TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Concerns exist regarding President Biden's Executive Order 14019 on promoting access to voting, with claims that it may be unconstitutional. The Biden administration has allegedly resisted turning over agency plans for implementing the order, despite subpoenas. A whistleblower US Marshal reported that the Department of Justice requires US Marshals to offer voter registration materials to everyone they contact, including federal prisoners. One instance involved a Mexican citizen imprisoned for violating federal law being registered to vote. The Demos website, a left-wing organization, has allegedly been dispatched by the White House to federal agencies to help implement this plan. Demos is allegedly assisting agencies with implementation, potentially violating the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). Plans were to be submitted to the White House, specifically to the Office of Domestic Policy under Susan Rice, for federal funds and grants dissemination. There are concerns about political appointees administering the order and a lack of transparency regarding who received grants and how much. Congress has not been able to access the documents.

Judicial Watch has filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the Department of Justice for details about a meeting between Attorney General Merrick Garland and General Mark Milley, where they reportedly discussed President Trump. Milley allegedly pressured Garland to investigate far-right militia groups, a meeting described as unusual by journalist Bob Woodward in his book, War. Judicial Watch's lawsuit follows the DOJ's failure to respond to a FOIA request regarding this meeting. Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton stated that the meeting highlights the Biden administration's conflict with constitutional principles and the DOJ's disregard for transparency. Additionally, President Biden is reportedly considering granting General Milley a preemptive pardon similar to that of his son, Hunter.

A presidential memorandum requires the immediate declassification of all FBI files related to the Crossfire Hurricane investigation, which is considered an instance of weaponization of law enforcement. The aim is for the American people to have a full understanding of the files' contents. The declassification gives the media the right to examine the files. All FBI files will be declassified, except for a classified annex, and made public. The FBI and Department of Justice should be ashamed, as should Biden.

A presidential memorandum requires immediate declassification of all FBI files related to the Crossfire Hurricane investigation, which is considered an instance of weaponization of law enforcement. The aim is to give the American people a full understanding of the files. The declassification gives the media the right to examine the files. All will be declassified except for a classified annex. The speaker suggests the FBI and Department of Justice should be ashamed, as should Biden.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss government disinformation offices and transparency concerns. - CISA’s office of mis, dis, and malinformation (MDM) operated as a DHS unit focused on domestic threat actors, with archive details at cisa.gov/mdm. The office existed for two years, from 2021 to 2023, before being shut down and renamed after the foundation published a series of reports. - The disinformation governance board was formed around April 2022. The CISOs countering foreign influence task force, originally aimed at stopping Russian influence and repurposed to “stop Trump in the twenty twenty election,” changed its name to the office of mis, dis, and malinformation and shifted focus from foreign influence to 80% domestic, 20% foreign, one month before the twenty twenty election. - Speaker 1 argues that the information environment problems are largely domestic, suggesting an 80/20 focus on foreign vs domestic issues should be flipped. - A June 2022 Holly Senate committee link is highlighted, leading to a 31-page PDF that, as of now, represents the sum total of internal documents related to the office of mis, dis, and malinformation. The speaker questions why there is more transparency about the DHS MIS office from a whistleblower three years ago than in ten months of current executive power. - The speaker calls for comprehensive publication of internal files: every email, text, and correspondence from DHS MIS personnel, to be placed in a WikiLeaks/JFK-style publicly accessible database for forensic reconstruction of DHS actions during those years, to name and shame responsible individuals and prevent repetition. - The video also references George Soros state department cables published by WikiLeaks (from 2010), noting extensive transparency about the Open Society Foundations’ relationship with the state department fifteen years ago, compared to today. The claim is that Open Society Foundations’ activities through the state department, USAID, and the CIA were weaponized to influence domestic politics while remaining secret, with zero disclosures to this day. - Speaker questions why cooperative agreements from USAID with Open Society Foundation, Omidyar Network, or Gates Foundation have never been made public, nor quarterly or annual milestone reports, network details, or the actual scope of funded activities. USAID grant descriptions on usaspending.gov are often opaque or misleading compared to the true activities funded. - The speaker urges transparency across DHS, USAID, the State Department, CIA, ODNI, and related entities, asking for open files and for accountability. They stress the need to open these records now to inform the public and prevent recurrence, especially as mid-term political considerations loom.

