TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker clarifies that they don't feel like a victim and that the incident they experienced was not sexual, although it did hurt. They mention that rape is often associated with sexual connotations and violence, but they emphasize that it was not an assault. The speaker suggests taking a short break and mentions the topic of fantasies.

The speaker claims a mock trial was run to determine if a jury would believe her. The speaker states the jury believed two people could be in a dressing room if something sexual happened, but that she was seen as too old for anyone to believe she wasn't begging for it. According to the other speaker, during jury exercises, women jurors disliked when the speaker suggested she wasn't a victim, supposedly because they or women they knew had similar experiences. The speaker had difficulty admitting weakness or how Donald Trump had irreparably damaged her life; she was never able to date again. An expert witness, a psychologist and trauma theory developer, spent 26 hours with the speaker, who learned she had given up everything erotic and romantic in her life because of the attack. It was important for the speaker to say it in a believable way, which required her to believe it.

A person recounts an incident where their friend, carrying kefir on the way to a protest, was harassed by two individuals. The speaker uses derogatory terms, including "rape ride" and "retard," and initially suggests ignoring the harassers. The speaker then directs insults at the friend, questioning if she knows English. The speaker then says that the friend is from Queens and a doctor.

I didn't feel like a victim. It wasn't a sexual assault, just hurtful. Rape isn't sexy, it's violent. Let's take a break and talk more later. You're interesting to talk to.

Speaker 0 asks, “Am I a bad person? … the more you didn’t like it, the more I enjoyed it. I loved how much you hated it. Turn me on. Why am I like that?” and questions why. Speaker 1 recounts: during sex, he put his hand on her throat and strangled her until she lost consciousness, but he continued having sex as she came back around. Speaker 0 declares, “I am one of the most dangerous men on this planet. … I’m the smartest person on this planet,” suggesting he’d rather pin her down to make her do things she didn’t like, or that he could do whatever he wants. Speaker 1 notes, the next day one of the whites of her eyes had turned completely red, explaining that lack of oxygen can cause blood vessels to burst, a common feature in domestic abuse cases. Speaker 0 asks if she’s seriously offended that he strangled her a little, noting she didn’t pass out. Speaker 1 says he kept saying, “I own you. You belong to me,” and threatened to kill her. Speaker 0 responds with a dismissive, “Chill the out. Jesus Christ. I thought you were cool.”

Speaker 0 discusses the experience of children being sexually abused. They mention that at a young age, children may not have a name for the act but still find it pleasurable. The speaker emphasizes that if the abuser is skilled, the child may not even realize the abuse has occurred. The transcript ends with the speaker asking if they can refer to the listener as "1."

Speaker 1 announces formal charges against Andrew Tate, including rape, human trafficking, the trafficking of minors, and sexual intercourse with a minor. One survivor states she was raped and trafficked regularly at ages 14 and 15 during that period. Speaker 2 describes asking other friends and classmates, ages 15 and 16 at the time, who also received messages, noting it was a well-known fact that Tate had a network of young girls. Speaker 3 explains a six-year relationship with Vivian, who is now 21; they met when Vivian was 15. He describes a pattern similar to those seen in other cases, where abusers use a boyfriend model of exploitation to lure victims, a form of human trafficking also known as the lover method. He is accused of using this method, stating: “My MO was find girls, make them love me and make them work for me. And that's how I got rich.” Speaker 1 recounts that while her abusers threatened, raped, and violated her, they were also kind. Speaker 3 discusses the mechanics of exploitation, asserting that you cannot run this business through fear. He explains that manipulating fear is ineffective because if you could scare a girl and put her on the street, she would leave and never return. He emphasizes that a pimp’s power comes from the girl’s respect and love, not fear: “They have to respect you and love you.” Speaker 0 offers a summation of the day’s session: the judge stated that it is likely these girls will never recover from the abuse they suffered, and remarked that the way the perpetrator treated them defies understanding. Speaker 3 adds a chilling statement reflecting the dynamics of the abuse: “The more you didn't like it, the more I enjoyed it. I loved how much you hated it. Turn me on.”

I didn't feel like a victim. It wasn't a sexual assault, but it did hurt. People often associate rape with violence, not realizing it can be seen as sexy in fantasies. Let's take a short break and continue our conversation later. You're really interesting to talk to.

But this ex model says several years ago she went to Jean Luc's house and didn't get away. She asked to have her voice and face disguised. He gave you a drink? Yes. You drank it and then what? I blacked out. I don't remember anything after that. Next thing you remember was being in this man's bed. Who was he? Do I have to say the name? It was Jean Luc from Karen's Modeling Agency. You were raped? Yes. I do know that. You sure? Yes. I'm positive. I I know. You think everybody knows this about Jean Luc Brunel? Oh, yes. A lot of people know that. A lot of people. They continue to deal with him. But everyone will continues to deal with it. I don't know why.

The speaker states that they do not feel like a victim because they were not thrown on the ground and ravished. They clarify that the experience, while hurtful, was not sexual. The speaker believes that most people associate rape with sexual acts, and even fantasies, but for them, it was a violent assault, not a sexual one.

