reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The discussion concerns alleged H-1B visa abuse connected to “Quibbits Technology,” “Three Bs Technologies,” and other related companies. The first visits involve a residential address at 130 Darbonne Lane, Irving, Texas 75039, where the doorbell is broken and windows appear boarded up. The narrator claims 27 H-1B visas were approved for that address between 2022 and 2025 and lists job titles such as software developer, software engineer, and IT project manager. No one appears to be present for the supposed workers. The narrator says the investigation began after online chatter about H-1B scams that included misplaced or incorrect information, and then explains how H-1B visas are described as working: a business files an LCA (Labor Condition Application) stating it has a job needing specific skills and cannot find Americans; after the LCA is certified by the Department of Labor, the H-1B petition can be filed with USCIS; USCIS then issues authorization so the sponsored worker can come to the U.S. and work. The narrator argues that businesses can be set up using an address and paperwork filed, including from a home address, which could allow sponsors to bring in multiple visa holders. They ask a neighbor about what they have seen at 130 Darbonne Lane. The neighbor says they know the family that lives there, but they do not know what the family works for and they do not see workers coming in and out; the neighbor says the family keeps to themselves and that the neighbors see young boys playing. The narrator then claims the company’s website lists a different address after the page was “scrubbed,” changing to 7300 Lone Star Drive, Suite C 200 in Plano, Texas, even though parts still reportedly show Darbonne Lane. At 7300 Lone Star Drive, the narrator finds an unfinished building under construction with no staff or office activity and no apparent offices for “Three B’s Technologies.” When searching the address further, the narrator says it is tied to “Legacy Club,” described as a members-only social club with an availability target of early 2026, and the narrator questions why a technology company would use that address. The narrator identifies a person connected to the visa filings and residence as Vamsi Krishna Vaginapalli and claims there is “potential fraud” involving multiple addresses being WeWork locations. They say the address listed for “Three B’s Technologies” is an old WeWork location and that another WeWork location is also listed as active on the Texas Business Registry. The narrator also claims some H-1B workers sponsored by the person were contracted to other businesses such as Verizon, and that another H-1B filing was made at “Critty Info Systems.” They state that the website for “Critty Info Systems” appears to have coding and spelling errors and lists an office address that takes users to a virtual office location; they also claim the India contact information references a made-up name. They add that other listed addresses reportedly do not exist and that the UK office address is linked to another entity. The narrator then references “H2M Info Systems,” stating its website is made in WordPress, lists an award/integrity-themed “About Us,” and that the “careers” section shows no open positions. They say a phone number with a Florida area code is not reachable. They also claim its listed location is another WeWork site and that an H-1B worker was allegedly subcontracted to a company in Des Moines, Iowa. The narrator then says “Three B’s Technologies is not an isolated incident” and moves to another company: Quibbits Tech Systems, which they claim filed 13 H-1B visas, with 12 approved in 2025 and one denied. They attempt to locate “12 workers” associated with that company at an address and encounter a person (identified as Hari / Speaker 1) who refuses to speak. The person says they cannot talk, states the address is “03 Roman 3 Drive” (Newport, Texas 7503 is mentioned) and later references “existence.com” as well as “03 Roman 3 Drive.” The narrator also states that USCIS data allegedly indicates workers are at their office. The narrator claims that the address associated with Quibbits Tech Systems (cubbitstechsystems.com) is in Irving, Texas, and they go there. The office appears to be a legitimate office building, but the narrator says the workspace looks cramped with only a couple of fold-out tables and one chair, and repeatedly asks where the workers are. The narrator asserts the uncovered information is public and claims H-1B visa fraud patterns can be found via H-1B databases and address lookups. The narrator concludes by asking why USCIS has not acted and calls for a moratorium on H-1B visas. They state they will continue exposing abuse and provide an email address (Sarahtips@blazemedia.com) to report suspected visa fraud.

About 70% of the 85,000 H-1B visas issued annually go to Indian workers, reflecting a growing US-India trade relationship. While some argue that Indian workers possess unique skills, others contend that the primary reason for hiring them is cost savings. Companies prioritize cheaper labor, which leads to American workers being laid off. Critics argue that the imported workers often require retraining and lack the necessary understanding of critical roles, especially in high-stakes environments like healthcare. The dedication and expertise of existing IT teams are irreplaceable, as their work directly impacts lives, highlighting the importance of having qualified personnel who understand the urgency of their responsibilities.

