reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0: Talked about a bike accident and something about the chest. Speaker 1: Mentioned dust, smoke, and oil. Speaker 2: Discussed a woman named Elizabeth de Bruk who is involved in some kind of illegal activities related to organ extraction. She had connections in Ukraine and Georgia. Speaker 3: Talked about the woman's criminal activities and her association with a person named Mikhail. Mentioned scandals related to organ trafficking. Speaker 1: Described how the woman's style of work changed and she started performing organ extractions without consent. Speaker 3: Mentioned that the woman had a foundation and worked in Ukraine. Speaker 1: Talked about the woman's involvement in illegal organ trafficking and how she would perform surgeries on injured individuals. Speaker 0: Mentioned someone named Vladimir and talked about organ trafficking in Ukraine. Speaker 2: Discussed how some individuals were taken to America or Romania after being injured and their organs were harvested. Speaker 4: Described the conditions created by the Ukrainian regime for illegal organ trafficking and experimentation. Speaker 0: Mentioned a medical center where people witnessed individuals involved in organ trafficking leaving the area.

The speaker asserts that hospitals are not allowed to vaccinate patients without their knowledge, yet an alarming shift is occurring inside the medical system. They claim the word vaccine is quietly disappearing from hospital consent forms and is being replaced with a broad, vague category: biologics or biogenics. Under this new classification, a hospital can technically administer vaccines or other biological products without explicit patient consent. Insiders are reportedly observing that new surgical and hospital consent forms no longer list specific treatments. They allegedly do not say vaccine or injection; they simply say biologics or biogenics, a category so wide it can include almost anything made from living organisms and their byproducts. The scariest part, according to the speaker, is that most people sign these forms without reading them because they trust the system, because they are in pain, overwhelmed, or seconds away from being put under anesthesia. This creates a setup where a patient can enter for a routine procedure, sign a consent form filled with vague terminology, go unconscious, and wake up having received something they did not directly approve. The speaker emphasizes that no medical system should be allowed to hide procedures behind intentionally unclear language. They urge spreading the message because, in their view, most people are unaware that this is happening.

The speaker asserts that every time people consume natural flavorings, they could be ingesting substances developed by human fetal cells. They claim that major food companies—Pepsi, Nestle, and Kraft—have used a biotech company called Cinomics to create flavor enhancers, and that these artificial flavors were originally tested using HEK293, a cell line derived from aborted fetal tissue. Due to legal loopholes, these connections aren’t required to be disclosed to consumers. The speaker explains how the process allegedly works: the food industry recognizes that processed foods lose flavor, so they hire biotech firms to develop flavor enhancers rather than using real ingredients. They state that Ceramics found HEK293 cells, which originated from fetal tissue, respond to flavors in a way similar to human taste buds. By testing flavors on these cells, additives were created to enhance processed foods, purportedly making them more appealing and contributing to widespread addiction to these products. These chemical compounds were then rebranded as natural flavors. Why this matters, according to the speaker, is that the food industry operates as a single, deceptive system that uses loopholes to keep consumers uninformed. They claim that today even “natural flavors” can contain over 100 synthetic compounds developed using biotech processes that consumers aren’t told about. The overarching message is that the pursuit is profit rather than health, and that consumers are being used as experimental subjects. If such information has been hidden for decades, the speaker questions what else might be concealed, urging listeners to wake up, check labels, and demand transparency. The speaker also warns that if companies can manipulate what people eat, they could influence how people think and feel. They exhort viewers to expose the truth together and to share the video with others who care about food provenance. The closing call to action emphasizes education as power and urges collective effort to uncover and understand hidden information about natural flavors. Throughout, the speaker asks viewers whether they have been fooled by natural flavors and invites discussion in the comments, framing knowledge and collective action as the path to greater freedom.

23andMe is mentioned, prompting a warning against using their services due to data selling practices. It is claimed that 23andMe sells user data to other entities, including Russia. Nathaniel Johnson, a policy advisor for the U.S. Department of the Treasury, is introduced. The claim is made that 23andMe's contract contains a clause allowing them to share information with shareholders, some of whom are pharmaceutical companies based in other countries. These foreign pharmaceutical companies are allegedly owned by entities such as the Ministry of Defense in Russia or are based in China.

