TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

It were me, a 100% of my red money would go into jay proof. A 100% of it. You've got a dev sitting here with his face on the screen every day telling you he's never gonna sell a penny and who never has. Who admits to mistakes when they were made like the market maker, Gambling on some shitcoin. Big mistake. Market maker. Gone. Dealt with.

This launch has been disastrous, generating over $1 million in fees while fans were left disappointed. Allegations of insider trading linked to the creator account have surfaced, but the creators deny any wrongdoing. They claim the fees support the project's ongoing operations and cover expenses, including legal fees for establishing a foundation. The project is managed by Hailey Welch, who supposedly owns none of it. The creators argue that their tokenomics are legitimate, despite criticism about the allocation and the potential for insiders to profit at the expense of fans. They insist they are committed to the project's long-term success and reject claims of a rug pull as defamatory.

That this is not a rug pull, that I have 100% control over this supply, that I'm not gonna lock it, that I'm not gonna stake it, that I'm gonna keep my control. And that's why here we are with people panicking, by the way, at a legitimate floor of 50 to $60,000,000 on a meme coin that was launched with a 100% fair stealth launch that nobody knew about until three days later. Do you know what kind of an achievement that is?

A developer states they promised never to sell and have kept that promise. They claim there are costs to running a website, and they personally pay for boosts on Dexscreener, which cost between $1,200 and $5,000. The speaker claims to have paid for these boosts at least a dozen times. They state these activities, along with paying influencers, have real costs.

My first idea was to trade and be a market maker. I spent a year trading in the ecosystem, specifically doing arbitrage. At that time, there were many significant arbitrage opportunities, with some spreads reaching up to 10%. I decided to try them out and see if they were real and if I could actually profit from them. In the end, it seemed like I could.

"And from a dev who promised never to sell, which I haven't." "There's a cost to putting a website together." "Who do you think pays for boosts on the Dex screener? That's me." "Those cost anywhere between 1,200 and $5,000." "I did it at least a dozen times." "You know, these things have actual real cost to them." "Along with influencers and from a dev who promised never to sell, which I have."

An individual known as AK is accused of being a Jew infiltrating JQ (Jewish Question) spaces, working with a network of Jews online to spread debunked lies. AK, described as a self-described JQ guy and a staple in JQ Radio, is alleged to be a Jew who wants unconditional surrender to Israel. AK is accused of claiming that insiders sniped the pump swap liquidity supply and flipped it for a $60,000 profit.

That this is not a rug pull, that I have 100% control over this supply, that I'm not gonna lock it, that I'm not gonna stake it, that I'm gonna keep my control. And that's why here we are with people panicking, by the way, at a legitimate floor of 50 to $60,000,000 on a meme coin that was launched with a 100% fair stealth launch that nobody knew about until three days later. Do you know what kind of an achievement that is?

An individual known as AK is accused of fabricating claims about an internet anon being behind an attack. Despite AK identifying as a JQ guy and being active in JQ spaces, he is portrayed as a Jew who infiltrated JQ ranks and is working with a network of Jews online. This network allegedly spreads debunked lies. AK, described as a Jew who wants unconditional surrender to Israel, claims that insiders sniped the pump swap liquidity supply and flipped it for a $60,000 profit. This is framed as insiders, potentially including the speaker, profiting from a crypto scheme.

It were me, a 100% of my red money would go into jay proof. A 100% of it. You've got a dev sitting here with his face on the screen every day telling you he's never gonna sell a penny and who never has. Who admits to mistakes when they were made like the market maker, Gambling on some shitcoin. Big mistake. Market maker. Gone. Dealt with.

And from a dev who promised never to sell, which I haven't. There's a cost to putting a website together. Who do you think pays for boosts on the Dex screener? That's me. Those cost anywhere between 1,200 and $5,000. I did it at least a dozen times. You know, these things have actual real cost to them. Along with influencers and from a dev who promised never to sell, which I have.

