reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Free speech should exist, but boundaries are needed when speech incites violence or discourages vaccinations. The question is where the US should draw those lines and what rules should be in place. With billions of online activities, AI could potentially encode and enforce these rules. A delayed response to harmful content means the harm is already done.

"Today's misinformation is always tomorrow's truth. It's always the government who wants to censor people who are critical of the government." "Europe is trying to police everyone and shake down American tech companies, which is exactly what the digital markets act looked like. That is what's at stake here, and that is not how our First Amendment works." "Everything our government here in The United States told us about COVID turned out to be false. If you criticize any of the things they initially told you, you had to be censored." "When Elon bought Twitter, now it's a place where the first amendment and free speech are right where they need to be." "The spillover effect it can have on, American content being seen by European users." "The answer to stupid speech, bad speech, and wrong speech is more speech." "the hallmark of Western culture is free expression." "There were 12,183 arrests for offensive post online." "Global Alliance for Responsible Media." "Disinformation governance board."

Foreign governments are using their own laws to censor information for Americans, like the EU's Digital Services Act, which threatens companies with fines if they don't comply. We've requested communications between these foreign entities and tech companies to reveal this pressure. We're also sending letters to the UK, EU, and Brazil to put them on notice that we're watching their actions. It's unacceptable for foreign governments to undermine the First Amendment rights of Americans. We saw this with the Biden administration pressuring companies to censor, which thankfully has been stopped. Free speech is a core value of Western civilization, and we must protect it. We're aiming to safeguard the rights of Americans and help companies resist these shakedowns.

We support free speech, but there are limits, especially when it incites violence or discourages vaccination. It's important to define these boundaries. If we establish rules, how can we enforce them effectively, perhaps using AI? With billions of activities occurring, identifying harmful content after the fact can lead to significant consequences.

The speaker discusses the lack of knowledge regarding what happens to our digital identities when creating new accounts or logging in through large platforms. To address this issue, the speaker mentions that the commission will soon propose a secure European digital identity. This identity can be trusted and used by citizens across Europe for various activities, such as paying taxes or renting bicycles. The speaker emphasizes the importance of a technology that allows individuals to control the data exchanged and its usage.

The EU Digital Services Act and the government's electoral commission will regulate misinformation on social media platforms. The speaker believes it is important for Ireland and that the establishment of a regulator will protect children from harmful online content. When asked about the government and state institutions deciding what is true, the speaker emphasizes the value of reliable information and public service broadcasting. They welcome the appointment of a digital services commissioner. The interviewer questions if assessments have been done to prevent abuse or overuse of regulations, but the speaker reiterates the importance of combating misinformation. The interviewer criticizes the lack of a direct answer, highlighting the concern of regulating truth. The speaker again emphasizes the value of public service broadcasting without directly addressing the question.

Speaker 0 argues that free speech is not a free fall in Europe, contending that two anti free speech movements have coalesced. One movement is in Europe, which has “laid waste to free speech” in countries such as Germany, France, and England, and also in places like Canada. The other movement is described as the US anti-free-speech movement, which began in higher education and then metastasized throughout the government, but which has “all reached our shores now.” The speaker notes that the Berlin World Forum followed remarks on free speech by Vice President Vance, and that the EU was “red hot.” They describe the forum as “the most anti free speech gathering I’ve ever been part of,” with only two attendees from the free speech community, but those present are “committed.” Hillary Clinton is identified as being there and said to have fueled the anger. A key claim is that when Twitter was purchased by Elon Musk, Clinton called on the EU to use the Digital Services Act, described as “one of the most anti free speech pieces of decades,” to force censorship of American citizens and to compel people like Musk to censor. The speaker characterizes this as “an extraordinary act by someone who was once a presidential candidate in The United States,” and asserts that Clinton’s position reflects a commitment to censorship. The speaker further claims that after the World Forum, this effort was globalized, and that they are “threatening companies like ACTS with ruinous fines unless they resume censoring American citizens.” The overall message emphasizes a belief that anti free speech forces are expanding globally, using regulatory tools such as the Digital Services Act to compel censorship and penalize platforms that do not comply, with the World Forum acting as a catalyst for broader international pressure.

