reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I, along with six colleagues, wrote a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) expressing concerns about the COVID vaccines. The EMA responded, revealing shocking facts. They clarified that the vaccines were only approved for individual immunization, not for controlling or preventing infections. The EMA emphasized the lack of data on contagiousness and even stated that repeated exposure to the virus could increase the risk of infection in vaccinated individuals. The government's campaigns promoting vaccination to protect others were unauthorized and based on misinformation. The EMA also highlighted the importance of carefully considering safety information before administering vaccines. The government's failure to report vaccine side effects within the first 14 days was not only fraudulent but also endangered lives. The vaccination campaign should be halted as it does not meet EMA standards. The government and supporting political parties should be held accountable for their lies and deception.

It is absurd for elected officials to decide medical treatments. Countries with high vaccination rates have high mortality rates, while those with low rates have lower mortality. Romania's low vaccination rate is due to distrust in the government. Opposition in the Romanian Parliament and public pressure prevented a vaccination mandate. Fellow EU parliament members criticized their stance, but some are now acknowledging their concerns about adverse effects. They encourage colleagues to speak out about their experiences. Access to private healthcare in the European Parliament differs from the general population's access.

We were elected by the people to represent their best interests in the European Parliament. However, the leaders of the Parliament have stripped away our fundamental rights without proper explanation. They are now conditioning access to the Parliament based on a green certificate, which violates people's freedom to choose whether they want to be vaccinated or tested. We also question whether European citizens were properly informed about what is happening. The contracts between pharmaceutical companies and the European Union were initially kept secret, but after pressure, they were disclosed. We believe in transparency and democracy, and it is our duty to fight for the freedom and liberty of the people.

The speaker expresses concern about the binding nature of the treaties and the extension of powers to the director general of the WHO. They highlight instances of misconduct within the WHO and criticize the compressed reporting time for public health risks. The speaker argues that these treaties would take away powers from elected representatives and create an unaccountable supranational body. They also raise concerns about the influence of pharmaceutical companies on the WHO and question the organization's handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. The speaker emphasizes the importance of individual rights and liberties and suggests that a one-size-fits-all approach may not be effective. They mention the EU's plans to establish a department of misinformation and express skepticism about a single version of the truth. The speaker concludes by calling for careful consideration and reading of the documents.

I was surprised to see our health commissioner, Mrs. Pierriacidès, signing an agreement with Mr. Tedros, the director of the WHO, regarding digital Covid certificates. They claim that these European certificates will serve as an international reference. However, many countries, including Germany, France, Bulgaria, and Austria, question the basis for this decision. Concerns arise about potential implications for future pandemics, other vaccines, and international surveillance. The lack of transparency and guarantees regarding data traceability further fuel these concerns. It is unclear on what legal grounds the health commissioner negotiated this agreement without the knowledge or delegation from member states. Personally, I find this decision unsettling and dislike having choices made for me.

A group of European Parliament members wrote a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) expressing concerns about the COVID-19 vaccines. The EMA responded, stating that the vaccines were only approved for individual immunization and not for controlling or preventing infections. They also admitted a lack of data on vaccine effectiveness against infections. The government's campaign to vaccinate for the sake of others was based on misinformation. Furthermore, the EMA emphasized the need to carefully consider safety information before administering vaccines. The mass vaccination campaign should be halted as it does not meet the EMA's requirements and puts people's health at risk. The government and supporting political parties should be held accountable for their lies and deception.

A group of European Parliament members wrote a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) expressing concerns about the COVID-19 vaccines. The EMA responded, stating that the vaccines were only approved for individual immunization, not for controlling or preventing infections. They also emphasized the lack of data on preventing infections and even mentioned that exposure to the virus could increase the risk of infection, even in vaccinated individuals. The EMA highlighted the importance of carefully considering safety information before administering vaccines. The government's vaccination campaigns were deemed unauthorized and based on misinformation. The EMA's information undermines the vaccination policies of the Dutch government, and they should be held accountable for their actions.

There is no way for people or member states to question the WHO's assessments, whether it's about public health emergencies, measures, or experimental vaccination regimes. Member states and citizens have no power to challenge these decisions.

