TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

"I think we'll eventually get there." "the folks who stayed up all night to go through the 34,000 individual pages have found that they're so redacted as to be useless and that many of them were already available." "the scope of their investigation is to investigate the investigators." "they don't ever intend to have any criminal referrals." "but they're not going in and trying to identify who these perpetrators were of these heinous sexual abuse crimes." "Well, I made the mistake of getting 12 cosponsors and the so the White House knew who to target." "So I'm not gonna name anybody who's thinking about joining." "They're literally calling it a hostile act to sign this discharge petition now."

The speaker discusses various subpoenas they have filed, including ones for Justice Sotomayor's staff and book publisher, Jeffrey Epstein's flight logs, Secretary Becerra regarding lost children, the Biden DOJ's decision to terminate the China initiative, and political donations by Robert Mueller's staff. They also mention the Biden administration's alleged censorship of conservative speech online and the investigation of Elon Musk. They criticize the committee for focusing on the legitimacy of the Supreme Court instead of important issues like social media's impact on children and the open southern border. The speaker expresses disappointment in the committee's priorities and the impact on public confidence.

I have filed more subpoenas, including one to Jeffrey Epstein's estate for the flight logs of his private plane. This is crucial due to the numerous allegations of human trafficking and sexual abuse surrounding Epstein. It is important to identify all individuals who were on the plane, the number of trips they took, and the destinations they arrived at.

The committee expresses frustration over the lack of responsiveness from the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) regarding document requests. They emphasize that other financial regulators have complied with congressional oversight, and the SEC should recognize Congress as a co-equal branch of government. The committee threatens to issue a subpoena if the SEC does not cooperate. The committee questions when a vote will be scheduled to provide the requested non-public documents, but the SEC representative does not provide a clear answer. The committee asks if the representative personally supports providing the information, but the representative avoids giving a direct response. The committee finds the situation ridiculous.

The American people wanna know what happened on Epstein Island. "I'm not gonna drop this topic." You've subpoenaed Bill Clinton. He's gonna fight you tooth and nail, with the best lawyers in the country. Do you think Bill Clinton ever actually testifies? This is a bipartisan, congressionally approved subpoena, and I think that will hold a lot of weight in court. America wants to know what went on at Epstein Island. The Oversight Committee is going back to the earliest days of Jeffrey Epstein's involvement with the Justice Department, including Acosta, who said, I was told to go easy on him because he's intel. They're going back to Mueller as FBI director. Hillary Clinton is on the list—what does she have to do with Epstein? Flight logs. This is extremely broad: everything the DOJ has except the names of the victims. How did he die? The MAGA base has been vocal; they want to know answers.

The speaker thanks the chairman and addresses someone named Hunter, suggesting they are afraid of the speaker's words. The speaker reclaims their time. The speaker says that the House committees should provide relevant information to any legitimate inquiry. The speaker claims their first five offers were ignored. Then in November, a subpoena was issued for a behind-closed-doors deposition. The speaker asserts that Republicans have repeatedly misused this tactic in their political crusade to selectively leak and mischaracterize witness statements.

Recently, in January, a member of the Senate Intel Committee tried to block someone from getting a job in the intel world because this person would push for the release of the JFK files. This senator's main goal is to keep those files secret, but I don't understand why they would be protecting the CIA, especially after the Church Committee hearings already discredited them. I know that a member of the Senate Intel Committee made that call to block the appointment. Someone asked if it was Tom Cotton from Arkansas, but I haven't asked him directly for an interview, even though I probably should.

There's no cross-examination allowed in this committee, so important questions remain unaddressed. For instance, why did a Capitol Hill police officer with a history of mishandling firearms shoot an unarmed Air Force veteran in the neck? We're also not allowed to inquire about the thousands of hours of surveillance footage or why police were seen letting people into the Capitol on January 6th. These critical issues are off-limits for questioning.

Speaker 1 says that the real information about the Epstein files has not come out and that “there were only four Republicans, four of us that’s really fought to get them released,” who “signed the discharge petition, went against the White House,” and were “threatened,” with Donald Trump calling him a traitor and saying his friends would be hurt. He questions why anyone would vote for Republicans if the administration doesn’t release all the information, framing it as a line in the sand for many people. Speaker 0 asks why they think the Epstein files are being hidden. Speaker 1 responds that it’s because the hidden information would protect “some of the most rich, powerful people,” arguing that Epstein was “definitely some sort of part of the intelligence state” who was “working with Israel” and with the “former prime minister of Israel.” He asserts that these are “the dirty parts of government and the powers that be that they don’t want the American people to know about.” He concludes that, sadly, he doesn’t think the files will come out. Speaker 0 presses on whether Trump is in the Epstein files. Speaker 1 speculates that if someone is “living under blackmail” or “living under threat” and told not to release information, that fear could influence actions. He suggests that someone might be warned by threats to prevent disclosure, giving a hypothetical example: after standing on a rally stage, you could be shot in the ear and warned that “next time we won’t miss,” or that the bullet might be for someone you care about. He says he is “speculating,” but notes he has “a strong enough reason to speculate like that.”

