reSee.it - Related Video Feed

White college-indoctrinated women will ruin America because they are brainwashed. The worldview uploaded to young women daily is hyper-narcissistic and hyper-selfish, with the belief that "I am the only one that matters." This indoctrination makes them miserable. The speaker is unsure how to solve this problem and is open to suggestions.

On elite campuses, there is a significant influence from certain groups that promote controversial ideas. A Berkeley professor argued that it is crucial to view Hamas and Hezbollah as progressive social movements on the left. It is worth noting that this professor, Judith Butler, is a lesbian. The speaker points out the hypocrisy of these movements, as they condemn gendering someone as a human rights abuse but openly call for the murder of Jews. This ideology is deemed disgusting and unacceptable.

In this video, the speakers discuss the double standard and negative experiences associated with white people. They mention how it has become fashionable to make derogatory comments about white people, attributing their actions and behavior solely to their whiteness. The speakers also touch on the idea of asking permission to bring a white friend to a group of people of color and suggest that not having babies can cause a "white genocide." They criticize white people for their lack of understanding and mention historical acts of pillaging, eradicating, enslaving, and oppressing. The video concludes with a statement that claims it is impossible to be racist towards white people.

"Whites are psychopaths, and their behavior represents an underlying biologically transmitted proclivity with roots deep in their evolutionary history." "Rape culture in America is a legal, economic, and moral institution." "This goes beyond gaslighting, and it's rooted in psychological delusion." "So we're going to we have it written in the law, you can rape black women, but we've never been a racist country." "We won't allow Florida tax dollars to be spent teaching kids to hate our country or hate each other, only to hate black people." "I think whites are psychopathic." "There are many lies. The level of lying that white people do that has started since colonialism, we're just used to it." "What would you say for folks who may say that your work is considered to be reverse racism? I don't make room for that."

A speaker stated that some males will refuse to vote for a female president because they don't think females are smart enough. The speaker then said, hypothetically, that those men could be lined up and shot for not understanding the way the world works. The speaker immediately retracted the statement and asked for it to be removed from the recording to avoid repercussions from the dean.

Speaker says a rising tide of racial hatred against white people and a shift from 'not seeing color' to 'you must see color.' They claim a 'perverse ideology' teaches that 'everything, every societal ill, is the fault of white people' and that 'we're being taught' a double standard where negative experiences are attributed to whiteness. They present TikTok clips against whites: 'You have a token white and you're hanging out with your friend group of color, you need to ask permission,' 'don't have babies,' and 'white privilege.' They contend that 'on one side of the political aisle, people of color actually have greater power than white people,' citing Minneapolis contract, New York COVID treatment policy, Cornell banning whites from rock climbing, and BIPOC events. They insist 'You are not an oppressor, period' and challenge the idea that 'racism is prejudice plus power.' They warn of demographic shift and urge 'Do better.'

Universities are facing issues with encampments due to Marxist control. Those in charge despise America, view ancestors as colonizers, and hate the country's history and achievements. They also dislike Christianity and the Judeo-Christian West. Interestingly, the most progressive students are the ones complaining the most.

Various professors from different universities have made controversial statements about white people, including advocating for their death or genocide. Some professors claim that white people are inherently racist or inhuman. Others argue that white privilege exists and that reverse racism is not real. These statements have sparked debates and discussions about race and discrimination. Additionally, there have been instances of professors promoting violence against white people or calling for them to give their money to black people. These controversial remarks have caused outrage and concern among the public.

White people are described as being superior at violence, insecurity, fear, ignorance, blame, ego-driven actions, oppression, gaslighting, lack of empathy, intellectualizing oppression, taking what's not theirs, copying ideas, gentrification, appropriating cultures, destroying humanity, upholding white supremacy, and lying, stealing, cheating, manipulating, and withholding information. It is also mentioned that white DNA comes from black females.

The speaker mentions various historical events and issues, attributing them to white people. These include the atomic bomb, hoaching, trophy hunting, wars in the Middle East and Africa, the use of AK 47s, the near extinction of Aborigines and Indians, the African slave trade, and the destabilization of the Middle East. The speaker expresses their belief that these actions are evil.

