reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I am puzzled by Trump's support for mRNA vaccines and Peter Marks at the FDA. Marks, a key figure in Operation Warp Speed, now wants to use the same approach for cancer treatment. He advocates for speeding up drug approvals by easing FDA regulations. Marks controls information flow and defends the vaccine program, despite concerns like myocarditis. He is seen as the gatekeeper for vaccine information.

The speaker expresses disappointment that the existence of myocarditis was known very early on. They claim to have written to Fauci in 2020 and 2021 about lymphopenia and the failure to clear the virus, asserting that this failure was also known early on. The speaker states the perception of 95% efficacy was inaccurate and suggests there were perverse incentives at play, and now the consequences must be recognized. Another speaker then states that this is why Fauci needed a pardon.

Speaker 0 argues that anyone can file a complaint with a law enforcement authority for murder conspiracy and demand arrests and prosecutions. He points to a 2013 press release claiming that DARPA awarded Moderna Therapeutics up to $25,000,000 to develop messenger RNA therapeutics, noting that DARPA is the Pentagon and claiming the Pentagon bought, paid for, and envisioned these mRNA shots. He contends Fort Detrick was involved in developing COVID-19 at the UNC BSL-3 and asserts the Pentagon is on both sides of the argument, developing the weapon and the alleged vaccines. Speaker 1 asks whether there is any liability shield for deploying a biowarfare weapon and whether the narrative about congressional liability for Pfizer is a SIOP. Speaker 0 agrees that civil liability is separate from criminal liability, stating in his book Resisting Medical Tyranny that executives at companies developing these mRNA shots are guilty of murder and conspiracy to commit murder. He cites a Portugal report claiming that upwards of 300,000 Americans had been murdered by the mRNA Franken shots and invokes the JAB resolution, describing it as a Nuremberg crime against humanity and a violation of the Nuremberg Code. He defines a Nuremberg crime against humanity as murder, extermination, and other inhumane acts committed against civilians. Speaker 1 asks about liability for government officials who approved the vaccines. Speaker 0 says FDA officials who approved the shots could be indicted for murder and conspiracy to commit murder, noting the FDA’s involvement in developing COVID-19 as an offensive biological warfare weapon at UNC BSL-3, including a cited contract listing National Center for Toxicological Research and FDA as contributors. He claims the FDA, which approves the vaccines, was involved in this development. Speaker 1 questions the CDC and media accountability, noting the CDC’s recommendation of the vaccines and media promotion of boosters. Speaker 0 says the CDC, including Director Milensky (appointed by Biden, from Harvard Medical School), is complicit, and claims the CDC has a history dating back to the Reagan administration of handling offensive biological warfare projects, including shipping weaponized agents to Saddam Hussein with implications for U.S. troops after Gulf War I. Speaker 1 asks whether there are lawmakers with intel on gain-of-function biowarfare. Speaker 0 mentions Senator Rand Paul as having a strong understanding, but asserts that some lawmakers were threatened and obstructed after consulting him, recounting an experience with Walter Jones of the House Armed Services Committee who briefly engaged but then did not follow up, implying threats prevented action. Speaker 1 asks how citizens should respond, and Speaker 0 advocates reporting to sheriffs, district attorneys, and state attorneys, noting progress with a Collier County health freedom declaration. They discuss enforcement mechanisms, seizure, and incineration of stockpiles, and trial and sentencing for those responsible. Speaker 0 condemns China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology as a bioweapons lab, alleging it was a Chinese counterpart to Fort Detrick, with the Chinese president seeking his own BSL-4 program and an offensive biowarfare arsenal. Speaker 1 notes U.S. funding and international bioweapons labs, including Ukraine and Taiwan, and ends by referencing Lindsey Graham and a speaker labeled as a professor Boyle.

