TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

I have photographs of two children who were each shot with extreme precision in the chest and head. It's impossible for a toddler to be shot twice by mistake, especially by a sniper. In just my first week in Gaza, the carnage against civilians surpassed all the disasters I've witnessed in 30 years of mission trips, including ground zero and earthquakes. The victims are almost exclusively children. I've never seen anything like it. I've seen more incinerated and shredded children in one week than in my entire life. Shredded means missing body parts, often from buildings collapsing or bomb explosions. We've removed large shrapnel from children and have seen kids shot multiple times by snipers.

Interviewer and Professor discuss what is known about October 7, the broader context, and the ongoing political implications. - On October 7, the global picture is that roughly 1,200 people were killed, with about 400 combatants and about 800 civilians, according to authorities the professor cites. He notes he relies on UN Human Rights Council Commission of Inquiry, Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch but cautions these bodies do not have perfect records. He maintains there is no compelling evidence that a significant portion of the deaths in Israel’s reaction to October 7 were the result of Israeli actions, and he says the deaths are overwhelmingly attributable to Hamas and other armed groups in Gaza. He states there is no evidence supporting the claim that Hamas weaponized rape on October 7. - Regarding rape allegations, the professor emphasizes that the UN mission distinguishes between rape and sexual violence; the UN Commission of Inquiry states there is no digital or photographic evidence of rape. Pamela Patton’s report looked at 5,000 photographs and 50 hours of digital evidence but concluded there was no direct digital or photographic evidence of sexual violence on October 7. He questions why, if such incidents occurred, witnesses did not produce photographic or digital proof, noting that in a conflict zone Israelis would typically photograph atrocities; he suggests eyewitness testimony often aligns with broader narratives about Israel, and argues that some eyewitness accounts come from sources that claim Israel is morally exemplary while also alleging atrocities. - The discussion then moves to the credibility of eyewitness reports. The professor argues that some eyewitness accounts “will tell you Israel is the most moral army in the world” while also suggesting Israel’s society is inbred and that Israeli soldiers form deep bonds in the army, which could influence narratives. He notes a broader pattern of people publishing favorable studies of Israel while denying atrocities. - On Hamas’s planning before October 7, the professor describes Gaza as an “inferno under the Israeli occupation,” with Gaza repeatedly described as a concentration camp by prominent figures since 2004 and 2008. He argues that by late 2023 Gaza was portrayed as facing international indifference, and he asserts that the belief that Gaza’s fate would be sealed by Saudi Arabia joining the Abraham Accords contributed to Hamas’s decision-making. He cites The Economist and UN commentary describing Gaza’s conditions well before October 7, including extreme unemployment (approximately 60% among Gaza’s young people) and a collapse of basic services. - The interviewer asks why violence occurred given various nonviolent and diplomatic avenues. The professor notes that Hamas had attempted diplomacy, including reports of seeking a two-state solution or a hudna, cooperation with human rights investigations after prior Israeli operations, and support for nonviolent movements like the Great March of Return. He claims Hamas’s efforts were ignored and emphasizes the blockade’s impact on Gaza. He argues that while Hamas was not saints, they engaged with diplomacy and international law before resorting to violence in the face of Gaza’s dire conditions. - The West Bank vs. Gaza comparison is discussed. The professor argues that the goal in Gaza differs from that in other contexts; whereas other actors may aim to subordinate, Israel’s long-term aim in Gaza is described as making Gaza unlivable and controlling the territory, with support from various Arab states. - The interviewer questions the historical legitimacy of Gaza and Palestinian statehood. The professor rejects attempts to deny Palestinian existence or redefine Gaza’s status, insisting Gaza’s people are Palestinian and Gaza is not part of the West Bank, while acknowledging the historical complexities. - On the UN Security Council resolution and the “board of peace,” the professor describes the resolution as endorsing the Trump peace plan and naming Donald Trump as head of the board of peace, with the board operating with sovereign powers in Gaza and lacking external accountability. He asserts that this effectively grants Trump control over Gaza and foresees rebuilding timelines; he argues that reconstruction would take decades under current conditions, given rubble, toxins, unexploded ordnance, and the scale of destruction. - The future of Gaza is described pessimistically: Gaza is depicted as “gone” in the sense of a prolonged, uninhabitable landscape under an administratively transitional framework that does not guarantee meaningful reconstruction. The professor contends that Arab states endorsed the resolution under pressure and that some leaders feared severe economic repercussions if they opposed it. - The discussion closes with reflections on who benefits from the resolution and the overall trajectory for Gaza, including strong skepticism about any imminent or credible path to durable peace given the political arrangements described and the perceived long-term consequences for the Palestinian people.

