reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In June 2021, we informed them about 25,000+ suspected counterfeit ballots. Despite having over a year to address the issue, they failed to prevent it from happening again in 2022. The GOP spread propaganda to discredit our findings, but everyone knew about it beforehand.

Who determined the number 420,987,987 regarding failed signatures from the 2020 election? That figure comes from analyzing a quarter of the 1,900,000 mail-in ballots in Maricopa County. We had 150 trained workers review the envelopes based on the secretary of state's guidelines, examining each voter record individually. After analyzing 25% of the ballots, we extrapolated the data to arrive at the final number. It's important to note that this analysis only pertains to Maricopa County, which had over 2 million ballots in total, with around 1.9 million being mail-in votes. Yes, that is correct. Thank you. Proceed.

I discovered the source of how ineligible individuals are being added to voter rolls. It's an organization called the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC), led by David Becker, who has a controversial background. ERIC, funded by George Soros, contracts with states to access sensitive DMV records protected under privacy laws. Their membership agreement prevents disclosure of citizenship status, allowing them to add names to voter rolls without confirming eligibility. These names are then shared with the Center for Election Innovation and Research, which received significant funding from Zuckerbucks in 2020.

In June of 2021, we informed them about our suspicion of over 25,000 counterfeit ballots. The GOP and conservative operatives spread propaganda to undermine our credibility. Despite having ample time to prevent a repeat in 2022, they chose to do nothing. As a result, the same fraudulent activities occurred again in 2020.

Stanford University, University of Washington, Graphica, and the Atlantic Council were used as a front by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to manipulate social media during the 2020 election. The goal was to censor posts containing misinformation about mail-in ballots and other election-related topics. DHS lacked the legal authority to directly censor, so they set up the Election Infrastructure Partnership (EIP) to fill the gaps. These outside organizations received federal funding and worked closely with DHS to ban or throttle millions of posts and accounts. The entire operation was orchestrated to rig the election. The question now is whether there will be political accountability for these actions.

Linda McLaughlin and her colleagues present a data-focused argument alleging election fraud in Georgia, supported by multiple data analyses and demonstrations. - Linda McLaughlin introduces the data integrity group and states that data is numerical and non-partisan; she aims to remedy a lack of presented data in the discussion. - Dave Labou, a lead data scientist, explains that their analysis across precincts, counties, and the state identified over 40 data points of negative voting or vote switching across candidates totaling over 200,000 votes. Separately, machine learning algorithms used for anomaly detection in fraud detection flagged over 500 precincts with over 1,000,000 corresponding votes showing suspicious activity. He emphasizes that the process is scientific and not tied to political affiliations. - Labou uses a banking analogy to illustrate data integrity concerns: in hypothetical online banking, deposits or withdrawals being redirected or split would indicate fraudulent activity. He applies this concept to voting data, arguing that the voting system data aligns with the Secretary of State data used to certify results, yet exhibits patterns akin to transfers and reallocation not authorized by voters. - He states that the data are publicly available but require advanced programming to extract, parse, and join datasets. Their independent team has made all analysis, programs, and data public to allow replication and has produced videos to translate the analysis for broader understanding. - A key claim is that receiving over 90% in a precinct is a marker for fraud; in Fulton County, more than 150 precincts voted 90% or more for Biden, and in the statewide race (decided by less than 13,000 votes), these 150 Fulton precincts accounted for 152,000 Biden votes, described as a clear indicator of suspicious or fraudulent activity. - Labou and team present a series of visuals and explanations indicating explicit vote count switching, e.g., in Dodge County, where Trump’s votes appear to be subtracted while Biden’s counts increase in tandem with county updates, leading to a shift in totals that would not appear in state totals due to timing of updates. - They reference adjudication as the review of ballots flagged during scanning, noting that only ballots with a contest causing questions about how the computer reads them are adjudicated. - In DeKalb County, they assert it is statistically impossible for nine out of ten voters to vote for Biden in 94 precincts. - They describe a data flow in Fulton County: poll pad check-in, ballot image saved on the machine, SD cards transported to drop-off locations, escorted to a warehouse, run through Democracy Suite, exported to a Dominion server, and inserted into a SQL Server database before transmission to the Secretary of State and data aggregators. - A critical point is the vulnerability within the county update data-entry process: the square box detailing data-entry options in the election software allows updating vote batches, projecting batches, and generating new or temporary batches that can be injected directly into the tally; these options can be validated and published, enabling potential manipulation before server upload. - They pose questions about validation: whether two observers from both parties were present during SD card transmissions and drop-off transmissions, and whether there is a public log of exchanges at drop-off points. They challenge why elected officials have not pursued these questions about voting integrity. - Labou notes the process is machine-to-machine and, by design, should not decrement sums; any decrement requires a robust explanation, and their data suggest negative drops are inconsistent with normal sequential processes. Speaker 2 clarifies the data sources (CITL election night data and Edison/New York Times data) and asserts that the process from poll pads to secretary of state is machine-driven, with no human entry of totals, thereby removing human entry error as an explanation for observed negative changes. Speaker 4 adds emphasis on the validation and potential vulnerabilities in the software options used for election administration, underscoring the need for transparency and inquiry into the electoral process.

