reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The President of the United States is in charge of the government. He appoints advisors, like Elon Musk and others at the White House, to execute his commands across federal agencies. Recently, Elon Musk claimed transparency at Doge, stating their actions are posted on X and their website. Regarding the termination and subsequent rescinding of 300 employees at the National Nuclear Security Administration, the Secretary of Energy would be responsible for those decisions. Under President Trump, the goal is accountability and transparency in federal spending. For example, where did the $22 billion that the Department of Health and Human Services provided to illegal aliens go? That's enough to provide a free house to every homeless veteran in America.

I believe Doge isn't about money, but shrinking government to limit its power, even against figures like Trump. But, if Trump is the head of the government, why would the government try to stop him? Because the bureaucracy should uphold the Constitution and prevent authoritarianism, holding everyone accountable and ensuring the government works for the people. Trump is shredding the Constitution, but we never said the bureaucracy should resist political leadership. We are saying that the President will put someone in charge who will contravene the constitution. This is what dictatorships do. The President is in charge of the military, as per the Constitution, which vests executive authority in the President. The idea of an independent military or a bureaucracy resisting political leadership is dangerous.

The President told me to be more aggressive, so we sent out an email to all employees asking what they do. We got a partial response, so we're sending another email. Our goal isn't to be unfair. Employees can simply respond that their work is too sensitive to describe. We want to keep essential employees who do their jobs well. If a job isn't essential or done well, those people shouldn't be on the payroll. Those million employees who haven't responded are on the bubble. Maybe they don't exist, or we're paying people who don't exist. A lot could have happened. The prior administration wasted money.

The other side is complaining that nobody voted for Elon or any of my cabinet nominees. They say people are dying because of budget cuts and even allege illegal activity. But frankly, I don't care. If they're complaining, we must be over the target and doing something right. We're simply trying to restore the will of the people through the President. What we've found is a vast, unelected federal bureaucracy that is against the President and the cabinet. In DC, it's 92% Kamala. How can we live in a democracy if the President's will, representing the people, isn't implemented? We're witnessing the bureaucracy thrashing as we try to restore democracy and the will of the people.

Many in the media failed to cover Joe Biden's mental state and misunderstand Elon Musk's role. A president, elected by all Americans, is unique. The Constitution vests executive power in this single president. They appoint staff to implement the democratic will. The real threat to democracy is the unelected bureaucracy of tenured civil servants who defy the will of the American people. For example, when Americans vote for FBI reform, or to end racist DEI policies, these bureaucrats resist change. President Trump is removing those defying democracy by not implementing lawful orders, which represent the will of the American people.

Speaker 0 recounts discovering a secret SCIF on campus, a secure facility with files nobody knew existed. An employee walked by a door, inquiries were made, the room was entered, and individuals were found working there with secret files on controversial topics. Those files have been turned over to attorneys and the speaker is pursuing what happened. The speaker notes that Customs and Border Protection (CBP) knows every traveler entering the country and every good that comes in, and they assess and collect tariffs. They highlight that information about travelers during COVID was with national labs under the speaker’s jurisdiction, and that scientists at those labs participated with the Wuhan lab. The speaker claims these scientists traveled back and forth between each other and worked on those experiments, describing this as eye-opening. Addressing Elon and his team, the speaker says they were extremely helpful since the speaker’s arrival in office, assisting in identifying a troubling issue: some of the speaker’s own department employees had downloaded software on the speaker’s phone and laptop to spy on them and record meetings. The speaker states that this had happened to several politicians and notes that bringing in technology experts helped reveal this software; without examining laptops and phones, the activity would still be ongoing. The speaker emphasizes a need to continue partnering with technology companies and experts to bring them in for assistance, as government work—especially within the department under the speaker’s jurisdiction—has been neglected and lagging behind what it should be. The speaker recalls that in the first four months, they couldn’t even email a PowerPoint from Department of Homeland Security servers if it was longer than six pages, illustrating what they view as backwards thinking that hindered national security. The speaker reflects on the concept of a deep state, admitting that they previously believed it existed but didn’t realize how severe it was. They describe daily efforts to uncover individuals who do not love America and who work within the Department and across the federal government. The overall message conveys uncovering secrecy, internal surveillance concerns, cross-agency connections involving CBP and national labs, collaboration with tech experts, and a strong critique of past departmental conduct and systemic protection failures.