In Arabic, terrorists use days of the week as code names. The war is against Hamas, not Gaza's people. The Israeli government denies reports of babies being beheaded. Gaza's civilians use Israeli-built bunkers to survive. The humanitarian crisis in Gaza is severe.

Aujourd'hui, les bilans des morts à Gaza sont inexactes. Les estimations suggèrent entre soixante et soixante-dix mille morts, avec environ trois cents morts par jour dus aux bombardements israéliens. Ces chiffres pourraient être comparables à ceux de la frappe nucléaire d'Hiroshima. Translation: Today, the death toll in Gaza is inaccurate. Estimates suggest between sixty and seventy thousand deaths, with about three hundred deaths per day due to Israeli bombings. These numbers could be comparable to those of the nuclear strike on Hiroshima.

The dialogue centers on casualties in Gaza and the broader human impact of the conflict. One participant states that the government has admitted 70,000 people were killed, a figure they had not previously disclosed. From their perspective, there are 70,000 killed, with many of the victims described as children and women, explicitly noting that they are labeled as terrorists according to Israeli categories. When asked what percentage of the dead are women and children, the speaker confirms that there are statistics out there, but asserts that the vast majority are women and children. The discussion then turns to access and movement: is it possible to know who can go to Gaza? Over the last couple of years in Gaza, the question is raised about what happened and whether there will ever be a clear answer. The speaker believes that people will ultimately know in one way or another, but emphasizes that the catastrophe there is unparalleled and cannot be healed. The sheer scale of destruction and death is described as heartbreak, with the speaker stating that there are no words to convey the impact. They anticipate that at some point, people will understand who did what, why it happened, and how it came to be, but for now the bottom line is that there are people who are suffering and dying as a direct result of violence, which they describe as devastating. The exchange concludes with a question about the speaker’s treatment in Israel, to which no explicit answer is provided in the transcript. Throughout, the emphasis remains on the human toll of the violence in Gaza, the stated casualty figures and demographic composition, the ongoing questions about accountability and causation, and the lasting, devastating impact on civilians. The dialogue underscores a sense of unresolved inquiry about access and movement into Gaza in the context of a catastrophe, while foregrounding the personal experience of suffering and loss wrought by the conflict.

An average 16-year-old Palestinian has experienced a lifetime of violence and conflict. From birth, they have endured an Israeli blockade and deadly assaults. At age 5, they survived an 8-day assault that claimed many lives. At 7, they witnessed a 50-day Israeli onslaught resulting in numerous Palestinian casualties. As a young teenager, they saw the aftermath of Israeli attacks that lasted 11 days. Now, at 16, they are living through what is described as a genocidal war, with over 16,248 people killed, including more than 7,112 children.

I apologize for the mistake in stating the number of unexplained deaths in aborted children as 350%. It is actually 3,328%. This data comes from AHS, which is posted on our website. I did not make up this number, and it was shocking to discover.