The tragic events in the Middle East, specifically the terrorist attacks by Hamas, have increased the stakes. The widespread dissemination of illegal content and misinformation related to these events poses a clear risk of stigmatizing certain communities, destabilizing our democratic structures, and exposing our children to violent content. The recent terrorist attacks in Arras, France, and Brussels serve as a grim reminder that the threat is real and present in Europe. With the Digital Services Act (DSA), we have a comprehensive toolbox that we must fully utilize to ensure online security and protect fundamental rights. We take this responsibility seriously and have been open and transparent with platforms about their new role and our expectations. They must adapt and adjust their systems to meet their new obligations regarding transparency, privacy, and the removal of illegal content and products.

I want to emphasize the importance of free expression on Facebook and Instagram. Over the years, we've seen increased censorship driven by political pressures and concerns about harmful content. To address this, we are simplifying our content moderation systems to reduce mistakes and restore free expression. We will replace fact checkers with a community notes system, simplify content policies, and focus enforcement on severe violations while relying on user reports for less critical issues. Civic content will be reintroduced as user feedback indicates a desire for it. Additionally, our trust and safety teams will relocate to Texas to enhance credibility. We will also collaborate with the U.S. government to combat global censorship trends. While this transition will take time, our goal is to prioritize voice and reduce unnecessary censorship on our platforms. Exciting changes are ahead!

We are the oldest democracy and are dedicated to protecting our children. If there is a breach of the law, we will use the full force of the law to address it. If these major platforms fail to comply with online safety regulations, the government should consider banning them. It’s essential that platforms with large user bases adhere to our standards; otherwise, they should not have the right to operate in this country.

The speaker expresses concern over three recent developments: the Global Compact for Migration, the international pandemic treaty by the WHO, and the EU Digital Services Act. They argue that these initiatives aim to disempower national parliaments, suspend fundamental rights, and concentrate power in the hands of the UN, WHO, and EU. The speaker specifically highlights the Digital Services Act, which introduces a digital state of emergency allowing platforms like Facebook to be completely shut down at the EU's discretion. They criticize the law for obligating platforms to prioritize government propaganda and censor content deemed harmful or critical of the EU. The speaker accuses the EU of attacking freedom of speech and democracy.

The speaker believes freedom of speech in the West is in a dire state, citing the UK's online hate speech arrests, Pavel Durov's arrest in France, and X's ban in Brazil. They claim the EU's Digital Service Act (DSA) grants the EU power to take down X for non-compliance, including removing "illegal hate speech." The DSA has supremacy over national law in EU member states. The speaker views Durov's arrest as a warning to Elon Musk. They believe EU leaders have an "inverted demonic view" of freedom of speech, limiting it to "protect democracy" by censoring content they dislike, labeling it as misinformation. The speaker will post weekly videos on X. They urge Europeans to dismantle the EU and Americans to make the "right decision" in the upcoming election.

Disinformation and misinformation are the primary concerns of the Global Risk Report. The Digital Services Act defines the responsibilities of large internet platforms regarding the content they promote, especially concerning children, vulnerable groups, and hate speech. The boundary between online and offline is blurring, necessitating the protection of offline values online. Generative AI is a significant opportunity if used responsibly, but the World Economic Forum Global Risk Report identifies artificial intelligence as one of the top potential risks for the next decade.

We support free speech, but there are limits, especially when it leads to violence or discourages vaccination. It's important to define these boundaries. If rules are established, how can they be enforced effectively? With billions of online activities, relying on AI to monitor and enforce these rules is crucial, as catching harmful content after the fact can lead to irreversible damage.

The threat of disinformation and foreign interference is growing. To combat this, we are introducing the European Democracy Shield. This initiative will identify and counter information manipulation, work with national agencies, detect foreign interference, enhance AI deepfake detection, and promote resilience.

Without Europe's support, engaging with platforms is challenging due to fewer contacts. The European Union's Digital Services Act offers hope by requiring risk assessments, transparent information sharing, and data access for researchers. This may lead to rehiring and increased platform accountability as enforcement of the DSA ramps up.