Speaker 0 describes a violent, coercive sequence framed as self-defense and pimping instructions. He begins: “When I grab you by your neck and you start annoying me trying to resist and I just And then I grab you by your neck again. Then what you're do when your face is collapsed and your cheekbones broken. Ain't gonna do cry.” He claims: “I guarantee I changed the way you look at sex forever. You're gonna be crying. I won't cry. I bet you cry, bitch. I bet you cry.” He questions: “You're saying I I wouldn't cry. You're challenging me to a fight. You're saying I can't hurt you. You're out of your mind? I don't even know you.” He says to ignore the sex part: “Forget the sex part. That's a distraction. Stay in my pants. I'll just start beating at you. How about that?” They walk to the bedroom: “We walk in the bedroom. I start kicking your [No sex. No sex involved. But you cry then.]” He adds: “I perfected this in pimp school. When I got my PhD, we had to practice if a girl comes at you. How are you cheating? You cheating. It's bang out the machete, boom in her face, and then grip her up by the neck. Her panties get wet.” He further describes: “Machete's on the floor, her panties are all wet, You fuck her. That's how it goes. Slap, slap, grab, choke, shut up bitch, sex. These are the basic moves of of pimping.”

I never met or saw the woman in question. The incident at Burgdorf's dressing room involved me bursting in while she tried on lingerie. Her pet's name, "vagina," was not allowed in court. The word "rape" has sexual connotations, but this was not sexual, just hurtful. Many associate rape with being sexy, but it's not. Let's pause. The conversation turns to fantasies and plans to go shopping with the money.

Speaker 0 expresses a desire to protect someone from experiencing hardships they've faced. Speaker 0 then states feeling violated. Speaker 1 compliments Speaker 0's scent and asks their age. Speaker 0 is 16, turning 17 in two weeks. Speaker 1 says they never smelled that good at 16. Speaker 0 asks if the other would rather be naked on stage during a song or drink blended worms. Speaker 0 says they have young fans and can't give a sex talk, noting they never received one. Speaker 0 asks why a 15-year-old boy would want a sex talk from them, expressing discomfort. Speaker 0 suggests discussing the album, noting the other person hasn't been calling or hanging out like before, and has tried contacting them through partners.

Speaker 0 asks, "Did you rape the student?" and "Why? Help us understand." Speaker 0 tells Speaker 1 to grab whatever she needs, like her phone or purse. Speaker 1 asks if she is going somewhere. Speaker 0 says they will explain everything and asks her to turn around. Speaker 1 asks if her husband is coming with her. Speaker 0 confirms he is and that they are staying in touch with him, adding they are just going down the road, ten minutes away. Speaker 1 says she would prefer her husband with her and asks if she is in trouble, stating she is lost. Speaker 0 asks if she wants a tissue or a bag because she feels like she is going to throw up.

The speaker describes a family history of alleged ritualistic abuse and satanic practices, stating: “Also in worshiping the devil, participated in human sacrifice rituals rituals and cannibalism.” They assert an extensive family tree, claiming it “has gone back to, like, 1,700.” They contrast the outward appearance of their family with the reality inside, saying: “Does everyone else think it's a nice Jewish family? From the outside, appear to be a nice Jewish girl? Definitely. And you all are worshiping the devil inside the home? Right.” The speaker references broader involvement beyond their own family, noting: “There's other Jewish families across the country, not just my own family.” They describe rituals in which babies would be sacrificed and claim, “Who’s babies? There were people who bred babies in our family. No one would know about it. A lot of people were overweight, so you couldn't tell if they were pregnant or not.” They recount a childhood experience in which they were forced to participate: “When I was very young, I was forced to participate in that in which I had to sacrifice an infant. And the the purpose of sacrifice is to what? Is to bring you what? What are you sacrificing for? For power.” The response given to the question about the purpose of sacrifice is: “Power.” The speaker also discloses personal abuse within the narrative, stating: “Mhmm. I was molested. I was raped several times.” They then describe their mother’s current life and public image, asserting: “And what's your mother doing? She lives in the Chicago Metropolitan Area. She's on the Human Relations Commission of the town that she lives in, and she's an upstanding citizen. Nobody would suspect her.”

The speakers discuss the disturbing topic of rape. Speaker 0 questions if it is right, while Speaker 1 admits to regretting it. They also mention the consequences, such as the emotional and physical effects on the victim, as well as the risk of contracting diseases. The conversation touches on the potential pregnancy and the uncertainty regarding the baby's father. The personal feelings of the victim are briefly mentioned.

I wanted to role play a rape in a public place, like the dressing room at Bergdorf's. I saw you coming out of the store and followed you in. We went to the lingerie department, which was empty. Let's talk about rape fantasies with Judge Crane. I pushed you against the wall and kissed you. You claimed to fight back. I wrote an email saying resistance means you want me more. Brief because when a woman resists, it only makes things more exciting. Thank you for being an interesting conversation partner. Translated: I suggested role-playing a rape in a public place, specifically the dressing room at Bergdorf's. I saw you leaving the store and followed you in. We went to the empty lingerie department. Let's discuss rape fantasies with Judge Crane. I pushed you against the wall and kissed you. You said you fought back. I wrote an email saying resistance means you want me more. Brief because when a woman resists, it only makes things more exciting. Thank you for being an interesting conversation partner.

