TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Nobody in this country cares about watching bombs go off, but they are interested in the Mexican border, which I just visited for three days. Mexico is a cesspool of barbarism and criminality, and that's our existential threat, not China, Russia, or Iran. The cartels run everything in Mexico, and everyone knows the truth. My son was just in Mexico City, and people told him where not to go and what not to do to avoid the cartels. If you cross them, you're dead. The cartels also take care of their own, providing healthcare and other benefits. The weapons they have are serious, including RPGs and Javelin missile systems. Border patrolmen and Texas guard people have seen them just across the border. Some of these weapons may have come from Ukraine, where corruption is rampant and a lot of the aid we send ends up on the black market.

The speaker discusses the hypothetical scenario of a revolution in Mexico and the potential consequences for the United States. They suggest that if a government hostile to the US were to come to power in Mexico, it might seek Russian military support along the US-Mexico border. The speaker questions whether the US would accept such a situation and highlights the need for a compromise. They propose that Ukraine should not become a NATO member in exchange for Russia withdrawing its forces.

I was asked about the recent election in Mexico, but I didn't follow it closely. The new president, Claudio Shinebaum, is a climate scientist and a globalist. People are concerned about Mexico's future under a socialist president, but many in Mexico don't pay taxes or follow laws. If the government tries to enforce regulations, they may face resistance, even violence.

We are being conquered by a complete resettlement of America with millions of people bringing different cultures and beliefs. This will permanently change the country unless there are massive deportations.

We're seeing Reaper drones hunting for fentanyl labs run by criminal cartels in Mexican airspace. These drones, while currently unarmed, can be equipped for precision strikes. The CIA is sharing the intel gathered with Mexican officials to dismantle these labs, which emit detectable chemicals. Previously, the Trump administration had similar drone flights but without notifying Mexican partners. There are concerns about potential overreach. Using US military in a foreign country could resemble an invasion. Mexico's president downplayed the drone presence as campaign related. Our president is expected to formally designate six Mexican cartels as terrorist organizations this week. Also, Border Patrol briefly stopped using body cameras due to radio frequencies that could trigger explosives and social media posts revealing agent locations. The order to stand down has been lifted, and agents are wearing body cams again, but we are waiting to hear how the issues were resolved.

The cartels have warned of escalating violence, and with both Mexican and U.S. troops at the border, military involvement is expected. The Mexican military is positioned to counter the cartels, who have previously engaged them. As the U.S. secures the border and reduces crossings significantly, cartels are likely to retaliate, especially given their record profits from smuggling and trafficking. President Trump has designated them as terrorist organizations due to the harm they cause, particularly through fentanyl. A strong message is sent to the cartels: any harm to U.S. troops will provoke a severe response. The cartels may claim toughness, but they are no match for the power of the U.S. military and the resolve of President Trump.

I spent a week in Tapachula, Mexico, where thousands of migrants are trapped due to a military operation aimed at controlling the situation before the U.S. elections. The Mexican government is relocating some migrants to other cities but is keeping most of them in the south to avoid a surge at the border. Many migrants are anxious about a potential Trump victory, fearing he would close the border. As a result, they are increasingly attempting to cross illegally. I predict that once the election is over, there could be a significant influx of migrants as the Mexican authorities may no longer hold them back. The current situation is unprecedented, with around 150,000 migrants in Tapachula, all eager to move north.

Mexico struggles to handle a sudden influx of millions of people, despite the desire to welcome them. Many have lived in the U.S. for decades, building lives and families there. The idea of deporting them back to Mexico, where they may find nothing left and face violence, is unrealistic. This situation could lead to a significant crisis, as these individuals cannot simply return to a life of lower wages and instability.

As an outsider in Texas, immigration has drastically changed the state. Trump effectively enforced federal laws, unlike previous administrations. Designating drug cartels as terrorist organizations allows the military to act against them, protecting states from cartel violence. The Biden administration's policies have indirectly funded the cartels, encouraging illegal immigration, which is a major profit source for them. They use these profits to buy weapons, some of which are surface-to-air, creating potential threats. George Soros has influenced the election of DA's in key Texas counties, leading to a proliferation of crime as these DA's often fail to prosecute, even financial crimes. This gives cartels an open invitation to operate. There's a fear among politicians of being targeted by these DAs, preventing effective action against crime.

