TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker expresses frustration over Congress not allowing a recorded vote on a bill, accusing them of a cover-up to protect members politically. He emphasizes the importance of representatives doing their jobs and voting in person. Despite opposition, he insists on a recorded vote to hold members accountable. The speaker criticizes the lack of action by Congress and asserts the need for transparency in decision-making. He confronts Pelosi and McCarthy for their role in preventing a recorded vote. Ultimately, he believes forcing everyone to return for a vote is necessary to uphold democracy.

The resolution was adopted with 219 yays and 208 nays. The motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

The votes are in: 111 in favor and 364 against. The motion has been rejected. Unlock.

Speaker 1 updates that the aid for Ukraine is being voted on in the House of Representatives and will likely pass. The next step is the Senate vote, expected early next week. They express support and admiration for Ukraine's bravery. The administration is preparing weapons and equipment to send quickly. Speaker 0 thanks Speaker 1 for the support and inspiration. They end with well wishes. "Slava, Ukraine."

Speaker 1 requests that House Bill 1312 be read at length, as well as every subsequent bill. Speaker 0 acknowledges the request for the bill to be read at length.

The "Defund the Taliban" bill passed unanimously in the House. The speaker thanks supporters for their help during the year-long journey. The bill will now go to the Senate, where Senators Hagerty, Blackburn, Sheehy, and Tuberville are expected to support it. The speaker encourages people to address their concerns to the Senate to get the bill passed. The bill aims to stop the estimated $40,000,000 a week, or over $5,000,000,000 total, of U.S. tax dollars that have allegedly gone to the Taliban.

The resolution was adopted with 88 votes in favor and 4 votes against. The motion to reconsider was laid on the table without any objections.

House Bill thirteen twelve is under consideration. An "aye" vote signifies approval, while a "no" vote signifies opposition. The vote is conducted. The "aye" votes prevail. House Bill thirteen twelve is passed.

The transcript shows a parliamentary division. The Speaker states: “The eyes to the right, 111. The nose to the left, 364. The eyes to the right were 111, the nose to the left, 364. So the noes have it. The noes have it.” Following this, the question is: “that the bill be now read a second time as many as are of that opinion say aye. Aye. Of the contrary, no. No.”

The division result is 79 in favor, 56 against. The bill has been agreed to. The minister for communications is called to move for the third reading. The leader of the house is asked to proceed immediately. The motion for the bill to be read a third time is made. The question is put to a vote. Those in favor say aye; those against say no. The ayes have it. The Clerk is called to announce the third reading of the bill to amend communications law and related purposes.

Speaker 1 describes four months of arduous negotiations to produce a bipartisan bill, noting there were many times negotiations derailed and that he stayed on the phone at midnight to keep them moving. He argues the bill is crucial and a turning point for America, outlining the stakes across several flashpoints. First, he asserts that if the U.S. does not aid Ukraine, Putin will walk over Ukraine, the war could be lost, and the U.S. could find itself fighting in Eastern Europe as a NATO ally in a few years, a scenario Americans would not like. Second, he says if the U.S. does not help Israel defend itself against Hamas, the perpetual war will continue. Third, he claims humanitarian aid to starving Palestinians in Gaza is essential to prevent hundreds of thousands from starving. Fourth, he mentions the border crisis, referencing statements from Speaker Johnson that it is chaos, and asserts legislative action is needed. Speaker 1 credits Mitch McConnell for his contributions, but contrasts him with others, including Speaker Johnson, who he says are "scared to death of Donald Trump." He contends Trump has called for chaos and suggested that if he becomes president, Ukraine could be gone, the border could worsen, and war in the Middle East could escalate. He argues Trump’s stance is political rather than policy-driven and asserts that the majority of Republican senators recognize the bill as the right thing to do. He emphasizes the bill as a compromise—describing it as something he does not like in full, nor does McConnell, but necessary to accomplish important outcomes in the Senate. He recalls bipartisan legislation from two years prior as proof such collaboration is possible. The core question he poses is whether senators will drown out the political noise from Trump and his allies and do the right thing for America. Speaker 1 frames the bill as a turning point in American policy and history, asking whether history will look back and see that they rose to the occasion. He asserts that the majority of Republican senators understand the bill’s necessity, despite political headwinds, and he casts passage as essential to addressing Ukraine, Israel, Gaza humanitarian needs, and border stability. Speaker 1 ends by reiterating that history is watching their decisions at this moment.

The Senate is evenly divided with 50 votes for and 50 against. The Vice President casts the deciding vote, resulting in the passage of the amended bill. Additionally, there is a commitment to eliminate taxes on tips for those who earn them.

