reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The government and economic systems have collapsed, leaving many without hope. Millions of Russian citizens navigate the aftermath of communism, with the elderly and young families suffering the most. Volodya and Maria, a young couple, live with her mother and grandfather in a cramped three-room apartment. They combine their incomes but still struggle to afford basic necessities like vitamins, medicines, and nutritious food.

I learned about the shocking events in the house from the internet. There were horrifying scenes of shooting and fire, resulting in the death of people. It felt like a terrible nightmare, and it was clear that Ukraine was not intending to resolve the issues peacefully. The next day, our protests grew stronger, and people were prepared for more forceful actions.

In a 1921 article from the New York Times, it is reported that 6 million Jews in Russia are in danger of extermination due to a massive gas threat. The famine is spreading, the counterrevolutionary movement is gaining strength, and the Soviet control is weakening. This article predates Adolf Hitler's rise to power by 12 years. The New York Times article titled "Begs America, Save 6,000,000 in Russia" highlights the urgent need for aid. (Words: 78)

In this video, it is mentioned that over 3,500 people, mostly Jews, were killed in just two days in Ukraine. The speaker also talks about how the police were involved in these killings, and how they didn't know it was happening at the time. Additionally, it is mentioned that over 100,000 people were killed in another incident in 1943. The crimes committed in Ukraine during this time were never punished, and the Kiev regime is mentioned as being responsible.

The speaker discusses the events of the Maidan massacre in Ukraine in 2014. They mention the protests, the shootings, and the investigations that followed. The speaker highlights the findings of Professor Ivan Kachenovsky, who discovered evidence suggesting that the massacre was part of a planned coup d'etat. They also mention interviews with far-right leaders and Western officials, who discussed the number of victims needed to change Western support. The speaker concludes by mentioning the lack of resolution in determining who started the shooting and the amnesty law that prevented prosecution of those involved in the protests.

The Russian monarchy, rooted in Christian beliefs, prospered under the Romanov family until their murder in 1918. Freemasonry's influence led to the revolution, with the royal family brutally killed in a dark ritual. The bodies were dismembered, dissolved, and consumed, symbolizing a shift towards a new world order. Czar Nicholas II is now a saint in the Russian Orthodox Church, prompting repentance for his dynasty's downfall.

The speaker argues that the Bolsheviks were as brutal as the Nazis in at least two key ways: they made Christianity illegal and religion illegal, and they also criminalized criticizing the regime. They claim the Bolsheviks destroyed 40,000 churches and tens of millions of Christians, and note that “that’s who we sided with.” They critique how history is framed, saying narratives always start after the most horrific actions and focus on the response to those actions, such as events around October 7, the Warsaw Ghetto, or Russia’s expulsions, rather than addressing why those actions occurred. The speaker contends this approach skews the overall picture. They acknowledge that “The Bolsheviks were unequivocally horrible,” but they argue that people don’t learn about that history. The speaker mentions denial of the Armenian genocide and the Holodomor, suggesting there is a double standard: it is “okay for them to deny the Armenian [Holodomor],” but now, in about 30 countries, people can be arrested or imprisoned over related claims.

The Russian revolution was driven by secret societies like the Bolsheviks, led by Lenin and Trotsky. They turned their cult into a mass religion with dreams of global dominance, causing millions of deaths. This event changed the world, showing the power of conspiracy and active minorities in shaping history. We are still feeling the effects today.

As Russian forces retreat from north of Kyiv, scenes of destruction emerge. Ukrainian authorities report flattened houses and believe bodies remain underneath. A mass grave in Bucha, shown by Ukrainian national police, is believed to contain up to 50 civilians killed during the Russian occupation. Vladimir searches for his brother, Dmitry, and believes he is buried there. A neighbor accompanying him accuses the Russians of hating and abusing Ukraine since the 1930s, with the intent to destroy and eliminate them. She asserts that Ukraine will endure.

Ukraine faced issues like human trafficking, organ trafficking, narco trafficking, and fascism. These threats are global, not just local. The world is on the brink of World War 3 due to these dangers. We are all at risk of being controlled by lies and manipulation from a common enemy.