Speaker 0: President Biden lied to the American people, his family profited through shell companies, and his Federal agencies are obstructing the congressional inquiry. There are numerous scandals and corruption cases that have been uncovered. President Biden claimed he never discussed his son's business dealings, but evidence shows otherwise. He had dinner with Russian and Kazakhstani oligarchs, spoke with Hunter's associates over 20 times, and met with a Chinese energy company while Hunter worked for them. A text message from Hunter implies a commitment not fulfilled. A confidential source alleged a $5 million bribe to President Biden. The House Oversight Committee investigation found that Hunter flew on air force 2 at least 15 times to enrich the Biden family. This impeachment inquiry will give House Investigators more subpoena authority to gather evidence from uncooperative federal agencies. The New York Post's report on Hunter Biden's laptop was falsely labeled as Russian disinformation. Social media banned the story, but it was later revealed to be legitimate. A court opinion confirmed that the White House and federal agencies were censoring conservative speech on social media platforms.

A corrupt group within the American government weaponized intelligence and law enforcement agencies to thwart the will of the American people. Fifty-one intelligence agents lied about Hunter Biden's laptop, claiming it came from Russia when they knew it came from his bedroom. They spied on his campaign, launched disinformation operations, persecuted his family, staff, and supporters, and raided Mar-a-Lago. These radicals tried to turn America into a corrupt communist and third-world country. The speaker insists on full accountability for these abuses, promising a far-reaching investigation into the corruption of the system. On day one, the speaker signed an executive order banning government censorship and directing the removal of bureaucrats who attacked free speech. The administration stripped security clearances from intelligence agents who lied about Hunter Biden's laptop and from Jack Smith, Alvin Bragg, Leticia James, and their law firms. The clearances of the Biden crime family and Joe Biden himself were terminated. The speaker pardoned hundreds of political prisoners, removed senior FBI officials, and fired James Comey.

Thanks to whistleblowers within the FBI and Department of Justice, I can now share an FBI document, labeled 10/23, with the American people. This document sheds light on potential misconduct involving Vice President Biden and Hunter Biden. The FBI needs to clarify their actions regarding this matter. It's important for the American people to have access to the same information I read three months ago. It's worth noting that this document was unclassified, so there was no valid reason for it to take a year to become available to the public.

Thanks to whistleblowers within the FBI and Department of Justice, I can now release an FBI document, labeled 10/23, that sheds light on potential misconduct involving Vice President Biden and Hunter Biden. It's important for the American people to have access to this information, which I read three months ago. This document is unclassified, so there was no valid reason for it to take a year to become public. Now, it's up to the FBI to disclose their actions regarding this matter.

Biden auto pen thing was Payola. People were paying for pardons. New revelations from the New York Times about Joe Biden and the auto pen scandal. According to New York Times, mister Biden did not individually approve each name for the categorical pardons. Rather than ask Biden to keep signing revised versions, his staff waited and then ran the final version through the auto pen, which they saw as routine. Jeff Zients, former Biden chief of staff, three minutes later, hit reply all and wrote, 'I approve the use of the auto pen for the execution of all of the following pardons.' The final list reportedly included Fauci. 'cash for clemency deal' and 'three people controlled access, and they were making money off of it.' The House Oversight Committee has brought in a number of former Biden aides to speak about this, and this will drive a wave of questions.

The Heritage Foundation's Oversight Project is suing the FBI for refusing to release documents related to alleged retaliation against whistleblowers who exposed efforts to suppress the investigation into Hunter Biden's laptop. The former FBI agent involved, Tim Tippoldt, had a history of attacking Trump on social media. Whistleblowers claim Tippoldt tried to portray news about Hunter's business dealings as Russian disinformation and attempted to erase information from the FBI database. Tippoldt's girlfriend, in now-deleted social media posts, suggested that the FBI would retaliate against the whistleblowers. The Heritage Foundation seeks to determine if the FBI was aware of this intimidation and allowed it to continue. They believe this could obstruct Congress and are taking the case to Federal Court. The Foundation's outside counsel finds the FBI's claims of privacy interests in this matter to be frivolous.

