TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
It were me, a 100% of my red money would go into jay proof. A 100% of it. You've got a dev sitting here with his face on the screen every day telling you he's never gonna sell a penny and who never has. Who admits to mistakes when they were made like the market maker, Gambling on some shitcoin. Big mistake. Market maker. Gone. Dealt with.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
I want you to know that everything will be shared on social media. I have twenty thousand followers myself. The money is there, look, the money is right there.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
This launch has been disastrous, generating over $1 million in fees while fans were left disappointed. Allegations of insider trading linked to the creator account have surfaced, but the creators deny any wrongdoing. They claim the fees support the project's ongoing operations and cover expenses, including legal fees for establishing a foundation. The project is managed by Hailey Welch, who supposedly owns none of it. The creators argue that their tokenomics are legitimate, despite criticism about the allocation and the potential for insiders to profit at the expense of fans. They insist they are committed to the project's long-term success and reject claims of a rug pull as defamatory.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explains they paid $15,000 to go and interview Clavicular for a thirty-minute session. The purpose was to ask about Clavicular’s funding, his business, and rumors about him and Peter Thiel, because those rumors are everywhere. However, the moment the interviewer brought up Peter Thiel and Palantir, Clavicular panicked, flipped it on the interviewer, and claimed that the interviewer was the one funded by Peter Thiel. Clavicular stated that his team did research on the interviewer and that there were blockchain ties from Thiel-funded parties to the interviewer’s wallet, which, according to him, there’s zero proof of because it never happened. He claimed he literally couldn't show one single receipt that the interviewer is Peter Thiel funded or Peter Thiel backed, and he said, “I'll wait.” The interviewer asks for clarification: “So let me get this straight. You charge $15,000 for thirty minutes, and then you can't handle a single question. Like, source, I just made it up.” The interviewer adds, “And then you're calling me a scammer, but literally what you just did is scamming. Like, nobody told me to do this. I went solo. I came alone.” The interviewer explains that the only reason for asking about Thiel was because everybody was saying that Peter Thiel is the one that got clavicular released from jail and dropped all of the charges. The interviewer concludes, “So, yeah, I just got fraud maxed, but it's pretty pretty clear that clavicular is funded by Peter Thiel.”

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
That this is not a rug pull, that I have 100% control over this supply, that I'm not gonna lock it, that I'm not gonna stake it, that I'm gonna keep my control. And that's why here we are with people panicking, by the way, at a legitimate floor of 50 to $60,000,000 on a meme coin that was launched with a 100% fair stealth launch that nobody knew about until three days later. Do you know what kind of an achievement that is?

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
A developer states they promised never to sell and have kept that promise. They claim there are costs to running a website, and they personally pay for boosts on Dexscreener, which cost between $1,200 and $5,000. The speaker claims to have paid for these boosts at least a dozen times. They state these activities, along with paying influencers, have real costs.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Okay, so you're asking if I was part of the Melania launch, and if it was sniped like Trump's? Yes, I was part of it. The team wanted to snipe it because of the Trump situation, but we weren't the big snipers. We didn't make any money from it, and we didn't take any liquidity out – zero. Regarding the wallet traced to the Portnoy situation that received $1,500,000 of Melania token, and then sold, there's a distinction. We didn't swap liquidity, but we did sell liquidations. Those are two different things. So yes, we sold, but we didn't swap.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker outlines additional investment costs, listing items that would total the investment: 'boosts, on Moonit, Dex ads, applications getting launched on other exchanges, getting a website going,' among other initiatives. He notes doing all of these while traveling across the country on his laptop, trying to get all this infrastructure set up. By enumerating these items, the speaker conveys that the total investment includes marketing and platform integration tasks. The travel-on-the-road context highlights a hands-on approach to building the project’s foundational infrastructure. The examples—boosts, Moonit, Dex ads, multi-exchange applications, and a website—illustrate a focus on visibility, accessibility, and readiness across platforms.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
That this is not a rug pull, that I have 100% control over this supply, that I'm not gonna lock it, that I'm not gonna stake it, that I'm gonna keep my control. And that's why here we are with people panicking, by the way, at a legitimate floor of 50 to $60,000,000 on a meme coin that was launched with a 100% fair stealth launch that nobody knew about until three days later. Do you know what kind of an achievement that is?

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Money is a concern on certain platforms or distributors. Instead of spending, why not consider other options?

