reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Doctors reportedly risked losing their licenses for prescribing ivermectin. The Federation of State Medical Boards, a private entity in Texas that oversees state medical boards, allegedly sent a directive to state medical boards concerning ivermectin and misinformation, encouraging them to target doctors. Some doctors are reportedly still dealing with medical boards to clear their names. This reportedly occurred in the fall of 2021, when Biden mandated the shots.

Vaccines are safe and save lives, according to the government's data. The UCP event spreading anti-vaccination conspiracy theories features doctors with revoked licenses. Calgary NDP Emily wants to vaccinate Alberta children every 3 months starting at 6 months old. She opposes discussing Alberta's childhood vaccine schedule. To learn more, watch "15 minutes with Dr. MacKiss" on maccusmd.substack.com.

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has acknowledged a pedophile problem at high levels within Alberta institutions, including Alberta Health Services and the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta. In 2021, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta allegedly reinstated the medical licenses of two pedophiles arrested for sex crimes against children, including possession and distribution of child pornography. This occurred while doctors who treated COVID patients with Ivermectin, like Dr. Daniel Nagasi, had their licenses stripped. The speaker claims Alberta media outlets, such as the Edmonton Journal, have defended child sex abusers. The speaker also alleges that former Alberta Premier Rachel Notley publicly defended child sex abusers, stating the NDP stands with child predators and pornographers against child victims. The speaker promises to continue exposing these crimes and will not be silenced by the media or the NDP.

- The speaker notes dated 07/25/2022, reporting on developments related to baby deaths and baby funerals. They reference the UK government website, and specifically Northampton NHS in detail mentioning children's funerals, noting that contracts for this area have appeared that were previously unseen. They point to contractfinderservice.gov.uk and advise looking for “children's and babies' funerals.” They identify several awarded contracts, including one for Hertfordshire, another for Hertfordshire specifically for baby funerals, and contracts awarded for Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS, and Leicester Hospitals NHS. - The speaker mentions that the WNHS is another organization involved for those who do not want to have Mexican arranged funerals, stating that they will do that for you now. - A doctor in Australia, Dr. Luke McClinton, is described as leading the fertility services at the Mater Hospital and as a principal investigator for a series of randomized controlled trials. He is also described as the president of the Australian Institute for Restorative Reproductive Medicine and is labeled as “the top doctor in Australia in this field.” - The speaker asserts that Dr. Luke McClinton was sacked on Friday for not getting the jab and for attempting to release his data on miscarriages post-vaccination. They state that he has until the following Friday to exit his private practice rooms, as he is no longer allowed to practice in public or private settings. - The speaker claims that Dr. McClinton has been investigating miscarriages in couples post-vaccination and states that the “normal miscarriage rate” is between five and perhaps as high as sixteen percent. They then claim that since the introduction of the vaccine, he has found that seventy-four percent of women who are vaccinated are now having miscarriages. - The speaker reiterates the statistic: “Seventy four percent of women are having miscarriages who are vaccinated.” They suggest that this statistic would explain why hospitals allegedly want to deal directly with crematoria, with vans taking multiple babies directly to the crematorium, bypassing funeral directors. The speaker emphasizes that they had previously mentioned these points.

According to the speaker, the person who reported them in Zimbabwe worked for the Wellcome Trust and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. The speaker believes forces above governments are at play, influencing doctors who think they are doing the right thing, and that the media is heavily censored, preventing the public from accessing information. The speaker feels that they have been neutered and that medical registrars can now erase doctors for saying or doing the wrong thing. They are not optimistic about finding new regulatory bodies, believing the opposition is too powerful. The speaker anticipates doctors being replaced by AI and patients losing trust in the medical profession. They stated that a combination of silver, Ivermectin, doxycycline, and zinc was effective, and that adding Ivermectin stopped people from dying.

Several alternative medicine doctors have died under mysterious circumstances, raising concerns about their safety. Doctor Bruce Hedendahl, doctor Jeff Bradstreet, and doctor Theresa Ann Sievers were all found dead within a two-week period. Doctor Bradstreet's practice had been raided by the FDA before his death, while doctor Hedendahl was found dead in his car on Father's Day. Two more doctors, doctor Patrick Fitzpatrick and doctor Jeffrey Whiteside, have also vanished. The speaker emphasizes that they are not suicidal and believes that the deaths are a result of the pharmaceutical industry losing money and a shift in the mindset of the American people towards alternative medicine. They urge people to stand up against this threat.

