TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Les Wexner acknowledged that he spent substantial time with Jeffrey Epstein and traveled to Epstein’s island as well as Epstein’s other properties. He admitted that Epstein had access to a lot of Wexner’s wealth, and questioned responses to simple questions about Epstein being the co-president of the foundation that established the area they discuss. Wexner appeared to downplay how close Epstein and Wexner actually were. The statements underscore the claim that there would be no Epstein Island, no Epstein claim, and no money to traffic women and girls, asserting that Epstein would not be the wealthy man he was without the support of Les Wexner.

The speaker doesn't understand why supporters are interested in the Jeffrey Epstein story, as Epstein is dead and "was never a big factor." The speaker believes the case is "pretty boring stuff" and doesn't understand why it continues to be discussed. The speaker suggests that "only pretty bad people, including fake news, wanna keep something like that going." They state that if there's credible information, "let them have it." The speaker then pivots to a question about AI.

I saw Alan Dershowitz and Bill Clinton on the island. Dershowitz was there for a business meeting, while Clinton was sitting with Jeffrey Epstein on the porch, Epstein's favorite spot. There were no other guests present. I was surprised to see Clinton with Epstein.

I was asked about my relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. I've said many times I shouldn't have had dinners with him. It was just dinner, nothing more. Regarding my divorce, my ex-wife has stated that my meetings with Epstein were a problem in our marriage. She made it clear she didn't like them. She even met Epstein once to see who he was but regretted it immediately, describing him as "abhorrent" and "evil personified," and had nightmares afterwards. I don't know why I kept seeing him. I am a rich man, but that's not a reason to take me seriously.

Bill Clinton is mentioned in relation to Jeffrey Epstein's island, which is described as a cesspool. The speaker claims to have knowledge of the planes associated with the island, but clarifies that they are not friends with the people involved. The speaker distances themselves from Epstein, stating that they threw him out of their club many years ago and never visited his island. They mention that others, including James Patterson, have also distanced themselves from Epstein. The speaker acknowledges knowing Epstein in the past but claims to have had a falling out and not being a fan of his for about 15 years.

The speaker was angry because someone lied to them about Epstein. The speaker then publicly stated in the Daily Mail that they believed David, but later discovered David was lying.

Speaker 0, Jeffrey Edward Epstein and my residence address is 6100 Red Hook Boulevard in Virgin Islands. Speaker 1: Is it true that you forced Virginia Roberts to have sex with numerous friends of yours? Speaker 0: Wouldn't love my fifth amendment right. Speaker 2: You had a number of meetings with Jeffrey Epstein, who, when you met him ten years ago, he was convicted of soliciting prostitution from minors. Speaker 3: And, you know, I've said I regretted having those dinners regretted having those dinners. We did what we did because we wanted to see Epstein go to jail. He needed to go to jail. Were there young women in another part of the house giving massages, when I wasn't around? I have no idea of that. Speaker 1: Sent him three 12 year old girls from France who spoke no English for defendant to sexually exploit and abuse. After doing so, they were sent back to France the next day. Speaker 0: Please, they never saw a young underage woman. Speaker 3: You know, those meetings were were a mistake. They didn't result in what he purported, and I cut them off. You know, that goes back a long time ago now. There's you know, so there's nothing new on that. Speaker 2: We now know that he was and had been procuring young girls for sex trafficking. Speaker 0: We now know that. At the time, there was no indication to me or anybody else. I kept my underwear on during the massage. I don't like massages particularly. Speaker 3: If we had had more transparency, perhaps this case would have gone differently. Speaker 2: It was reported that you continued to meet with him over several years. Speaker 3: You know, I had dinners with him. I regret doing that. Speaker 0: You have what's been described as an egg shaped penis. Speaker 3: Well, he's dead. So, you know, in general, you always have to be careful.