The government is taking action against extremist content online, including hate speech and incitement to violence. Ireland's new online safety and media regulator, along with the European Commission, will address these issues under the EU Digital Services Act. They have engaged with major platforms, the Gardaí, and the European Commission, activating instant response plans. Reporting hate speech and illegal content to the platforms or the regulator is encouraged. Once fully operational, the regulator will allow direct reporting for ignored or rejected complaints, aiding oversight, investigations, and enforcement. The first online safety code, holding video sharing platforms accountable for user content and addressing extremist content, will be adopted in early 2024. This marks a new era of empowerment for regulators and the public to create a safer online environment.

Should the Judiciary Committee be concerned if European law results in the censorship of Americans? Absolutely, especially after recent events. I shared information this morning on X about a judicial ruling in Europe asserting their right to censor. We're seeing similar trends in Australia, where authorities believe they should censor the entire global Internet of disfavored information. This is very disturbing and really makes you question our alliance with Europe.

The European Union is pressuring tech companies to censor content secretly, with Elon Musk's x being the only one resisting. The EU is threatening x with fines for not complying. Governments and intelligence agencies are involved in demanding censorship, while spreading their own disinformation. X's community notes system allows for corrections to false information, unlike what the EU claims. Musk's refusal to censor is crucial for free speech. To fight back, share the video, join the email list, and support the free speech movement. Stand up against foreign interference in free speech.

Foreign governments are using acts like the Digital Services Act to censor information globally, pressuring companies to take down content and threatening fines if they don't comply. We've requested communications between the EU, UK, and Brazil with these companies to see what pressure has been applied. We're sending letters to the UK, EU, and Brazilian Supreme Court, putting them on notice that we're monitoring their actions. It's one thing to censor their own citizens, but impacting the First Amendment rights of Americans is a problem, especially when companies are pressured with fines. We saw this when the Biden administration pressured companies to censor, which they later regretted. Free speech is essential, and we must protect it for Americans, especially against foreign interference.

In response to the global risk report, I want to address the concern of disinformation and misinformation. We have been focusing on this issue since the beginning of my term. Through the Digital Services Act, we have defined the responsibilities of large internet platforms in promoting and spreading content. This includes protecting children and vulnerable groups from hate speech. It is crucial to protect our offline values online, especially in the era of generative AI. The World Economic Forum Global Risk Report also highlights artificial intelligence as a top potential risk for the next decade.

La loi permet d'interdire certains réseaux pour protéger nos démocraties en Europe. Quand on parle d'interdiction, cela peut inclure des plateformes comme Twitter. Il est important de comprendre que cette loi n'est pas personnelle, mais résulte d'un processus démocratique. Bien qu'elle ait été élaborée avec mon équipe, elle a été amendée et votée par le Parlement européen. C'est une loi qui représente les parlementaires et non un individu. --- The law allows for the prohibition of certain networks to protect our democracies in Europe. When discussing prohibition, this could include platforms like Twitter. It's important to understand that this law is not personal but results from a democratic process. Although it was developed with my team, it was amended and voted on by the European Parliament. This is a law that represents the parliamentarians, not an individual.

The government is addressing extremist content online and has established Ireland's new online safety and media regulator. They will work alongside the European Commission to regulate the EU Digital Services Act. The regulator has engaged with large platforms, the Gardaí, and the European Commission, who have activated their response plans. The public is encouraged to report hate speech and illegal content to the platforms or the regulator. Once fully operational, the regulator will accept direct reports from the public regarding platform complaints. The regulator will use these reports to focus their oversight, investigations, and enforcement actions. The first online safety code will be adopted in early 2024, holding video sharing platforms accountable for protecting users from extremist content. This marks a new era of empowerment for regulators and the public to create a safer online world.

The speaker discusses the current "transatlantic flank attack 2.0" strategy, where state department exiles are working with the EU to pass censorship laws. The EU Digital Services Act, crafted with input from figures like Michael Hayden and Tom Ridge, poses a major threat to freedom of speech. X faces the choice of forfeiting revenue or implementing internal censorship mechanisms to comply with the law. This battle against censorship from Europe is a significant challenge for X.

I will explain how C63 will make the online world safer. As a father of 2, I understand the dangers online for children. We have safety standards for toys like Lego, but not for screens in front of our kids.