Dr. Robert Malone, a physician and scientist, discusses the need for a rapid response capability to address emerging infectious diseases and engineered pathogens. He highlights the potential risks associated with the technology, stating that almost anyone with an undergraduate degree in biology can weaponize pathogens. Dr. Malone criticizes the rushed deployment of mRNA-based gene therapy vaccinations, citing the false justification of a high case fatality rate. He argues that ethical and regulatory norms were breached, and informed consent was not properly obtained. Dr. Malone calls for transparency and access to data to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of these products, citing numerous adverse events reported in peer-reviewed studies. He concludes by urging the public to question the safety and efficacy of these products.

Dr. Robert Malone, a physician scientist, discusses the rushed development and deployment of mRNA-based gene therapy vaccinations. He highlights the breach of ethics and regulatory norms, as well as the lack of informed consent. Dr. Malone emphasizes the need for open and transparent access to data regarding the safety and effectiveness of these products. He mentions the numerous adverse events associated with the vaccines, including menstrual cycle disruptions, reproductive health issues, blood clotting, damage to various body systems, immunologic and oncologic harms, and even death. Dr. Malone urges governments to disclose the data so that scientists can evaluate it and resolve the controversy surrounding these products.

Raja Cholan, a new employee at the NIH, discusses the accelerated approval process for COVID vaccines and expresses skepticism about their effectiveness, particularly regarding myocarditis risks for those under 30. He mentions that vaccine mandates have financially benefited companies like Pfizer and Moderna. Cholan also reflects on the lack of solid evidence behind guidelines like the 6-foot rule during the pandemic. He shares concerns about the NIH's bureaucracy and the potential impact of political changes on the organization. Cholan acknowledges conspiracy theories surrounding NIH funding but believes most government employees genuinely want to improve public health. He also hints at issues with FOIA requests, suggesting that the NIH may intentionally complicate the process. Overall, he questions the integrity of vaccine approvals and the motivations behind public health decisions.

Speaker 0 described a guest whose 18-year-old daughter was injected with Pfizer and developed cancer. He stated that he has sat across numerous people who lost their children to these injections, with some deaths immediate and others gruesome, and that these people must testify to lawmakers and others recounting their stories repeatedly. He framed this as a massive crime that needs to stop. He asserted that the FDA was fully aware that these injections would cause cancer, citing published guidance documents. He claimed that the FDA regulates the industry and, in 2015 and 2013 (and even more recently), wrote extensive guidance documents explaining to manufacturers developing mRNA products that they must study risks, including cancer, death, fertility issues, blindness, strokes, and cardiovascular issues. He said these risks were documented as regulatory knowledge and that manufacturers were told they had to study these risks and exclude them. He also claimed that studying these risks in healthy volunteers was not allowed because it was considered unethical. He contrasted this with 2020, stating that “all of a sudden, all of this is solved,” calling it a joke, and that this period raised his suspicions, prompting him to investigate independently. He concluded by describing the situation as a premeditated crime in which regulators knew, and that the military conducted a “fake exercise” to capture all these pharmaceutical companies and compel them to create these weapons.

The speaker discusses the development of vaccines and raises concerns about a specific type of research called gain-of-function. They suggest that this research involves making viruses more dangerous and could potentially be used to create bio weapons. They mention that Anthony Fauci, a prominent figure in the field, received a raise for his involvement in this research. In 2014, three dangerous viruses escaped from labs in the US, leading 300 scientists to urge President Obama to shut down Fauci's gain-of-function research. Although a moratorium was issued, the research was moved offshore, including to a Chinese lab in Wuhan.

The speaker discusses the issue of DNA contamination in mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and questions the FDA's handling of the situation. They explain that normally rigorous tests are required to ensure safety, but in this case, the FDA ignored those tests. The speaker also mentions that Moderna's own patent acknowledges concerns about DNA and insertional immunogenesis. They reveal that DNA fragments, including an antibiotic resistance gene and sequences from simian virus 40, were found in the vaccines. The speaker expresses shock at the FDA's lack of transparency and highlights the potential risks associated with DNA damage, such as cancer and birth defects.