- Speaker 0: Since Israel began strikes on Gaza after Hamas’ surprise attack on October 7, it has targeted residential buildings. The UN says nearly 200,000 structures have been destroyed or damaged. With so many fleeing attacks, Palestinians packed into makeshift shelters, many of them UN run schools, but they were not safe. More than 1,000 schools have been bombed, and Israel has destroyed most of Gaza's hospitals, including Al Shifa, where more than 400 Palestinians were killed in a raid in March 2024. - Speaker 1: We make the best weapons in the world, and we’ve got a lot of them. And we’ve given a lot to Israel, frankly. And I mean, Bibi would call me so many times, can you get me this weapon, that weapon, that weapon. Some of them I never heard of, baby, and I made them. But we’d get them here, wouldn’t we? And they are the best. They are the best. And you but you used them well. It also takes people that know how to use them, and you obviously used them very well. But so many that Israel became strong and powerful, which ultimately led to peace. That’s what led to peace. So as we celebrate today, let us remember how this nightmare of depravity and death all began. - Speaker 2: In 1948, when the land of Palestine was officially stolen and given to a group of rabid Zionists who murdered over 10,000 Palestinians. This crime against humanity was decided as early as 1917 with the Balfour Declaration, the British Crown, and Lord Rothschild of the Rothschild banking dynasty, otherwise known as the Bank of England, who when it’s all said and done, will have control over hundreds of billions of dollars worth of Palestinian oil and gas reserves. As Michael Roverero famously said, all wars are bankers’ wars. According to Benjamin Franklin, the primary catalyst for the American Revolution was the Bank of England’s Currency Act. After the revolution, a value based economy with no interest being paid to any central bank was created. But it didn’t last long. The first bank of the United States was chartered in 1791 and favored foreign stockholders over Americans. The charter ended in January 1811 followed by the war of eighteen twelve and the establishment of the second bank of the United States in 1816, which gave more power to the Bank of England. Andrew Jackson successfully killed the bank’s renewal and shortly after became the first US president targeted for assassination when Richard Lawrence drew pistols on him outside The US capital, but misfired. Laws were passed in the early eighteen sixties for the US government to issue its own currency in a value based economy as opposed to the debt based system imposed by central banks. According to an 1864 edition of the London Times, this would have made America the wealthiest nation of the world. The article warned that if a government creates its own money, it will be without debt. It will become prosperous without precedent in the history of the world and therefore must be destroyed. In 1865, president Lincoln was assassinated, and the economy was quickly phased back to the central bank’s debt enslavement model. In 1913, the tyrannical Federal Reserve Bank and federal income tax was born. The two world wars brought Germany under the heel of the central banking cartel. Western banking institutions financed the Bolshevik revolution. In 2000, Iraq stopped selling its oil and Federal Reserve notes. In 2003, Iraq was illegally invaded by The United States and dollar based oil sales were reinstated. In Libya, Muammar Gaddafi’s gold dinar currency was making the nation rich. In 2011, The US invaded and reverted Libya’s oil sales to dollars. The Bank for International Settlements recently proposed efforts under the guise of anti money laundering that would provide scores to tokens and digital wallets including stablecoins. Digital ID, social credit scores, and a carbon tax is what the bankers are up to now. And everything else is a distraction. Today’s war is mostly psychological, and it’s being waged upon you. Greg Reese reporting. The Reiss report is now fully funded by my Substack subscribers. Subscribe today and support my work at gregreiss.substack.com.

The official death toll of 37,000 in Gaza is inaccurate because it excludes those not treated in hospitals, unidentified bodies, and those buried by families. The destruction of the healthcare system and the killing of healthcare workers have severely diminished the capacity to record deaths. The count excludes deaths from lack of medication, rampant diseases due to destroyed sanitation, post-injury infections, and starvation, especially among vulnerable groups. Missing persons, including those under rubble or allegedly kidnapped by Israel, are also not included. There are claims that some children are being trafficked and that organs are being stolen, referencing past admissions of organ harvesting by Israeli doctors. Accounting for these factors, the actual death toll is estimated to be between 193,000 and 514,000. Israel's actions are described as a long-held plan to colonize Gaza, remove its population, and exploit its resources, including gas and oil fields. The siege imposed in 2006 aimed to starve the population.

Over 230 people, including many children, were killed during the bombardment of Gaza, prompting investigations into potential war crimes. In response, it's important to acknowledge that Hamas also fired rockets into civilian areas in Israel, resulting in casualties, including children, though not on the same scale as the impact in Gaza. There are also allegations of war crimes related to these actions.

We initially reported 1400 casualties, but we later corrected it to 1200 as we realized our overestimation. We made a mistake by identifying badly burnt bodies as ours, but they turned out to be Hamas terrorists. We acknowledge our errors and take responsibility for them.

We discussed the high number of unexplained deaths in aborted children at our event. I mistakenly stated it was 350%, but it's actually 3,328%. This data comes from AHS, which is posted on our website. I apologize for the error with the decimal point.

Children in Gaza are being shot by snipers with deadly precision. I have seen two children shot directly in the chest and head, which is not a mistake. In my 30 years of experience and 40 mission trips, I have never witnessed such a level of civilian carnage, particularly among children. The devastation I observed in just one week in Gaza surpasses anything I've encountered before. The number of incinerated and shredded children is staggering and unprecedented in my lifetime.

The Israeli government has misrepresented the events of October 7th to justify its actions in Gaza. Initially claiming nearly 2,000 civilian deaths, the number was later revised to 1,400, then to 1,200, with many being military personnel. Evidence suggests that Apache helicopters were involved in some of the deaths on that day, as confirmed by the Israeli media outlet Haaretz. Reports indicate that helicopters were called in to respond to Hamas fighters, who lacked heavy weaponry. This raises questions about the true cause of the casualties, suggesting Israeli forces may bear responsibility for the deaths and destruction.

What if a grain of rice represented one death in Gaza? This is 1,200 grains, the number used to justify recent actions. The current Palestinian death toll is about 42,000 grains of rice, but this is likely an undercount. A report from The Lancet estimates the true toll, including those missing or likely to die from starvation and untreated injuries, at 186,000. However, a University of Edinburgh report projects the death toll could reach 335,000 by September 2024. This stark figure challenges the narrative that these deaths are a form of self-defense or a proportional response.