The speaker reflects on a societal reckoning around the Epstein case, insisting that no girl should be put in the situations associated with him and the people around him. The speaker emphasizes the heartbreak of the situation, recalling the ages of the girls and even mentioning their own daughters to illustrate how painful and personal the issue is. There is a strong personal lens: the speaker remembers the ages of those girls and the painful times in their own marriage. They note that they moved on and pushed the memory away, and they are in a unexpectedly beautiful place in life now. They state that the questions surrounding what happened are for the people involved and for their ex-husband, not for the speaker, who feels detached from “the muck” and content to be away from it. When asked about the dominant emotion elicited by the news, the speaker describes it as unbelievable sadness. This sadness extends to the young girls affected, and the speaker expresses sorrow for what those girls endured. The speaker explains that they had to leave their marriage and felt compelled to leave the foundation, underscoring a personal journey of moving forward. Despite moving on, the speaker holds a sense of sorrow and a desire for justice. They express hope that there is justice for the women who have come forward, acknowledging the gravity of their experiences. The speaker notes that they have seen these women publicly speaking in Washington, D.C., and reiterates that what those women went through is unimaginable. Overall, the message combines a call for a reckoning and accountability with a personal narrative of healing, resilience, and a desire for justice for the survivors. The speaker remains focused on the human impact of the events, the pain of the victims, and the importance of addressing the harm done.

Speaker 0 discusses emails suggesting Bill Gates had additional affairs, tried to obtain medication to treat a sexually transmitted infection, and planned to give the medicine without the recipient knowing; his representative says all of this is false. It is not on you to respond to the details of that alleged behavior. The question posed is about the speaker’s dominant emotion when reading these news articles with these details. Speaker 1 answers: Sad. Just unbelievable sadness. Unbelievable sadness, right? And again, I’m able to take my own sadness and look at those young girls and say, my god, how did they, how did that happen to those girls, right? And so for me, it’s just sadness. Sadness for, you know, I’ve left, I had to, I left my marriage. I had to leave my marriage. I wanted to leave my marriage. I had to leave the, I felt I needed to eventually leave the foundation. So it’s just sad. That’s the truth. Right? And it’s kind of like, at least for me, I’ve been able to move on in life.

Gates met Epstein multiple times, including at his mansion and on his plane. Despite Gates' denial of a relationship, the frequency of their interactions raises suspicions. Additionally, Gates' charitable foundation's focus on helping young women in need contradicts any support for Epstein's trust.

The speaker suggests focusing on Bill Clinton, the former president of Harvard, and hedge fund managers, providing a list of individuals who allegedly lived with Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker asserts they did not live with Epstein.

Bill Clinton's connections to Jeffrey Epstein were mysteriously deleted from Wikipedia on July 22nd. Despite evidence of their friendship and Epstein's visits to the White House, the information remains absent. Speculation arises about possible motives behind the deletion, with implications of blackmail and conspiracy theories. The speaker questions the timing and potential involvement of Hillary Clinton. The reminder of Epstein's blackmail activities and influence on powerful figures is emphasized, raising concerns about the extent of his impact. The overall tone suggests skepticism towards official narratives and highlights the complexity of the situation.

Bill Clinton's connections to Jeffrey Epstein were mysteriously deleted from Wikipedia on July 22nd. Despite evidence of their friendship and Epstein's visits to the White House, the information remains absent. Speculation arises about the reasons behind this deletion, with suggestions ranging from Hillary Clinton's involvement to Epstein's blackmail activities. The speaker questions the significance of a painting of Clinton in Epstein's possession and highlights the potential implications of such a relationship. The discussion concludes with a reminder of the power dynamics at play and the need to acknowledge uncomfortable truths.

I made a mistake by meeting with Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted sex offender, multiple times. My intention was to raise money for global health, but I now realize that my association with him downplayed the terrible things he did. I have learned from this and acknowledge it as one of my big mistakes, along with not following Melinda's advice sooner.