Ursula von der Leyen should resign as President of the European Commission due to criminal investigations into vaccine contracts. The European Public Prosecutor's Office is looking into contracts worth billions of euros for COVID-19 vaccines, signed without public disclosure. This lack of transparency is concerning for EU citizens. Resignation is necessary. Thank you. Translation: Ursula von der Leyen should resign as President of the European Commission due to criminal investigations into vaccine contracts. The European Public Prosecutor's Office is looking into contracts worth billions of euros for COVID-19 vaccines, signed without public disclosure. This lack of transparency is concerning for EU citizens. Resignation is necessary. Thank you.

Last month, a group of European Parliament members, including myself, wrote a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) expressing concerns about the COVID-19 vaccines. The EMA's response revealed shocking facts. They admitted that the vaccines were only approved for individual immunization and not for controlling or preventing infections. Furthermore, there is a lack of data supporting the vaccines' effectiveness in preventing infections. In fact, the EMA stated that repeated exposure to the virus increases the risk of infection even in vaccinated individuals. The government's campaigns promoting vaccination to protect others were unauthorized and based on misinformation. The EMA also emphasized the need to carefully consider safety information before administering vaccines. The mass vaccination efforts were in direct contradiction to the approved use of the vaccines. The government and supporting political parties should be held accountable for their lies and deception. The vaccination campaign needs to be halted as it is not safe and does not meet EMA requirements.

The speaker criticizes a report for omitting important information discussed in the committee. They highlight that contracts were not fully disclosed and mention a scandal involving text messages between Ursula von der Leyen and Albert Bourla. They question the safety and effectiveness of the injections, citing a statement from a Pfizer representative. The speaker argues that information about the SARS CoV-two virus was known prior to the report's claim. They also dispute the claim that vaccines saved 250,000 lives, pointing out the high mortality rates in highly vaccinated countries. The abusive use of the Digital Green Certificate and the violation of individuals' rights to consent are also mentioned. The speaker concludes that this report highlights a disconnect between EU institutions and its citizens.

Speaker 0 questions the seriousness of the European Commission's proposal, asking if they are really not forcing people to be vaccinated. Speaker 1 clarifies that they were not allowed to enter the parliament without a green certificate. Speaker 0 asks about the transparency of disclosing redacted versions of contracts, questioning how trust can be built without knowing the contents. They also inquire about the responsibility for side effects, stating that EU citizens should know the price of vaccines and not be forced to be vaccinated against their will.

I am honored to be here with 7 brave citizens launching a European citizens initiative against the globalist agenda. We reject the idea of granting unelected bodies like the WHO governing powers. Democratically elected governments should not be replaced by billionaire-controlled organizations. This goes against the principles of democracy and shows contempt for the people. These 7 citizens and we will not tolerate this power grab. I will expose any government, whether in a member state or elsewhere, that supports this.

There are alarming signals in the Covid situation that are concerning for the health of our citizens. Many people have chosen to get vaccinated based on information from the government and doctors, believing they made an informed decision. However, informed consent is only possible if the information provided by member states and authorities is accurate. Unfortunately, when governments spread misinformation, doctors cannot give proper advice and people cannot make an informed choice. The timeframe for recording adverse effects after vaccination is flawed, as reactions usually occur within the first 14 days. This disregards the risks and side effects that may arise during this crucial period. The government's policies and media campaigns promoting Covid vaccinations fail to consider these risks. It is essential to address these concerns promptly to ensure informed consent and protect public health.

I am Marcel de Graaf, Member of the European Parliament for Forum for Democracy. I recently sent a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) regarding the approval of medications in the European market, specifically questioning the COVID-19 vaccines. We have received a response that clarifies many issues. This response is highly critical of the vaccination policy in the Netherlands. I will provide more details in a press conference tomorrow at 3 PM via a livestream from Strasbourg. The EMA's response confirms that Forum for Democracy's criticism of the vaccination policy is justified.

This work is challenging due to the abundance of fake news, lies, and conspiracy theories surrounding the pandemic agreement and IHR. Some claim that the agreement will give WHO the power to impose lockdowns or vaccine mandates on countries, but these claims are false. The agreement, written by us, will not cede sovereignty to WHO. We need your support to counter these lies and assure your citizens that the agreement safeguards national sovereignty while enhancing global health security. It is negotiated and implemented by countries in accordance with their own laws.