Almost 70% of the casualties in the Gaza conflict are women and children, according to the UN's Human Rights Office. This analysis is based on nearly 10,000 verified victims over a six-month period. The ongoing war between Israel's military and Hamas militants has been described by the UN as a systematic violation of international humanitarian law.

15,000 Palestinians killed in Israeli airstrikes, mostly women and children. No reports of Israeli soldiers raping Palestinian women.

Gaza's death toll and civilian injuries continue to rise as airstrikes persist. In the Al Shateh refugee camp, people desperately dig through rubble to save loved ones. Over 440 children have been killed by Israeli airstrikes, according to Gaza's health ministry. Israel claims to target Hamas, but medical facilities, schools, and residential areas have been affected. Displaced individuals, including 47% children, seek refuge in UN-run schools. However, Gaza now faces a complete siege, with no access to water for drinking or hygiene. Schools have been bombed, and many innocent lives lost. The people of Gaza question why they are suffering.

- On October 7, approximately 1,200 people were killed, with about 400 combatants and 800 civilians, according to the speaker who bases this on authoritative human rights reports (UN HRC Commission of Inquiry, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch). He notes that these organizations do not have perfect records but argues there is no compelling evidence that contradicts Hamas and other armed groups in Gaza being responsible for the majority of deaths, while there is no evidence that Israeli actions within Israel constituted a significant share of the total deaths. - The speaker contends there is no credible evidence of weaponized rape by Hamas on October 7. He discusses the UN Commission of Inquiry’s distinction between rape and sexual violence, and Pamela Patton’s report, which he says concluded there was no direct digital or photographic evidence of sexual violence on October 7, despite reviewing thousands of photographs and hundreds of hours of digital evidence. He argues the rape claim relies on assertions by observers and advocates rather than verifiable forensic or photographic proof. - Eyewitness testimony is challenged as being part of a pattern that could promote a narrative of Israeli moral exceptionalism; the speaker asserts that some eyewitness accounts “tell you Israel is the most moral army in the world” and notes that many such testimonies come from sources described as biased, with Israeli soldiers often embedded in a siege mentality. He suggests that Israeli society, with a citizen army and strong military culture, may have incentives to shape or repeat certain stories. - The speaker discusses Hamas’s planning and motives in the years leading to October 7, describing Gaza as an “inferno under the Israeli occupation.” He cites early 2000s characterizations of Gaza as a concentration camp by Israeli officials and UN/Human Rights reports, and notes the blockade and economic collapse. He explains that in 2023, Gaza was described by The Economist as a “rubber sheep” and by others as a toxic dump, with extremely high unemployment (60% of youth) and a deteriorating social fabric. The anticipated end of Gaza’s struggle was seen when Saudi Arabia joined the Abraham Accords, leading the speaker to say Gaza’s fate was sealed. - The discussion on Hamas’s shift to violence notes Hamas had previously tried diplomacy, international law (including cooperation with human rights organizations after Operation Cast Lead and Operation Protective Edge), and even nonviolent strategies like the Great March of Return (endorsed by Hamas). The UN report on the March of Return found demonstrators overwhelmingly nonviolent, while Israel was accused of targeting civilians. The speaker argues Hamas pursued multiple avenues but faced a harsh blockade and a failing prospect of improvement. - Regarding the broader regional context, the speaker asserts that the West Bank and Gaza have different trajectories; Egypt and Jordan are seen as neutralizing or stabilizing forces, while the West Bank’s situation is contrasted with Gaza’s harsher conditions. He argues that the goal in places like Egypt is to neutralize, whereas Israel’s policy toward Gaza is described as cleansing or subjugation, a distinction he says differentiates regional dynamics. - The speaker critiques the UN Security Council’s handling of Gaza, describing a 2023 resolution (UNSC Resolution 2803) that endorses the Trump peace plan and creates a “board of peace” with sovereign powers in Gaza, headed by Donald Trump, and notes that no external body supervises this board beyond a quarterly report to the Security Council. He claims this arrangement renders Gaza effectively under a transitional administration, with reconstruction timelines alarmingly long (fifty to eighty years to rebuild) and a minimal chance of Israel withdrawing from the green zone. - He argues that after October 7, the board’s governance path, the Trump plan, and Arab states’ support for the resolution collectively resulted in Gaza’s “death warrant,” with reconstruction hampered by deliberate destruction and political arrangements that preclude meaningful self-determination or statehood for Gaza. - On international reactions, the speaker notes varying support for Gaza among Arab nations and emphasizes that some regional actors (including Turkey, Egypt, Qatar, and others) endorsed handing Gaza to Trump; he accuses these states of compromising Gaza’s future for broader geopolitical aims and accuses several of “slavery and subservience” to such outcomes. - The concluding portion covers Gaza’s future: the speaker reiterates that Gaza has effectively been made unlivable, with rubble and toxic contamination delaying any reconstruction for decades, and he maintains that the path to a two-state solution remains contested, with the Trump-led framework limiting Palestinian rights and self-determination. He indicates he has just completed a book on UN corruption and the Security Council’s role in Gaza, titled Gaza’s Gravediggers, and suggests that the UN declaration of war on Gaza nullifies international law regarding self-determination.