Speaker 0 stopped representing Epstein after the deal was made and hasn't seen him in years. Introduced to Epstein by Lady Rothschild, Speaker 0 had an academic relationship with him, attending conferences and seminars. Once they learned about Epstein's other life, all social relationships ended. Speaker 0 became Epstein's lawyer and defended him, proud of representing controversial people. Some criticize the deal, but Speaker 0 defends trying to get the best deal possible. Speaker 0 denies ever meeting the woman who made allegations against Epstein, calling it a complete lie. Speaker 1 appreciates Speaker 0 joining to discuss the explosive story and the horrific allegations against Epstein.

Speaker 0 explains that Epstein’s legal problems began with police investigations into allegations that underage women were coming to Epstein’s house. Epstein allegedly believed that Trump was the first to inform the police about what was happening at Epstein’s house, and from that point they became bitter enemies. Speaker 1 asks if this is what Epstein is telling him. Speaker 0 confirms that this is the version he is relaying, as presented by “Oh, the hoax yesterday.” Speaker 2 clarifies that “the hoax” refers to Democrats using a narrative to attack him. He says Epstein has never said or suggested or implied that the hoax is real; he has talked to Epstein many times. He states that the whole thing comes across as a hoax, not that Epstein’s actions are a hoax. He explains that Epstein believes himself innocent, and that when he first heard the rumor, he kicked him out of Maribago. He adds that Epstein was an FBI informant trying to take this matter down. The president knows and has great sympathy for the women who have suffered harms; it’s detestable to him. He and the speaker have spoken as recently as twenty-four hours ago. What he is talking about, according to Speaker 2, are the Democrats who are pursuing this with impure motives. If they truly cared, he asks, why didn’t they act during the four years of the Biden administration when the Biden DOJ had all the records? They didn’t say a word about it, and now they pursue it for political purposes. Speaker 3 notes that our current president has had relationships with Epstein in the past, and mentions Katie Johnson and possibly other victims who have accused Trump of involvement in similar matters. In the speaker’s experience, Trump supporters will not listen to such claims. He admits the court of law isn’t present here. He asks if there is anything that can be said about the validity of those claims or whether more is known. Speaker 1 responds that he can say nothing at all. He states that the only thing he can say about President Trump is that in 2009, when he served subpoenas and gave notice to connected people that he wanted to talk to them, Trump was the only person who picked up the phone and said, “let’s just talk.” Trump offered as much time as needed, provided information that checked out, and helped him so they didn’t have to depose him. He adds that this occurred in 2009. Speaker 3 asks if there is any truth to James Patterson’s claims that Trump kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago. Speaker 1 confirms that he definitely heard that.

Bill and Melinda Gates's divorce is surrounded by speculation and controversy. Melinda expressed her dislike for Bill's association with Jeffrey Epstein, calling him "abhorrent" and regretting her own meeting with him. There are claims of intense fights between Bill and Melinda over Epstein. The divorce papers mention the name Paul Weiss, who has connections to Epstein's accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell. Bill Gates posted a picture with a book titled "In Search of Memory" shortly before Epstein's apparent suicide. The cameras stopped working, and the Justice Department seemed to cover up the Epstein case. It is suggested that Bill Gates should come forward and admit the truth.

I no longer represent Epstein and haven't seen him in years. If his lawyers ask me about the deal, I have to answer as a lawyer. I was introduced to him by Lady Rothschild and we attended academic conferences together. We had no idea about his other life and ended our social relationship when we found out. I became his lawyer and defended him, which some people criticize. However, I deny ever meeting the woman who accused him and call it a complete lie. I will continue to say this until I die, and my children will say the same.

Bill Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein's infamous island are discussed in this video. The speaker mentions that the island was a cesspool and suggests asking Prince Andrew for more information. They also mention that some people are friendly with Epstein, but they are not friends themselves. The speaker considers Epstein a potential political problem for someone running for president. Another speaker denies being a fan of Epstein and claims to have distanced themselves from him many years ago. They state that they were not a fan of Epstein and had not spoken to him in about 15 years.

