reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Last weekend, I was at a very expensive ski resort in the Alps, filled with wealthy Ukrainians spending lavishly. This is happening all over Europe. This money, I believe, should be ours—American taxpayer money. Furthermore, I know that a significant portion, up to half, of the arms we send to the Ukrainian military is being sold off, a lot of it ending up in the hands of drug cartels at our border. This is criminal. Our intelligence agencies are aware of this, and I believe they are profiting from it. Billions of dollars in aid are being stolen and sold to our enemies. This is unacceptable, and no one in America seems to know about it.

We have an abundance of money for funding war machinery and foreign aid, like $8 billion to Ukraine. We also support Ukrainian businesses and banks with taxpayer funds. Humanitarian aid often ends up in corrupt hands due to lack of oversight.

The Biden-Harris administration persuaded Ukraine to abandon a peace deal that would have resulted in losing only half of the territory currently occupied by Russia, leading to significant loss of life. This decision was driven by interests in the vast mineral resources under the Donbas region and the desire to weaken Russia's military. Additionally, U.S. hedge funds are profiting from Ukraine's fertile land and mineral rights. The narrative of the U.S. standing with Ukraine is misleading, aimed at justifying prolonged conflict for profit. Ultimately, the actions taken have cost Ukraine its territory and the lives of its children, with war profiteers showing no genuine support for the Ukrainian people.

The focus is on the exploitation of Ukraine's fertile land, with foreign corporations eyeing agricultural opportunities. Despite promises of a referendum on land sales, the moratorium was lifted in 2021, allowing foreign-controlled companies to buy land through loopholes. The U.S. has heavily invested in Ukraine, providing over $46 billion in military aid since early 2022. Concerns arise that once peace is established, Ukraine will face immense debt repayment demands, with current debts exceeding its GDP. The country is experiencing severe inflation and rising poverty, while many citizens are sent to the front lines, leading to significant casualties. Zelensky's actions appear to align with foreign interests, raising questions about the future of Ukrainian sovereignty and the well-being of its people.

This war should never have happened. Russia sought terms favorable to Ukraine, primarily to keep NATO out. Military contractors benefit from NATO expansion, ensuring a market for their weapons. Since March 2022, the U.S. has committed over $113 billion to Ukraine, with more requested, while the real beneficiaries are American defense manufacturers. Mitch McConnell suggested this funding is a money laundering scheme, with BlackRock owning many of these companies. Loans to Ukraine come with harsh conditions, including austerity and the sale of government assets, particularly valuable agricultural land. Despite the sacrifices of Ukrainians, 30% of this land has already been sold to companies like DuPont and Cargill, also linked to BlackRock. The rebuilding contracts for Ukraine have gone to BlackRock, revealing a strategy to maintain divisions among us while profiting from the conflict.

The speaker discusses the war in Ukraine, claiming it benefits American defense contractors like Northrop Grumman and Lockheed through NATO expansion. They criticize the large sums of money being allocated to Ukraine, suggesting it is a money laundering scheme benefiting companies like BlackRock. The speaker highlights loan conditions imposed on Ukraine, leading to the sale of government assets to multinational corporations. They express concern over the exploitation of Ukraine's valuable agricultural land by companies like DuPont and Monsanto, ultimately controlled by BlackRock. The speaker concludes by emphasizing a strategy to keep the population divided and distracted by internal conflicts.

Corruption and big business are entwined in Ukraine's ongoing war. Russia sought terms favorable to Ukraine, primarily keeping NATO out. As Kyiv engages with BlackRock and JPMorgan for reconstruction funding, concerns arise about U.S. companies profiting from the conflict. Significant U.S. financial commitments have been made, but much of this money may benefit American defense contractors rather than Ukraine directly. The collaboration with BlackRock began amid economic isolation, attracting global businesses eager to invest. However, conditions tied to loans may impose austerity and force Ukraine to sell its assets, including valuable agricultural land. Critics argue this reflects a broader pattern of foreign domination, with the war creating profit opportunities at the expense of Ukraine's sovereignty and future.