As artificial intelligence becomes more powerful, a debate is emerging over who should decide how critical data is used. Tech executives often argue they are best placed to manage AI because they understand it, but some employees say others should also have a say. At Google, more than 500 staff signed a letter urging the company not to allow its AI tools to be used for classified military operations. The employees argue that working closely with technology creates a responsibility to speak out. This is not the first time tech employees have raised concerns. Employees at Google, Amazon, and Microsoft previously voiced concerns about how their companies’ products might have been used by the Israeli military to target Palestinians during the Gaza war. Earlier whistleblowers, including Francis Haugen at Facebook, exposed how some social media companies engineered addiction, contributing to a major legal case against them. The stakes around AI are increasing. The US is in an AI race with China. Some companies argue that restrictions could put them at a disadvantage, especially with China, described by “Silicon Valley Hawks” as having no democratic constraints. Others warn that the risks of AI being used in unethical and dangerous ways are too great. At the same time, companies are taking a tougher stance on dissent, with protests leading to firings in some cases. In 2024, Google sacked 50 employees who had protested against the company selling cloud computing services to Israel. The transcript states that it ultimately is up to a company’s board to decide which principles are inviolable and where trade-offs are appropriate. It also raises the question, “who guards the Guardians?” and notes that in the absence of federal AI regulation in the US, that role may increasingly fall to tech employees themselves.

- Speaker 0 asserts that there will never be a country like the current one and questions whether Republicans should frame it that way. - Speaker 1 asks if the H-1B visa issue will not be a big priority for the administration, arguing that to raise wages for American workers you can’t flood the country with tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of foreign workers. - Speaker 0 counters that there is a need to bring in talent, and questions whether there are enough talented people domestically, implying that some people must be brought in from outside. - Speaker 1 retorts that there aren’t enough talented people domestically. - Speaker 0 argues that you can’t simply take people off unemployment lines and place them in factories manufacturing missiles, asserting that this doesn’t work. - Speaker 1 asks how such work has been done historically. - Speaker 0 provides an example from Georgia: they raided to remove illegal immigrants and hadSouth Korean workers who needed batteries and were capable of producing them, noting that battery production is dangerous and complex, with explosions and problems. - Speaker 0 notes that they had five or six hundred people in the early stages to make batteries and to teach people how to do it, and that the aim was to get them out of the country. - Speaker 1 acknowledges disagreement, stating you can’t simply invest billions to build a plant and take people off unemployment lines who haven’t worked in five years to start making missiles, concluding that it doesn’t work that way.

I'm at my job at a Hyundai plant that makes electric cars, but immigration came today, and hundreds of people left. Some ran and jumped the fences. My group is here waiting to see what we're going to do. The Americans are trying to protect those who don't have documents or legal status. They stopped work today just to wait and see what happens, to see if we return to work or not. Everyone's worried because eighty to ninety percent of my group are Venezuelans with status to stay here, but people are still scared. ICE came to raid our workplace, and the Americans are trying to help, protect, and ask about everyone's case.

I used to work in tech until my team got laid off. In my exit interview, they said they were replacing us with Indians. I told them I'm Indian, but they wanted Indians from India to do the job cheaper. I joked about doing an accent, but they were serious. It made me feel like they were taking our jobs.

Speaker 0 questions why Americans ever believed they had no claim on their country, on the jobs, or on a share of the economic pie. They ask whether the goal is for Americans to compete with people from all over the world for jobs in their own country, describing that idea as one of the most psychotic things they’ve heard. The speaker suggests this notion would only make sense if you were part of the asset-owning class that owns everything serviced by people who are paid much less.

I was informed that as of February 28th, I would lose my job because it’s being outsourced to a company in India. I was offered four more months of pay and a bonus if I trained my replacement, but I’m furious about having to train someone to take my job. I really don’t want to do this. My colleagues and I protested outside the medical center. Kurt, a senior systems administrator, is also losing his job after training his replacement from India. We’re standing up and saying enough is enough; we won’t accept this anymore.

Knowledge transfer was the term used instead of training a replacement. Craig D'Angelo, a former IT worker at Northeast Utilities, was replaced by an H-1B visa employee from India, earning half his salary without benefits. He emphasized that he was laid off not due to a lack of work, but because someone cheaper could do his job. The group of workers he met with also faced similar situations. Leo Pereiro, who had received high performance reviews at Disney, was shocked to learn he had to train his replacement after being told his job would end in 90 days. He described the experience as humiliating and demoralizing, never imagining someone would come from another country to take over his role.