Joe Rogan announced on social media that he has COVID and mentioned taking Ivermectin as part of his treatment. However, Ivermectin is primarily used as a dewormer for horses and is not proven to be effective against COVID. In fact, it can be dangerous and potentially deadly. The CDC and FDA have issued warnings against using Ivermectin for COVID. Some doctors claim that Ivermectin is effective and have faced backlash for advocating its use. There are allegations that pharmaceutical companies and the media have influenced the narrative against Ivermectin due to financial interests. Studies on Ivermectin have shown mixed results, but some countries have reported success in using it to treat COVID.

There is concern over the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario suggesting psychiatric medication for unvaccinated individuals. This recommendation is seen as unethical and a dangerous path to labeling those who choose not to get vaccinated as mentally ill. This slippery slope is alarming. The speaker is thanked for their courage and support from the people of Canada.

A veteran physician, Dr. Karen Ruthman, was found dead after allegedly discovering a link between parasites and cancer and a suppressed cure: ivermectin. Dr. Ruthman observed that many patients with chronic illnesses and cancers had parasites. Her research indicated parasites trigger cancer, and ivermectin could treat it. Threatened after planning to reveal her findings, she died in a house fire deemed a "freak accident," though some suspect a cover-up. Experts claim the NIH is aware of the parasite-cancer connection, with studies on ivermectin and cancer. Some researchers claim cancer tumors resemble parasite egg sacs. Big Pharma profits from chronic disease and suppresses cures. Ivermectin, smeared during the COVID-19 pandemic, is a safe, Nobel Prize-winning drug that threatens their profits. Pfizer invested heavily in cancer treatments as mRNA vaccines, potentially linked to "turbo cancers," were rolled out. Experts suggest cancer is linked to parasites, mold, toxic metals, and viruses. The media allegedly altered footage to discredit ivermectin. Federal law prohibits emergency use authorization for vaccines if an existing effective treatment exists, so ivermectin had to be discredited to protect the vaccine enterprise. The World Economic Forum has warned of new injectables for various ailments, including cancers potentially caused by mRNA injections.

No. There's a lot of doctors that I know that were in danger of losing their license because they had prescribed ivermectin. And that was another thing. You know, the the Federation of State Medical Boards, is this private entity, they're actually located in Texas, who oversees all the state medical boards. They sent out a directive to all the state medical boards concerning ivermectin, concerning misinformation, and basically encouraging the medical boards to go after doctors like myself. And, I mean, I'm still I'm still tangled up with the medical board trying to clear my name. But they did that. That was it all happened in that 2021. Right when Biden mandated the shots, They really came down hard on the doctors.

In this video, the speakers discuss the challenges faced by doctors who speak out against mainstream narratives. They explain that in order to speak freely, doctors often have to give up their medical licenses, which discredits them in the eyes of the media. The speakers argue that having a license does not determine one's knowledge or experience in the field. They also discuss how the regulatory bodies that control doctors' licenses, such as the colleges of physicians and surgeons, can easily be compromised. The speakers highlight the corruption within these bodies, which are run by lawyers and powerful families. They mention that in British Columbia, the government has amended the Health Professions Act to have more control over doctors and enforce mandatory vaccinations.