Up to half the weapons we send Ukraine are being sold off, often to drug cartels at our border. This isn't speculation; it's fact. Our intelligence agencies know this is happening. They, and likely the CIA, are profiting from it. Billions of dollars in aid are being stolen and sold to our enemies. Zelensky recently denied these claims, and the media reported his denial. But it's true: anyone can easily buy Ukrainian weapons online. This is a crime, and no one is talking about it.

The speaker discusses the war in Ukraine and claims that Russia tried to settle it on favorable terms. They argue that the US spends a significant amount of money on military contracts and expanding NATO. The speaker criticizes the allocation of funds, stating that the money could have been used to address homelessness. They also mention that the war will require further expenses for rebuilding. The speaker suggests that politicians and defense manufacturers benefit from this situation, referring to it as a money laundering scheme. They question the loan given to Ukraine and its repayment prospects. The speaker highlights the loan conditions imposed, including austerity measures and the sale of government-owned assets to multinational corporations. They express concern over the ownership of these corporations, specifically mentioning BlackRock. The speaker concludes by stating that the strategy of keeping people divided allows those in power to continue their actions unchecked.

BlackRock and Chase are involved in a $400 billion contract to rebuild Ukraine. The speaker questions the situation, expressing confusion and disbelief, but clarifies that they are not a conspiracy theorist.

The EPA budget is $12 billion, while Ukraine receives 12 times that amount annually. Even after the war ends, the US plans to spend half a trillion on rebuilding Ukraine. Mitch McConnell stated that the money goes to US military contractors, benefiting the country. This reveals the money laundering scheme involving companies like Raytheon, General Dynamics, Boeing, and Lockheed.

They believe that large sums of money are being stolen, particularly in Ukraine. The money is not being used for its intended purpose of fighting a legitimate war. There are suspicions of kickbacks and corruption. The goal seems to be to depopulate Ukraine for other purposes. Estimates suggest that hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian men have been killed or displaced, leading to a significant decrease in the population of Ukraine.

The speaker discusses the war in Ukraine and claims that Russia tried to settle on favorable terms. They argue that the expansion of NATO benefits military contractors like Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, General Dynamics Boeing, and Lockheed, who gain a captive market. The speaker criticizes the large amounts of money committed to Ukraine and suggests it is a money laundering scheme benefiting BlackRock, the owner of the military contractors. They also mention loan conditions imposed on Ukraine, including extreme austerity measures and the sale of government-owned assets to multinational corporations. The speaker highlights the sale of Ukrainian agricultural land to companies like DuPont, Cargill, and Monsanto, all owned by BlackRock. They conclude by stating that the strategy of keeping people divided allows those in power to continue their actions without consequence.

This war should never have happened. Russia sought terms favorable to Ukraine, primarily keeping NATO out. Military contractors benefit from NATO expansion, ensuring a market for their weapons. Since March 2022, the U.S. has committed over $113 billion to Ukraine, with more requested. Mitch McConnell suggested that this funding primarily supports American defense manufacturers, hinting at a money laundering scheme. Loans to Ukraine come with harsh conditions, including austerity measures and selling government assets, particularly fertile agricultural land. Major corporations, including those owned by BlackRock, are purchasing this land. Biden awarded contracts for Ukraine's reconstruction to companies like Accra. This strategy aims to keep society divided, fostering conflict among various groups while obscuring the true motives behind these actions.

This war never should have happened. Russia tried to settle with terms beneficial to Ukraine and us, mainly keeping NATO out. Military contractors want new NATO countries because it forces them to buy weapons from specific companies like Northrop Grumman and Lockheed, creating a trapped market. We've committed billions to Ukraine, money that could have housed every homeless person in the US. Mitch McConnell admitted this money largely goes to American defense manufacturers, essentially a money laundering scheme. BlackRock owns these companies. The "loan" to Ukraine will never be repaid. The conditions include extreme austerity and the sale of government-owned assets, including its valuable agricultural land, to multinational corporations like DuPont, Cargill, and Monsanto, which are also owned by BlackRock. BlackRock even got the contract to rebuild Ukraine. They're doing this openly because they keep us divided and fighting each other.