I work at a top consulting firm embedded in the Pentagon, focusing on artificial intelligence and emerging technologies. I previously served as an FBI special agent in counterintelligence, motivated by my desire to catch foreign spies after the 2016 election. I have meetings with retired generals to discuss national security concerns regarding Trump's presidency, whom I view as a sociopathic narcissist primarily interested in his own gain. Tomorrow, I have a significant meeting with military leaders in a secure location to discuss AI and the need for better information sharing. I believe Trump may attempt to extend his presidency beyond the constitutional limit, which raises concerns about the future.

I wanted someone smart to work with me on important country matters. This person is a good businessman, and he understands the challenge with executive orders. You write one, think it's done, but it often doesn't get implemented. He gets it done. He's a leader. He has brilliant young people working for him, and he takes my executive orders to them. They then go to the relevant agency and push to get things done. They ask questions like: When are you doing it? Get it done! Suddenly, even those who were hesitant start signing. He doesn't want to be bothered, he just wants it done.

I'm David Nelson, a tax examining technician at the IRS. I'm speaking out because our systems are antiquated, specifically the Integrated Data Retrieval System (IDRS) from the 1960s. It drastically hurts our efficiency. The entire US tax system relies on this outdated, command-code driven program, similar to an older version of MS-DOS. I even created a solution in my free time to address this, but can't use it without permission. Congress has been aware of these issues for years, but the funding provided is just a band-aid, not a real fix. I'm risking my career because I want to help the American people and my colleagues at the IRS. I want to set an example for my kids. I'm doing what I can to protect others and do the right thing.

I work at a top consulting firm embedded in the Pentagon, focusing on artificial intelligence and emerging technologies. I previously served as an FBI special agent in counterintelligence. My assessment of Trump is that he is a sociopathic narcissist primarily interested in his own wealth and reputation. I'm in discussions with retired generals about how to protect American interests. I have a significant meeting with military leaders tomorrow to address AI and the need for better information sharing. I also worked with a nonprofit to highlight the national security risks of another Trump presidency, writing numerous op-eds. I believe Trump may entertain the idea of extending his term, which would create considerable political pressure.

The Democrats complain that nobody voted for Elon or my cabinet nominees and claim people are dying because of budget cuts while also calling my actions illegal. Their reaction shows we must be over the target and doing something right. We're trying to restore the will of the people through the president. There's a vast, unelected federal bureaucracy implacably opposed to the president and the cabinet. Consider that DC voting is 92% for Kamala. If the president's will, representing the people, isn't implemented, then the will of the people isn't being implemented. We're not living in a democracy, but a bureaucracy. What you're seeing is the bureaucracy resisting as we try to restore democracy and the will of the people.

The courts are the first line of defense against illegal activity. I'm working with lawyers bringing these cases forward, and we're seeing many temporary restraining orders issued recently. This reflects the Trump administration's illegal use of executive orders to bypass Congress and make sweeping changes. I'd like to see Doge and Project 2025 put up for a vote in Congress; I believe they would fail. Trump avoided these issues on the campaign trail because they're unpopular. Now, he's using executive orders to push them through and has Elon Musk doing his "dirty work".

I've issued a deadline for agencies to submit waste reduction plans. Failure to comply will result in tech support intervention, which is essentially what my team is doing – fixing outdated government computer systems. We aim to find a trillion dollars in savings to prevent national bankruptcy. Every agency will have a "mini Elon Musk" to justify spending. We're freezing government credit cards for 30 days and doing a pulse check via email to see if employees are real and responsive, we suspect some are dead or even fictional. Some people are upset with our aid to Ukraine which has been spent on things like fashion shows, wine, and cheese puffs. Providing money to LGBTQ individuals in Serbia is also coming under fire. Some are questioning the loyalty of Elon Musk because of this. The Biden years proved we don't even need an active president, because institutions are running everything behind the scenes.