Laura Logan hosts a discussion with Dr. Sherri Tenpenny on vaccines, public health policy, and what they see as failures and harms within the system. The conversation weaves together personal history, policy details, scientific debates, and broader social concerns, intercut with promotional content for GiveSendGo. Key points and claims raised by Dr. Tenpenny - Vaccine ingredients and aluminum exposure: Tenpenny asserts that if someone receives every vaccine on the schedule, they would be injected with a total of about twelve thousand micrograms of aluminum, which she says is inflammatory to every organ system and can be stored in bones (60% of aluminum exposure). She notes aluminum is present in vaccines in order to replace mercury, which she describes as also a poison. - Early vaccine industry liability and the 1986 Act: The discussion explains that prior to 1986 there were liability concerns for vaccine makers due to injury lawsuits. Tenpenny recounts that in 1986 Congress passed a law giving the pharmaceutical industry liability immunity for vaccines, creating what she describes as a ramp in the vaccine schedule. She cites that by 1991 additional vaccines were introduced (Hep B at birth, Hib, chickenpox, Prevnar, Gardasil, Hep A, and more) and alleges this resulted in a rising autism incidence aligned with new vaccines. - The vaccine injury system: Tenpenny explains the Injury Compensation Act and the existence of VAERS as a tracking system, along with a separate pathway created under the PREP Act (the Preparedness and Readiness Act). She states that during the COVID era a separate program, the Covered Countermeasure Program (CICP), existed under the PREP Act, but it had no funding and a one-year statute of limitations, leading to under-compensation and very few adjudicated cases; she contrasts this with the earlier 1986 act, which funded vaccine injury compensation through the Federal Court of Claims and VAERS. - Perceived safety and effectiveness concerns: The speakers discuss studies suggesting that the flu shot might not prevent flu and that some studies indicate vaccines including pneumonia vaccines may be associated with higher risk of the conditions they aim to prevent. Tenpenny frames this as evidence of cracks in the vaccine program and argues that vaccines are linked to a broad spectrum of health issues, including autoimmune diseases, infertility, and cancers, which she says have been increasing. - Pediatric vaccination schedule and “pediatric poisoning program”: Tenpenny asserts that infants receive multiple injections early in life, with claims that by age two they will have thousands of micrograms of aluminum and other compounds that remain in the body, including in the brain. She characterizes the pediatric schedule as a systematic poisoning program for children and a parallel “adult assault program” for adults receiving vaccines. - COVID-19 vaccine controversy and health impacts: The conversation covers the COVID vaccines, including assertions about adverse effects such as myocarditis, strokes, kidney injury, autoimmune diseases, neurological issues, and cancers. Tenpenny describes long-term concerns (long COVID, autoimmune diseases) and claims of widespread injury and death, contending that the pandemic revealed how the health-care and pharmaceutical systems operate, including alleged corruption and profit motives. She discusses the difficult experiences of families during the pandemic, including restrictions on care and the use of alternate treatments like ivermectin in some cases. - The claim that COVID vaccines were not properly evaluated and that mandated vaccination reflected coercion: The speakers discuss mandates and the experiences of individuals in workplaces and educational institutions who faced pressure to receive vaccines, including religious exemptions and disputes about mandates. Tenpenny suggests a broader pattern of overreach in public health policy and questions about the balance between individual rights and mandates. - History and philosophy of public health programs: They discuss the Healthy People initiatives, arguing that the program’s goals have expanded in scope (from 15 goals to 1,200 for Healthy People 2030) and that the expansion is associated with greater surveillance and control over personal lives. Tenpenny claims that this is part of a broader trend toward data collection and governance of individual health and behavior. - The economics and incentives around vaccines: The conversation notes how physicians are compensated in part through vaccine administration, implying financial incentives influence clinical decisions. Tenpenny emphasizes the profit motive behind vaccines and the pharmaceutical industry’s financial interests, citing extreme examples like the one boy in a photo who allegedly became heavily medicated due to vaccines. - The role of media and information control: They discuss the influence of advertising in media since the 1990s and the difficulty of reporting critically on vaccines when major advertisers are pharmaceutical companies. They also mention AI and misinformation concerns, including examples of AI fabricating sources and the need to verify information. - Personal stakes, accountability, and political possibilities: Tenpenny discusses personal cost for challenging the vaccine paradigm, including an earlier period of potential licensing scrutiny and professional pushback. She names figures such as Fauci and Birx, argues that accountability has not yet occurred, and expresses hope that public interest in accountability could shift through advocacy and political leadership, citing RFK Jr. as a potential ally though acknowledging political and institutional obstacles. - Treatment and detoxification approaches: For those who have already received vaccines, Tenpenny outlines two separate tracks: detoxification for childhood vaccines and detox for COVID vaccines. For detox, she mentions products such as PureBody Extra (PBX), a zeolite-based supplement she says helps remove metals like aluminum and mercury from the body. She notes it is usable across age groups and even for pets, and she personally uses it. She also discusses non-specific detox approaches such as vitamin D optimization, lymphatic stimulation, exercise, and a diet focusing on avoiding white foods and reducing inflammation. She cautions that there is no proven blood or urine test to quantify spike protein after a COVID vaccine, and that detox strategies aim to support overall health rather than remove embedded spike protein from tissues. - The role of faith and resilience: The interview includes discussions of faith as a guiding force for Tenpenny, including her personal journey toward Christian faith in 2020. They reflect on fear, hope, forgiveness, and the idea that one can act with integrity and do the right thing even when faced with controversy or personal cost. They discuss existential questions about meaning, purpose, and moral responsibility, including the belief that life has a spiritual dimension that informs how to respond to public-health challenges. - Community and parenting: The conversation emphasizes the importance of community networks for new parents, including seeking mentorship from experienced parents and trusted health advocates, and maintaining parental agency in decisions about vaccines, medical interventions, and child-rearing. They discuss the value of critical thinking, asking questions, and avoiding blind trust in professionals or institutions. - Closing notes and resources: Tenpenny provides her websites and a Substack for ongoing information, including dr10penny.com, dr10penny.substack.com, and 10pennywalkwithgod.substack.com, as well as her X profile busy doctor t. The episode closes with a call to viewers to stay informed and to seek second opinions, while thanking the audience for supporting independent journalism. Overall, the dialogue centers on a critical, conspiratorial framing of vaccines, public-health policy, and the medical establishment; it weaves together testimonies about personal experience, policy history (notably the 1986 Act and the PREP Act), alleged systemic failures in compensation for vaccine injuries, criticisms of COVID-19 responses and vaccine mandates, and practical detoxification and faith-based guidance. The promotional content for GiveSendGo lightly interrupts the core discussion, but the majority of the exchange remains an extended argument about vaccine safety, accountability, and the perceived influence of big pharma on health care and public policy.