Speaker 0 asks Vivian if she works for an Israeli intelligence firm called Black Cube, to which she denies. Keith Woods mentions that this information can be found on Wikipedia. Vivian abruptly ends the conversation, leaving Speaker 0 wondering about her sudden departure.

The speakers discuss financial incentives for abortion services and procedures. They mention removing body parts intact for organ harvesting. The conversation includes details on dismembering fetuses and ensuring intact organs for research purposes. The speakers also discuss the process of extracting body parts during abortions.

A medical director for an entire affiliate and someone over abortion services discuss fetal tissue procurement. They are looking for livers and cardiac tissue, not footprints. Dilation makes it easier to get bigger pieces out before potential relation returns. If the fetus is coming out to the umbilicus and the torso area is intact, that's ideal because that's where all the organs are. Disarticulation counts, and then the rest can be brought through all in one piece. The discussion touches on the use of "ditch" procedures, which nuke the stem cells. Even in procedures where they're not doing anything close to intact, it's easy to identify and isolate relatively intact abdominal context, though the diamonds are trickier. They are considering getting someone who can do deep sedation protocol. The medical director needed to meet with legal counsel to clarify where exactly this is.

The speaker discusses a stem cell technology called SCNT, which involves using the egg of a young woman and replacing the nucleus with their own DNA. They express admiration for the genetic qualities of curvy, sexy black women from Africa and offer to pay $100 for their eggs. They mention the value of stem cells in period blood and suggest it should be captured and recycled. The transcript abruptly ends.

Reporter Vanessa Gellman from Project Veritas confronts a woman, whose name is not mentioned, about emails instructing Pfizer employees not to disclose the use of fetal cell lining. The reporter questions what else she is hiding from the public and emphasizes the importance of transparency. The woman avoids answering and runs away. The reporter concludes by stating that they will continue to seek answers and wonders who will be the next person to face scrutiny.

During a clinic day, they discussed what specific body parts people wanted. Some wanted intact parts, like livers and muscles. They mentioned the importance of having a good relationship with the supplier to have these conversations. They also talked about a training method where they would start with research cases and gradually allow others to do more. They emphasized the need to prioritize these requests.

A person asks if someone is a blood donor and when they last donated. The person replies they donated in January and seems to believe they cannot donate again for a while. The first person states that whole blood can be donated every eight weeks and other donation types can be donated more frequently. The first person then asks if the other person wants to donate next week.

Animal rights activists have more influence on vaccine companies than anti-abortion activists. There is concern over the lack of outcry regarding human babies born alive at 5 to 6 months old for research purposes. These babies are delivered alive and their hearts are cut out without anesthesia. The speaker clarifies that they are referring to fetuses that are 5 months old. Stanley Plotkin, a scientist, described using various parts of aborted fetuses for vaccine production. Scientists purchase different body parts for research purposes. The speaker mentions receiving a catalog with prices for body parts of 32-week-old babies. The conversation then shifts to discussing the science behind this issue.

Animal rights activists have more influence than vaccine companies and anti-abortion activists. There is concern over the lack of outcry regarding human babies born alive at 5 to 6 months old for research purposes. These babies are delivered alive and their hearts are cut out without anesthesia. The speaker emphasizes that they wouldn't do this to a mouse. The conversation then shifts to discussing the use of fetuses in vaccine production. Stanley Plotkin, a scientist, allegedly used various parts of aborted fetuses for vaccines. The speaker confirms that scientists purchase different body parts for research purposes. The speaker mentions receiving a catalog with prices for body parts from 20 years ago. The conversation concludes by acknowledging the moral implications and transitioning to discussing the science.