I work at a top consulting firm embedded in the Pentagon, focusing on artificial intelligence and emerging technologies. I previously served as an FBI special agent, specializing in counterintelligence. I have concerns about Trump, viewing him as a sociopathic narcissist primarily interested in his own gain. Tomorrow, I have a significant meeting with military leaders to discuss AI and the need for better information sharing. I've been collaborating with retired generals to address national security concerns related to Trump's presidency. We aimed to inform the public about the implications of another Trump term, and I contributed extensively to op-eds and articles. I predict Trump may publicly consider extending his term, which would create significant political tension.

Let's address the Elon Musk controversy. He's not a freelancer but a government official appointed by Trump to head the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge), set to last until 07/04/2026. Musk's role is to identify waste and fraud within agencies, a task he has the authority to do. The legality of executive orders is in question, with Democrats suing based on the principle that Trump isn't spending funds they approved. Ironically, executive order usage is more consistent across Republican and Democratic presidencies than commonly perceived. Trump is following Biden's precedent of not spending congressionally approved funds. Musk's controversial figure status redirects attacks away from Trump. Despite media attempts to create a divide, Trump isn't bothered, recognizing that Musk is drawing attention away from him while fulfilling his executive duties to cut wasteful spending.

Many of you failed to acknowledge Joe Biden's mental state and his role in leading the country. You also misunderstand how government works by saying Elon isn't elected. A president is elected by all Americans, unlike judges or members of Congress. The Constitution vests executive power in the president. This president appoints staff to carry out the democratic will. The real threat to democracy comes from unelected, tenured civil servants who ignore the will of the people. When Americans vote for change, like FBI reform or ending DEI, these bureaucrats resist. President Trump is removing those defying democracy by not implementing his lawful orders, which reflect the will of the American people.

I consider myself a humble tech support, and that’s almost a literal description of the work the Doge team is doing to help fix government computer systems. Many of these systems are extremely old and don't communicate, and the software doesn't work. The overall goal is to help address the enormous deficit. We simply cannot sustain $2,000,000,000,000 deficits. The interest on the national debt now exceeds the Defense Department spending. If this continues, the country will become de facto bankrupt. It's not an optional thing; it is essential. If we don't do this, America will go bankrupt. I'm confident that we can find a trillion dollars in savings.

I work for President Biden every day and love it. Recently, President Biden announced that he wishes he could have a stand-in with an earpiece while he relaxes in his basement, allowing someone else to do the talking and ceremonies for him.

My Reagan administration mentors couldn't penetrate bureaucratic obstacles because they lacked technical expertise. Elon Musk's team gained direct access to tech systems, something unprecedented for any president. They bypassed the usual obstruction and uncovered shocking data. They saw payments to individuals with duplicate or missing social security numbers, totaling billions. Money flowed to entities like Internews Network, pushing a left-leaning agenda globally, and even to protesters worldwide. We're being transparent about accessing the data and revealing these findings. Despite facing resistance and attempts to slow us down, we're actively releasing information, and more is coming soon. The real question is whether we will be stopped from continuing this process.

Many of you failed to acknowledge Joe Biden's mental state and questioned Elon Musk's authority, revealing a misunderstanding of government. The President, elected by the entire nation, embodies the will of the American people. He appoints staff to implement this democratic will throughout the government. The real threat to democracy comes from unelected, tenured bureaucrats who disregard the people's vote. They resist change, whether it's FBI reform, energy policies, or ending DEI, undermining the democratic process. President Trump is removing these officials who defy democracy by not implementing his lawful orders, which represent the will of the American people.

