reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Welcome to the Megyn Kelly show. Megyn reflects on her vacation in Montana and expresses excitement to return to the show. She discusses the evolving understanding of COVID-19, emphasizing that vaccinated individuals can still catch and spread the virus, and that lockdowns and school closures have been unnecessary. She notes that hospitalizations and deaths are the relevant metrics, not case numbers, and argues that society must learn to live with COVID. Megyn critiques media figures like Nicole Wallace and President Biden for their shifting narratives on COVID, highlighting that the pandemic's realities are becoming clearer even to those who previously adhered to strict measures. She mentions Dr. Fauci's recent acknowledgment that the focus should shift from case numbers to hospitalizations and the need for balance in public health policies. Dr. Jay Bhattacharya joins the discussion, sharing insights from the Great Barrington Declaration, which advocated for focused protection of vulnerable populations rather than broad lockdowns. He discusses the early miscalculations regarding COVID's spread and the need for a more rational approach to managing the virus. The conversation shifts to the Omicron variant, which appears to be milder than previous strains. Bhattacharya emphasizes that while vaccination is important for vulnerable groups, the current vaccine mandates are unjustified, especially given the mild nature of Omicron. He argues that the focus should be on protecting those at risk rather than imposing strict mandates on the general population. Megyn and Bhattacharya discuss the politicization of public health and the need for trust in health institutions. They also address the ongoing debate around mask mandates, testing, and the implications of vaccine boosters for young people, particularly regarding potential side effects. The show then transitions to a discussion about the controversy surrounding transgender swimmer Leah Thomas, with guests Cynthia Millen and Nancy Hogshead-Makar. They express concerns about fairness in women's sports, arguing that allowing transgender women to compete against biological women undermines the integrity of female athletics. Millen recounts her resignation from USA Swimming in protest of the current policies, while Hogshead-Makar highlights the need for separate categories to ensure fair competition. The conversation concludes with a focus on the implications of these policies for young female athletes and the broader societal impact of prioritizing inclusion over fairness in sports. Megyn emphasizes the importance of protecting women's rights in athletics and the need for a balanced approach to inclusion that does not disadvantage biological women.

Chase Strangio’s appearance on Interesting Times with Ross Douthat centers on the shifting politics and law surrounding transgender rights in America, from civil rights victories to debates over medical care for minors and participation in sports. The conversation delves into two landmark Supreme Court cases: Bostock v. Clayton County, which extended protections against sex discrimination to include gay and transgender employees, and United States v. Skrmetti, which challenged Tennessee’s ban on gender-affirming care for minors. Strangio explains how the Bostock decision rested on a textualist interpretation of Title VII’s prohibition on sex discrimination, arguing that firing someone for being gay or transgender constitutes sex discrimination, regardless of congressional intent in 1964. The Skrmetti case, by contrast, was framed as an equal protection issue under the 14th Amendment, with Strangio arguing that bans on puberty blockers and hormone therapies for transgender youths amount to sex-based classifications, and thus require heightened scrutiny. The discussion acknowledges the human stakes: families uprooted for access to care, the emotional distress of youth, and the medical community’s evolving practices in pediatric gender clinics. The mentor-pupil dynamic of the interview reveals the tension between the desire to protect minors and respect parental autonomy, with Strangio stressing the importance of leaving room for conversation, research, and patient-centered decision-making in medicine, while defending constitutional guarantees against government intrusion into family decisions. The sports debate becomes a focal point for how to balance inclusion with fairness; Strangio argues against broad categorical exclusions while proposing a nuanced approach that considers age, hormonal exposure, and league governance. Throughout, Douthat probes how legal interpretations, cultural attitudes, and political climate influence which rights are advanceable and which protections become contested, especially as the public conversation moves from adult autonomy to childhood decision-making. The dialogue foregrounds a overarching question: how can liberal democracy reconcile strong protections for transgender people with ongoing concerns about youth welfare, sports equity, and scientific uncertainty? topics otherTopics booksMentioned