The speaker, a well-versed American patriot, has been aware of the sketchiness of the election systems for about 15 or 16 years. They have been working with a group of people who have uncovered some significant findings. In 2018, the Dallas election had irregularities, which prompted the Texas governor to form a panel to investigate. This panel hired a cybersecurity group to study the irregularities, specifically on Dominion Machines. Over the past two years, this group has reverse-engineered the process of stealing an election using this equipment. The speaker has been associated with them since August and has been actively supporting their efforts for the past 4 or 5 months.

The speaker discusses the establishment of an election integrity partnership (EIP) at the request of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). They mention an email from Graham Brookie of the Atlantic Council, confirming the setup of the partnership. The speaker also highlights the connection between the Atlantic Council and the National Endowment for Democracy, which is linked to the CIA. They point out the involvement of various organizations with ties to intelligence agencies, such as Stanford, UW, and Graphika. The speaker asserts that EIP was not a secret operation and was formed due to funding and legal limitations of CISA. They express personal satisfaction in discovering and sharing this information.

In June of 2021, we informed them about our suspicion of over 25,000 counterfeit ballots. However, the GOP and conservative operatives spread propaganda to undermine our credibility. Despite having ample time to prevent a repeat in 2022, they chose to do nothing. As a result, they enabled the same fraudulent activity to occur again in 2020.

These individuals, referred to as government cutouts, are not traditional academics but rather work closely with the government. The head of the Election Integrity Partnership (EIP) consortium, which includes Stanford University, UW, Graphica, and the Atlantic Council, openly admitted that EIP was created to fill the gaps in government capabilities. They were given a $3 million government grant to continue their censorship work for the 2022 midterms and 2024 election. All four entities in the EIP consortium receive funding from the federal government, and there is a revolving door between government and academia, with individuals moving between positions. This close relationship and funding from the government raise questions about their independence and objectivity.

The speaker questions whether purging the 2020 election database in February is a standard practice for all elections. The response is uncertain, but they promise to provide an answer. The speaker further asks why data from previous elections was still present on the databases. Again, there is no clear answer, but they assure the congressman that they will find out. The chairman mentions limited server space as a reason for making room for new election data. The speaker raises concerns about the credibility of the recorder, who had criticized Adrian Fontes, the person in charge of the 2020 election. The speaker clarifies that they had a bipartisan board overseeing the election to ensure fairness.

The source of ineligible voters being added to voter rolls is the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC), led by David Becker, who has a controversial background. ERIC, funded by George Soros, contracts with states to access protected DMV records to identify unregistered voters. However, their membership agreement prevents disclosure of citizenship status. This means they receive information without knowing who is a citizen, leading to ineligible names being added to voter rolls. These names are then shared with the Center for Election Innovation and Research, which received significant funding in 2020.