Dr. Robert Malone, a physician and scientist, discusses the need for a rapid response capability to address emerging infectious diseases and engineered pathogens. He highlights the potential risks associated with the development of bioweapons and the justification for the mRNA-based gene therapy vaccination technology. Dr. Malone criticizes the misinformation surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic, including the exaggerated case fatality rate and the disregard for ethical and regulatory norms. He emphasizes the importance of informed consent and transparency in accessing and analyzing data to determine the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines. Dr. Malone also mentions various adverse events associated with the vaccines, such as myocarditis, reproductive health issues, blood clotting, and death. He calls for open disclosure of data to resolve the controversy surrounding the vaccines.

The speaker is questioned about the Health Secretary pulling funding for mRNA vaccine research, claiming the risks outweigh the benefits, putting him at odds with the medical community. The speaker responds that Operation Warp Speed was considered incredible, regardless of political affiliation, citing its efficiency and distribution. While acknowledging that Warp Speed was "a long time ago," the speaker states that they are "on to other things" and are looking for answers to other sicknesses and diseases. They mention upcoming meetings to determine the next steps.

Dr. Robert Malone, a physician and scientist, discusses the need for a rapid response capability to address emerging infectious diseases and engineered pathogens. He highlights the potential risks associated with the technology, stating that almost anyone with an undergraduate degree in biology can weaponize pathogens. Dr. Malone criticizes the rushed deployment of mRNA-based gene therapy vaccinations, arguing that it violated ethical and regulatory norms. He questions the justification for the technology based on inaccurate case fatality rate predictions and emphasizes the importance of informed consent and transparency. Dr. Malone calls for open access to data to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of these products, citing numerous adverse events reported in peer-reviewed studies. He concludes by urging governments to disclose the data and address the controversy surrounding these products.

Dr. Hotez initially expressed concerns about rushing COVID vaccines under emergency use authorization, citing potential safety issues. However, he later led a program that fast-tracked vaccine development. He changed his stance and praised the vaccines once emergency use authorization was granted. Dr. Hotez stated that with enough vaccinations, viral transmission would stop and restrictions could be lifted. However, he now suggests that multiple booster shots may be necessary, even though the vaccines do not prevent infection. Despite the Johnson & Johnson vaccine's blood clot concerns, Dr. Hotez still supports it. Critics argue that Dr. Hotez ignores data showing the vaccination campaign's failures.

The speaker claims the Biden administration covered up science related to the COVID shot. Information related to vaccine complications was allegedly censored as COVID vaccine hesitant content. The speaker alleges the heart inflammation in young, healthy men and boys was not disclosed as soon as it should have been, resulting in thousands of kids developing myocarditis unnecessarily. The speaker suggests the administration knew the shot didn't stop transmission but kept it secret. The head of the FDA is cited as saying the Biden administration suppressed information about myocarditis damage to children. The speaker believes this sounds criminal, especially considering mandates for school, work, and travel.

The transcript presents a polarized view on mRNA COVID vaccines. It states: "the US Department of Health and Human Services is slashing a half billion dollars in government funding from mRNA vaccine development." It notes mixed messages: "the FDA is fast tracking possible coronavirus vaccine" and "The mRNA vaccine... has probably saved about three million lives." Personal stories describe injuries: "a week after his vaccination, Joel's health began to rapidly decline," leading to transverse myelitis; Toby and Jessica recount autoimmune-like symptoms and chronic pain. Critics argue that "lipid nanoparticles go everywhere in the body, To the brain, to the bone marrow, to the liver, to the spleen, most importantly to the reproductive organs" and that "the spike protein is the toxic part of this virus that causes clotting, that causes inflammation, that causes myocarditis, that causes brain fog." Robert Malone and others claim "the evidence about the adverse events from the vaccines is unequivocal. It is absolutely overwhelming." The piece highlights advocacy groups and calls for more safety research and support for the vaccine-injured.

The discussion revolves around the NIH and vaccine concerns. There are claims about accelerated vaccine approvals and potential risks, particularly myocarditis for those under 30. The speaker expresses skepticism about the effectiveness of vaccines in preventing COVID-19 and questions the validity of health guidelines like the six-foot rule. They mention possible funding connections to the Wuhan lab and suggest that intentions behind government actions may not be malicious but rather misguided. The conversation touches on political implications for the NIH under different administrations and raises concerns about transparency in government communications, particularly regarding FOIA requests. Ultimately, it questions the competence and integrity of those making medical decisions in government.

