TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker states they are in litigation with 18 states across 19 different lawsuits over these states’ alleged refusal to comply. They say objections raised include privacy, noting they are requesting information such as the last four digits of individuals’ Social Security numbers and whether someone is in the country legally or a citizen, which they describe as a matter of federal records. The speaker asserts that the concept of this being a privacy issue is “total nonsense,” and argues that those states have no right to be on the voter rolls. They express an expectation to win these cases, even if it takes going to the Supreme Court. The speaker indicates they started this effort earlier in the year to give states a chance and mentions targeting jurisdictions like Fulton County, Georgia, which still has custody of some ballots from the 2020 election that they would like to examine, along with a couple of other jurisdictions. They say they reached a settlement with North Carolina, which is cleaning up its voter rolls with 100,000 records that were incorrect and needed updating. They mention they waited on behalf of Wyoming’s voter ID law and helped them win a case in court against liberal efforts to push it back. The speaker outlines an overall expectation for 2026: cleaner voter rolls, with many election officials, as noted by John, doing their job after receiving these letters. They anticipate hundreds of thousands of people in some states being removed from the voter rolls correctly. The speaker notes a past hesitation to act, suggesting it was because the DOJ and some left-wing organizations would sue when states attempted to do their job, framing it as “damned if you do, damned if you don’t.” They conclude that for the remainder of this administration, they will be supporting states in cleaning their voter rolls as required by federal law and emphasize that they are just getting started.

The Arizona Republican Party filed a lawsuit against the state's secretary of state for having 500,000 to 1.3 million ineligible voters on the rolls. The lawsuit revealed dead people and non-residents on the voter rolls, with some counties having more registered voters than eligible citizens. This highlights the need for election integrity. Republicans must address this issue before the upcoming elections to prevent cheating. It is crucial to purge voter rolls of deceased individuals to ensure fair elections. Democrats may argue otherwise, but it is clear that dead voters should not be on the rolls.

California settled a case, resulting in the removal of 1,200,000 names. New York settled as well, removing 450,000 names. In Pennsylvania, a warning led to one county removing 69,000 names, with more removed through settlements. Kentucky saw 500,000 names removed after a consent decree. North Carolina also removed numerous names. Overall, about 4,000,000 names have been cleaned up in the past year and a half to two years due to Judicial Watch's litigation. Efforts will continue, as Illinois and other areas, including parts of California, still have significant issues with their voter rolls.

42,000 people in Nevada voted more than once, 1,500 were deceased, 19,000 didn't live in Nevada, 8,000 had non-existent addresses, 15,000 were registered at commercial or vacant addresses, and 4,000 were non-citizens. The speaker asked about voter fraud prosecutions in Nevada, to which the response was not yet.

Fulton County does not conduct independent searches to remove ineligible voters, such as deceased individuals, convicted felons, or those living out of state, from voter rolls.

Fulton County allegedly does not conduct independent searches to remove ineligible voters, such as deceased individuals, convicted felons, or those residing out of state, from voter rolls. The question is raised whether routine maintenance is performed to remove convicted felons from the voter list.

"we have sent out a number of letters to states, under two federal statutes." "We administer different statutes, Help America Vote Act and NVRA, National Voter Registration Act." "these acts have different purposes and different rules, but basically states are required to maintain certain data." "they're required to keep their voter rules generally up to date." "we're finding that a lot of states are being very sloppy, cutting corners, not doing this, certainly not doing the list maintenance required." "And too many millions of Americans today don't feel confident." "And that means it's deterring some people from voting." "We have sloppy maintenance requirements in these different states." "There are a lot of problems with this."

California settled a case, resulting in the removal of 1,200,000 names. New York settled, removing 450,000 names. In Pennsylvania, a warning led to one county removing 69,000 names, with more removed in a settlement. Kentucky removed 500,000 names after a consent decree. North Carolina also removed several names. Overall, approximately 4,000,000 names were cleaned up in the past year and a half to two years due to Judicial Watch's litigation. Efforts will continue, as Illinois and other areas, despite some removals, still have significant issues with their voter rolls.