Hey, everyone. I'm here to address the Libra situation and set the record straight. I am Javier Mele's advisor and fully support him. While I only controlled certain aspects of the Libra launch, I acknowledge things didn't go as planned. I intend to inject every dollar I've recovered from fees and liquidations back into the Libra chart within the next 24-48 hours. I'm open to alternative plans that benefit everyone, especially from crypto leaders with structural solutions. I'll share more details in future videos, but for now, my priority is to address the immediate issue by reinvesting the recovered funds, potentially burning or locking them for liquidity. I urge those who profited from fees, like Photon, Bolex, and others, to do the same. This could be a success story if everyone contributes fairly. More information will be in the statement below.

Discussion centers on a claim that "these are the wallets that bought J Approved before Stu announced it on Telegram on April 0 04/12/2025 at 04:48 UTC." The speaker adds "Andrew buys, and the market may have maker buys twenty minutes after that." Stu says he announced after launch; others discuss timing. "Any purchases that were made on April 11 would have been people that saw this thing on the deck screener or other people that I had called and told." "I launched it and then people started buying." "No. Negative. Nope. Not at all." "They didn't buy the day before." "I launched it and then people that were I have no idea who they are. Immediately, people started buying." AK: "the wallets that we're referring to are those that interact with other wallets with the team." "If they interacted with the team wallet, not the burn, but with the team wallet, then yeah. Then that's a problem." "I don't do shitcoins."

Speaker asserts: '100% of my red money would go into jay proof. A 100% of it.' They describe 'a dev sitting here with his face on the screen every day telling you he's never gonna sell a penny, and who never has.' The speaker notes that this dev 'admits to mistakes when they were made, like the market maker, gambling on some shitcoin, big mistake, market maker, gone, dealt with.' They emphasize that 'every single thing that I do every day is to bolster this token.' The segment ends with the repetition 'Every single thing that I do every' underscoring a continuous, daily effort to support the token.

The speaker accuses someone of making antisemitic remarks, including calling Lucas a "foreign born Italian cosplaying as white." They allege this person claims a Jewish network is out to get J Proof and that he's working with Jewish billionaires. The speaker challenges claims about $5,400,000 in a J Proof wallet, stating the actual value is closer to $115,000, and the recent transfer was only a little over a thousand dollars, not $50,000. They accuse the person of lying and initially denying insider trading, then admitting on Stu Peter's network that the market maker wallet made bad trades and gambled on shitcoins. The speaker asserts this person used their platform to promote a meme coin token, breaking promises and Minnesota state law. They claim a class action lawsuit has enough participants to move forward and that blockchain evidence supports their accusations. They also dispute claims that investing in a mystery project will increase liquidity and market cap, arguing that increasing liquidity makes it harder to increase market cap without buy pressure.

A developer states they promised never to sell and have kept that promise. They claim there are costs to running a website, and they personally pay for boosts on Dexscreener, which cost between $1,200 and $5,000. The speaker states they have paid for these boosts at least a dozen times. They also mention the real costs associated with influencers.

It were me, a 100% of my red money would go into jay proof. A 100% of it. You've got a dev sitting here with his face on the screen every day telling you he's never gonna sell a penny and who never has. Who admits to mistakes when they were made like the market maker, Gambling on some shitcoin. Big mistake. Market maker. Gone. Dealt with.

"It's not what this is. We can get into that. But that's what these people did. They bought in at $200,000,000, and now they're freaking out because we're rock solid at, well, now approaching $70,000,000 market cap value. It's a ticking time bomb." They predict: "This is gonna go to billions. The Jews can't fuck with it. The Jeets can't control it. Nobody can control it." "Screen record what I'm saying right now." They add: "They can lie about us. They can talk shit about us. I'm ignoring the noise, and I'm looking at the zoomed out view of this chart."