An undercover video by O'Keefe Media Group features Raja Cholan from the NIH, who claims that COVID health initiatives were fabricated. He expresses skepticism about the effectiveness of vaccines, stating, "I don't even know if these vaccines stop you from getting COVID." Cholan also reveals that the six feet social distancing guideline lacked scientific backing and was "completely made up." He suggests that a Democrat in office would be better for the NIH, as they would face less scrutiny. The NIH has admitted to funding gain of function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, contradicting previous statements by Dr. Fauci. Allegations of kickbacks from pharmaceutical companies related to COVID vaccines are also mentioned. More undercover videos from the NIH tapes series are expected.

The speaker discusses the issue of DNA contamination in mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and questions the FDA's handling of the situation. They explain that normally rigorous tests are required for genotoxicity and immunogenesis, but the FDA seemed to ignore these requirements. The speaker also mentions that Moderna's own patent acknowledges the concerns related to DNA and insertional immunogenesis. They reveal that DNA fragments, including an antibiotic resistance gene and sequences from simian virus 40, were found in the vaccines. The speaker expresses concern about the potential risks associated with DNA damage, such as cancer and birth defects. They criticize the FDA for downplaying the issue and emphasize the importance of transparency.

Doctors and politicians have promoted vaccines, but refuse to acknowledge potential harm. Many Americans who received the vaccine may face unknown risks. The truth must be revealed to prevent future harm from the mRNA platform.

MRNA vaccines were hailed as medical breakthroughs in the fight against COVID. Now the US Department of Health and Human Services is slashing a half billion dollars in government funding from mRNA vaccine development. The current vaccines are not infection blocking. When new variants come up, you lose protection, and they have very short duration. There was never a vaccine made with mRNA. Lipid nanoparticles go everywhere in the body, to the brain, to the bone marrow, to the liver, to the spleen, most importantly to the reproductive organs. I regret it every single day that I walked into my local pharmacy to get that shot in my arm. The spike protein directly causes blood clotting and is found in the middle of large blood clots. This vaccine, the mRNA vaccine, has probably saved about three million lives.

Senator Rand Paul discusses the NIH's funding of gain-of-function research in Wuhan, asserting that Dr. Fauci misled Congress about it. He explains that gain-of-function research increases a virus's lethality or infectiousness, which poses significant risks if it escapes the lab. Paul criticizes Fauci's advice on masks and social distancing, claiming they were ineffective and potentially harmful. He emphasizes that people who had COVID should not have been mandated to get vaccinated again. Paul expresses skepticism about government mandates and believes the public has become more resistant to government overreach. He also mentions his committee's investigation into COVID-related decisions and the misuse of surveillance programs, advocating for stricter adherence to the Fourth Amendment regarding data collection.

- "After reviewing the science and consulting top experts at NIH and FDA, HHS has determined that mRNA technology poses more risk than benefits for these respiratory viruses." - "BARDA has begun the process of terminating these 22 contracts totaling just under $500,000,000 To replace the troubled mRNA programs, we're prioritizing the development of safer, broader vaccine strategies, like whole virus vaccines and novel platforms that don't collapse when viruses mutate." - "I'm still waiting for Robert Kennedy Jr. To say that we're going to wipe out mandates and everyone will have a choice, but this is a great step in the right direction." - "Half a billion dollars, 22 projects in the pipeline for mRNA vaccine technology." - "KFF Foundation did a survey on really what Americans are still going to want this vaccine going into the fall, the COVID vaccine."

I'm skeptical about the COVID vaccine, especially the mRNA vaccines. I recently spoke with a top cancer expert in Britain who was very critical of the long-term effects of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. According to this expert, we may see a significant increase in cancer cases as a result of these vaccines. While I believe the vaccines saved lives, I question whether we had enough time to fully understand the potential long-term consequences.