There are concerns about the infiltration of terrorist organizations into the United States, particularly those sympathetic to the Palestinian cause. The open borders and weak policies of the Biden administration have allowed for potential threats to enter the country. The Mexican cartels, responsible for killing Americans with fentanyl, could also collaborate with terrorists. It is unknown how many sleeper cells or terrorists are present in the US, but the close alliance with Israel suggests that the conflict between Israel and Hamas could spread to American streets. Law enforcement and intelligence agencies are worried, but their ability to address these threats is hindered by distractions and resource limitations. The US is seen as a likely target due to its support for Israel.

Speaker 0, Speaker 1, and Speaker 2 discuss immigration and U.S. foreign aid policy, focusing on roots, outcomes, and political implications. They begin with a provocative assertion: immigration is a major issue, with Speaker 0 claiming, “mostly with immigration… I wish people knew that we’re letting in criminals daily.” The speakers note migration as a central concern for the region, describing large U.S. aid to Central America—“4,000,000,000 over four years”—and acknowledging migrants now arriving from other places, including Venezuela. The dialogue questions the end goals of policy, asking, “What is the end goal? Why are they allowing children?” and “So what does he say to that?” along with a reference that “a lot of children” are involved. Speaker 2 mentions aid directed to female prisons in Mexico and to work on training, and to gender issues in Pakistan, noting initiatives to recruit, retain, and advance more women in law enforcement. A lingering question is asked: should U.S. taxpayers’ money be spent in their own country on these issues when they are described as fatal or concerning to others. The conversation shifts to specifics of administration and oversight: “Secretary Lincoln, how close are you to him? Five degrees separation.” The group references briefings on the FY2025 budget request and budget cycles, then reiterates the migration issue with a call to “stop migration.” They discuss a “root cause strategy” involving funding to address migrants at their origins, “Central America, basically,” aiming to support development there. A critical point is the assertion of substantial U.S. funding to the region and the concern that migrants are still coming from elsewhere, notably Venezuela, which “looks bad for the administration.” The dialogue notes the difficulty of finding a clear answer, with a sense that the other side might benefit politically. The speakers reflect on the scale of the funding relative to past decades and acknowledge uncertainty about what is effectively changing. There is talk of internal discussions with colleagues who manage migration processes and foreign assistance, with admissions of confusion or lack of clear messaging: “I don’t know what we do… there’s no clear answer.” They touch on messaging about immigration, including a belief that “we’re letting in criminals daily,” and contrast the status of “good, honest, hard work” Mexicans who stay in Mexico with others who come to the United States. Towards the end, Speaker 0 argues that traditional Americans—“Nebraska… Americans that have my family’s been in United States for four hundred years”—are not leftists, while stating that Latin Americans are leftist, framing it as a broader political and societal divide connected to immigration policies. They propose a hypothetical: allowing 100,000 Mexicans a year if they are not in the country illegally and have no criminal record, suggesting a quality filter on entrants.

"These people are directly being taught by USX military." "They got Pegasus from Israel." "She wants Mexico to stay Mexico. She doesn't wanna see American forces coming in." "A 100%." "Does she have narcoties? 100%. 100%." "I believe she definitely has narcoties." "She's with the Morena Party. So many political figures in this party have now, just recently, been sanctioned by The US, had their visas revoked by The US, have been tied to shell companies in The US that are cleaning money for the cartels." "This was the most violent Mexican election in the history of Mexican elections." "And then prior to her, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, the previous president of Mexico, who basically took Sheehanbaum and put her up and said, everyone who voted for me, for her, and she won by a landslide." "He had been reported to have received a significant multimillion dollar payout from the Sinaloa cartel." "If she really cared about the Mexican people, the cartel crackdown would be to the next level." "I published that list. And then exactly a month later, Marina del Pilar, her US tourist visa and her husband's were revoked."

Don't tell me "Viva Mexico" if you've never lived there on Mexican wages, or if your kids haven't been trafficked. Many are living off American privilege. Don't tell me "Viva Mexico" when kids are slaughtered, women are murdered, and the government doesn't care. Kids at the border are drug trafficked, killed, and their organs sold on the black market by cartels. There is no justice; money buys impunity. The government doesn't care about the people, or they would eliminate the cartels. Many parents almost died crossing the border for their children's benefit, or escaped the cartels. Visiting Mexico is different than living there. Don't say "Viva Mexico" while benefiting from American privilege. Mexico isn't what it was; it's not safe anymore, except for the wealthy. Live in Mexico on pesos, then say if it's enjoyable. Don't burn the American flag while being ungrateful. Don't praise Mexico if you've never lived or struggled there.