Newspapers have reported on the claims from Kfar Azar, where an Israeli journalist said soldiers told her that 40 babies had died, some of them beheaded. However, there is no evidence to support these claims. The Israeli Defense Forces have not confirmed the numbers. While emotions are high and it is undeniable that women and children have been killed, it is crucial to verify such horrifying claims. Some newspapers have put the Israeli claim of 40 beheaded babies in quotation marks, indicating that they could not verify it. It is important to acknowledge that women and children have been killed in this situation.

Speaker 0 asks the total number of civilians killed. Speaker 1: "the estimate currently is that there is something in in the realm of one terrorist killed, and in that context, two civilians killed. So that's a very, very low rate." Speaker 0: "Thousand civilians have been killed?" Speaker 1: "Those would be the estimates." Speaker 1 later notes: "there's absolutely no differentiation between terrorists who have been killed and civilians who" and adds "the Gaza Health Ministry, which is Hamas run"—"these are estimates. Nobody knows with any certainty." Speaker 1: "It's approximately two civilians per enemy combatant. Okay." Speaker 0: "So in other words, 60,000 civilians have been killed. Is that what you're saying?" Speaker 1: "Two civilians to one terrorist."

In Gaza, there is a genocide with 12,000 children killed, while 30 Israeli children were also killed. 30,000 Palestinian civilians and 72,000 people were killed or injured. Israel is also causing starvation by blocking food supplies. This is genocide, collective punishment, and ethnic cleansing, with 70% of homes destroyed and hospitals damaged.

The BBC World Service has compiled a dataset documenting incidents involving children in Gaza who were shot, aggregating more than 160 individual cases. The compilation focuses specifically on injuries sustained by minors in the context of armed conflict, and it highlights patterns within those cases. According to the material, in 95 of these incidents the child was shot in the head or the chest, indicating a striking concentration of severe ballistic injuries in the upper body region. The ages of the victims in the reviewed cases are reported to be predominantly 12 years old, underscoring the involvement of children at or around early adolescence in the fatalities and injuries recorded. The material covers a span that begins in the early weeks of the war, continuing through to July, thereby providing a temporal window that traces the initial phase of the conflict through the mid-year point of observation. This time frame offers insights into how the early dynamics of the conflict correspond with the reported casualties among children and the specific injury patterns observed. The emphasis on head and chest gunshot wounds in nearly a third of the identified cases suggests a recurring severity in the nature of the injuries, as captured by the compiled records. The reference to “the first weeks of the war up to July” indicates a focus on the initial period of hostilities, rather than extending into the later months beyond July, and frames the dataset as a snapshot of the early trajectory of harm to children within this conflict zone. Overall, the report presented by the BBC World Service centers on quantitative and descriptive observations drawn from more than 160 individual cases involving children shot in Gaza, with a detailed note that a substantial portion—95 cases—involved gunshot wounds to the head or chest, affecting children who are predominantly around the age of 12, and covering the period from the inception of the war through July. The material emphasizes injury location, age, and the chronological span of the recorded incidents, offering a descriptive account of the early-year impact on minors in the conflict.

I volunteered in Gaza and witnessed extreme carnage against civilians, mostly children. I've never seen so many incinerated and shredded children in my 30 years of disaster relief work. Children are being shot by snipers, with some even shot twice in critical areas. Other doctors in Gaza have also reported numerous children with gunshot wounds to the head, some captured on video.

Our event focused on explaining the high number of unexplained deaths in aborted children. I previously misstated the percentage of unexplained deaths as 350%, but the correct figure is actually 3,328%. I apologize for the error; it was a mistake with the decimal point. Some may doubt this number, but it is based on data from AHS, which we have posted on our website, an injection of truth dot.