The speaker points out that the budget for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the US is $12 billion, while Ukraine receives 12 times that amount in one year. The speaker mentions that even after the war in Ukraine ends, the US will spend half a trillion dollars on rebuilding the country, with contracts for rebuilding being even larger than war contracts. The speaker highlights a statement made by Mitch McConnell, who suggests that the money sent to Ukraine actually goes to US military contractors, benefiting the country. The speaker implies that this reveals a money laundering scheme involving companies like Raytheon, General Dynamics, Boeing, and Lockheed.

The focus is on Ukraine's fertile land and the interests of foreign corporations. Despite a moratorium on land sales, pressure from the IMF led to its lifting in July 2021, allowing foreign-controlled companies to purchase land through local proxies. Ukrainian agricultural land is significantly cheaper than in Western Europe, attracting foreign investment. The U.S. sees Ukraine as a strategic project, controlling food security in Europe. In 2022, BlackRock proposed to assist in Ukraine's reconstruction, with costs initially estimated at $350 billion, later rising to $1 trillion. This has raised concerns about Ukraine being privatized and sold to investment funds, as BlackRock's influence grows in politics and the economy.

A BlackRock recruiter, Serge Barlett, claims financial institutions buy politicians, stating senators can be bought for as little as $10. He says it's not the president who controls things, but hedge funds and banks. According to Barlett, war, specifically the Russia-Ukraine war, is "good for business" because volatility creates opportunities for profit. He notes that BlackRock manages $20 trillion. Barlett describes himself as a "gatekeeper" at BlackRock who decides people's fates. He explains that BlackRock acquires and diversifies, reinvesting profits to exponentially grow wealth and eventually "buy people." He also says the US government relies on BlackRock.

Giving two-thirds of the funding as debt creates a trap for Ukraine, which already struggles to repay existing debts. This situation effectively leads to the colonization of Ukraine, as foreign corporations, particularly from Europe and America, are now allowed to purchase large tracts of land. Since the IMF's 2021 loan, these corporations have acquired more land in Western Ukraine than the Russians have in the east. This debt burden undermines Ukraine's sovereignty and raises questions about the commitment to the welfare of ordinary Ukrainians. Politicians supporting the ongoing conflict have not shown personal sacrifice, as none have fought or sent their children to the front lines.

Checklist for summary approach: - Identify the central thesis: a long-running NATO-led effort to seize Eurasia and extract trillions in resources. - Track the causal chain: expansion, energy leverage (gas diplomacy), privatization, and Western financial interests. - Note key actors and mechanisms: NATO, State Department, DOD; Chevron, Shell, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, BlackRock; Soros; Burisma; Naftagas. - Capture the main examples and evidence: Russia’s resource base ($5,000,000,000,000); S-400 systems; Ukraine’s resources cited by Lindsey Graham ($12,400,000,000,000); specific deals and privatization moves. - Highlight the geographic scope and implicated states. - Emphasize the claimed fragility of the plan and the pivotal role of Trump’s neutrality or peace deal. - Preserve direct claims and numerical figures as stated, without adding qualifiers. - Keep within 385–482 words; translate if needed. Summary: This account argues there has long been a “foreign policy blob operation” to seize Eurasia, led by NATO and major Western policymakers, with Russia’s vast resources at the center. It asserts Russia “has by far the most natural resources of any other country on Earth” (cited as $5,000,000,000,000 in resources) and notes that ex-Soviet satellite states surrounding Russia have been drawn into Western economic and security entanglements since 1990. The narrative links NATO expansion to a broader political and economic project, culminating in a struggle over Europe’s gas economy as Putin reasserted influence through gas diplomacy in 2002–2006, the Georgia conflicts, and frictions with Baltic and Balkan states. This is presented as part of a broader effort to end Russia’s military capacity and to leverage Russia as a backstop to Western aims, including Syria (where Russia’s S-400 air defense blocked US air raids) and various African conflicts the US opposed. A striking claim is attributed to Lindsey Graham: “Even if you don’t care about democracy in Ukraine, the fact is they sit on $12,400,000,000,000 of natural resources,” implying readiness to defend Ukraine to access those resources, though the speaker contends that the assets ultimately enrich investors rather than Ukrainians. The analysis contends that moving into these countries makes them political and economic vassals controlled by American and allied firms, with Ukrainian gas giant Naftagas feeding Burisma; Chevron signed a $10,000,000,000 deal with Naftagas before the 2014 coup, and Shell also signed a $10,000,000,000 deal. George Soros is described as driving privatization to US investors, so pipelines and much of Ukraine’s economy benefit investors in Washington and London rather than citizens. The “game,” it claims, spans Germany, Moldova, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Finland, Sweden, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Kazakhstan, with the objective of bringing trillions to firms like Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Citibank, BlackRock, and other multinationals and insiders. The plan’s fragility is emphasized: Russia persists, regime-change efforts (Navalny, Pussy Riot) failed, and escalation is difficult. The critical lever, the speaker argues, would be for Trump to remain neutral. If Trump negotiates peace and recognizes the Donbas as is, while accepting the 2014 Crimea referendum, the war ends and hundreds of billions in anticipated windfall profits for Wall Street and London bankers are undermined, thereby derailing the drive to seize trillions in Eurasia.