Some voter rolls in swing states contain illegal aliens because they register their address as the processing center. Software integrating property tax records with voting files reveals voters not living at legal residences. These new illegal voters are inundating voting roles, especially in swing states. In 2022, 40,000 phantom voters were exposed in Wisconsin and removed. These are people who were dead, moved out of state, don't exist, or don't live at a legal address. Challenging the address is the most efficient way to get an illegal voter off the voting roll. Certain NGO groups, such as Catholic Charities, are helping illegal immigrants and are funded by the Republican Party. These groups don't believe in borders and feel fine registering people to vote. Dark money, evading campaign rules, tends to go to NGOs and other groups. Evidence suggests a lot of dark money is coming from Chinese-controlled groups and is trying to affect the election in favor of Kamala Harris. The Trump campaign and the RNC need to dedicate time, money, and energy to analyzing the voting file in the seven major swing states to find voters using illegal addresses and have those addresses removed.

The speaker claims to have found the source of ineligible voters being added to voter rolls: an organization called the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC), led by David Becker. Becker was allegedly involved in a scandal as a US attorney and later worked for left-leaning organizations. The speaker alleges that with George Soros' money, Becker created ERIC, which contracts with states to access DMV records and other sensitive data. According to the speaker, ERIC's membership agreement prohibits disclosing citizenship status, yet they add names to voter rolls and circulate the information. The speaker further claims that this information is then given to the Center for Election Innovation and Research, which received funding from Mark Zuckerberg.

The speaker claims that illegal voter registration originates from the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC), founded by David Becker with George Soros' money. Becker allegedly had a past scandal involving the DOJ and the city of Boston. ERIC contracts with states to access DMV records, including sensitive data protected under the Driver's Privacy Protection Act, to identify unregistered individuals. The speaker alleges that ERIC's membership agreement prohibits disclosing citizenship status, leading to ineligible voters being added to voter rolls. This information is then circulated back to states and shared with the Center for Election Innovation and Research, which received funding from Mark Zuckerberg.

Michigan voter data is described as a state secret that Jocelyn Benson is safeguarding from the federal government, with the speaker claiming she told authorities they can’t have it and contrasting this with the idea of not wanting the federal government to have your social security number. The speaker then alleges that Benson “gives our voter data away” to a nonprofit, and that she has done so since taking office in 2019. The nonprofit identified is the electronic registration information center, ERIC. The claim is not that Benson gives data away to ERIC per se, but that she spends taxpayer money to provide data to ERIC. The speaker contends that on television Benson presents herself as the guardian of voters’ data, while, in reality, she uses public funds to share it. After ERIC receives the voter data, the speaker says it is sent to another nonprofit, the Center for Election Innovation and Research, or CEIR. The common thread alleged between ERIC and CEIR is a liberal operative named David Becker, who is said to have founded both organizations. The speaker asserts that in 2020, Becker’s CEIR gave Benson’s nonprofit $12,000,000 on the eve of the election. The claim continues that Benson used part of this funding to purchase Jocelyn Benson campaign ads. The speaker notes that this year, Lansing Republicans attempted to pull Michigan out of ERIC, as eight other states had already left, but the Republicans could not secure the votes to do so. The transcript suggests that Republicans facing Benson in the governor’s race should make this a campaign issue. It is presented as an easy story on the campaign trail: Jocelyn Benson’s friends obtain Michigan voter data and are paid to manage it, while Michigan taxpayers fund both sides of the lawsuit between Benson and the U.S. Department of Justice. The speaker connects the financial support from CEIR to Benson’s nonprofit with the broader political dynamic involving Benson and the DOJ.

We are committed to ensuring that only U.S. citizens participate in elections, and so far, there is no evidence of noncitizen voting. However, there have been instances where noncitizens voted; this year, 135 were identified as having voted, with another 400 registered but not yet voting. Just because something is illegal doesn't mean we shouldn't have measures in place to prevent it, similar to how we maintain TSA for air travel security.

42,000 people in Nevada voted more than once, 1,500 were deceased, 19,000 didn't live in Nevada or attend college, 8,000 voted from non-existent addresses, 15,000 were registered at vacant addresses, and 4,000 were noncitizens. The speaker questions if any prosecutions are happening in Nevada for the 130,000 instances of voter fraud identified in the 2020 election. No prosecutions have been reported yet.

42,000 people in Nevada voted more than once, 1,500 were deceased, 19,000 didn't live in Nevada or attend college, 8,000 voted from a non-existent address, 15,000 were registered to vacant addresses, and 4,000 were noncitizens. The speaker asks if there are any ongoing prosecutions for voter fraud in Nevada, given the 130,000 instances identified in the 2020 election. The response is that there are currently no prosecutions.

