimental injections and calls for accountability.

The Queensland Supreme Court ruled COVID-19 vaccine mandates for emergency services were unlawful. Dr. Nick Coatsworth, a medical expert, acknowledged his role in promoting mandates but believes they were wrong. He stated mandates have a time limit in a pandemic, and we should reconsider their use in the future. Hindsight should guide our decisions for future pandemics.

A key insight from the report is the failure to transition from an initial precautionary approach during the pandemic to a more evidence-based strategy that balanced risks and benefits, including non-health impacts. This lack of shift has significant implications for public trust. The report highlights insufficient transparency regarding the rationale and evidence behind government decisions, which deeply affected Australians' lives and freedoms. As a result, trust has declined compared to pre-pandemic levels. The panel warns that many measures implemented during COVID-19 are unlikely to be accepted by the public in the future due to this erosion of trust.

During the pandemic, Australian governments spent $577 billion on COVID response, including $247 million on tests and over $18 billion on vaccines. They bought 267 million vaccine doses, with 126% used and 35% wasted. The Department of Health posted 19,000 times on social media about COVID, while 4,000 posts were censored as misinformation. 2,662 complaints were made to the Australian Human Rights Commission about COVID policies. This raises questions about accountability and competence in handling the pandemic.

Vaccination policies are being discussed, with some advocating for mandatory vaccinations in certain sectors. While the government has not made vaccinations mandatory for the general public, specific mandates are in place for residential aged care workers and high-risk industries. Employers may require vaccinations if deemed lawful, and some companies have already implemented strict policies. There are penalties for non-compliance, including fines for businesses allowing unvaccinated staff on-site. Unvaccinated individuals face restrictions on accessing various venues and services. Critics argue that mandates infringe on personal freedoms and have led to job losses. The government maintains that vaccinations are voluntary, but there are increasing calls for consequences for those who refuse the jab.

Australian lawmakers and officials are admitting they were misled into enforcing coercive vaccine mandates, citing rising deaths and evidence of harm. They are calling for an urgent inquiry and the suspension of mRNA vaccines globally. A New South Wales health minister admitted a link between COVID-19 vaccines and a surge in hospitalizations and heart problems. A lawmaker highlighted synthetic DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, up to 145 times higher than safety limits, potentially causing cancer and other health risks. Each vaccine shot tested contained trillions of synthetic DNA fragments, including SV40, known to cause cancer. It is claimed that using biological weapons to harm people violates the Geneva Convention. An Australian judge, Helen Rife QC, who dismissed a lawsuit against Pfizer, allegedly failed to disclose her ties to the company. Senator Malcolm Roberts is pursuing those responsible for what he calls the "greatest crime" of the 21st century.

Australia has administered over 60 million vaccine doses to over 20 million people. Despite this, governmental health authorities have chosen not to monitor new or emerging cancer trends, and have failed to make post-vaccination cancer trend data publicly available, which is a critical oversight. Given the massive contamination levels of rogue residual DNA in the Australian vials, we must expect an ongoing rise in cancers and other genetic disorders in Australia. This is a potential long-term health crisis. This matter must be taken seriously. We must advocate for immediate public health responses and monitoring of these trends. Without action, Australians are vulnerable to preventable diseases that may devastate families and strain our healthcare system. These gene-based vaccines should never have been considered. The technology had never been proven to be effective in preventing coronavirus infections and was unsafe long before 2021.

Australia has administered over 60 million vaccine doses to more than 20 million people, yet health authorities have not monitored cancer trends post-vaccination. The lack of publicly available data on these trends raises concerns about public health oversight. Given the contamination levels of residual DNA in the vaccines, there is a potential for an increase in cancers and genetic disorders, posing a long-term health crisis. Immediate public health responses are necessary to monitor these trends and protect Australians from preventable diseases that could overwhelm the healthcare system. The use of gene-based vaccines raises questions, as their effectiveness in preventing coronavirus infections had not been proven, and safety concerns existed prior to their use in 2021.