North Carolina, there are significant issues with voter registrations. Since the start of the year, there have been 499,566 total registrations. Notably, 110,462 lack information on race, sex, or ethnicity. Additionally, 149,699 do not have a North Carolina driver's license or ID, and 274,589 have no recorded birth state. This raises concerns about the integrity of the registration process.

Judicial Watch litigation led to the removal of approximately 4,000,000 names from voter rolls in the last 1.5-2 years. Specifically, lawsuits resulted in 1,200,000 names removed in California and 450,000 in New York. A warning sent to Pennsylvania led to one county removing 69,000 names, with more removed as part of a settlement. Kentucky removed 500,000 names following a consent decree. North Carolina also removed a number of names. Judicial Watch is continuing its efforts, having sued Illinois and California again due to remaining issues with their voter rolls.

Since January 2020, election officials in one governor's state have removed 453,000 names from voter rolls. This includes 97,000 deceased voters, 56,100 felons, 15,000 duplicate registrations, and 195,000 individuals who failed to verify their address. Over the past three years, 144,000 voters who moved out of state have also been removed. New legislation allows for automatic removal of voters upon notification from another state that they've surrendered their driver's license there.

Some voter rolls in swing states contain illegal aliens because they register their address as the processing center. Software integrating property tax records with voting files reveals voters not living at legal residences. These new illegal voters are inundating voting roles, especially in swing states. In 2022, 40,000 phantom voters were exposed in Wisconsin and removed. These are people who were dead, moved out of state, don't exist, or don't live at a legal address. Challenging the address is the most efficient way to get an illegal voter off the voting roll. Certain NGO groups, such as Catholic Charities, are helping illegal immigrants and are funded by the Republican Party. These groups don't believe in borders and feel fine registering people to vote. Dark money, evading campaign rules, tends to go to NGOs and other groups. Evidence suggests a lot of dark money is coming from Chinese-controlled groups and is trying to affect the election in favor of Kamala Harris. The Trump campaign and the RNC need to dedicate time, money, and energy to analyzing the voting file in the seven major swing states to find voters using illegal addresses and have those addresses removed.

Speaker 0 recounts what happened yesterday as it relates to the actual fact pattern of law and a warrant issued by a magistrate judge based on probable cause after evidence was submitted, not a Trump-appointed judge. He notes that the law enforcement process in America works this way. He argues that declarations of perfection of the 2020 election are inconsistent with what happened, and then lays out specifics. He asserts that drop boxes were “invented out of thin air,” with no basis in Georgia law. He says mobile voting units moved through Fulton County to 80% Democrat precincts, 81% Democrat precincts to be precise, and that this was not envisioned in Georgia law. He claims 6,800,000 absentee ballot request forms with a first-class stamp were mailed to every registered voter in Georgia, again “nowhere envisioned in Georgia law.” He adds that if the same ballots are counted three times, the numbers should match, but they did not. Regarding the recount, he states that 3,930 double-scanned ballots were found in Fulton County alone, and thousands of those were confirmed by the state election board. He notes that Governor Kemp raised concerns from the Rossi report and that there were double-scanned ballots, but even after double scanning, the numbers did not match on the second recount, being off by eight hundred fifty ballots. He asks, “Not one person here can answer the question of how that happened.” He says ballot images were deleted and test ballots were included in the recount process, and that this was confirmed. He then discusses Democrats’ response to legitimate questions about the 2020 election. A former constituent, Derek Summerville, former FBI agent, ran data analysis with Mark Davis. They questioned the 6,800,000 absentee ballot request forms (with a first-class stamp), noting that if a national change of address form was filed, forwarding could occur. They identified reasonable cause to question the validity of 39,141 of those ballots cast. They found that 160 people were registered to vote from a single UPS store, 2,138 from one church in Fulton County, and 1,391 from a shuttered 1,000-square-foot building in Fulton County. The transcript states that thousands of people remain registered to vote in Fulton County at UPS stores, storage units, pack mails, and homeless shelters that haven’t been open for over five years. Summerville and Davis filed objections to these voters, but Stacey Abrams sued them in federal court and they won—Judge Jones ruled in their favor, not Stacey Abrams. The speaker notes that since then, “twelve zero” of the 39, zero voters had been removed from the voter rolls because Summerville and Davis were correct that they were no longer eligible to vote; 9,500 had updated addresses outside Fulton County, proving that those voters were ineligible. Ultimately, 84% of the votes whose eligibility Summerville and Davis challenged were proven to have been invalid voters in the 2020 election. The speaker concludes by urging an end to the charade of the most perfect, most secure election in history and advocates cleaning up Fulton County’s voter rolls for future elections.