Bolshevism and Marxism had a devastating impact on Russia and Eastern Europe, resulting in widespread atrocities and millions of deaths. The true death toll is unknown due to censorship and suppression of information. The crimes committed during this time are often ignored or whitewashed. The early 20th century saw tensions between European powers, leading to World War I. The war, along with the sinking of the Lusitania, led to America's involvement and the subsequent World War II. The Russian army suffered greatly during the wars, resulting in food shortages and conscription of Central Asians and Southern Russians. The Bolshevik Revolution in 1917 led to the rise of Lenin and the establishment of the Soviet Union. Stalin's reign saw further oppression, including forced collectivization and the Gulag system. The Soviet Union played a significant role in World War II and the establishment of Israel. The Cold War and the psychological warfare of communism continue to impact society today.

Speaker 0: 6,000,000 number used lot many times before World War two by, like, newspapers. Is that true? I've seen that mentioned quite a bit with that being used. Speaker 1: If you wanna read up all on this, it's volume six of the Holocaust Hangposts here. It's the first Holocaust. Talks about all the many times that, particularly, New York Times was good at it, as I call it, the New York Times because it's owned and run by Jews. They were propagating the 6,000,000 number, and they were using first, the term Holocaust already during the czarist time in Russia before the first world war. 6,000,000 Jews are threatened. 6,000,000 Jews are dying. They're threatened by a holocaust. It goes into the first world war after the first world war with the Bolshevik revolution, the New York Times, the Jewish community in The United States to a large degree supporting the Bolshevist revolution, which was mainly a a Jewish supported revolution. Speaker 0: And Speaker 1: then you if that revolution collapses, the Jews are facing countrywide pogroms that would potentially wipe them out. So they knew it's either the the Bolshevik, revolution succeeds or we're gonna have a holocaust. And they were talking about that, in this context. When you support the Jews, 6,000,000 are about to die and so forth. It goes on. There is a straight line going from the eighteen eighties into the second world war Killing final five. 6,000,000 Jews are dying or threatened or being killed. So it's nothing new. The area, Russia, Poland, Germany has changed. The the villain, the czar, the white anti Bolshevik civil war people, or then Hitler and his acronies. Speaker 0: So what you’re saying is that— Speaker 1: So the ingredients to the story have changed, but not the story in general.

The speaker shares their experience of being targeted by military police who wanted to forcibly take them away. They also recount a story of a child being taken from their parents by armed individuals. The speaker expresses disbelief that Russia killed their mother and mentions being protected by a Russian sniper during an evacuation. They describe the hardships they have endured and state that they have aged beyond their years. When asked about their plans for the future, they simply express a desire to live and enjoy life together.

In 1932, a law led to 7 million peasants starving to death, sparking questions of intentional planning. Stories of horror from that time haunt survivors, like the speaker's grandfather, who couldn't accept his fate. The tragedy left scars on families, villages, and the nation, with many facing starvation and resorting to unthinkable acts. The speaker reflects on the madness and suffering, echoing the universal questions of how and why such atrocities occurred. This chapter in history, filled with sacrifice and loss, remains a hidden yet tragic tale. Translation: In 1932, a law led to 7 million peasants starving to death, sparking questions of intentional planning. Stories of horror from that time haunt survivors, like the speaker's grandfather, who couldn't accept his fate. The tragedy left scars on families, villages, and the nation, with many facing starvation and resorting to unthinkable acts. The speaker reflects on the madness and suffering, echoing the universal questions of how and why such atrocities occurred. This chapter in history, filled with sacrifice and loss, remains a hidden yet tragic tale.

The video discusses the Jewish involvement in the Russian Revolution, the murder of the Romanov family, and the atrocities committed by the Bolshevik regime. It highlights the role of Jewish bankers in funding the revolution and the subsequent implementation of communism. The transcript also mentions the brutal killings of millions of Russians under the Bolshevik rule, including deliberate famines. The speaker emphasizes the impact of Jewish Bolsheviks on Russian history and the suffering endured by the Russian people.