Auto pens are described as widely used on Capitol Hill. “I do it because I respect your signature. Mhmm.” Staffers push a button to pass off documents as authentic, not the elected official signing. “They’d be like, oh, I didn’t know. Lock. Get out of jail free card.” The esign Act, signed 06/30/2000, “it is legal for senators to use an auto pen for their signature. However, the esign Act also states that all parties must consent to the use of their signature and must be aware of what they're actually signing.” The gray area: whether staffers used it “without the direction and authorization of the senator.” Senator Ed Markey: “staff uses an auto machine that replicates the senator's signature all the time” for “everything from Veterans Affairs cases to visa issues.” In 2025, “Biden issued 14 executive orders. Every single one was auto pinned.” “staff quietly added violent criminals to the list and then ran them through the AutoPen without telling him.” Hidden Camera shows Markey’s aide bragging “fucked up” while driving, mocking Markey's wife as a Karen, and claiming that white people are afraid of him because he's a black n word. Markey also “takes an aggressive stance against Tesla's autopilot feature.” “This is ironic considering the senator often doesn't even sign his own name without his pen on autopilot.” Tips: o'keefmediagold.com; 0keefemediagold.com or 833324gold. This is James O'Keefe.

My Reagan administration mentors couldn't penetrate bureaucratic obfuscation because they lacked technical expertise. Elon Musk's team gained direct access to tech systems, a first for any administration. They bypassed gatekeepers and uncovered shocking data. We're talking payments to people with duplicate or no social security numbers, totaling up to $100 billion. Funds were also traced to entities like Internews Network, pushing a specific viewpoint globally, and even to protesters worldwide. We're being transparent about it; we accessed the data directly and exposed it. It's only been twenty days, and we're already releasing a lot. People are trying to slow us down, but the main question is can we stop their grift?

The Biden White House is under investigation regarding the use of an "auto pen" to sign documents, with Trump now calling Biden "the auto pen." Bondi's team is investigating Biden's competence and whether others exploited him, questioning if he knew what he was signing, including 8,000 pardons. The investigation was launched after Ed Martin made an announcement at the Department of Justice. The Heritage Foundation found that many documents with Biden's signature used the same auto pen signature. The auto pen was first used regularly by President Truman for simple tasks, but Obama used a portable auto pen in Europe to sign major legislation. The question is whether Biden directed someone to sign his name or if aides had free rein. Speaker Johnson suggests Biden was out of the loop. One source claims a top Biden aide may have misused the auto pen, while David Sacks alleges Elizabeth Warren controlled it. If Biden didn't approve its use, it could be forgery. Some believe Biden wasn't running the country, while others insist he was engaged and gave directives. Jake Tapper's coverage of Biden has prompted CNN to cover the auto pen investigation. Some suggest Democrats should abandon their current machine and rebuild. There's a divide within the Democratic Party between "team restraint" and "team resistance."

Speaker 0 contends that a large number of pardons were issued by the auto pen on the final day of the Biden presidency, and asserts there is no record showing that Joe Biden participated in the authorization of those pardons. The speaker claims that these pardons include notable examples such as those for Dr. Anthony Fauci, members of the Biden family, Adam Schiff, the January 6 committee, and an extensive list that the speaker describes as continuing at length. The core assertion is that every one of these pardons was signed with the auto pen and there is no evidence that Joe Biden was personally involved in the decision-making process behind them. According to the speaker, the absence of Biden’s involvement in the decision-making is a key element of the argument, and the implication is that this absence of direct participation should be recognized in legal terms. The speaker further states that these pardons could be declared null and void by the Department of Justice. The underlying claim is that there is a basis for such a nullification rooted in the way the pardons were issued, specifically the use of the auto pen and the lack of documented presidential involvement. The speaker also asserts that the ongoing investigation will produce evidence that will support the DOJ’s decision to void the pardons. In this framing, the investigation’s forthcoming findings are presented as capable of reinforcing the claim that the pardons were improperly issued or improperly authorized due to the absence of direct presidential action. The overall narrative presented is one of procedural challenge to the pardons, anchored in the asserted method of issuance (the auto pen) and the supposed lack of Biden’s participation in the process. The speaker emphasizes a sequence in which the pardons, if deemed void, would be reversed or nullified by official action from the Department of Justice, with future investigative evidence expected to validate that outcome in court.

Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton announced that they had to seek a default judgment in Georgia against Fannie Willis, who did not respond to their lawsuit for records of her communications with the Biden administration and Congress regarding her actions against Trump. Fitton highlighted that in over 30 years and hundreds of FOIA lawsuits, no government agency or official has ever failed to appear in court for one of their cases. This situation is unprecedented and indicates Willis's efforts to conceal what Fitton describes as collusion aimed at targeting Trump.

Concerns exist regarding President Biden's executive order 14019 on promoting access to voting, with claims that it may be unconstitutional. The Biden administration has allegedly resisted turning over agency plans for implementing the order, despite subpoenas. A whistleblower US Marshal allegedly sent documentation showing the Department of Justice requires US Marshals to offer voter registration materials to everyone they contact, including federal prisoners, such as a deported Mexican citizen. The executive order is allegedly being implemented without transparency. The Demos website, a left-wing organization, has allegedly been dispatched by the White House to federal agencies to help implement this plan. Demos is allegedly assisting agencies with implementation, potentially violating the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA). The executive order allegedly involves federal agencies in the voting process, overseen by politically appointed officials. Plans were supposedly submitted to the White House, with federal funds disseminated through Susan Rice's office. Congress has allegedly been unable to access any related documents.

"Senator: 'We discovered is that Anthony Fauci was destroying federal records. He was encouraging other people to destroy federal records. That is a crime.' He testified to the house a year ago and said he wasn't doing that. 'That's a crime to perjure himself.' 'We will bring him back. I've asked him to come and testify this fall. If he doesn't come voluntarily, we will subpoena him.' 'The question is, is he immune because of the pardon? I think that that needs to be challenged in court.' 'I have encouraged the Trump administration that they should prosecute this case and challenge the auto pen. I don't think the auto pen is sufficient.' 'There were so many pardons that I'm not sure Biden was aware of all the people he did pardon.' 'There is not a direct link from the person running the auto pen to the president. The person that was running the auto pen never spoke with the president.' 'And I think a president's signature on something so as important as legislation or a pardon is absolutely required.'" "Susan Monarez will testify before the senate HELP committee tomorrow. This will be her first appearance since being ousted from the role. She will be joined by Deb Aury, a former chief medical officer and deputy director who was one of four CDC officials who resigned after Monarez was ousted." "The chair with the president of Moderna ... I asked him about the expectation that he'll be getting a lot less revenue from the vaccine for COVID perhaps this time around. The scientific evidence shows that the risks of taking the COVID vaccine for children exceeds the benefits, and the scientific evidence is abundant on this. There's a study out of Israel that showed that about six to eight kids 20 that are healthy will get an inflammation of the heart that is very dangerous, and that risk exceeds the benefits of a vaccine. Every kid at six months needs to get a COVID vaccination, and that defies the scientific evidence and shows me that she's not objective. It's the same with the hepatitis B vaccine. Unless the mom has hepatitis B vaccine, disease, there is no indication for the vaccine at birth, and we need to readdress that."

Last week, I spoke about the FBI hiding an unclassified document, known as the 10/23, from Congress and the American people. The FBI eventually agreed to show the document to Congress, but it was heavily redacted. The 10/23 allegedly involves a bribery scheme between Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, and a foreign national. The Justice Department then announced charges against former President Trump for mishandling classified records. This senator is committed to fighting political corruption in the Department of Justice and the FBI by promoting transparency. The 10/23 contains references to audio recordings of conversations between the foreign national and the Bidens. It is crucial for the American people to have access to the unredacted document to understand the truth and hold the FBI and Justice Department accountable. Congress must continue to fight for transparency and release the document without unnecessary redactions.