Speaker 0 argues that white Americans will soon be a minority, and that this is great. Speaker 1 counters that whites will not be the majority and describes it as an exciting transformation and evolution, a progress of the country. Speaker 2 states that whites will be a minority very soon and says, “I'm okay with that.” Speaker 1 asks, if the white working class is in trouble, whether new Americans should be brought in. Speaker 3 predicts America will look very different in a hundred years, with racial labels becoming less distinct (“You're black, you're white, you're Hispanic, you're Puerto Rican, whatever”), and says that complexity will be good in the end. Speaker 2 contends that white Americans feel they are losing their country and ownership, and that they are, in the end, not the future. Speaker 3 asserts that for the first time in American history, the number of white people went down; “White population is declining for the first time in history in America.” Speaker 3 cautions that white people will not be the majority in the country anymore, noting it will be the first generation with whites as a minority. Speaker 1 proclaims, “Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.” Speaker 3 proclaims that to abolish whiteness is to abolish white people. Speaker 1 contends that white people are committed to being villains in the aggregate. Speaker 3 declares, “We gotta take these motherfuckers out.” Speaker 2 asks whether it was the duty of every good revolutionary to kill all newborn white babies. Speaker 3 responds, “We have to kill white people,” and, when pressed, mirrors that sentiment with, “When we say we wanna kill whites, we don't really mean we wanna kill whites. We do. We have to exterminate white people off of the face of the planet to solve this problem.” Speaker 1 comments, “When do we start killing white people?” and then, “start killing all white folks, but maybe?” Speaker 3 reiterates the extermination goal, stating, “We have to exterminate white people off of the face of the planet to solve this problem.” Speaker 5 adds, “An unrelenting stream of immigration. Nonstop. Nonstop. Folks like me who were Caucasian of European descent will be in an absolute minority in The United States Of America. Absolute minority.” He concludes that this shift is not a bad thing and calls it a source of strength.

White, college-indoctrinated women will ruin America because they are brainwashed. The worldview being uploaded to young women is hyper-narcissistic and hyper-selfish, with the belief that "I am the only one that matters" and rejecting guidance on how to act. This indoctrination makes them miserable. The speaker is unsure how to solve this problem and is open to suggestions.

A college sophomore found a class titled "The Problem of Whiteness" and shared it on social media, questioning its content. The professor called the student a cyber bully and demanded expulsion, labeling them a terrorist in national news. The student faced backlash and negative attention, feeling unfairly targeted. This experience has been challenging amidst the professor's accusations.

The speaker states that nine months ago, they would have considered making "pro white content" insane, as white pride is associated with evil and hate. They believe white people are uniquely taught to hate themselves and are blamed for all atrocities. The speaker claims white people are the only ones taught to be color blind and are constantly subjected to diversity initiatives. They assert that white people are a global minority being replaced in their own countries, and the speaker has "had enough."

A group of white women discuss their realization of their own racism and the need to address it. They acknowledge that their privilege has led to the erasure of others' experiences and lives. One woman shares how she discovered her own racist thoughts, which she attributes to her father's influence. The speaker questions the claim that white women are the most dangerous people in the world, suggesting that they are more silly than dangerous. Another person speculates that these women are using discussions on race as a way to enhance their resumes for leadership positions in corporate America. They argue that the normalization of anti-white bigotry is an attempt to undermine the Christian foundation of the country.

Various professors from different universities have made controversial statements about white people, including advocating for their deaths, promoting white genocide, and calling them racist. Some professors have equated white privilege with math and blamed white supremacy for events like the Vegas shooting. There have been courses on white racism and slides in classrooms that perpetuate negative stereotypes about white people. These statements and actions all share the common theme of denying the existence of reverse racism. The video concludes by stating that white people are seen as dangerous and a plague to the planet.

This video highlights various instances where professors and educators express controversial views about white people. It includes statements advocating for the killing of white people, promoting white guilt, and demonizing white children. The video also mentions cases where schools are penalized for having a high white student population and incidents of racial tension in classrooms. It concludes with a report on a teacher who took students to Antifa protests without permission. Additionally, it mentions a student walkout in New York due to the perceived overrepresentation of white students.