The speaker discusses the shocking revelations of pedophiles and child sex abusers within Canada's healthcare leaders. They highlight a specific case of a top doctor who held positions in Alberta and British Columbia governments, including being the chief medical officer of health. This doctor was convicted of sex crimes against a child and two other children, yet the mainstream media downplayed the scandal. The speaker also criticizes the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta for protecting doctors involved in such crimes while punishing those who use alternative treatments. They question the lack of disciplinary actions on the doctor's medical license and express concern about the safety of patients.

In 2019, the Canadian government removed the crime of spreading false news from the Criminal Code. This raises concerns about trusting a government that takes our money, restricts effective treatments, and fails to investigate the safety of promoted vaccines. Additionally, the parliament we elect allows mainstream media to freely lie without consequences.

Federal agencies are reportedly interfering in doctor-patient relationships, targeting physicians who offer alternative treatments like ivermectin or chronic pain management. Dr. Neil Anand highlights an upcoming trial in Philadelphia concerning the use of AI to analyze personal data (social media, phone records, banking) to build cases against doctors. He claims thousands of physicians have faced imprisonment or license revocation. Dr. Anand mentions Dr. Joseph Parker is currently imprisoned for treating pain patients. He notes the demonization of pain medication, despite the legitimate needs of patients, including those with cancer. Dr. Anand suggests civil asset forfeiture is a motivation behind targeting physicians, particularly older ones, labeling them as drug dealers to seize their assets. He thanks the platform for giving exposure to the issue, because many doctors are scared of speaking out.

Speaker claims ivermectin is part of a diabolical Rockefeller plan devised in 2010, predicting people would reject vaccines after 2020 and turn to another pharmaceutical. They question ivermectin’s safety by listing side effects such as blindness, liver failure, and infertility. They argue the Rockefellers own the entire medical system worldwide, so buying from a different country is ineffective. The discussion notes ads for pharmaceuticals on alternative-health platforms, suggesting a marketing push. They say parasites are really heavy metals in the body, and that ivermectin contains heavy metals. The claim is that ivermectin, like antibiotics, suppresses symptoms. They describe a $32,000,000,000 industry fueled by this narrative, and when they researched producers, they found Merck, Johnson and Johnson, Pfizer, and Bayer. The same companies making vaccines in 2020 allegedly also make ivermectin, framing it as a bait-and-switch.