42,000 people in Nevada voted more than once, 1,500 were deceased, 19,000 didn't live in Nevada or attend college, 8,000 voted from non-existent addresses, 15,000 were registered at vacant addresses, and 4,000 were noncitizens. The speaker questions if any prosecutions are happening in Nevada for the 130,000 instances of voter fraud identified in the 2020 election. No prosecutions have been reported yet.

Research on voter fraud has revealed that many voter rolls in swing states contain illegal voters, including undocumented immigrants who register using processing center addresses. By integrating property tax records with voting files, we can identify these illegal registrations. In 2022, around 40,000 "phantom voters" were removed in Wisconsin, which helped secure Senator Ron Johnson's reelection. Some NGOs, like Catholic Charities, are involved in registering these individuals, despite receiving funding from the Republican Party. Additionally, dark money from Chinese-controlled groups is influencing elections by circumventing campaign finance rules. To secure the upcoming election, the Trump campaign and RNC must urgently analyze voter files in swing states and challenge illegal addresses to ensure integrity.

42,000 people in Nevada voted more than once, 1,500 were deceased, 19,000 didn't live in Nevada or attend college, 8,000 voted from a non-existent address, 15,000 were registered to vacant addresses, and 4,000 were noncitizens. The speaker asks if there are any ongoing prosecutions for voter fraud in Nevada, given the 130,000 instances identified in the 2020 election. The response is that there are currently no prosecutions.

A project called IV3 identified over 25 million ineligible records in the nation's voter rolls. They are monitoring to see if these ineligible records are used to cast ballots. Any instances of this will be immediately reported to the proper authorities and litigation partners. This is described as a "1,000 front war" that is not easy, but focus must be maintained. Despite "propaganda," the speaker believes they are winning and that "liberty will find a way," but it is important to "stay in the fight." The message is to focus on the signal.

Speaker 1 outlines a plan to revisit all 50 states and 'clean up voter rolls' and 'ensure as best they can that people are citizens when they're registering to vote in a federal election.' He notes letters have been sent to states under two statutes: 'Help America Vote Act' and 'NVRA, National Voter Registration Act.' States must maintain data, keep rules up to date, and have procedures for federal registrations to safeguard citizenship. He says many states are 'sloppy, cutting corners, not doing this, certainly not doing the list maintenance required,' and not properly ensuring people are on the rolls. The goal is that 'every citizen, whatever their party, whatever their views are, they should feel confident in the outcome of the election.'

The speaker claims voter rolls in swing states are full of illegal aliens and others who shouldn't be on them, alleging some register using processing center addresses. They use software integrating property tax records with voting files to identify voters not living at legal residences. In 2022, Ron Johnson and Jay Valentine exposed and removed 40,000 phantom voters in Wisconsin. The speaker advocates challenging addresses to remove illegal voters from rolls, preventing mail-in ballots from reaching them. They claim the removal of these phantom voters led to Ron Johnson's reelection. Certain NGO groups, like Catholic Charities, are allegedly helping illegal immigrants and are funded by the Republican Party. These liberal Christian charities purportedly don't believe in borders and register people to vote. The speaker alleges dark money, potentially from Chinese-controlled groups, is influencing elections in favor of Kamala Harris. They urge the Trump campaign and RNC to analyze voting files in swing states, identify voters using illegal addresses, and remove those addresses before the upcoming election.