Remember when I promised to release the Epstein, JFK, and 9/11 files? It's been a while, and still nothing. I put Anna Paulina and Pam Bondi on it, even created a committee, which seemed unnecessary just to release files. They handed over binders to DC Draino and company, but the information was heavily redacted, supposedly to protect victims' names and due to the FBI's concerns, even though we oversee the FBI. Then national security became the excuse for more redactions, and the whole thing just stalled. Now, we're moving onto releasing the JFK files, while the Epstein files remain hidden. And now Pam Bondi is investigating antisemitism on college campuses. So, I just have one question: Where are those files?

I've been working to obtain all documents related to the Epstein case, and recently discovered that the Southern District of New York is withholding thousands of pages. We will obtain those documents, redact grand jury information and confidential witnesses, but the American people deserve to know the truth. We will release the full Epstein files, as well as JFK and Martin Luther King files. As a lawyer, I want to review everything before drawing conclusions, but those who withheld information will be held accountable. We will protect victims by redacting their personal information. Regarding Jack Smith's team, we are currently investigating whether they complied with the Presidential Records Act and the Espionage Act. We're going through everything now and are looking into whether they removed or destroyed any materials.

I'm at the airport, and I want to discuss the Epstein files. I met with President Trump, Vice President Vance, Attorney General Bondi, and FBI Director Patel this morning at the White House. They presented me with a binder labeled "Epstein Files Phase One," ordered by Bondi and Patel. We were expecting bombshells, but the binder didn't contain any. Bondi mentioned that she had expected to find "juicy stuff" but didn't. Despite this, they prepared the binder for release, fulfilling the President's order for transparency. However, late last night, Bondi received a call from a source within the FBI, Southern District of New York, revealing that hundreds, if not thousands, of other documents and files were being hidden from everyone. They were hiding it from the President, the Vice President, the Attorney General, the FBI Director, and you.

The speaker is part of a senate bipartisan investigation into an assassination attempt. According to the speaker, the Secret Service and FBI are dragging their feet and not providing requested documents, such as 302s and interview transcriptions. Documents that are provided are heavily redacted and delivered the day of the interview, making them unusable. The speaker believes this behavior is suspicious and fuels conspiracy theories. They claim releasing the body for cremation before autopsy or toxicology reports further drives suspicion and conspiracy theories.

The speaker discusses various subpoenas they have filed, including ones for Justice Sotomayor's staff and book publisher, Jeffrey Epstein's flight logs, Secretary Becerra regarding lost children, and the Biden DOJ's decision to terminate the China initiative. They also mention filing a subpoena for documents on political donations by Robert Mueller's staff and the investigation of Elon Musk. They criticize the Biden administration for censoring conservative speech online and mention the FTC's suit against Twitter. They express concern about social media's impact on children, the open southern border, and the loss of track of 85,000 children. They criticize the committee for focusing on the legitimacy of the Supreme Court instead of these pressing issues.

The speaker discusses various subpoenas they have filed, including ones for Justice Sotomayor's staff and book publisher, Jeffrey Epstein's flight logs, Secretary Becerra to explain the lost children, the Biden DOJ's decision to terminate the China initiative, and documents related to political donations by Robert Mueller's staff. They also mention the Biden administration's alleged censorship of conservative speech online and the suit against Twitter. They express concerns about social media's impact on children, the open southern border, and the legitimacy of the Supreme Court being questioned. The chairman acknowledges the speaker's desire to speak on the judges, but the meeting will first address the judicial nominations and then move to the subpoena issue.

Some suggest waiting for all witnesses and documents before proceeding with impeachment, but President Trump obstructed the investigation. He instructed his senior aides not to testify and defy subpoenas. He also told agencies not to provide relevant records, hindering our investigation.

Speaker 0 from Fox News asks Senator Durbin why he won't subpoena Jeffrey Epstein's flight logs. Senator Durbin claims to have no knowledge or interest in the issue, stating that it has never been raised to him. Speaker 0 mentions that Senator Blackburn has wanted to subpoena the flight logs but there hasn't been a vote in the committee. Speaker 0 questions if Senator Durbin is curious about high-profile individuals potentially involved in illegal activities, but Senator Durbin dismisses the question and thanks Fox News for their time. Speaker 0 persists in asking if Senator Durbin will take action, but the conversation abruptly ends with Speaker 1 calling Durbin a liar.