The speaker claims that the chief medical officer of health and Alberta Health Services have stated on record that there is no proof of the virus and no material evidence to support the use of the Public Health Act against the COVID-19 pandemic. They urge people to request their transcripts and court documents under the Freedom of Information Act. The speaker provides their contact information on Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter, mentioning their difficulties with multiple Facebook accounts and being censored. They also mention that their previous work and investigations have been erased from the internet, including interactions with First Nations, Hereditary Chiefs, and a pipeline project. They mention attending the Bilderberg conference and filming Canadian delegates with access to a large sum of Canadian taxpayers' money.

Craig Kelly, former federal member for Hughes, faced backlash for promoting the effectiveness of cheap drugs like Ivermectin. He was criticized for suggesting these drugs were more effective than vaccines, which raised concerns about public confidence in the vaccination program. The cost of vaccines was a point of discussion, with assurances that they would be provided for free. The suppression of Ivermectin was attributed to its potential threat to the emergency use authorizations for experimental vaccines. The need for a discussion on medical research incentives was highlighted, as well as the large amount of research supporting Ivermectin's effectiveness. Despite the Therapeutic Goods Administration initially discouraging its use, Ivermectin is now allowed to be prescribed off-label. Craig Kelly faced personal attacks and defamation, leading to the ruin of his political career.

Craig Kelly, former federal member for Hughes, faced backlash for promoting the effectiveness of cheap drugs like Ivermectin. He was criticized for suggesting these drugs were more effective than vaccines, which raised concerns about public confidence in the vaccination program. The cost of vaccines was a point of discussion, with assurances that they would be provided for free. The suppression of Ivermectin was attributed to its potential threat to the emergency use authorizations for experimental vaccines. The need for a discussion on medical research incentives and the demonization of hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin was highlighted. Despite numerous studies and global research, Ivermectin faced a ban before being allowed for off-label prescription. Craig Kelly's career was negatively impacted by the controversy.

Dr. Miley Trinh, a GP based in Sydney, Australia, joins Jim Ferguson for her first appearance on the show. She explains she has practiced as a GP for nearly thirty years and has been suspended since late 2021 amid a dispute with the health regulator over her license. She describes her suspension as part of a broader fight with regulators and regulators’ attempts to cancel her medical license. Trinh recounts how her concerns about the COVID-19 situation began in 2019, while following global events and studying debt-based economic systems. She states she became alarmed by reports of Wuhan’s lockdown timing, noting that authorities announced a lockdown five days earlier and allowed travel before it commenced, which she found alarming. She observed what she called unusual global coordination in reporting and policy responses to the pandemic, with early treatment being suppressed and a tightly controlled narrative across countries. Regarding ivermectin, she says she concluded after months of research that it was a key medication for treating COVID-19, particularly when given early. She describes participating in doctor groups and Zoom meetings to discuss how to treat patients and notes she treated a patient by telephone during lockdown who was deteriorating. She reports that the patient improved after her treatment but later faced complications requiring hospital care. She says two complaints were filed against her in September 2021—the first from a patient she had helped, and the second from an individual named John Smith who obtained a prescription that belonged to a family member for ivermectin. She asserts John Smith did not belong to her practice, and that the prescription was allegedly handed to an APRA (Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency) agent, a fact she says regulators overlooked when investigating her practice. Trinh emphasizes that she had never before faced a complaint in nearly thirty years of practice and that the suspension hearing concluded with her being deemed a danger to public health, despite her insistence that she saved a life. She has remained suspended for over four years. She describes the regulatory process as involving claims of prescribing ivermectin “below standard” and accusations of professional misconduct for not handing over 20 to 30 patient medical files, which she says she refused to provide because she did not know the patients’ names and because none of the patients had filed complaints against her. She notes that hearings occurred in December, March, and August, with subsequent issues over transcript integrity and requests for recusal of the presiding judge. She says a decision on the main case is imminent, but a cancellation of her license could entail a three to five-year suspension and substantial costs, complicating the possibility of reinstatement. Beyond her case, she argues the fight is about medical autonomy and the right for physicians to tailor treatments to individual patients, not be dictated by politicians or rigid guidelines. She criticizes what she views as a heavily censored environment for doctors who questioned the pandemic narrative or advocated for therapeutics like ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, vitamin D, and zinc. She asserts that the COVID-19 Task Force guidelines opposed ivermectin and other therapeutics, and she contends such guidelines restrict doctors’ ability to provide individualized care. Trinh links the censorship and regulatory pressure to broader concerns about global governance, citing media suppression, removal of dissent on platforms like Facebook and YouTube, and increased control over platforms such as X (formerly Twitter). She mentions public support, including her presence on X and Facebook, as important to her ongoing legal battle and the broader struggle over medical autonomy and truth during the pandemic. She concludes by inviting people to follow her on X and Facebook to learn more and to show support as she pursues potential appeals if the judgment does not go in her favor. She frames her case as about more than COVID-19 alone: it is about challenging what she views as a long-standing, disproportionate control of doctors and a fight for fundamental rights, including the right to a hearing before the tribunal and the right to medical decision-making free from political interference.

