reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing Vice President Kamala Harris's recent interview with the National Association of Black Journalists (NABJ), criticizing the lack of challenging questions compared to the tough inquiries faced by former President Trump. She highlights a Politico report stating that Harris did not stray from her talking points and expresses frustration at the perceived failure of journalists to hold her accountable. Kelly shares an example of a question posed to Harris about joy, which she finds trivial and uninformative, contrasting it with the aggressive questioning Trump received. Dave Rubin joins the discussion, expressing concern about the upcoming election and the media's role in shaping narratives. He criticizes the NABJ for their questioning style, suggesting it reflects a bias that favors Harris. The conversation shifts to the broader implications of media bias and the responsibility of journalists to challenge political figures effectively. Rubin mentions the significant amount of unspent infrastructure and pandemic funds, warning that if the administration pushes to spend these funds, it could lead to inflation. He discusses the potential consequences of government spending and the importance of protecting financial futures through investments like gold IRAs. The dialogue continues with Rubin addressing the recent indictment involving Russian influence in a podcast network he was briefly associated with. He clarifies that he was not accused of wrongdoing and emphasizes the need for transparency in media and politics. They discuss the implications of the indictment for conservative commentators and the media's tendency to discredit them. Kelly and Rubin then delve into the topic of Kamala Harris's tenure as Attorney General, highlighting a controversial case involving George Gage, who was convicted of sexual abuse. They criticize Harris for her handling of the case and the media's lack of coverage on her record, suggesting that it reflects a broader failure to hold political figures accountable. The conversation shifts to Robbie Starbuck, who discusses his efforts to dismantle Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs in major corporations. He explains how whistleblowers have provided information about companies like Harley-Davidson adopting woke policies and how his campaigns have successfully pressured these companies to change their practices. Starbuck emphasizes the importance of focusing on merit and neutrality in corporate policies and the need for individuals to take responsibility for advocating change. Starbuck shares his strategy of targeting companies individually rather than as a collective, noting that many corporations are now reconsidering their DEI initiatives in response to public pressure. He highlights the success of his campaigns in influencing major companies to abandon radical policies and return to a focus on fairness and merit. The discussion concludes with Starbuck expressing optimism about future campaigns and the potential for significant corporate changes, encouraging listeners to support his efforts in promoting neutrality and fairness in the workplace.

Morning headlines collide as the hosts open with a dramatic sweep of power and politics. The FBI raided former national security adviser John Bolton’s Maryland home at 7 a.m. as investigators pursue classified documents in a leak probe. Meanwhile, Gavin Newsom appears buoyant, celebrating state victories and redistricting moves that tighten Democratic control. The discussion touches on New York’s appellate ruling overturning a $500 million penalty against Donald Trump, and threads through topics from a looming Jubilee and corporate headlines to military moves against drug cartels and the broader question of accountability for those in power. Walmart and Target are described in parallel as stock moves, leadership shifts, and cultural flashpoints drive investor attention. Target announces internal promotion Michael Fidelki as CEO effective 2026, while Wall Street shows mixed relief; investors expect an external hire. Meanwhile Walmart leverages tariff pressures to raise prices and retain customers. The conversation widens into a wave of corporate culture backlash, with DEI policies and consumer boycotts feeding into earnings narratives, and a veteran host weighs whether the backlash will sink or salvage brands as a coalition of customers reconsiders whom they support with their dollars. Another thread centers on Cracker Barrel’s logo refresh and leadership choices. The hosts dissect the move away from the folksy image, the questions about leadership hires from the Taco Bell ecosystem, and the acrimony over public relations missteps. They compare the decision to earlier brand sketches and note how retail icons can suffer when culture shifts collide with customer expectations. They also cover Bed Bath & Beyond’s California stance, Marcus Lemonis’s critique, and the political climate’s impact on business climate, hinting that California’s regulatory maze may chill investment. The UK revival story adds a religious countercurrent, with a surge in church attendance and belief among young adults, framed as a counterweight to secular trends and policy strain. The conversation loops back to power, faith, and accountability, even as the hosts share personal reflections on God’s role in their lives. A separate Kentucky case of a judge killed in his chambers by a sheriff triggers debate about vigilante justice, power dynamics, and due process, underscoring how bold actions ripple through law, media, and public sentiment.