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing Tucker Carlson's return with a video that garnered millions of views, contrasting it with Fox News's declining ratings after his departure. She highlights the anger among viewers and questions Fox's motives for firing Carlson, suggesting they aim to ruin his reputation. Kelly references a New York Times report revealing Carlson's off-camera comments about his audience and a senior executive, implying a smear campaign against him. Melissa Francis joins the discussion, sharing her own experience of being abruptly fired from Fox News amid an arbitration over pay. They analyze the New York Times article, which claims Carlson made offensive remarks in private messages, and question the timing and motives behind the leak. Francis argues that if Fox were genuinely concerned about such behavior, many others in the network would also face consequences. The conversation shifts to the ratings drop at Fox News, with Kelly providing statistics showing a significant decline in viewership since Carlson's exit. They speculate on Fox's strategy to separate Carlson from his audience to mitigate the fallout from his departure. Kelly introduces Ali Beth Stuckey to discuss Leah Thomas, a transgender athlete, and the implications of gender identity in sports. Stuckey critiques the notion that feminism is being used to justify trans inclusion in women's spaces, asserting that biological definitions of womanhood are being undermined. They express frustration over the term "transphobic" and emphasize the importance of standing firm in their beliefs about gender. The discussion continues with a focus on the dangers of allowing biological males into women's spaces, citing incidents where women and girls have been put at risk. They highlight the need for women to reclaim their rights and protect vulnerable populations from aggressive ideologies. Kelly and Stuckey also touch on the case of Zoe Zephyr, a transgender lawmaker in Montana, who faced censure for inflammatory remarks regarding legislation on minors' access to gender-affirming care. They criticize Zephyr's rhetoric and the broader implications of allowing minors to undergo irreversible medical procedures. Finally, Kelly discusses the firing of Don Lemon from CNN, referencing a Variety article detailing his history of alleged misogyny and inappropriate behavior. Tatiana Siegel, the journalist behind the piece, explains the context of Lemon's past actions and the challenges he may face in finding future employment in the industry. The conversation concludes with a critique of workplace relationships and the consequences of poor decisions by executives.

Megyn Kelly opens the show with breaking news about OJ Simpson's death at 76 due to cancer. His family announced his passing, highlighting his battle with prostate cancer. OJ Simpson, once a beloved sports figure and actor, became infamous for the 1994 murder trial of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman. The trial captivated the nation, revealing the brutality of the murders and sparking discussions about race and justice in America. OJ was acquitted in 1995, a verdict that divided the country and highlighted deep-seated racial tensions. He was later found liable for wrongful death in a civil suit and faced legal troubles, including a conviction for armed robbery in 2008, serving nine years before his release in 2017. Kelly transitions to a legal discussion with lawyers Viva Frei and Phil Holloway, who reflect on OJ's legacy and the implications of his trial. They discuss how the trial's outcome was influenced by public perception and the prosecution's mistakes, particularly regarding the handling of evidence. The conversation shifts to current legal matters, including Donald Trump's upcoming criminal trial related to hush money payments. The hosts express concerns about the fairness of the trial in Manhattan, suggesting that political bias may affect the proceedings. The discussion continues with the implications of Trump's legal challenges on the upcoming election, emphasizing how a conviction could impact his support among Republicans and Independents. They analyze the political landscape, noting that Trump's legal troubles could be seen as election interference. The conversation then shifts to cultural issues, particularly the impact of transgender policies on women's spaces and sports. Kelly and her guests discuss incidents involving male athletes competing in women's sports and the implications for female athletes. They express concerns about the safety and fairness of allowing transgender women to compete against biological women, citing specific examples of injuries and discomfort experienced by female athletes. The hosts also address the broader societal implications of gender ideology, emphasizing the need to protect women's rights and spaces. They critique the normalization of men in women's locker rooms and the potential dangers posed by such policies. The show concludes with a discussion on mental health, particularly the over-prescription of SSRIs to young people. The guests share personal experiences and concerns about the medicalization of emotions, advocating for a more holistic approach to mental health that addresses root causes rather than relying solely on medication. They emphasize the importance of understanding and managing emotions without resorting to quick fixes. Overall, the episode covers a range of topics, from legal issues surrounding high-profile cases to cultural debates about gender and mental health, highlighting the complexities and challenges facing society today.