Curtis from AOS Positioning Systems calls Sarah to tell her they will be removing her from their website. Curtis says customers are questioning the product because it was listed at “600 bodies” and later at “two fifteen,” which customers view as anomalies. Curtis explains the removal is intended to protect Sarah while the results are validated in “just a couple more years,” after which they will put her back on the website. Sarah reacts, asking what Curtis means and disputing the implication that it is their fault. Curtis says they stand by their systems and that they work, and he clarifies that the system did not come with the “white guys” who were present during Sarah’s last use of it. Curtis explains the people Sarah refers to were archaeologists at an archaeological site, and they do not come and operate the machine for Sarah; Sarah has to operate it herself. Sarah identifies herself as an archaeologist and calls herself a conflict anthropologist. She says she remembers the word “conflict” from CBC articles and assumed it related to archaeology because the work was described as an archaeological dig. Sarah acknowledges the article lent credibility to her work and she did not double-check. Curtis asks what conflict anthropology is, and Sarah responds with an explanation that it is “the study of hating white people.” Curtis then says he would like to read Sarah’s thesis about how much she hates white people, and Sarah agrees that she will read it.

Speaker describes taking on two nonverbal twins in July ’24. The mom from Tennessee flew in to see him, and a patient‑doctor relationship formed. He realized the mom would do everything he told her to do, and she said, “I trusted you because I came to your clinic and I saw everything you're doing to do things right.” After achieving speech, the kids went from nonverbal to fully verbal. He notes they followed the protocol and succeeded. The mom saw his lab and the machines; this is a multi‑million‑dollar lab created to help bring products to market that help the microbiome and to understand the microbiome so that if you mess up your microbiome with product ABC, we potentially could know in the future how to restore that damage from product ABC. Are there certain

Big money is being made from the sale of fetal body parts, which even disturbs pro-choice advocates. The medical director for the national office discusses the demand for specific body parts, such as livers and lower extremities, and the pricing range for these specimens. Techniques are discussed to ensure intact organs are obtained, and the importance of communication between the person performing the procedures and the end goal is emphasized. The possibility of partnering with EPFA to streamline the process is mentioned, although it is currently deemed too sensitive. The conversation concludes with gratitude for the helpfulness of a certain individual in fetal tissue collection.

23andMe is mentioned, prompting a warning against using their services due to data selling practices. It is claimed that 23andMe sells user data to other entities, including Russia. Nathaniel Johnson, a policy advisor for the U.S. Department of the Treasury, is introduced. The claim is made that 23andMe's contract includes a clause allowing them to share information with shareholders, some of whom are pharmaceutical companies based in other countries. These foreign pharmaceutical companies are allegedly owned by entities like the Ministry of Defense in Russia or are based in China.

Natalie, the lead technician for BioMax, has been discussing tissue collection with Misty. There are two providers who book up to 24 weeks. Anne is one of these providers. There is another provider who can also send samples through up to 24 weeks. Formula was put in a sample, making it dark white instead of clear.

Some people try to change the presentation, but you never have enough dilation to deliver an intact calvarium unless you have a huge amount of dilation. With breech presentation, dilation happens as the case goes on, and often in the last step, you can evacuate an intact skull. With ultrasound guidance, they can change the presentation. When asked if there has ever been a case where the presentation had to be changed to get intact fetal tissue, the speaker said no. The speaker confirmed that when they said "we've been pretty successful with that," they were referring to Planned Parenthood Los Angeles (PPLA) and including themselves.

The speaker asserts that every time people consume natural flavorings, they may be eating something developed by human fetal cells. They claim that some of the biggest food companies, including Pepsi, Nestle, and Kraft, have used a biotech company called Cinomics to create flavor enhancers. The speaker emphasizes that these artificial flavors were originally tested using HEK293, a cell line derived from aborted fetal tissue, and that due to legal loopholes, companies do not have to disclose this information. They repeat that natural flavors do not necessarily come from nature; they can be chemically engineered in a lab using biotech derived from human cells. The explanation continues with a description of how the process works: the food industry knows that processed food loses flavor, so rather than using real ingredients, biotech companies are brought in to develop flavor enhancers. Ceramics (likely a misspoken or misnamed term) is cited as identifying that HEK293 cells, derived from fetal tissue, react to flavors like human taste buds. By testing flavors on these cells, additives were created to improve the flavor of processed food, allegedly addicting millions of people worldwide. The speaker claims that these chemical compounds were rebranded as natural flavors. The broader assertion is that the food industry operates as a large deceptive machine, using loopholes to keep consumers uninformed. The message is that even natural flavors can contain over 100 synthetic compounds developed via biotech processes that consumers are not told about. The speaker claims the issues are driven by profit rather than health, and that people are the experiment. They ask what else has been hidden if this has been kept secret for decades, urging listeners to wake up, check labels, and demand transparency. The speaker warns against trusting food giants that profit from deception, arguing that if they can manipulate what people eat, they can manipulate how people think and feel. The speaker ends by declaring that the truth is out and invites the audience to share whether they have been fooled by natural flavors in the comments.