"They bought in at $200,000,000, and now they're freaking out because we're rock solid at, well, now approaching $70,000,000 market cap value." "It's a ticking time bomb." "You never know when this thing is gonna go to a billion. It's going. Inevitably, it's gonna go into the multibillions. That's what's gonna happen with this coin. Mark my words." "Screen record what I'm saying right now." "This is gonna go to billions." "The Jews can't fuck with it. The Jeets can't control it. Nobody can control it." They can lie about us. They can talk shit about us. I'm ignoring the noise, and I'm looking at the zoomed out view of this chart."

But also the market maker was there to implement strategies like chart support, marketing, advertising, billboards, building the new LP on pump swap. Yeah. The market maker made some poor trades. Lost capital. They want to talk all about that. At first, was I was a scammer and I ran off with it until it wasn't that anymore. And then the market maker burned the exact amount just to make up for it. so it negated it, including an additional $30,000 buy on the chart for support after AK's original Jewish FUD attack. To use for payments to creators for content, these videos, the music videos, the memes, really good stuff, deck screener trending 500 x boosts, and the market maker had plans for a whole lot more.

The speaker discusses using an arsenal to combat volatility, which included strategies like chart support, marketing, advertising, billboards, and building a new LP on pump swap. The market maker lost capital on some trades, but burned the exact amount to make up for it, including an additional $30,000 buy on the chart for support after AK's original Jewish FUD attack. Funds were also used for payments to creators for content, such as videos, music videos, memes, and deck screener trending boosts. The market maker had plans for more. The arbitrage bot sniping was a setback, but it functions properly and alleviates fees, streamlining J Proof purchases.

The exchange centers on how the dev wallet supply was acquired. "The dev wallet. The dev wallet's initial acquisition of the supply." There were "combined purchases" that were "over 6,000" and ended up "close to 30,000. 25, 28, 30,000." The purchases required "multiple transfers into the dev wallet" because "my bank account only allows me to like send $5,000 at a time" and "Jewish restrictions are on that." The first three days show "only $6,000 in transactions." "He only put 14,000 initially from his from his Coinbase, and he claimed a 150,000 he's in." "I did it immediately. I did it immediately. I locked up the supply immediately." On evidence, "Have you got evidence that you put in $3,540,000 either via source scan or something else?" and "Where's the evidence that you..."

"that's not enough supply to lock it, so I had to go back and buy more." "There should be your Coinbase going into your dev wallet." "Where's that evidence?" "I'd like to see the evidence that you're in a $150,000, my friend." "I'm into this project for a collective 100 and some odd thousand dollars." "Between buying out of my own pocket, all of the boosts, all of the Dex ads, all of the website stuff." "But I made the dev buy immediately before and after it insta bonded." "So the first buy bonded it, and the second buy was right after it bonded." "I needed another buy to get the 85% that I needed, and that we wanted for the control structure to set all of this up."

When we snipe a coin we launched, it's usually to prevent other snipers from getting in. I don't personally conduct snipes, but the money used is the project's, aimed at deterring others and maintaining the project's viability. For example, Trump coin had enough volume that the snipes didn't matter, but when projects don't have enough volume to deter snipers the project can die quickly. So sniping becomes necessary to protect the project. This is a common conversation in Solana. I think this happens in all meme coins. The public isn't really aware of these behind-the-scenes activities, where projects manipulate their own prices to keep them stable. This is just me being super transparent, maybe it's oversharing.

The speaker discusses using an arsenal to combat volatility, which included strategies like chart support, marketing, advertising, billboards, and building a new LP on pump swap. The market maker lost capital through some poor trades, but burned the exact amount to make up for it, including an additional $30,000 buy on the chart for support after an attack. Funds were also used for payments to creators for content like videos, music videos, memes, and deck screener trending boosts. The market maker had plans for more. Being sniped by the arbitrage bot was a setback, but it functions properly and alleviates fees, allowing streamlined J Proof purchases without huge fees due to the LP.