The Russian Imperial Romanov family, including Tsar Nicholas II, his wife Alexandra, and their five children, were killed in July 1918 by Bolshevik troops under the orders of Lenin. The bodies were taken to a forest, where they were stripped, mutilated, and sexually abused. The British King George was horrified by the news. New documents reveal that the Bolsheviks also stole royal jewels. Some believe that Jewish financing and influence played a role in the events.

Stalin aimed to destroy independent farmers in Ukraine and Russia, defined as those owning land or a cow, as part of class warfare. This created opportunities to plunder Ukraine, murder people, and enrich supporters. An estimated 7 to 10 million Ukrainians and 1 to 2 million Russians were killed. This orchestrated famine was not the first, as it had occurred under Trotsky and Lenin. Stalin perfected it. Before World War II, over 20 million people died. Ukrainians never forgot this orchestrated famine, which was used to destroy the population and transform it into the "Soviet man." Families were annihilated.

Stalin aimed to destroy millions of independent farmers in Ukraine and Russia, defined as those owning land or livestock, as part of class warfare. This also allowed for plundering Ukraine and enriching supporters. An estimated 7 to 10 million Ukrainians and 1 to 2 million Russians were killed. This orchestrated famine was not the first, as it had occurred under Trotsky and Lenin. Stalin perfected it. Before World War II, deaths under the Bolsheviks likely exceeded 20 million. The famine was used to destroy the population and transform it into the "Soviet man." Families were annihilated, and terrible crimes were committed. Ukrainians never forgot this period.

During the Bolshevik regime, the Tambov and Penza regions experienced harsh tactics to seize crops and livestock, causing starvation and fear among the population. The Bolshevik authorities used beatings, rape, and deliberate grain rotting as weapons. This Tambov massacre served as a test for the Red Army's brutal force against civilians, revealing Lenin's weapon against European Christians. The Red Terror campaign involved mass torture, murder, and oppression by the Jewish Bolsheviks in 1918. European farmers were executed, and atrocities like tying officials to planks and burning them occurred in Odessa, while scalpings and hand flames were common in Kharkiv.

The speakers discuss their experiences with the military police in Ukraine and the abduction of a young girl. They recount how the police came looking for children and showed the girl's photo to her grandfather. The girl's friends also became targets. The speakers describe the abduction of a four-year-old girl whose parents were unaware. The police took the child by force, and when the parents resisted, the child was shot. The speakers also mention a sniper who targeted them but did not harm them. They express disbelief at the idea that Russia killed the girl's mother. Despite their traumatic experiences, they plan to live and enjoy life together.

In the early 1900s, various articles in The New York Times mentioned the plight of 6,000,000 Jews facing famine, disease, and death in Central and Eastern Europe. The articles highlighted the horrifying conditions and the need for a billion-dollar fund to help these individuals. This was years before Hitler's rise to power, showing the longstanding struggles of the Jewish population. Additionally, Russia was reported to have faced the extermination of 6,000,000 Jews through massacre in 1931. These articles shed light on the tragic circumstances faced by millions of Jewish people.