We don't accept vaccinated people because there is research suggesting that the spike protein in stem cells triggered by the vaccine may cause inflammation and potentially worsen things. Although the data is not 100% clear, we only use products from unvaccinated women to avoid any potential risks.

Big money is being made from the sale of fetal body parts. Even pro-choice advocates are disturbed. People want liver and lower extremities. The price is $30 to $100 per specimen. Providers try to change the presentation so it's not vertex. If starting from a breech presentation, dilation happens as the case goes out. There are steps to change the COVID presentation. If enough dilation is maintained, the person doing the procedures understands what is needed. Knowing what is needed makes a huge difference. One person had 8 cases and knew which were more likely to yield what was needed, making decisions accordingly. Conversations are happening behind closed doors with affiliates.

Emily and a technician from Biomax discuss tissue collection. The technician mentions meeting the director and having a lot of tissues available. They have two providers who go up to 24 weeks, including Anne. The technician recalls a past experience in Brisbane with a 16-year-old patient where they had to hurry, resulting in less intact tissue. Other days, the tissue is more intact, with possibly only an arm detached. Tissue collection typically occurs Thursday, Friday, and Saturday. The technician also mentions an instance where formula was put in a glass mirror, making it difficult to see.

The speakers discuss the use of aborted fetuses in medical research. Speaker 1 confirms that various organs, including the lung, skin, kidney, spleen, and heart, were included in a study. Speaker 0 questions the number of fetuses Speaker 1 has worked with throughout their career, to which Speaker 1 admits not remembering the exact number but acknowledges studying quite a few before using them for vaccine production. When asked about the number of studies involving fetuses, Speaker 1 cannot recall. Speaker 0 then mentions that one objection to vaccination is the use of aborted fetuses.

Speaker 0 introduces a provocative claim, warning the video might be removed and urging viewers to watch and download it while possible, saying the content sounds like a horror movie. Speaker 1 raises a question about research involving implanting aborted baby parts into a lab animal, asking if such research exists. Speaker 2 confirms a prior analysis indicating that over ninety percent of experiments using human fetal tissue involving animals were funded by Fauci's NIAID. They add that much of the tissue comes from colleges and universities that have affiliate hospitals performing the procedures. Speaker 1 suggests the need to investigate where the aborted human fetal tissue is sourced and asserts the issue should be looked into, addressing the Madam Chair. Speaker 0 clarifies that the video is for entertainment purposes, but describes a certain person’s claim that aborted fetal parts are being used and combined with other animals, implying a practice beyond ordinary science. The speaker acknowledges skepticism but says the rumor should be investigated regardless of political alignment, arguing that it would be understandable to be unsettled by such alleged activities. The speaker shares a personal stance: they will take the claim with a grain of salt because it originates from a random person on X, yet reiterates the claim that people are “playing god” and that humanity is unprepared for the extent of these actions, suggesting that the truth is being concealed to avoid public outcry. The speaker adds a conspiratorial thread: “these USOs under the sea” are related to the topic, and mentions a family acquaintance who allegedly knows an ex-military person who had to deal with a creature created in a lab that merged with AI. If the claims are true, the speakers imply this would constitute a true horror story, indicating that humanity is not in control of the government globally. They urge the audience to remember this when they see references to the USA. A broader existential claim follows: humanity is making decisions and following orders from ancient “gods” such as the Anunnaki, an alien race. The people at the top are portrayed as having sold their souls, believing they have no chance of going to heaven, and having been traumatized from birth. The speakers emphasize that these powerful individuals fear humanity—our soul, love, kindness, strength, fierceness, and capabilities—and urge listeners not to be manipulated any longer, concluding with a call for awakening and healing the world through collective awareness.