We in the European Union are working to strengthen health systems and promote digitalization in healthcare globally. During the pandemic, we quickly implemented a digital COVID certificate to facilitate travel and revive economies. This initiative has been adopted by WHO and over 80 countries. We must think innovatively, move forward, and embrace the potential benefits of digital health while being mindful of the risks.

The European Union has reached an agreement on the implementation of digital identity, which is concerning news. Commissioner Breton has also mentioned the possibility of introducing the digital euro, or Central Bank Digital Currency. This connection between digital identity and digital currency is worrying, as it goes against previous promises and has raised concerns among privacy and security experts. However, there is still a chance to voice opposition to this development by contacting your Member of European Parliament (MEP) and expressing your disagreement with this tool.

The European Union has reached an agreement on the implementation of digital identity, which is concerning news. Commissioner Breton has also mentioned the possibility of introducing the digital euro, or Central Bank Digital Currency. This connection between digital identity and digital currency is worrying, as it goes against previous promises and has raised concerns among privacy and security experts. However, there is still a chance to oppose this development by contacting your Member of European Parliament (MEP) and expressing your opposition to this tool.

The European Union developed a COVID-19 certification system to facilitate safe travel during the pandemic, which has now been adopted by WHO as part of a global digital health certification network. This network will initially include the COVID-19 certificate and will later expand to include other health documents. There is a need to address the challenges posed by anti-vaccine sentiments, as vaccines are effective and supported by evidence. WHO clarified that it did not impose any mandates during the pandemic, emphasizing its role in providing guidance and support to governments rather than enforcing policies.

I just left the negotiations on digital identity, and I have concerning news. The member states and the European Parliament reached an agreement, meaning the digital identity will soon be implemented in the EU. Commissioner Breton announced that we now have the digital identity wallet, which he intends to fill with the digital euro, or central bank digital currency. This is troubling, as they previously assured us there would be no connection between the two. Privacy and security experts have warned that this development poses significant risks to our privacy and freedom.

Ursula von der Leyen should resign as President of the European Commission due to criminal investigations into vaccine contracts. The European Public Prosecutor's Office is looking into the contracts worth billions of euros for COVID-19 vaccines, signed without public disclosure. This lack of transparency raises concerns about the use of public funds in the EU. Immediate resignation is urged. Thank you. Translation: Ursula von der Leyen should resign as President of the European Commission due to criminal investigations into vaccine contracts. The European Public Prosecutor's Office is looking into the contracts worth billions of euros for COVID-19 vaccines, signed without public disclosure. This lack of transparency raises concerns about the use of public funds in the EU. Immediate resignation is urged. Thank you.

I believe the COVID-19 vaccines and future boosters are unsafe for human use. I urge the European Medicine Agency to pressure and urgently remove these vaccines from the market. In the United States, we will remove them state by state if the federal government doesn't act. This will happen worldwide. The World Health Organization (WHO) supports these vaccines, but they are more of a problem than a help to the European Union. I think the European Union, the United States, and other major stakeholders should withdraw from the WHO and let them focus on their own initiatives. The WHO will not have control over my healthcare decisions as a practitioner. I'm Dr. Peter McCullough. Thank you.

I expressed skepticism towards the World Health Organization's ability to handle a global pandemic due to past errors and conflicts of interest. While we can assist other countries, we must not give up our sovereignty or agree to a lockdown charter. In emergencies, governments may feel pressured to make harmful decisions. Therefore, I believe that no pandemic treaty is preferable to a flawed one.

The speaker expresses concern over the World Health Organization's (WHO) proposed new pandemic treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations. They argue that these changes will diminish countries' sovereignty and individuals' rights, erode democratic participation, and grant the WHO excessive power. The speaker highlights the lack of transparency and public debate surrounding these negotiations. They emphasize that the WHO will have authority over health matters, including imposing restrictions, lockdowns, and experimental treatments. The speaker also criticizes the WHO's control over information and the absence of mechanisms to challenge their decisions. They conclude by urging citizens to pressure their political representatives to halt these negotiations.