TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Yahoo News discusses how leftist media is censoring voices by allowing certain political content to be posted while blocking others. The speaker demonstrates that typing "Trump 2024" triggers a warning about inappropriate content, but typing "Biden 2024" goes through without issue. This is presented as evidence of bias and silencing of conservative viewpoints. The speaker urges viewers to share this information. Translation: The video talks about how the media is censoring voices by allowing some political content while blocking others. Typing "Trump 2024" triggers a warning, but "Biden 2024" is allowed. This is shown as bias against conservative views. The speaker encourages sharing this information.

Trump has frozen millions in USAID funds for foreign media, causing outrage among liberals. Reports reveal that USAID has been funding outlets like Politico and the New York Times, raising concerns about the U.S. government influencing global journalism. Trump’s recent hold on USAID has cut $268 million from media in over 30 countries, affecting 6,200 journalists and 707 news outlets. This situation parallels past revelations about social media collusion with the government to shape public opinion. Critics argue that while they highlight U.S. involvement in foreign affairs, the real issue is that many media outlets are funded by the U.S., including the BBC, which is the second-largest recipient of U.S. funding after the UK government.

"New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, The Nation, Mother Jones, GLAAD." "Breitbart, Daily Caller, Epic Times, Fox News, New York Post, The Federalist." "Anti defamationally gets a green light." "Only for some. Yes. If you're reporting about the about the Arab Israeli conflict? Yes. You may not cite them." "You can't you can't find the Jewish perspective on the war so easily anymore on Wikipedia." "There is a a serious academic encyclopedia of Christianity that is not allowed on Wikipedia." "Daily Caller not allowed." "Life site news not allowed." "Sputnik, of course, not allowed." "TV Guide allowed." "The Uns review not allowed." "TV Guide totally cool." "Uns. V dare not allow." "Mister x is the name of his account." "This is obviously huge news."

We're members of Congress, here at the Department of Education, and we're being denied entry. The doors are locked, and a private security contractor is blocking our access. We showed our IDs; this is our job, and we have oversight responsibilities. We're not a threat; we're trying to request a meeting. This lack of transparency is unacceptable. The administration claims to be open, yet they won't even let us into their own building. This isn't right; we represent the people, and we demand access. They've even called Homeland Security. This building is a public institution; we pay for this building and its employees. This contractor, who isn't even a federal employee, is blocking us without a good reason. This is outrageous.

NewsGuard and GARM pose a serious threat to free speech in the US. NewsGuard's board includes former CIA and NSA heads, working to control the news narrative. They blacklisted 650 news sites during COVID-19 for questioning the origin of the virus. GARM aims to cut funding to alternative news sources spreading misinformation. These organizations collaborate with ad agencies like Publicis Group, which receive taxpayer subsidies. Congress can take action to remove funding from these agencies.

Every outlet is subjective, but they should all be allowed. Google's search engine now prioritizes authoritative sources over others, like showing mlb.com instead of a local Little League site. This approach limits access to diverse perspectives, favoring mainstream sources like the New York Times over specialized ones like the world socialist website. This hierarchical system goes against the idea of letting individuals make their own decisions by seeing all available information.

Governments worldwide are imposing strict regulations on social media platforms, potentially ending freedom of speech. The European Union aims to give NGOs and state sponsors control over content moderation by requiring tech companies to share data with vetted researchers. In the US, the RESTRICT Act threatens severe penalties for accessing blacklisted websites through virtual private networks. Ireland may imprison citizens for possessing material deemed hateful, while Canada allows state agencies to filter online content. Australia grants government officials the power to compel social media companies to remove posts. These policies have been introduced quietly, with little media coverage or public outcry. This marks a significant moment in the history of the internet, as governments gain the ability to control the information people have access to.

The incoming small house Republican majority is starting off by bullying a fellow member of Congress instead of fostering collaboration. This raises questions about their priorities following the November election. Are they genuinely committed to solving issues like high living costs, housing prices, and grocery prices? It seems not. Their focus appears to be on far-right extremism rather than addressing the real concerns of the American people. We will continue to highlight this disconnect and demand that Congress prioritize the needs of the public.