I've discovered how ineligible voters are being added to voter rolls. The source is the Electronic Registration Information Center, or ERIC, led by David Becker. Becker was involved in a scandal as a US attorney, worked for the far-left organization People for the American Way, and then Pew. With funding from George Soros, Becker created ERIC. ERIC contracts with states to access DMV records, which are normally protected. They use this data to identify unregistered individuals but the agreement prohibits states from telling ERIC who is or isn't a citizen. ERIC then puts these names on voter rolls and shares the data with the Center for Election Innovation and Research, the group that received Zuckerbucks in 2020.

We work for a company registering Hispanic voters. Visited a Georgia complex, found 14% noncitizens registered to vote. Georgia has 339,000 noncitizens, potentially 47,000 registered. Biden won by 12,000 votes. 2024 election at risk.

Fight Voter Fraud, active in 49 states, provides free data on double-registered voters, some of whom have voted in multiple states. Voter rolls are described as a mess, with examples cited, including one individual who allegedly voted three times in North Carolina and Florida. The speaker advocates for law enforcement to prosecute egregious cases of double voting. The organization claims to have perfected methods for identifying double-registered voters, double voters, and instances of deceased individuals voting. They also address the issue of "illegals" voting. The speaker highlights a situation in Georgia where election board members verified ballot reconciliation, a process of matching voters to ballots. Democrats are allegedly suing these individuals, and the speaker suggests this is because the reconciliation rule prevents them from cheating.

I've discovered how ineligible voters are added to voter rolls. The source is the Electronic Registration Information Center, or ERIC, led by David Becker. Becker was previously involved in a scandal as a US attorney. With funding from George Soros, Becker created ERIC, which contracts with states to access DMV records. This sensitive data, protected under the Driver's Privacy Protection Act, is used to identify unregistered individuals. ERIC's membership agreement forbids disclosing citizenship status, so they add these names to voter rolls and circulate the data. This information is then shared with the Center for Election Innovation and Research, another organization founded by Becker, which received funding from Zuckerburg in 2020.

Becker, a character of interest, received $1 million from George Soros and used it to establish ERIC, the electronic registration information center. The state of Wisconsin pays $100,000 to ERIC and David Becker. Kevin Kennedy, a disgraced former head of the Government Accountability Board, is still involved in Wisconsin and sits on the 5-man board of directors of the Center For Election Innovation and Research, alongside David Becker. Becker, a former lawyer at the Department of Justice, founded ERIC with seed money from Soros. Megan Wolf, the administrator of the state elections commission, is also a board member of ERIC. There is a connection between Becker, ERIC, and the CTCL grants.

The speaker claims Scott Pressler's father is a retired Navy captain working with Michelle Flournoy's husband. Flournoy is linked to WestExec, CNAS, Booz Allen Hamilton, and the Carlyle Group, which has a stake in Dominion Voting Systems. Flournoy's brother is allegedly a Chinese spy involved with Tumisomo Bank and SoftBank, an early investor in Alibaba, which obtained US voter registration data. The speaker alleges that ERIC voter registration data was sent to Beijing, China, and that the Center for Election Integrity and Research (CEIR), which administers ERIC, defends corrupt elections officials. WestExec helped establish the relationship with Alibaba, Tencent, and Huawei for election fraud. Robert Pressler allegedly works with Flournoy. The speaker claims that during Carrie Lake's election lawsuit, Maricopa's elections network was illegally accessed, with the hack originating in Kansas. Thomas Liddy, son of G. Gordon Liddy, stopped the trial. Michael Salim from Rackspace and Data Republican, Jenna aka Jenica Pounds, are allegedly involved. Pounds, formerly with Snapchat, partnered with CEIR to allow voter registration on social channels using compromised data. The speaker alleges ActBlue is a subsidiary in the arena domain, used to defraud elections. Columbia University and Michael Crow of In-Q-Tel are also implicated. Scott Pressler is accused of ignoring the data/cyber side of election fraud. WinRed and ActBlue are two sides of the same coin. WinRed was allegedly hacked from British Columbia.