The transcript presents an extensive compilation of claims from a group of speakers arguing that the established Holocaust narrative is false or exaggerated and that many historical incidents have been misrepresented or fabricated by Allied propaganda, Soviet influence, and Jewish-led organizations. The speakers frame Holocaust revisionism as a legitimate scholarly effort rather than denial, asserting that revisionists do not dispute that Jews and others suffered and died in the war, but dispute the scale, methods, and specifics of extermination. Key asserted points and claims - Holocaust definition and revisionism - The Holocaust is described as a belief that 6,000,000 Jews were murdered primarily by gassing in “shower rooms,” a narrative the speakers say is amplified by Hollywood, media, and schools. A growing movement of scientists, historians, engineers, journalists, and free-speech activists is portrayed as revisionist, though often branded as “Holocaust deniers” to discourage discourse. Revisionists are said not to deny persecution, deprivation of civil rights, deportation, internment, forced labor, or deaths in camps and ghettos, including deaths from disease; they also say that many victims died in ways other than genocide and that many victims’ dignity is not denied. - Internment and civilian camps in the United States - After Pearl Harbor, over 100,000 people of Japanese descent on the Pacific Coast were interned by Executive Order 9066; the text claims this restricted freedoms, required identity cards, and denied compensation or war reparations. The narrative includes accounts of interned individuals describing camp life, guard presence, and harsh conditions. - General wartime devastation and context - The war is described as a conflict that would not have occurred if “international jury” had not declared war on Germany in 1933, with emphasis on typhus, subversion, and crowded camps as drivers of disease and death. The speakers stress that millions died across battlefields, ships, and cities, and that propaganda surrounding German crimes obscures Allied or Soviet misdeeds. - Claims about typhus, gas chambers, and cremation - Typhus epidemics are said to explain many deaths in camps; Cyclone B (hydrogen cyanide) is claimed to have been used for delousing and pest control rather than execution, with several speakers arguing that gas chambers as homicidal devices did not exist or were technically infeasible. They assert there is no scientific proof of gassing, no German documents proving extermination plans, and that cremation and delousing procedures served health purposes rather than execution purposes. - Expert testimonies and forensics are cited (e.g., Leuchter, Rudolf, Lift, Lindsay) to support the claim that the gas chambers could not have functioned as execution facilities, noting technical impossibilities such as lack of explosion-proof features, gasketed doors, or proper gas delivery systems. - Specific camp narratives and testimonies - The camps are described as having been centers of labor, medical care, and even cultural activity, with accounts of weddings, births, nurseries, orchestras, libraries, theater performances, and recreational activities. Some testimonies describe attempts to maintain humanity and morale under harsh conditions, including a piano in Block 1, children’s art, and soccer games. - Several testimonies challenge the image of mass exterminations, claiming instead that most deaths resulted from disease, starvation, and Allied bombing, and that Red Cross and Vatican inquiries found no evidence of homicidal gas chambers. - A number of survivor testimonials are presented as quotations or paraphrases challenging the notion of mass murder in gas chambers, with some individuals denying personal knowledge of gas chambers or mass killings. - Documentary, legal, and scholarly disputes - The Institute for Historical Review (IHR) and other revisionist scholars are described as measuring and challenging the established narrative, sometimes facing legal or financial pressure. The transcript cites various researchers and forensics teams (e.g., Leuchter, Krakov, Farison, Groff, Farison, Larsson) as having concluded that homicidal gassings were not technically feasible in the cited facilities. - It is claimed that many postwar figures and witnesses provided testimonies or stories later recognized as unreliable or fabricated, including famous Holocaust survivors whose accounts are presented as inconsistent or false. Names and cases (e.g., Herman Rosenblatt, Anne Frank, Elie Wiesel) are invoked to illustrate alleged fraud or manipulation, though these claims contradict well-established historical records. - Propaganda, media, and the so-called “Holocaust industry” - The text asserts that the Holocaust narrative is used as a tool to enforce globalist policy, promote multiculturalism, and suppress nationalist sentiments among white Europeans. It claims that ongoing denazification efforts, legal penalties for questioning the Holocaust, and control over media and online platforms are designed to suppress dissent and promote a one-sided portrayal. - There is a claim that “atrocity propaganda” and black propaganda have been used to shape public perception, with references to Sefton Delmer and Allied psychological warfare, and accusations that postwar trials and media representations were heavily biased or manipulated. - Population counts, mortality figures, and documentary evidence - Several sections contest the veracity of the commonly cited death tolls, the reliability of Red Cross and other international communications, and the authenticity of diaries and eyewitness testimonies. The transcript asserts that the Nuremberg trials did not use physical or technical evidence to establish gas chamber existence and that some documents used as proof were mistranslated or contextualized wrongly. - The piece repeatedly emphasizes that millions of Jews did not die in the camps, that the “6,000,000” figure is a symbolic or religious number, and that high-profile Holocaust narratives are part of a constructed orthodoxy. - Final framing - The speakers position Holocaust revisionism as a defense of free speech and historical inquiry, arguing that questioning the official narrative is essential to truth. They claim laws against denial suppress inquiry and that truth should stand on its own merits without legal protection. They also suggest that conflicting accounts, forged documents, and political agendas have shaped the popular memory of World War II. Note on structure and tone - The transcript interweaves personal testimonials, expert opinions, documentary references, and polemical assertions. It repeatedly contrasts “revisionists” with conventional accounts, often asserting that mainstream portrayals are driven by propaganda, financial interests, or political goals. The overall thrust is to challenge the conventional understanding of the Holocaust, question the evidentiary basis for extermination claims, and highlight alleged inconsistencies in survivor narratives and official records.