The conversation opens with Speaker 0 making a provocative claim that everything people experience, including rape and addiction, is attracted into their life, and that the people involved in rape or pedophilia are attracted to those acts. Speaker 1 pushes back, asking for clarification about cases of pedophilia and how these dynamics should be understood. Speaker 0 continues by saying that the children are attracted to the pedophile, and Speaker 1 challenges them to pursue the line of thought by asking to go there. They discuss how labels of good and bad are often tied to who one chooses to side with. Speaker 0 expresses discomfort with the implication of the discussion and provides a hypothetical: if someone assaulted his wife at home, he would “forcibly stop” them and would value stopping the act “100% certainly.” He argues that morality at the moment would drive one’s reaction to harm, and asserts that when one sees something as evil, one would act to stop it, emphasizing that it is evil in one’s perception. Speaker 0 then asserts a universal standard: it is not acceptable to beat a child to a pulp or to sexually assault a child. He argues that there is something fundamental inside humans—a driving force toward life, love, freedom, and the experience of living in the world—and when someone intentionally interferes with that, there is an obligation to try to prevent or stop them. He adds that one can override impulses, acknowledging personal temptation to harm that has been resisted. Speaker 1 accuses Speaker 0 of repressing desires and then attacking his customers publicly. He suggests Speaker 0 is taking information that contradicts his stated beliefs and refuses to broadcast it because it conflicts with his system, describing it as a fight that Speaker 0 is ready to engage in. The tension is evident as Speaker 0’s and Speaker 1’s reactions become increasingly heated; Speaker 0 notes that Speaker 1’s hands are shaking. Speaker 1 criticizes the stance of not exposing certain information on the show, arguing that it challenges his beliefs and that he is unwilling to “pacify” his research for anyone. He asserts that there are upsides to events, even to the murder of children, stating that there are upsides to it. Speaker 0 concludes with an abrupt decision to stop the discussion: “I think we’re gonna have to stop here, John.”

Some individuals in the video discuss their involvement in rape cases, admitting to committing the act multiple times. They share their tactics, which involve pretending to be friendly to gain the victim's trust before threatening them with violence to prevent them from screaming. They also mention a practice called "jack rolling," where they take turns assaulting the victim. The conversation ends with them expressing enjoyment and celebrating their actions.

Before being trafficked to various locations, one victim described being strangled, threatened with a knife, and facing threats to her home. She was victimized numerous times and lost count of her abusers due to their numbers. In response, there was a call for more respectful language regarding the victim's experience. It was emphasized that the use of language should avoid inflaming or inciting discrimination. The speaker was reminded to tone down the rhetoric and focus on asking questions without being overly descriptive.

In a dressing room, "the minute I was in there, he shut the door and pushed me up against the wall and bang bang my head on the wall and kissed me." She laughed to cope: "You started laughing?" It turned serious as he "pulled down the tights" with one hand, and it was "a fight" against her will; she notes he is "six three" and she was "about six one in the massive heels." She confirms "Yes" to penetration and says, "That's the definition" of rape, though she prefers calling it "the fight" and says, "I was not the victim." She adds, "Sexual violence is in every country, in every strata of society" and that her incident was short—"three minutes in this little dressing room"—and she "got out. I'm moving on."

Donald Trump is accused of inappropriate behavior towards women. The speaker finds it disrespectful to women who are victims of rape. They recall a past encounter with Trump involving lingerie. The speaker expresses anger and panic, mentioning death threats. They ponder the possibility of DNA evidence on the lingerie. The conversation shifts to Trump's statement about the accuser not being his type. The speaker challenges the perception of rape as sexy. The discussion pauses briefly.

I didn't think I was just going to be killed; I expected other things to happen to me as well. So, you believed you might also be raped? Yes, I did. And now you understand that this fear stems from your experience? Yes, I think so.

The speaker expresses her refusal to stay, sleep, or have sex with someone. She tries to talk her way out of the situation but realizes she is trapped in a room with a deadbolt. The speaker then shifts to a commercial about Shark Week and a self-cleaning toilet. She continues her story, feeling scared as she tries to make small talk to humanize herself. However, the person becomes aggressive, pulling out his penis and forcing himself on her. The speaker emphasizes the physical force and lack of power she felt in that situation. She mentions blocking the memory for 27 years.

Speaker 0 was alarmed to see the MSM, either CNN or MSNBC, defining a certain action as reparations and stating, "This is what reparations means." Speaker 1 stated that certain people should experience being in a farm in the middle of the night when someone comes for them, gang rape, and witnessing the torture and death of a loved one before reparations can be discussed. Speaker 1 does not recommend gang rape, based on personal experience.