On May 30, 2023, Dave Rubin discusses the rise and fall of woke capitalism, emphasizing the backlash against corporations like Bud Light and Target for their progressive marketing strategies. He highlights the grassroots boycotts against Bud Light, which have led to a significant drop in sales, and critiques Target for promoting LGBTQ+ products aimed at children, including items related to gender identity. Rubin expresses concern over the marketing strategies that confuse children and criticizes corporate leaders for prioritizing diversity and inclusion over profitability. He shares insights from Kevin O'Leary, who notes that Bud Light's brand mismanagement serves as a cautionary tale for CEOs. Rubin also addresses the controversy surrounding Target's removal of certain pride products due to employee safety concerns, framing it as a response to economic pressure rather than genuine threats. He critiques the corporate focus on diversity initiatives, arguing that it detracts from their primary mission of selling products. Rubin concludes by discussing Florida's political landscape, particularly Ron DeSantis's approach to combating woke ideology and the media's portrayal of him as a dangerous figure. He asserts that DeSantis's policies resonate with voters and suggests that the backlash against woke capitalism could lead to a shift in cultural and political dynamics.

In a conversation between Jordan Peterson and Robby Starbuck, Starbuck discusses his activism against "woke capitalism," which he equates to a modern form of Marxism. He argues that corporations have shifted from serving customers to aligning with the Democratic Party and major investment firms like BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard. Starbuck has effectively targeted companies like Tractor Supply, John Deere, and Harley-Davidson, successfully pushing back against their woke policies. Starbuck recounts how he began his activism after uncovering troubling practices at Tractor Supply through a whistleblower. This led him to realize that he was financially supporting companies that contradicted his values, particularly regarding children's exposure to certain ideologies. He emphasizes the need for a strategic approach to activism, learning from past boycotts and focusing on companies that rely heavily on conservative consumers. He highlights the importance of individual responsibility and grassroots activism, contrasting it with the left's organized efforts. Starbuck believes that the left has gained control of cultural institutions by mobilizing activists, while conservatives have been too passive. He stresses that the silent majority must become active to reclaim influence. Starbuck's strategy involves creating impactful videos that expose corporate misalignments with consumer values, ensuring that these stories are not just fleeting news cycles. He has built a network of over 5,000 whistleblowers to gather information on corporate practices. He emphasizes the need for accountability, stating that if companies fail to follow through on their commitments, he will aggressively report on their shortcomings. The conversation also touches on the moral implications of the current ideological battle, particularly concerning children and the transgender movement. Starbuck expresses concern over the medical community's actions regarding minors and views it as a crime against humanity. He believes that the fight is not just political but fundamentally moral, with the potential for significant societal consequences. Starbuck reflects on his background in Hollywood and how his experiences shaped his views, particularly his family's history with communism in Cuba. He emphasizes the importance of faith and integrity in his activism, stating that he aims to leave a legacy of righteousness for his children. The discussion concludes with a call for individuals to take personal responsibility and engage actively in the fight against wokeness in corporate America.

Tucker Carlson and Anson Frericks discuss the decline of Anheuser-Busch, tracing its roots back to its ownership by the Bush family and its eventual acquisition by InBev in 2008. Frericks explains that the company's culture shifted dramatically after the takeover, moving from a focus on American consumers and brand growth to a European-style stakeholder capitalism model, emphasizing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) over meritocracy. Frericks highlights that Anheuser-Busch adopted ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) philosophies, which led to a series of missteps, culminating in the controversial partnership with Dylan Mulvaney, a transgender influencer. This decision alienated a significant portion of their customer base, resulting in a 50% drop in Bud Light sales. He argues that the company's leadership, particularly the marketing team, became disconnected from its core consumers, labeling them as "fratty and out of touch." The conversation touches on the broader implications of corporate America adopting progressive social agendas, with Frericks asserting that this shift has been detrimental to both businesses and society. He contrasts the American capitalist model, which prioritizes shareholder value, with the European stakeholder model, which he believes dilutes accountability and effectiveness. Frericks also discusses the role of major asset management firms like BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard in pushing corporations toward these progressive agendas, often at the expense of traditional business practices. He emphasizes that the backlash against Anheuser-Busch's marketing decisions reflects a growing discontent among consumers who feel their values are being disregarded. The discussion concludes with Frericks suggesting that Anheuser-Busch should return to its roots, focusing on its core mission of brewing beer and serving its customers, rather than engaging in political and social issues. He advocates for a potential sale of the company back to American ownership to restore its identity and accountability.