Protecting American jobs was a key theme of Donald Trump's campaign, particularly targeting the H-1B visa program, which allows companies to hire skilled foreign workers. Many businesses misuse this program, replacing American workers with cheaper foreign labor. Robert Harrison, an IT engineer at UCSF Medical Center, was informed he would lose his job and must train his replacement from India. This situation has led to protests by affected workers, who feel humiliated and betrayed. Critics argue that the H-1B program has been exploited, with companies prioritizing cost savings over American jobs. Former congressman Bruce Morrison expressed outrage over the program's misuse, emphasizing that it was intended to protect American workers. As companies increasingly outsource jobs, many American workers are left feeling vulnerable and devalued.

Eliminating per country quotas could lead to an immigration system favoring India. John Miano, a former computer scientist turned lawyer, is suing the Department of Homeland Security on behalf of laid-off IT workers from Southern California Edison. He claims these workers, along with others from companies like Disney and UCSF, were replaced by foreign H-1B workers. Miano highlights that H-4 EAD holders can work freely, increasing competition for American workers, while H-1B visa holders are restricted to specific employers. He argues that prioritizing American workers is essential in the current job market.

Companies are allegedly using foreign labor visas, such as H-1B and student visas, to displace American workers and pay lower wages. This was exemplified at Fuyao Glass in Dayton, where the Chinese company fired local workers after unionization attempts and replaced them with lower-paid foreign visa workers from China, eventually leading to a federal raid for using them as "slave labor." This issue is impacting young people, especially STEM graduates, who face intense job market competition from imported labor from countries like India and China. A high percentage of STEM applications from graduates are rejected because companies can pay foreign laborers less, who will accept lower contracts than American graduates. Mass immigration, both legal and illegal, has oversaturated the economy, making it harder for young people to get decent wages. Corporations are allegedly replacing Americans with foreign labor while promoting left-wing messaging. Republicans have an opportunity to address this issue that impacts young people.

Attacking the H-1B visa program aligned with Trump's message and resonated with public frustration towards the corporate and political elite. It's shocking to be laid off and then required to train your replacements to receive severance pay. This situation feels particularly demeaning.

I discussed some of the concerning individuals surrounding Musk. Does this surprise you? Sadly, no. It's a familiar pattern. Experienced professionals aren't drawn to such chaotic and toxic environments. This approach appeals to a specific type of person, as we saw at Twitter. Inexperienced engineers evaluated our code, and we endured loyalty exercises like printing code and justifying our work—a demoralizing and insulting process. I'm hearing similar accounts of long-tenured federal employees facing similar humiliating situations. This is insulting to the dedicated federal employees who work hard daily. It's truly unacceptable.

High-tech firms claim they can't find enough qualified American workers, but many skilled Americans exist. Companies often prefer hiring foreign workers for financial reasons. Rajesh, an H-1B visa holder at a Wall Street bank, reveals that outsourcing firms, primarily from India, are replacing American workers. He was unaware he would be taking jobs from Americans. He describes the emotional toll on American workers who lose their jobs after years of service. While Rajesh feels blamed, he argues that the real culprits are the Indian companies and their American clients exploiting the situation. A loophole in the law allows companies to bypass hiring Americans by paying over $60,000, a figure that is not considered high for the industry. This loophole, influenced by industry lobbying, has led to the practice of "knowledge transfer" instead of training replacements.

Companies are using visa programs to displace American labor with foreign workers who accept lower wages. This was evident at Fuyao Glass in Dayton, where the Chinese company fired local workers after unionization attempts and replaced them with lower-paid foreign visa workers from China, eventually leading to a federal raid due to alleged slave labor practices. This issue affects young STEM graduates who face intense job market competition from imported labor from countries like India and China. Many STEM applications from graduates are rejected because companies prefer to pay foreign laborers less, as they accept lower contracts than American graduates. Mass immigration, both legal and illegal, has oversaturated the economy, making it harder for young people to secure decent wages. Corporations are replacing Americans with foreign labor while promoting left-wing messaging. Republicans should address this issue, as it impacts young people who struggle to find jobs after investing in education, only to be replaced by cheaper foreign labor.