Survivors in the room stood and raised their hands to indicate they have not yet met with the Department of Justice. The Congresswoman urges Attorney General Bondi to apologize to the survivors for the DOJ’s handling of the Epstein files, calling the release of the Epstein files and their information “absolutely unacceptable.” She asks Bondi to turn to the survivors and apologize, stating this is about Bondi taking responsibility for the Department of Justice and the harm it has caused. The exchange continues with the Congresswoman insisting that Merrick Garland has sat in that chair twice, and she questions whether Bondi will respond to the survivors, not to those who predated Bondi. The Congresswoman reiterates, “This is not about anybody that came before you. It is about you taking responsibility for your Department of Justice and the harm that it has done to the survivors who are standing right behind you and are waiting for you to turn to them and apologize for what your Department of Justice is.” The hearing appears to encounter procedural friction. The Congresswoman complains that the question is not being answered as expected, accusing the proceedings of theatrics, while another member clarifies that witnesses answer in the way they choose. The chair and other members intervene to maintain “regular order.” The Congresswoman asserts that the situation represents “a massive cover up,” accusing then-President Donald Trump of making the release of the Epstein files a center of his political campaign because he thought it would benefit him. She claims that Bondi’s office claimed to have a client list, but says there was no list, and alleges that Deputy Todd Blanche met alone with Elaine Maxwell and “transferred her to a minimum security prison.” She insists that Bondi should turn to the survivors who are standing behind him on a human level. The chair interrupts and remarks that time has been delayed, noting that the gentlewoman has time remaining but the session ends with a reflection that the general has done something, though the exact action is not specified in the excerpt. The session ends with an acknowledgment of the time constraints and appreciation for the discussion.

Senator Dick Durbin is being accused of covering up for Jeffrey Epstein, a deceased child trafficker. Senator Marsha Blackburn attempted to subpoena Epstein's flight log, but Durbin blocked it. The public wants to know who was on Epstein's jet and who visited his island, especially since Bill Clinton flew on Epstein's jet multiple times. Durbin's office claims they didn't have enough time to schedule a vote on the subpoena, but they should make time. Epstein had surveillance videos and hard drives seized by the FBI, suggesting he had connections to intelligence agencies. This raises concerns about the government's lack of interest in combating international sex trafficking. The situation is seen as hypocritical, as those involved claim to care about women and children.

I asked colleagues to create a committee with subpoena power to investigate the lack of Secret Service protection for the president. The Secret Service director agreed to brief us, but it hasn't happened yet. I question why the president wasn't given more protection and who is responsible for that decision.

The speaker questions the lack of transparency and public disclosure regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically the flight logs and videos from Epstein's house. They express frustration that despite the need for information from organizations like the FBI, it is not being provided. The speaker finds it absurd that they are unable to obtain this information despite existing laws and expectations.

Speaker 0: Reclaiming time from Chairman, Hunter is avoiding my words. Speaker 1: House committees seek relevant info, but GOP misuses subpoenas for political gain, ignoring offers and leaking witness statements. Translation: Speaker 0 reclaims time from the Chairman as Hunter avoids their words. Speaker 1 mentions that House committees are seeking relevant information, but Republicans are misusing subpoenas for political purposes by ignoring offers and leaking witness statements.

Senator Dick Durbin is being accused of covering up for Jeffrey Epstein, a deceased child trafficker. Senator Marsha Blackburn attempted to subpoena Epstein's flight log, but Durbin blocked it. The public wants to know who was on Epstein's jet and who visited his island, especially considering Bill Clinton's frequent trips. Durbin's office claims they didn't have enough time to schedule a vote on the subpoena, but they managed to find time to search Melania's underwear drawer. Epstein's seized surveillance videos and hard drives suggest government disinterest in combating sex trafficking. This implies Epstein had connections with intelligence agencies, and Durbin is accused of covering up the entire operation. It's hypocritical for them to claim concern for women and children.

Speaker 0 from Fox News asks Senator Durbin why he won't subpoena Jeffrey Epstein's flight logs. Senator Durbin claims to know nothing about the issue and says it has never been raised with him. Speaker 0 mentions that Senator Blackburn has wanted to subpoena the flight logs but there hasn't been a vote in the committee. Speaker 0 questions if Senator Durbin is curious about high-profile individuals who may be involved in illegal activities, but Senator Durbin dismisses the topic, stating it's the first time anyone has brought it up. Speaker 0 asks if Senator Durbin is interested in pursuing the matter, but there is no clear response.

I want to reclaim my time, Mr. Chairman. The house committees issued a subpoena for a closed-door deposition after our first five offers were ignored. Republicans misuse this tactic to leak and mischaracterize witness statements.