Judicial Watch’s legal action led to the removal of 5,000,000 names from voter rolls nationwide. Specifically, 1,000,000 names were cleaned from New York City’s rolls, 1,200,000 from Los Angeles’s rolls, and hundreds of thousands to millions of names were cleaned from Colorado, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and Kentucky. The list goes on, all thanks to Judicial Watch’s heavy lifting in court. They say millions more names need to be cleaned up, and Judicial Watch is in federal court now. In the meantime, there are 5,000,000 fewer opportunities for voter fraud.

Fight Voter Fraud, active in 49 states, provides free data on double-registered voters, some of whom have voted in multiple states. Voter rolls are described as a mess, with examples cited, including one individual who allegedly voted three times in North Carolina and Florida. The speaker advocates for law enforcement to prosecute egregious cases of double voting. The organization claims to have perfected methods for identifying double-registered voters, double voters, and instances of deceased individuals voting. They also address the issue of "illegals" voting. The speaker highlights a situation in Georgia where election board members verified ballot reconciliation, a process of matching voters to ballots. Democrats are allegedly suing these individuals, and the speaker suggests this is because the reconciliation rule prevents them from cheating.

The office and the DOJ will revisit all 50 states to clean up voter rolls and ensure compliance with voter laws. Letters have been sent to states under two federal statutes—Help America Vote Act and the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA). These acts have different purposes and rules, but states must maintain data, keep rules up to date, and have procedures whereby people are registered for federal elections to safeguard that registrants are citizens. They are finding that many states are sloppy, cutting corners, not doing list maintenance, and not properly ensuring people are getting on the voter rolls in the first place. The goal is to clean that up so every citizen should feel confident in the election outcome; too many Americans don’t feel confident because of sloppy voter rolls.

42,000 people in Nevada voted multiple times, including 1,500 deceased individuals, 19,000 who didn't reside in Nevada, and 8,000 from nonexistent addresses. Additionally, 15,000 were registered at commercial or vacant addresses, and 4,000 were noncitizens. In our state, we prosecute individuals for voting twice, which occurs about 50 times a year. Of the 130,000 instances of potential voter fraud identified in Nevada's 2020 election, there have been no prosecutions yet. It's crucial to enforce voter integrity laws. While building a fraud case can take time, an honest investigation should lead to charges. Losing the principle of one person, one vote risks authoritarianism.

Speaker 0 states that California is failing to abide by the NVRA and make its voter rolls clean, giving the example of 1,000,000 voters in Los Angeles County alone. Speaker 0 claims the county of Los Angeles agreed in a consent decree. Speaker 1 interjects, saying the county agreed to adopt additional practices on maintaining voter rolls and that all lawsuits were unsuccessful. Speaker 0 responds that this is untrue and that they have won several lawsuits against California at the United States Supreme Court.

The Civil Rights Division of the DOJ provided an update on its election integrity litigation. The department announced that it sued four additional jurisdictions for not complying with federal election laws and facilitating the sharing of voter data: Georgia, the District of Columbia, Illinois, and Wisconsin. In addition, three more jurisdictions provided voluntary compliance, bringing the total to ten states that are voluntarily sharing their voter data so that the DOJ can help ensure that only American citizens vote, and that each person votes only once in federal elections per election cycle. The DOJ stated that, despite the holiday season, it will continue its work to obtain compliance from every jurisdiction or pursue lawsuits where necessary. The announcement framed the effort as part of making federal elections great again and ensuring that every citizen has confidence in them.