The speaker asserts that cartels are running Mexico and expresses that it is very sad to watch what has happened to the country. They claim that the cartels are killing about 250,000 to 300,000 people in our country every single year, mentioning drugs as part of the issue.

The idea that drug cartels are a problem here is laughable and has already been debunked. Governor Abbott deployed DPS troops, and Colonel McGraw, the head of the DPS, testified in front of Senate and House committees last year. According to their reports during the special sessions, there is simply no significant crime issue in this area.

Border patrol agents have exchanged gunfire with Mexican drug cartels, and the situation is expected to escalate. President Trump plans to seal the border and dismantle the cartels, which he has designated as terrorist organizations. The goal is to eliminate their involvement in trafficking, smuggling, and drug operations, leading to increased violence at the southwest border. The U.S. government will take action against these groups not only in Mexico but also in the 42 countries where the Jalisco cartel operates. The Trump administration aims to confront them decisively, similar to the approach taken against the caliphate, with the intent to destroy them.

More people are now entering the US through ports of entry rather than crossing the border illegally. This is because of an app that allows them to enter easily. However, the app has been hacked by Mexican cartels, who are now selling the service to migrants worldwide. They use a virtual private network to override the app's security and bring in as many people as possible. This shows that the Biden administration doesn't understand the extent to which cartels will go to make money. The question remains: Is Mexico an ally in the fight against illegal immigration?

I think the most unexpected group of people might end up saving us all. Do you know who Trump is trying to declare war on? The cartel. Oh, please, do it.

Speaker 0: Have you considered talking to the president of Colombia who you called a drop leader? Speaker 1: No. I haven't really thought too much about him. He's been fairly hostile to The United States, and I haven't given him a lot of thought. He's he's gonna have himself some big problems if he doesn't wise up. Speaker 2: Did you say Colombia is producing a lot of drugs. Have cocaine factories that they make cocaine, as you know, and they sell it right into The United States. So he better wise up or he'll be next. He'll be next too. I hope he's listening. Speaker 0: So was this operation a message that you're sending to Mexico, to Claudia Scheinbaum, president there? Speaker 2: Well, it wasn't meant to be. We're very friendly with her. She's a good woman, but the cartels are running Mexico. She's not running Mexico. The cartels are running Mexico. We could be politically correct and be nice and say, oh, yes. Is no. No. She's very, you know, she's very frightened of the cartels that are running Mexico. And I've asked her numerous times, would you like us to take out the cartels? No. No. No, mister president. No. No, no, please. So we have to do something because we lost the real number is 300,000 people, in my opinion. You know, they like to say a 100,000. A 100,000 is a lot of people, but the real number is 300,000 people. And we lost it to drugs, and they come in through the southern border, mostly the southern border. A lot plenty come in through Canada too, by the way, in case you don't know. But but they come in through the southern border, and something's gonna have to be done with Mexico. Cuban government, the Trump administration's next target, mister secretary, very quickly. Speaker 3: Well, the Cuban government is a is a huge problem. Yeah. The the the the Cuban government is a huge problem for Speaker 2: some So is that a yes? Speaker 3: Cuba. But I don't think people fully appreciate. I think they're in a lot of trouble. Yes. I'm not gonna talk talk to you about what our future steps are gonna be and our policies are gonna be right now in this regard, but I don't think it's any mystery that we are not big fans of the Cuban regime, who, by the way, are the ones that were propping up Maduro. His entire, like, internal security force, his internal security opera apparatus is entirely controlled by Cubans. One of the untold stories here is how, in essence, you talk about colonization because I think you said Dulce Rodriguez mentioned that, the ones who have sort of colonized, at least inside the regime, are Cubans. It was Cubans that guarded Maduro. He was not guarded by Venezuelan bodyguards. He had Cuban bodyguards. In terms of their internal intelligence, who spies on who inside to make sure there are no traitors, those are all Cubans. Speaker 0: He felt very strongly. We we needed for nationals. We need Greenland for national security, not for minerals. We had some we have so many sites for minerals and oil and everything. We have more oil than any other country in the world. We need Greenland for national security.