The transcript centers on an email from Howard Lutnick to Jeffrey Epstein and the surrounding reaction to Epstein’s public notoriety. The message indicates travel plans: Lutnick asks Epstein where he is located and what the exact location for Lutnick’s captain is, noting that they are landing in Saint Thomas early Saturday afternoon and plan to head to Saint Bart’s/Anguilla on Monday, with a dinner proposed for Sunday evening. Lutnick mentions traveling with “another couple, Michael and Mary Lerman,” and states that “each of us has four children.” The ages of the children are listed in the email as “two 16s, two 14s, a 13, a 12, an 11, and a seven year old.” The speaker points out that this is “forty years after Jeffrey Epstein was convicted.” Following the email, the speakers express strong, unambiguous condemnation of Epstein and the surrounding circumstances. Speaker 1 asserts, “How this guy has a job today is a disgrace. That is There is no room That is disgusting. Fire. Fire. I'm done with these fucking people. Fire this guy right now. What is your excuse?” They emphasize a history of alleged deceit, with one speaker stating, “He’s a liar. Neighbors with this dude. Claims he only ever met him once. Lived next to him for twenty some years. That's crazy. Proven liar advising the president of The United States every fucking day.” The emotional tone escalates, with both speakers declaring, “I'm so done with these people. Yeah. That is so That is done with these That is absolutely abhorrent. I'm so fucking done with these people.” They mention tax-related concerns, noting, “and we gotta I gotta fucking file taxes in a couple weeks.” The dialogue then questions accountability and the persistence of Epstein’s influence in high-level circles: “What is the conversation when he's like, hey, I'm about to email Jeff back. You got you're four. What are their ages? I gotta what are their ages? Like, I get like, what a fucking” (truncated in the transcript). Overall, the excerpt juxtaposes a routine social planning email involving Epstein with a contemporaneous, vehement condemnation of Epstein’s legacy and ongoing professional influence, highlighting the contrast between personal arrangements and public outrage.

Bill Gates was questioned about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, which he claims was limited to dinners. He admitted he shouldn't have had them. When asked if Melinda Gates warned him about Epstein's potential to sexually compromise people, Bill Gates denied it, stating it was just dinner. Melinda Gates stated that Bill's association with Epstein was upsetting to her and played a role in their divorce. She met Epstein once and regretted it immediately, describing him as "abhorrent" and "evil personified," causing her to have nightmares. The speaker questions why Bill Gates continued to associate with Epstein to the point where Melinda felt the need to intervene and suggests that Bill Gates should not be taken seriously.

The speaker references Brock Pierce, described as an Epstein client and alleged child abuser and as a cofounder of Tethr, and asks, “Who is friends with Epstein client and alleged child abuser, Tethr cofounder Brock Pierce.” They then say, “I don't know shit about Brock's history, and I've never met him. I don't know if he's an Epstein client. I don't know anything about these allegations, and I don't really care at this point because it doesn't affect my life at all.”

The speaker discusses the high-profile individuals who were associated with Jeffrey Epstein, including Prince Andrew, Naomi Campbell, Kevin Spacey, Bill Clinton, and Hillary Clinton. They question how many of these people who visited Epstein's private jet, island, and ranch were involved in the exploitation of children. They also mention that Epstein was well-known but evaded legal consequences due to fear. The speaker criticizes Sydney McCain for not taking action against Epstein despite her knowledge of him. They conclude by stating that Epstein's death was likely not a suicide, similar to Jeffrey Epstein's case.

I regret having dinners with Jeffrey Epstein, as he claimed to have connections to people interested in global health philanthropy. However, those meetings were a mistake and did not result in what he promised. This happened a long time ago and there is nothing new to add. When I learned about his background, I cut off contact with him. The lesson here is to always be cautious. Despite this, I am proud of the philanthropic work we do at the foundation, which is my main focus every day.

Bill's connection to Jeffrey Epstein was one of many factors in our divorce. I met Epstein once and found him abhorrent. I shared my feelings with Bill, but his relationship with Epstein is for him to explain. My heart goes out to the young women affected by Epstein.