Speaker 0 notes the enormous difficulty of doing that, saying, “In fact, the big majority of have been able to.” Speaker 1 reminds listeners that floor time in the Senate is finite, and outlines a lengthy slate of items that could be teed up for action on the Senate floor: a housing bill awaiting action, a market structure bill, possibly permitting reform, a farm bill, and a highway bill, with Russia sanctions and a whole host of other items also on the potential agenda. He says the conference will have a conversation about that, and he has committed to discussing the idea and determining whether the conference’s views on it indicate how they want to proceed. He adds that they will vote on the SAVE Act, but notes that triggering a talking filibuster has ramifications and implications everyone needs to be aware of. Speaker 1 explains that those discussions are necessary because the decision to pursue a talking filibuster would tie the floor up for an indefinite amount of time, with not only unlimited debate but also unlimited amendments. He emphasizes that the floor time is precious and that the decision will affect how much can be done on a wide range of important legislation. Speaker 0 interjects that the Senate Majority Leader and Speaker of the House were speaking at the same time, which is why the dialogue is jumping back and forth. He concludes with a brief update that the bill has passed, funding DHA.

The amendment was put to a vote. Those in favor signified by saying aye; those opposed say no. The chair ruled the noes have it, and the amendment is not agreed to. A roll call was requested. The roll call results were: - Missus Fishbach: No - Mister Norman: Yes - Mister Roy: No - Missus Houchin: No - Mister Langworthy: No - Mister Scott: No - Mister Griffith: No - Mister Jack: No - Mister McGovern: Aye - Miss Gantlin: Aye - Mister Nugoose: Aye - Miss Ledger Fernandez: Aye - Madam chair: No The clerk reported the total as 5 yeas and 7 nays. The amendment remains not agreed to. The chair indicated that what’s appropriate will be released when it is time for the president to release it.

The speaker mentioned the goal of getting Republicans elected. However, the gentleman was not recognized and members were reminded not to engage in personal attacks against each other.

The vote for Mr. Radcliffe's nomination from the intelligence committee was 14 to 3, indicating strong bipartisan support. We’ve wasted a day that could have been used to act on this nomination, which is crucial for national security. The question is whether we want to vote on these nominations now or delay until later in the week. This should be straightforward; both parties agree on his qualifications. While there may be some opposition, the consensus is clear that we need to fill this important position quickly. Stalling serves no purpose, and we will proceed with the votes as necessary.

Speaker 1 emphasizes the importance of a bipartisan bill that has been negotiated for four months. They highlight the significance of aiding Ukraine to prevent Putin from taking over, supporting Israel against Hamas, providing humanitarian aid to Palestinians in Gaza, and addressing the chaos at the border. Speaker 1 praises Mitch McConnell for his efforts but criticizes Republicans, including Speaker Johnson, for being afraid of Donald Trump. They argue that many Republican senators know the bill is necessary but are hesitant due to political reasons. Speaker 1 urges senators to prioritize the well-being of America over political noise and emphasizes that history is watching their actions.

The yeas are 56, the nays are 44. Three fifths of the senators duly chosen and sworn not having voted in the affirmative, the motion is not agreed to.

The speaker spoke with a Senator who said he was okay, despite the speaker's concerns. The Senator stated he has a blood pressure condition and has seen a doctor about it. The speaker conducted a cursory examination and concluded the Senator was okay.

The senate was equally divided on a bill, with 50 votes in favor and 50 against. The vice president voted in the affirmative, and the bill as amended was passed. A speaker stated that upon taking office, they would eliminate taxes on tips for people making tips, specifically service and hospitality workers.

The governor signed the driver's license for all bill into law, causing a packed room at the Saint Paul armory to erupt in cheers.

parliamentarian ruled that sections of it were outside of the process that they're using to get this through. Do you think that senators should respect the decisions of the parliamentarian? And what have you personally done in the last forty eight hours to try and get Republican senators who are against the bill to a yes? 'If it's not approved, your taxes will go up by 68%. Think of that. 68, a record, the highest in the history.' 'The Democrats won't approve it only because, politically, it's so good for the Republicans.' 'They're not approving border security.' 'We've done a great job at the border, but we have to add some wall.' 'We have no money for that.' 'But if the Democrats it'll be interesting to see if we get any Democrat votes. We should.' 'If I were a Democrat, I would vote for this bill all day long because it's tax cuts and so many other things that are common sense.'

Speaker 0 asks what you are here to talk about, says “Thank you very much,” and asks, “Any votes in the prime minister?”

Speaker 0 requests unanimous consent. Speaker 1 acknowledges the official opposition leader. Confusion arises regarding the request.

The vote resulted in 54 yeas and 46 nays, confirming the nomination. Additionally, the motion to reconsider is now laid upon the table, and the president will be promptly informed of the Senate's decision.