Why don't I hire Americans? Simply put, we can't find the workers. We never receive calls from Americans, and they don't show up. That's why we deeply appreciate the workers who are willing to come here and do the work on our farm. We depend on them. We often can't accomplish what needs to be done with only people from our local communities.

I used to work as a software engineer until my entire team was laid off. During the exit interview, I was told we were being replaced by Indian workers. I pointed out that I’m Indian too, suggesting they could keep me. They insisted I wasn’t the type of Indian they wanted, implying they preferred workers from India. I mentioned I was born there and could move back if needed, but they clarified they wanted to move the jobs to India for cheaper labor. In that moment, I felt like every frustrated parent, thinking, “These Indians are taking our jobs.”

At Northeast Utilities, fired workers staged a quiet protest by placing American flags in their cubicles. As they were let go, the flags were removed, and one worker took a final picture of the empty space. This situation reflects the experiences of many across the country. Janet Napolitano, former head of Homeland Security and now president of the University of California, faced backlash for eliminating 80 IT jobs at the medical center. She publicly stated that the university mishandled the H-1B process and instructed the outsourcing company to stop using H-1B workers. However, this came too late for workers like Kurt Ho and Robert Harrison, who recently packed up their belongings on their last day at the medical center, expressing that others will soon feel the same hardships they faced.

Protecting American jobs was a key theme of Trump's campaign, particularly regarding the H-1B visa program, which allows companies to hire skilled foreign workers. Many businesses exploit loopholes to replace American workers with cheaper foreign labor, often requiring those workers to train their replacements. Robert Harrison, a telecom engineer, faced job loss and was asked to train his replacement from India, leading to protests among affected workers. Critics argue that the program, initially intended to protect American jobs, has been misused for corporate profit. Former Congressman Bruce Morrison expressed outrage over the program's exploitation. Workers like Craig D'Angelo and Leo Pereiro shared their experiences of being replaced despite their skills, highlighting the emotional toll of such practices. The situation reflects broader issues of corporate greed and the need for job protection for American workers.

It's tough work out here—hot and full of mosquitoes. For those who think it doesn't affect them because they don't hire undocumented immigrants, be prepared for higher grocery prices. American workers often need training for farm work, and many simply aren't willing to do it. On this farm, no U.S. citizens are picking crops. The work is heavy and difficult, and farm owners acknowledge this. Americans have other job options and often choose not to work in agriculture. In contrast, many immigrants come here to earn a living and support their families back home. They're serious about their work, as evident in the fields around us.

Speaker 0: Growth without restraint is driving corporate takeovers of physical space, water, power, land, and communities, with costs pushed directly onto people through their electric bills, water supply, property values, and quality of life. This is framed as enabling big tech to build the backbone of the AI economy, an economy described as planning to eliminate most jobs and most futures. Speaker 0 says the AI story is widely discussed online, including on X and Instagram. Speaker 0 rejects the idea that it is “the Chinese” pushing this, saying it is Americans asking what is happening in their communities—why electric bills are changing and why people are being forced off property—because some American oligarch wants to build a massive data center using more energy than the rest of the state. Speaker 1: Speaker 1 responds to Kevin O’Leary by saying Americans have concerns about noise pollution, light pollution, the use of local water, takeover of farmland, and destruction of local ecosystems, and that it is not foreign agents but American people who have the right to protect communities and resources. Speaker 1 argues that data centers threaten and displace local people and that they provide no benefit to the communities affected. The outcome is described as job replacement rather than job creation, with claims that people would face 24/7 noise from gas turbines and a gigawatt of power without receiving an “utopia” of abundance. Speaker 1 says the result includes noise, pollution, taking water, destroying real estate value, and taking jobs. Speaker 1 identifies himself as an accomplished AI developer who supports AI technology when used “for humanity,” but calls the data center effort “a threat to humanity.”

The speaker emphasizes a deep reliance of the AI industry on Chinese talent, noting that 50% of the world's AI researchers are from China. They point out that Chinese companies want China to win, and that this is terrific. The speaker adds that the Chinese want China to win, and that America also wants to win, expressing that there can be a healthy competition while competing fairly and collaborating at the same time. They assert that everybody's jobs will change as a result of AI, and that some jobs will disappear. As with every industrial revolution, some jobs are gone, but a whole bunch of new jobs are created. The speaker warns that everybody will have to use AI because if you don't use AI, you're going to lose your job to somebody who does.