Riley Gaines, a former collegiate swimmer, gained prominence after competing against Leah Thomas, a transgender athlete, in the NCAA finals. Despite placing fifth, Gaines faced backlash for speaking out against the unfairness of allowing transgender women to compete in women's sports. In her new book, "Swimming Against the Current: Fighting for Common Sense in a World That's Lost Its Mind," she shares her experiences and advocates for fairness in athletics. Gaines recounts a pivotal moment when she was assaulted during a protest, which solidified her commitment to fighting for women's rights in sports. She emphasizes that there are two sexes and that both deserve equal opportunities and safety. Gaines highlights the emotional toll on female athletes who feel their rights and privacy are being violated, particularly in locker rooms. She discusses recent legal cases, including a West Virginia court ruling against a young girl competing against a transgender student, illustrating the broader implications of these policies. Gaines argues that the current narrative dismisses the concerns of female athletes, who are often silenced. She calls for a return to fairness and safety in sports, urging society to recognize the inherent advantages that biological males possess.

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing the start of Pride Month, expressing skepticism about the ongoing celebrations for a community that has already achieved significant rights. She references Bruce Bawer’s article questioning the need for continued celebration of LGBTQ identities, stating that being gay is an attribute, not an accomplishment. Kelly shares her evolving views on preferred pronouns, recounting her past support for them and how her perspective has shifted due to various societal changes, particularly regarding transgender issues. She highlights the impact of transgender athletes in women's sports, citing cases where biological males have outperformed female competitors, leading to legal battles and feelings of unfairness among female athletes. Kelly expresses concern over schools affirming children's gender identities without parental consent and the medical interventions being promoted for minors, emphasizing the potential long-term harm these decisions could cause. Kelly recounts the case of Leah Thomas, a transgender swimmer who dominated female competitions, and the backlash faced by female athletes who spoke out against this. She emphasizes the need to protect women's spaces and rights, arguing that the current discourse around gender identity often disregards biological realities, which she believes leads to harm for women and girls. In her conclusion, Kelly resolves to stop using preferred pronouns, motivated by a desire to uphold truth and reality in discussions about gender. She expresses empathy for individuals with gender dysphoria but insists that children should not be subjected to medical interventions without thorough consideration of the consequences. The conversation shifts to a discussion with Rich Lowry and Jim Garrity from National Review, where they reflect on the cultural implications of recent events, including corporate responses to LGBTQ issues and the backlash against brands like Bud Light. They discuss the political landscape, particularly regarding the upcoming presidential elections, and the challenges facing both parties, including Biden's age and the potential for a lack of debates among GOP candidates. The segment concludes with a focus on CNN's internal struggles under Chris Licht's leadership, highlighting the network's identity crisis and the challenges of transitioning back to a news-focused brand after years of opinion-driven content. The hosts express skepticism about CNN's future and the effectiveness of Licht's strategies.

Megyn Kelly and her guest Kristen Wagner dissect the day’s Supreme Court arguments over whether states may bar transgender athletes from girls’ sports, weighing Equal Protection and Title IX against the backdrop of dozens of state bans and a broader national debate about biology, fairness, and female athletic opportunity. The hosts frame the case as a test of whether the Court will anchor policy in biological reality or, as they argue, allow identity-based classifications to erode longstanding protections for women and girls. Wagner offers practical insights from years of litigation, the athletes’ experiences, and the tension between compassion and truth, highlighting Adelaide Cross and Becky Pepper Jackson as emblematic victims of shifting standards. The discussion touches on the potential implications for locker rooms, scholarship access, and the integrity of women’s sports, with a sense of urgency about preserving Title IX guarantees while acknowledging scientific complexities. The conversation shifts to how the media and public discourse shape these legal battles, critiquing coverage that they say obscures the voices of the young female athletes and overemphasizes ideological rhetoric. They criticize attempts to avoid defining sex in legal terms, arguing that the law relies on stable biological distinctions to protect fairness. The exchange also probes how the judiciary’s concept of decorum can clash with live political controversy, and how Supreme Court dynamics—such as the posture of several justices and the role of textualism—could influence a landmark ruling that affects more than one state. Throughout, the speakers insist that the core issue is protecting women’s and girls’ opportunities in sport, not singling out or demonizing transgender individuals, and they warn about the long-term consequences of eroding biological categories in law. The episode then pivots to a postscript on Scott Adams’s death, with Kelly reflecting on his influence, the cost of principled dissent, and how public figures are remembered in media narratives. Andrew Klavan joins to discuss the broader cultural clashes, the fragility of civility, and the power of media to shape political identities. The hosts juxtapose Adams’s legacy with contemporary debates about free expression, censorship, and how the right navigates a rapidly evolving information landscape. Interwoven are critiques of how headlines frame controversial figures, the ethics of journalism, and a call to stay committed to truth in a climate of partisan polarization. The episode closes with tribute to Adams and a forward-looking note about continuing to defend foundational values in public life.