BlackRock has made a deal with Zelensky to rebuild Ukraine after the war. However, it's worth noting that BlackRock is a major shareholder in arms manufacturers profiting from the war. So, while they sell weapons, they also get to rebuild the country. Hillary Clinton also mentioned economic opportunities in Iraq after the devastating war, referring to the large customer base there. It's a rather cynical perspective, considering the loss of innocent lives. The United States should view Iraq as a business opportunity, according to Clinton.

- "This is a war that should have never happened." - "The major thing they wanted was for us to keep NATO out of the Ukraine." - "March 2022, we committed a 113,000,000,000." - "it's not really going to Ukraine. It is going to American defense manufacturers. So he just admitted it's a money laundering scheme." - "And who do you think owns every one of those companies? Blackrock." - "Ukraine has to put all of its government owned assets up for sale to multinational corporations, including all of its agricultural land, the biggest single asset in Europe." - "500,000 kids almost. Ukrainian kids have died to keep that land as part of Ukraine." - "And then in December, president Biden gave out the contract to rebuild Ukraine. And who do you think got that contract? Lakhra."

Putin was dealing with Biden, and he knew Ukraine was stealing money we sent. Under Trump, that stops, ending the fighting and our wasted money in a war we shouldn't be in. Ukraine's president admitted not knowing where half the money went, which has been widely reported. The money sent to Ukraine is paying off "war pimps" at the Pentagon, prolonging the war for profit while young men die. We were on both sides at the start of the war with gas contracts with Russia and giving money to Ukraine. Missile defense systems went to Ukraine and members of Congress had stock in the missile defense company. Putin is responsible, but why isn't there outrage about China? Because everything is made there and it's all about the dollars.

Since Joe Biden became president, the US government has spent billions of dollars on an undeclared war against Russia without explaining its purpose or benefits. The war has resulted in Ukraine receiving billions of dollars in aid, but it has not been successful in ending the conflict. Ukraine is unable to defeat Russia, and the rest of the world is aware of this. However, US media continues to falsely claim that Ukraine is winning. Republican leaders like Mitch McConnell are pushing for more funding to Ukraine, despite opposition from the majority of American voters. Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene criticizes the funding, highlighting the country's own issues and the lack of support from the American people.

I recently attended a meeting in an expensive Alpine town, overwhelmingly populated by wealthy Ukrainians spending lavishly. This is a pattern across Europe; the richest people are Ukrainian. This money, I believe, should belong to American taxpayers. Furthermore, I know that a significant portion, possibly half, of the arms we send to Ukraine are being sold, some ending up with drug cartels on our border. Our intelligence agencies are aware of this. The media reports Zelensky's denials, but the New York Times could easily order Ukrainian weapons online—this is a fact. The official death toll is likely a lie; the entire situation is a deception. Sending billions in aid without tracking its use is irresponsible, and the possibility of these weapons being used against us is terrifying. This situation mirrors the issues we faced with the Mujahideen in the 80s. The lack of transparency and accountability is appalling.