The Gateway Pundit claims to be known for original reporting and accuracy, citing instances such as calling out the WHO chief for allegedly lying about the COVID mortality rate, publishing photos of COVID testing on mice at the Wuhan Institute, and exposing content from Hunter Biden's laptop. They reported on late-night ballot deliveries in Michigan and ballot counting in Georgia during the 2020 election, and claimed that Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick died from a stroke, not from being beaten. They also reported on the death of Trump supporter Roseanne Boylan and the case of Jeremy Brown, who refused to be a government operative on January 6th. The Gateway Pundit states that after being ranked as a top conservative news website, it faced attacks, including advertising removal by Amazon, being labeled as Russian propaganda by Hamilton 68, and censorship by Google, Facebook, Pinterest, and LinkedIn. They claim NewsGuard, funded partly by the US Defense Department, targeted them, and the DHS created the Stanford EIP Censorship Group, which targeted their website. Despite lawsuits and censorship, The Gateway Pundit says they continue to grow, averaging over 3,000,000 page visits a day. They pledge to continue providing news and resisting being silenced.

A video discussing the deployment of a Pentagon AI to censor videos about the wildfires in Hawaii and other topics is being taken down. A PhD researcher is experiencing the same issue. The sound was removed from the video, claiming copyright violation, even though there was no background music. Six of the speaker's videos about the wildfires were banned simultaneously. This is seen as treasonous and an attack on Americans asking legitimate questions about the Hawaii incident. The Pentagon is paying a New York company to use AI bots to harass people online, which is deemed outrageous and borderline treasonous. Investigations and defunding are called for. This threatens freedom as we know it.

Members of Congress are being denied entry to the Department of Education by a private security contractor, leading to a tense confrontation. They assert their right to access the building, emphasizing their roles as elected representatives advocating for the public, particularly children with disabilities. The security personnel, unable to provide a valid reason for the blockade, are accused of lacking transparency and accountability. The Congress members express frustration over being barred from discussing important issues, including student loans and educational support for low-income families. They highlight the irony of being locked out while billionaires and their associates gain access. The situation raises concerns about the administration's commitment to transparency and public service.

House Republicans are prioritizing Elon Musk's interests over those of everyday Americans. Their opposition to transparency is baffling, especially for a party claiming to represent the people. The argument that access is needed to combat misinformation is misleading; the individuals involved are treasury employees, not external actors manipulating the system. The Republicans' actions demonstrate a lack of concern for the American people and their tax dollars. Full transparency on government spending is necessary to prove otherwise.

Should the Judiciary Committee be concerned if European law results in the censorship of Americans? Absolutely, especially after recent events. I shared information this morning on X about a judicial ruling in Europe asserting their right to censor. We're seeing similar trends in Australia, where authorities believe they should censor the entire global Internet of disfavored information. This is very disturbing and really makes you question our alliance with Europe.

Jen Psaki stated that most Americans now rely on social media for news, and the Biden administration aims to limit what these platforms can post. The irony of a press person discussing press restrictions was noted. The primary target of censorship is speech, which is crucial for practicing faith, sharing beliefs, and petitioning the government. Without free speech, there is no free press. The committee is dedicated to addressing censorship efforts. Translation: Jen Psaki mentioned that many Americans use social media for news, and the Biden administration wants to control what is posted. The irony of a press representative discussing press limitations was highlighted. The main focus of censorship is speech, which is essential for practicing faith, expressing beliefs, and petitioning the government. Without free speech, there is no free press. The committee is committed to addressing censorship efforts.

Why do conservatives believe fact-checking is biased against them? If your information consistently gets flagged as false, consider what you're sharing. What content were conservatives sharing on platforms like Meta that resulted in frequent fact-checks? Were they disseminating misinformation? Why the eagerness to share potentially false information? Furthermore, why is there a push, particularly among Republicans, to eliminate fact-checking altogether? What exactly are they attempting to circulate, and what's the underlying reason for resisting factual verification?

My name is Kian Bexy from the Countersignal, an accredited journalist at the Alberta Legislature. We're in Edmonton, and access is being blocked by someone who doesn't even claim to be part of the campaign. This individual is preventing multiple journalists from entering the building to cover a potential future prime minister's appointment. Is this the kind of country he aims to create? This behavior is unacceptable, especially when a diverse group of journalists, including students and accredited professionals, are waiting to enter.

Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna, chair of the Oversight Committee task force on the declassification of federal secrets, discusses what she describes as evidence of interdimensional beings operating through existing time spaces. She references photo and video material from classified briefings that are now being made public, including a video “dead dropped” to Representative Eric Burleson from within the Department of War showing a UAP/ unidentified aerial phenomena deflecting a Hellfire missile, captured from ISR footage off the coast of Yemen. Luna says there is evidence of an advanced technology not created by mankind, and while some cases previously labeled as UAPs were later identified as drones, there remains a portion of evidence that cannot be explained. She notes that multiple governments have examined these phenomena, and emphasizes a national security perspective: as AI and drone technology evolve, it is important to determine whether these are potential adversarial weapons. She argues that the federal government’s denial of access to some members of Congress is alarming and incompatible with a free, transparent society, and she expects the American people to draw their own conclusions after reviewing the evidence. Luna adds that Representative Gates joined the initial codal discussion with her and Representative Tim Burchett, and stated that if viewers have seen the material they have seen, they too would become believers. She then questions whether the Air Force has covered up UAP sightings, asking whether the technology could be something the U.S. possesses that others should not know about, or if it indicates capabilities possessed by a foreign actor that operate in ways that are hard to understand. Based on interviews and testimony she has reviewed, she says there is reason to believe the tech is not created by mankind, though she concedes it is also possible that certain advanced U.S. weapons could be involved. The conversation centers on the accessibility of evidence, the secrecy surrounding it, and the potential implications for national security and public transparency.

Yesterday, Donald Trump banned the Associated Press from the White House because it declines to call the Gulf Of Mexico the Gulf Of America. This is press censorship based on viewpoint discrimination. During Trump's presidency, the DOD kicked out news groups from the Pentagon that asked skeptical questions, including the New York Times, NBC News, and the Washington Post. These organizations were replaced by outlets willing to advance the party line of the states, like Breitbart and One American News Network.

The speaker claims that big tech companies like Facebook, Google, and Twitter coordinated with the government to censor information on various topics, including the Hunter Biden laptop story, negative economic information, conservative opinions on COVID vaccines and lockdowns, and jokes about President Biden. The judge in the court case called this censorship Orwellian and the largest attack on free speech in US history. The speaker argues that the American people deserve to know the facts and that their inquiry into the matter is legitimate, despite media headlines suggesting otherwise. They also criticize the White House for urging news agencies to scrutinize their investigation and question why the president won't provide requested information if there is no impropriety. The speaker extends an open invitation for President Biden and others involved to come forward and clear their names.

One-sided news stories and the sharing of biased and false news on social media are plaguing our country. Some media outlets publish these fake stories without fact-checking. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.

The Irish government is attempting to pass a law allowing police to search homes, confiscate devices, and arrest individuals for online activities. This global crackdown on independent journalism is a threat to free speech. We must support Ireland to prevent this from spreading. Stand up for the right to speak out against political issues. Take action now to stop this dangerous reality from becoming widespread. Share this message and consider donating to a free speech fund. Our future generations depend on our actions today. Let's prevent this dystopian scenario from becoming a reality.

Millions of people are being purged from the Internet as big tech titans have the power to control and censor. It's time to recognize social media companies as public utilities, just like electricity and telephone services. Social media is essential for businesses, nonprofits, and political campaigns. The establishment has been censoring those who question them, using any excuse to consolidate power. We must unite as Americans and demand an Internet bill of rights that protects our freedom of speech in cyberspace. This is the United States, where our right to free speech is not optional.

The Spanish version of the White House government website is no longer accessible. The message directing users to the homepage simply states "go home."

Members of Congress are being denied entry to the Department of Education building. The doors are locked, and a tense conversation is taking place with a security guard. We're trying to get access to federal bill 19. We are members of Congress and should be allowed entry. A private security contractor is preventing us from entering, and it's unclear why. We're simply doing our job. Show them your ID. Were you told to block us, or did you decide to do so? We have the right to access the building.

Two years ago, we were labeled as bought-off journalists for questioning digital censorship. I was shocked to see my party seemingly endorse censorship. John Kerry even lamented that the First Amendment hinders the government's ability to control information and build consensus, essentially complaining that people choose their own news sources. Building consensus isn't the media's job; it's our job to make governing hard, and many of our allies have already embraced draconian speech laws. The EU's Digital Services Act is the most comprehensive censorship law in a Western democracy. USAID is funding organizations that promote unified messaging and discourage diverse opinions, spending millions of dollars to transform the free press into a consensus machine. You've taken taxpayer money to tell people they're wrong about what they can see, you sold us out.