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Jake Paul made millions of dollars promoting scam crypto projects, and sadly, he's one of many celebrities doing this. One notable example was his NFT scam known as stick dicks, where Jake Paul promoted the NFT for months on his Twitter selling millions of dollars of them. But after sales faded, he dumped the project and walked away with $1,500,000 personally. And after that, got involved in promoting the scam SafeMoon and Yummy, which Yummy was a con where they said the goal was to make people money while donating a large portion of coins to charity. And while they did donate some money to charity, many people were unhappy where after the Jake Paul bubble, there were 90% losses for investors. And the next was SafeMoon, which is a very big project that claimed it would make crypto transactions better. But they ended up under investigation for hiring influencers like Jake Paul to promote it and not having them tell their fans they were paid to do so. Jake Paul made money while his fans lost big making $300,000 off of Yummy and a 190,000 off of SafeMoon. He also made another $189,000 off of scam products like Sacred Devils and Milf. It runs the family where his brother promoted Dinktoink and didn't tell people he's a creator. And with that, I'm Charles and following to avoid celebrity scams.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
It were me, a 100% of my red money would go into jay proof. A 100% of it. You've got a dev sitting here with his face on the screen every day telling you he's never gonna sell a penny and who never has. Who admits to mistakes when they were made like the market maker, Gambling on some shitcoin. Big mistake. Market maker. Gone. Dealt with.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
And from a dev who promised never to sell, which I haven't. There's a cost to putting a website together. Who do you think pays for boosts on the Dex screener? That's me. Those cost anywhere between 1,200 and $5,000. I did it at least a dozen times. You know, these things have actual real cost to them. Along with influencers and from a dev who promised never to sell, which I have.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Nobody had advanced knowledge of the launch. I mean, that's what insider trading is. Nobody, absolutely nobody besides myself and Andrew, knew that J Proof was even a thing until after the launch, thereby negating any claims of insider wallets. Anybody can buy these things immediately when they hit the blockchain.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker asserts: '100% of my red money would go into jay proof. A 100% of it.' They describe 'a dev sitting here with his face on the screen every day telling you he's never gonna sell a penny, and who never has.' The speaker notes that this dev 'admits to mistakes when they were made, like the market maker, gambling on some shitcoin, big mistake, market maker, gone, dealt with.' They emphasize that 'every single thing that I do every day is to bolster this token.' The segment ends with the repetition 'Every single thing that I do every' underscoring a continuous, daily effort to support the token.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
A developer states they promised never to sell and have kept that promise. They claim there are costs to running a website, and they personally pay for boosts on Dexscreener, which cost between $1,200 and $5,000. The speaker states they have paid for these boosts at least a dozen times. They also mention the real costs associated with influencers.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The old content from ten years ago is being conflated with the current charges from 2021, but anything before 2021 has nothing to do with the case. Here's context for a video circulating of me talking about the "Lover Boy method." You can't just ask a girl to work for you doing webcam. My recruitment process is like a PhD course; I message them on Instagram. I don't mention webcam until after I've had sex with the girl. After that, she takes the PhD test. If she passes and wants to be with you, then you can suggest she works for you. Approaching girls directly about webcam doesn't work. Also, tax is important for controlling your woman. Tell her you're paying the tax, even if you aren't because you are being paid in Bitcoin. This makes her think her taxes are taken care of, so you can pay her less.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
It were me, a 100% of my red money would go into jay proof. A 100% of it. You've got a dev sitting here with his face on the screen every day telling you he's never gonna sell a penny and who never has. Who admits to mistakes when they were made like the market maker, Gambling on some shitcoin. Big mistake. Market maker. Gone. Dealt with.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
This is my coin. This is my face, my reputation on the line, and this is my word. So if you believe in our message and if you believe in me and if you believe in our movement, then you have the opportunity to invest in that movement.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Do my family and friends know I'm in this business? Yes, they do. You think I'm stealing? How? It's not stealing, it's legal. The tokens are real, people buy them. You say the tokens are worth nothing? No, they're worth something. You can still sell. People investing don't know their money will disappear? It's a gamble and they lost. It's a legal way of making money, a legal way of stealing. We wear masks because I'm recognizable. I'm connected with celebrities. It would put a stop to my lifestyle. Do I feel bad about people losing money, like their retirement? I'm just trying to get it. So, no, I don't care.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The exchange centers on how the dev wallet supply was acquired. "The dev wallet. The dev wallet's initial acquisition of the supply." There were "combined purchases" that were "over 6,000" and ended up "close to 30,000. 25, 28, 30,000." The purchases required "multiple transfers into the dev wallet" because "my bank account only allows me to like send $5,000 at a time" and "Jewish restrictions are on that." The first three days show "only $6,000 in transactions." "He only put 14,000 initially from his from his Coinbase, and he claimed a 150,000 he's in." "I did it immediately. I did it immediately. I locked up the supply immediately." On evidence, "Have you got evidence that you put in $3,540,000 either via source scan or something else?" and "Where's the evidence that you..."

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
"that's not enough supply to lock it, so I had to go back and buy more." "There should be your Coinbase going into your dev wallet." "Where's that evidence?" "I'd like to see the evidence that you're in a $150,000, my friend." "I'm into this project for a collective 100 and some odd thousand dollars." "Between buying out of my own pocket, all of the boosts, all of the Dex ads, all of the website stuff." "But I made the dev buy immediately before and after it insta bonded." "So the first buy bonded it, and the second buy was right after it bonded." "I needed another buy to get the 85% that I needed, and that we wanted for the control structure to set all of this up."

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: This is my coin. This is my face, my reputation on the line, and this is my word. So if you believe in our message and if you believe in me and if you believe in our movement, then you have the opportunity to invest in that movement. Speaker 0: This is my coin. This is my face, my reputation on the line, and this is my word. So if you believe in our message and if you believe in me and if you believe in our movement, then you have the opportunity to invest in that movement.

Philion

The Rabbit Hole of Roobet
reSee.it Podcast Summary
New information about Wizza, the latest influencer scam. I put 'scam' in quotation marks because, although it may appear legal on paper, they are up to no good. The company refuses to clarify how they operate or what their goals are, and nobody knows who these people are or how they're able to do this. Today's video focuses on Rubet, the conglomerate behind Wizza, and the pawns keeping the show running. 'a rather anonymous 25-year-old multi-millionaire pulling the strings of your favorite Twitch streamers and YouTube personalities right before your eyes.' 'Currently, they are pulling in seven figures a month, millions of dollars, at the expense of their viewers. They want the money, they want to continue their lavish lifestyle, but they can\'t do it without fraud over here and fraud over there. Nelk has lied to fans about winning supercars and has silenced dissenting voices by removing my video from their subreddit. This shadowy figure that nobody knows about—a quiet, discreet businessman, a rogue of sorts, dare I say it, the wizard behind the curtains: Alan Allen.'
View Full Interactive Feed