The speakers share a mosaic of daily life and cultural activities amid the horrors of Auschwitz and nearby camps, highlighting how people sought meaning, small freedoms, and human connection even as starvation, fear, and cruelty persisted. - Food and water deprivation are described as extreme: “The worst, they never gave us any water. They never gave us any food. The children were screaming.” (Speaker 0) - Cultural and artistic life persisted despite conditions: - Music and performance: An orchestra formed by prisoners, with some musicians writing notes for the ensemble; a piano was brought into Block 1 and a downstairs room was converted into a theatre space so women could perform. A pianist who could read notes helped arrange music for each instrument, even composing parts when paper and supplies were scarce. (Speakers 2 and 3) - Theater and sewing: A curtain and stage were built, and sewing help was provided for curtain rings. (Speaker 3) - Films and reading: A library and newspapers existed, and later plans for a camp cinema were realized, with films shown in barracks on some evenings. (Speakers 4 and 5) - Music in daily life: Barracks housed a violin quartet that performed for inmates. (Speaker 5) - Social life and informal economies: - On weekends, prisoners formed a soccer group, turning to sport as a mental respite. (Speaker 2) - A “cantina” and limited shop goods existed; money in the camp was earned as coupons redeemable for items in the canteen. Regular money stopped, replaced by coupon-based payment. Cigarettes and weak beer were among the few items available; food was scarce. (Speakers 4 and 5) - Education and organized resistance: - In some camps, like Monowitz and Gross Rosen, prisoners organized soccer teams and even assembled equipment with outside civilian help, sometimes under cover from the SS, reflecting a paradoxical sense of normalcy amid brutality. (Speakers 6 and 7) - War’s shifting pressure and relative freedoms as the front approached: - By 1944, as the Germans lost ground, there was a slight relaxation in pressure, with some instances of camaraderie between SS personnel and prisoners during matches, though overall conditions remained dire. The Auschwitz soccer field sat next to the genocidal gas chambers, visible to players, underscoring the proximity of daily life to the Final Solution. (Speakers 1 and 7) - Personal acts of humanity and resistance: - Freddie Hirsch coordinated painting for the children; a volunteer artist painted a meadow, cows, sheep, and a backdrop inspired by Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs after children requested it. The painter and children collaborated on a Satirical play inspired by Snow White, with a crown made from paper and costumes fashioned from available materials; the child playing Snow White had a remarkable soprano voice. The process occurred hush-hush, with occasional SS oversight when the performance began. (Speakers 9 and 10) - The children wrote a play satirizing Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, following the painting; a parenthetical note mentions a ward ville play and a disliked dynamic with one performer. (Speakers 9 and 10) - Closing personal note: - A photograph is described as being taken at a bat mitzvah, showing survivors; the speaker identifies the people in the image as survivors from a family connection. (Speaker 0) Overall, the transcript intertwines accounts of deprivation with bursts of artistic, athletic, and communal activity, illustrating how inmates created culture, camaraderie, and brief pockets of normalcy within the Auschwitz system and related camps.

During the periods of 1921 to 1922, 1932 to 1933, and 1946 to 1947, millions of Russians died due to deliberate famines orchestrated by the Jewish Bolshevik regime. This tragedy, known as the Holodomor, affected Ukraine, Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Russia, with people resorting to extreme measures like eating grass and even cannibalism. Encyclopedia Britannica estimates that the Stalin Kaganovich famine alone caused the death of around 8 million people, including 5 million Ukrainians. Overall, the three Holodomor genocides resulted in a death toll of approximately 16.5 million. Russian historian Alexander Solzhenitsyn further estimated that the Jewish Bolshevik regime exterminated up to 6 million Europeans between 1917 and 1958 through forced collectivization, hunger, purges, banishment, executions, and mass deaths at Gulags. These acts align with communist theory's acceptance of industrial-scale murders.