Listeners are confronted with a heated debate sparked by a World's Strongest Woman competition where Jamie Booker, a transgender woman, defeated competitors described as biologically female. The clip montage presents a spectrum of reactions: supporters insisting the athlete trained hard and deserves recognition, critics arguing that biological males hold unfair physical advantages, and commentators invoking fairness, safety of women’s competitions, and the integrity of sport. Personal stories surface, such as competitors who felt robbed of opportunities and funding, and experts draw analogies to steroids and gender transition timing. Throughout, the discourse oscillates between calls for inclusion and demands for a separate category or stricter eligibility standards. While some voices emphasize respect for individual identity, others insist that performance advantages should not determine who can compete in female divisions. The piece highlights the broader tension between inclusivity and fairness in athletic competition.

Riley Gaines discusses her unexpected journey as an advocate for women's sports, particularly in response to the inclusion of transgender women in female competitions. She shares her background as a dedicated swimmer from a family of athletes and recounts her experiences during college, including the impact of COVID-19 on her training and competitions. Gaines describes the moment she learned about Leah Thomas, a transgender woman who competed on the women's swimming team after previously swimming on the men's team. She expresses her shock and concern over the NCAA's decision to allow Thomas to compete, emphasizing the unfairness of the situation and the lack of support for female athletes. Throughout the conversation, Gaines highlights the physical advantages that biological males have over females in sports and the implications for women's rights and safety. She recounts her experiences at competitions where she felt uncomfortable due to the presence of transgender athletes and the reactions from her peers and coaches. Gaines also discusses the broader societal implications of the current discourse around gender identity, including the challenges faced by women in advocating for their rights. She emphasizes the importance of standing up for women's sports and the need for clarity in defining terms related to gender. The conversation touches on the cultural and political climate surrounding these issues, with Gaines expressing frustration over the silencing of dissenting voices and the manipulation of language to promote certain ideologies. She encourages individuals to find their voices and advocate for fairness in sports and society. Gaines concludes by discussing her upcoming book, "Swimming Against the Current," which details her experiences and perspectives on the ongoing debates surrounding gender and sports. She expresses gratitude for the opportunity to share her story and reach a wider audience.

Megyn Kelly welcomes former NFL star Marcellus Wiley to discuss various topics, including the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and its implications for the economy. Kelly highlights the ongoing debate about the bank's bailout, with Steve Forbes suggesting that SVB's management made significant mistakes, particularly in risk management and asset-liability mismatches. Forbes criticizes the bank's focus on "woke initiatives" over sound banking practices, leading to its downfall. Forbes emphasizes that the Federal Reserve's monetary policies contributed to the bank's issues, as SVB's deposits surged during a period of low interest rates, prompting risky long-term investments. He argues that while the bailout may have prevented broader economic fallout, it raises questions about accountability for bank management and the role of the FDIC in facilitating a sale of the bank's assets. The conversation shifts to the implications of the FDIC's actions and the potential for consumer confidence in smaller banks to be restored through guarantees. Kelly and Forbes discuss the need for a thorough investigation into the bank's collapse, including the actions of its executives and auditors. The discussion then transitions to the topic of transgender athletes in sports, particularly in women's competitions. Wiley asserts that biological differences between men and women necessitate separate categories in sports. He supports a Vermont Christian school's decision to withdraw from a tournament due to a transgender player on the opposing team, arguing that it is unfair for biological girls to compete against biological boys. Wiley also addresses the controversy surrounding transgender athletes in powerlifting, citing examples of biological men competing in women's events and dominating. He stresses the importance of maintaining fairness in sports and suggests that transgender athletes should compete in their own category. Lastly, Kelly and Wiley touch on Colin Kaepernick's recent comments about his adoptive parents and the complexities of identity and race. Wiley argues that Kaepernick conflates racism with parental concern over appearance, emphasizing the importance of understanding the context of such discussions. The conversation concludes with a call for more open dialogue about these issues.