Brandon Newsom, a civil servant with the office of the Secretary of the Navy in the Pentagon, told an undercover interviewer while disguised with a mustache that he implements executive orders from President Trump affecting the Navy, overseeing corporate operations including HR, IT, and security. He said he reads executive orders, figures out how they will be implemented, and how they affect the Navy. Newsom also said he disagrees with certain Trump administration actions but plans to stay in his position until Trump leaves office so he can “undo whatever has been done,” describing himself as having “influence” rather than lawful authority. Newsom told the interviewer he does not want the Pentagon to hold prayer service as it is currently implemented. Although he said he is a Christian, he argued against a specific Christian-only prayer service and said he would either remove it or implement a prayer service for all recognized religions. He claimed that the Pentagon’s leadership takes notice of who attends or opts out of the prayer service, “noticing who’s there and who’s not there,” and suggested this could lead to favoritism or discrimination. The transcript notes that the Pentagon Memorial Chapel is described as a 24-hour interfaith space and that Pete Hegseth said in May 2025 he intended a monthly volunteer prayer service there, and it states that critics raised concerns about government endorsement. The interviewer and Newsom also discussed “schedule policy,” described as an executive order that moves career civil service classification into the “expected service,” reclassifying approximately 8,000 career civil servants largely at or above the GS-15 level. The transcript says this removes positions from competitive service, reducing job protections and making it easier to fire officials deemed unaligned with Trump priorities, with unions and critics arguing it enables political firing; Reuters reported unions sued over this policy. Newsom said he was “converted to schedule policy,” which he said sent away his employment protections, and he said he is negatively impacted but believes the policy is being used to slow-roll or enforce agendas. Newsom said many Pentagon contracts being terminated were data-related, but that a larger data contract was later awarded to Palantir. He suggested this pattern was due to senior Pentagon officials being friends with contributors who donate to campaigns. The transcript says the interviewer’s team was unable to confirm donations directly to Pentagon officials, but it says Palantir acquired the largest overhaul of data-related contracts in the history of the US Army on 07/31/2025: 75 contracts worth $10,000,000,000, and that earlier Pete Hegseth and “DogE” cut $580,000,000 in contracts from the Pentagon for not being aligned with Trump priorities. Newsom characterized Trump as a “textbook narcissist” and said the war in Iran is driven by “one man’s ego,” adding that the interviewer’s undercover encounter and Newsom’s comments about overturning policies while holding a GS-15 position were presented as noteworthy. The transcript also includes references to Hatch Act limits on partisan political expression by government employees and describes how Newsom acknowledged the undercover interviewer could be a reporter while also telling him what he did not want shared.

I work at a top consulting firm embedded in the Pentagon, focusing on artificial intelligence and emerging technologies. I previously served as an FBI special agent, specializing in counterintelligence. My assessment of Trump is that he is a sociopathic narcissist primarily interested in his own gain. I'm in discussions with retired generals about protecting American interests, especially regarding AI. Tomorrow, I have a significant meeting with military leaders to address these issues. We need to improve information sharing and collaboration among international partners. I also worked with a nonprofit to highlight the national security risks of another Trump presidency, which I found disheartening after his election victory. I predict Trump may attempt to stay in office beyond his term, despite constitutional limitations.

I'm a platform services manager for the Department of Homeland Security. I'm not thrilled about Kristi Noem's appointment. The truth is, we don't let political appointees get in our way. It's my job to filter things. By the time marching orders get to me and below, we can steady the ship. I feel bad for the GS fifteens because they have to deal with the crazy stuff. They have to kiss ass and re-word ideas. DHS could fall on Noem's head, and she wouldn't even know it. The secretaries can set priorities, but they can't tell us what to do. If we don't agree with the priorities, there's a lot of room for interpretation. We can filter the marching orders, like a septic tank. Also, my trans colleagues are freaking out because this administration is super anti-trans.

I had two questions regarding tariff revenue and the IRS. President Trump discussed replacing income tax with tariff revenue to combat waste, fraud, and abuse. The China tariff revenue, estimated between $500 billion and a trillion dollars over ten years, should facilitate the passage of a Republican bill. I also asked about comments regarding cutting $50 billion in waste, fraud, and abuse by unelected bureaucrats. The narrative from the president's critics is that Elon Musk is an unelected bureaucrat. Is one of Doge's objectives to get rid of the federal bureaucracy? The executive power is vested in the president. The existential threat to democracy is the unelected bureaucracy. President Trump is removing federal bureaucrats who defy democracy by failing to implement his lawful orders, which are the will of the whole American people.

I know people who worked in the Reagan administration. When they asked the bureaucracy questions, they were often blocked and deterred because they weren't technical. Elon Musk's team bypassed this by directly accessing the tech systems. No president has ever done this. They found crazy things like payments to people with duplicate or no social security numbers, totaling up to a hundred billion dollars. Payments were also going to organizations like Internews Network, which promotes a left-leaning point of view, and to protesters worldwide. My team is being transparent about it. We went to the data, we found it. We've only been at this for twenty days, so give us a chance. We're already releasing a lot of information. People are trying to slow us down, but the biggest question is whether we can stop their grift.