Colleges are accused of destroying medical ethics and the patient-doctor relationship. Danielle Smith, running for Premier of Alberta, spoke up for the unvaccinated, calling them persecuted. She suggested dissolving the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta for change. Elect politicians willing to make major changes, not just tinker with healthcare. Support doctors who upheld the Hippocratic oath during the pandemic, as the healthcare system may collapse.

The speaker states they are still being persecuted for raising concerns about harm from vaccines. They testified at the National Citizens Inquiry in Edmonton about vaccinated kids now getting cancer, which they believe will be denied for years despite seeing it in their patients. They claim to have discussed the "died suddenly" phenomenon and "turbo cancer" – aggressive cancers developing after COVID-19 vaccines – for two years, resulting in being banned from Twitter. The speaker says they have shifted focus to solutions and treating vaccine injuries, as the destructiveness of the "jabs" is now widely understood, with many knowing someone who has experienced heart attacks, strokes, blood clots, autoimmune diseases, neurological issues, or cancer. They claim there has been a huge explosion of cancer, and they are currently running the largest ivermectin cancer clinic in the world with over a thousand patients.

Four days after ordering a deadly injection, Dr. Picchu allegedly ordered the removal of the COVID-19 vaccination record from the patient's medical file. The speaker claims any doctor would know not to vaccinate an ill patient, especially one recently off a ventilator. The head of the ICU ordered an mRNA injection for COVID-19 for a patient less than a week removed from a mechanical ventilator. The patient died later that week. The speaker states that Dr. Picho, head of the ICU in British Columbia, still has his medical license.

A physician recounts being attacked for offering alternative COVID treatments and questioning vaccine efficacy. Despite treating thousands of patients and being proven more accurate than public health authorities, she is still fighting to keep her medical license. The physician describes treating a sheriff's deputy with COVID in February, following the vaccine rollout, when ivermectin was difficult to obtain. She notes primary care doctors often did not treat viruses, leading to catastrophic outcomes. After President Trump touted hydroxychloroquine, the Texas State Board of Pharmacy restricted its prescription. The government then launched a PR campaign against ivermectin, influencing hospitals to mandate vaccines. The physician observed more vaccinated individuals contracting COVID with similar or worse symptoms. Monoclonal antibodies, which worked effectively, were removed as an option, allegedly to promote vaccination. A urology department considered refusing unvaccinated patients. The physician faced obstacles in obtaining emergency privileges to administer ivermectin to the sheriff's deputy, who ultimately survived but suffered long-term health issues and later passed away. The Texas Medical Board is pursuing charges against the physician for recommending COVID therapy. The expert witness against her is a Planned Parenthood lab director. She highlights the politicization of medicine, the loss of power for doctors, and the influence of corporations and insurance companies. She expresses concern over COVID shot injuries, the shots being added to the childhood vaccine schedule, and the potential for long-term immune system damage.