My Reagan administration mentors couldn't penetrate bureaucratic obstacles because they lacked technical expertise. Elon Musk's team gained direct access to tech systems, something unprecedented for any president. They bypassed the usual obstruction and uncovered shocking data. They saw payments to individuals with duplicate or missing social security numbers, totaling billions. Money flowed to entities like Internews Network, pushing a left-leaning agenda globally, and even to protesters worldwide. We're being transparent about accessing the data and revealing these findings. Despite facing resistance and attempts to slow us down, we're actively releasing information, and more is coming soon. The real question is whether we will be stopped from continuing this process.

The Justice Department refused to provide Judicial Watch with audio tapes of Joe Biden's interviews with special counsel Robert Hearn, citing privacy concerns. The released transcript raises questions about Biden's memory and ability to serve as president. Judicial Watch plans to challenge this decision in court, arguing that the American people have a right to access this information. Biden has the power to waive his privacy rights and release the tapes, but has not done so.

The House Oversight Committee is expanding its investigation into Biden's alleged mental decline, interviewing five members of the Biden administration and deposing former physician Dr. Kevin O'Connor. Chairman James Comer stated that they are serious about the investigation, especially regarding the use of an auto pen to sign executive orders and pardons. Comer said that President Trump has waived executive privilege, and if witnesses don't answer questions or show up for interviews and depositions, they will be held in contempt of Congress. The committee aims to discover who authorized the use of the auto pen, especially since many documents were signed while Biden was supposedly at the White House. Comer believes there was a cover-up of Biden's mental decline and that Anthony Bernal, former chief of staff to Jill Biden, was a major part of that inner circle.

The discussion centers on the legality and appropriateness of Joe Biden's use of an autopen, particularly concerning pardons. It's claimed that the Trump administration believes Biden's autopen use may be unconstitutional if he wasn't fully competent or if others used it on his behalf. A former US attorney claims to have contacted senior Biden officials early on regarding Biden's competence and the pardons, receiving some responses. The speaker argues that incompetence could invalidate contracts and pardons, even though the pardon power is plenary. He alleges a whistleblower from the 2020 Biden campaign identified three "gatekeepers"—Clayne, Anita Dunn, and Bob Bauer—who controlled access and potentially profited from it. While not yet verified, this information is deemed potentially scandalous. The speaker clarified that he contacted the Biden family and others in the US attorney's office.

During the Biden administration, attempts to obtain records on funding for Wuhan research were blocked; findings came largely from FOIA challenges. Communications allegedly show Fauci and NIH director Francis Collins instructing: 'read this, this is some more crap coming from me, the senator from Kentucky, I wanna be done with this. When you're done reading it, delete this material.' The speaker says this is illegal and constitutes two crimes: destroying federal records and lying to Congress. The auto pen pardon raises questions about Biden's awareness; the operator says he never met the president, and 'thousands of auto pen pardons' were issued. The speaker has invited Fauci to testify; if not accepted, a subpoena will be issued. They claim Fauci lied to Congress and that gain-of-function research was funded by the United States government with Fauci's approval. Kennedy, Bhattacharya, Makary cooperative. End deadline for Fauci's response is this week or next.

I know people who worked in the Reagan administration. When they asked the bureaucracy questions, they were often blocked and deterred because they weren't technical. Elon Musk's team bypassed this by directly accessing the tech systems. No president has ever done this. They found crazy things like payments to people with duplicate or no social security numbers, totaling up to a hundred billion dollars. Payments were also going to organizations like Internews Network, which promotes a left-leaning point of view, and to protesters worldwide. My team is being transparent about it. We went to the data, we found it. We've only been at this for twenty days, so give us a chance. We're already releasing a lot of information. People are trying to slow us down, but the biggest question is whether we can stop their grift.