Speaker 0 states it is not okay to be white because white people have "done too much bad" and should "try not to be white." Speaker 1 questions if these statements constitute hate speech, imagining the reaction if someone expressed similar sentiments toward their skin color. Speaker 1 believes only white people are held accountable for their words and actions, and that some people are striving for supremacy rather than equality. Speaker 1 wonders if the person who made the initial statements is gainfully employed and if it would be wrong to find out where they work and inform their employer.

Professors from various universities make controversial statements about white people, including advocating for their mass suicide, calling for their deaths, and labeling them as racist. Some professors equate beliefs like hard work and math with white ideology and privilege. One professor even suggests that white people are a plague to the planet. These statements reflect a trend of anti-white sentiments and calls for violence in academic settings.

Speaker 0 asserts that Joshua Zimmerman is “the Jew” who is a traitor and an enabler to murder, claiming that Jews engineered the destruction of South Africa and the rise of the African National Congress led by the convicted terrorist Nelson Mandela, whom Speaker 0 says “was in jail for acts of terrorism.” They state Mandela “was not an angel or humanitarian.” The speaker then condemns Julius Malema, alleging he is inciting crimes, and warns of “Genocidal Jews” across Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, Syria, and Iran. Speaker 1 introduces Joshua Zimmerman as the person present in Ward 72 at Glen Hazel, saying they are there with fellow fighters to “conscientize the minds of those in the suburbs that the EFF is an all inclusive party regardless of race, class, or status,” and that “Slowly but surely, we are going to start winning more in the suburbs.” Speaker 2 leads chants: “Long live the commander in chief. Long live. Long live. Long live the commander in chief, Julius Malema. Long live. Long live. Viva EFF. Viva. Viva. Aman Clark. Away to.” Speaker 3 describes a crowd of “just under 100,000” chanting “kill the boar.” They identify the Boers as the remnant white South Africans who built South Africa, and say Julius Malema is leading the genocidal chant as head of the South African Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF). They claim the Boer community was betrayed by liberal whites decades ago. They describe South Africa as once prosperous, now suffering under majority black rule, with unreliable electricity and a collapsed agricultural sector, labeling it an economic basket case of savagery typical of failed African states. They claim white people face daily violence and live in a state of siege, particularly those who did not leave after Mandela and the ANC took power. Speaker 3 provides context on the EFF as a South African far-left pan-Africanist and Marxist party founded by Julius Malema and allies in 2013, noting Malema serves as president and that the party is the third largest in both houses of Parliament and growing. They state the party “hasn’t yet started the mass killings of whites, but it will if Malema is to be believed.” They reference an October 2022 speech in which Malema told branch members they should “never be scared to kill.” They cite a 2018 rally where Malema urged supporters to “go after the white man” and proclaimed, “we are cutting the throat of whiteness.” They mention a 2016 rally where Malema said, “we are not calling for the slaughter of white people, at least for now.” Speaker 3 notes that after Robert Mugabe’s death, Malema tweeted quotes hostile toward white people, including “the only white man you can trust is a dead white man,” and asserts that Malema has given warnings of white genocide. They claim that white people who acquiesce to replacement, mass immigration, or intercultural guilt narratives will face death, insisting: “Death follows. Be warned if your current white majority nation has adopted multiculturalism, diversity, and inclusion policies. It won’t end well.” The speakers claim the media hides the truth, leaving whites “supine and docile as they’re killed,” and reiterate Melena’s call: “Kill the whites.” They conclude with a call for whites to be racialists, meaning to defend their own kind.

Targeting a white mayor is effective because it causes significant emotional pain within that community. We are directly confronting the issue of whiteness. Another politician, from the Black First Land First party, incited violence at a rally, urging the crowd to kill white people, their children, and pets. This demonstrates a political leader openly calling for the genocide of white people.

A speaker stated that some males will refuse to vote for a female president because they don't think females are smart enough. The speaker then said, hypothetically, that those men could be lined up and shot for not understanding the way the world works. The speaker immediately retracted the statement and asked for it to be removed from the recording to avoid repercussions from the dean.

Various professors and educators are mentioned in this video, with statements that range from controversial to extreme. Topics include discussions on white supremacy, white privilege, racism, and violence towards white people. The video highlights instances where professors have made inflammatory remarks or expressed extreme views towards white individuals. The overall tone of the video seems to suggest a negative portrayal of these professors and their statements.